By GEORGE CHRISTENSEN
- The “Charlie’s Angels” photo was a PR stunt so out-of-touch it made rusted-on Liberal voters gag, rather than be inspired.
- The backlash wasn’t from trolls; it was from the base… people who once handed out how-to-vote cards, now openly mocking the party.
- Sussan Ley’s leadership is hollow, obsessed with image, parroting Labor-lite lines, and completely missing the values that matter.
- Her performances in parliament have been weak, uninspired, and embarrassing; she couldn’t land a punch if she tried.
- The Liberal Party is being run by consultants, not conviction, and unless it finds its spine fast, it’s heading for political extinction.
Here’s a taste of the feedback on the “Charlie’s Angels” photo from both X and Facebook:
“This says nothing. We need more than a nod to Charlie’s Angels and low-key girl power vibes.”
“We don’t want a female version of Albanese.”
“Time to shut down the Liberal Party. Merge with the Teals and call it the Miserable HR Girlboss Party… powered by feelings, funded by taxpayers.”
“The Liberal Party destroying itself in 4K.”
“Look more like the Teals than an opposition.”
“It will be like Labor questioning Labor.”
“Give us a break — the Three Stooges.”
“Best you all go back inside.”These weren’t left-wing trolls. These were rusted-on conservative voters. Perhaps some of them were once long-time Liberal Party supporters. People who used to hand out how-to-votes for the party, now wondering what the hell they’re looking at.
Basically, the base had seen the “Charlie’s Angels” photo, and they threw up in their mouths.
The message? Crystal clear: you don’t win back the nation by copying Labor’s PR tactics in a pink pantsuit.
The so-called “Charlie’s Angels” moment wasn’t just a cringeworthy PR stunt. It was a flashing red signal that the Liberal Party, once the party of Menzies, Howard, and conviction, is now being steered by handlers, strategists, and diversity consultants more concerned with appearances than with anchoring the country.
It was tone-deaf. It was shallow. And worst of all, it revealed just how little the current leadership understands the very people they’re supposed to represent.
Let me ask you: how many voters in the suburbs or the bush saw that photo and thought, finally, a team that gets me? Not one.
Because here’s the unvarnished truth: Sussan Ley does not connect with the conservative base. Not on values, not on instinct, not even on performance.
We saw this in her debut at the National Press Club, where she opened by signalling to “modern Australia,” rehashing her personal life story, and parroting Labor-lite lines about “reflecting diversity” and boosting female quotas. Not one word about defending faith. Not one line about protecting free speech. Not even a mention of the family as the cornerstone of society.
Instead, we got a soft-focus memoir. Not a call to arms. Not a blueprint for rebuilding. Just a meandering, progressive-safe, focus-grouped monologue designed to avoid offence and, in doing so, it failed to inspire anyone. But worse was yet to come.
In her very first question to the Prime Minister yesterday, the most critical opportunity to show strength, she fluffed it. A half-baked attack on Labor’s housing failures was lobbed weakly across the chamber. And Anthony Albanese swatted it back like a tennis ball, quoting Queensland’s Liberal National Party Housing Minister, citing industry bodies, and ridiculing the Coalition’s record without even breaking a sweat.
She couldn’t land a punch. Not even close.
Then came her speech for the Matter of Public Importance debate (which a glorified high school debate that, quite frankly, serves no place in the parliament). That speech was full of kitchen table metaphors, broken promises, and mum-speak that sounded more like a lifestyle segment than a battle cry.
It was the speech version of the “Charlie’s Angels” photo — political theatre for people who read The Guardian and think saying “modern Australia” ten times will magically solve structural decay.
Today, Ley’s question to Albanese on AUKUS and the fact that he hasn’t met with President Donald Trump was a little bit better, but failed to land even a scratch on the Prime Minister. He merely embraced AUKUS, and cited three conversations with Trump.
Talk about a wet lettuce leaf political attack.
And don’t think people inside the party haven’t noticed. The mood is clear. The best you’ll hear from Liberal politicians is “we’re giving her time to see how she goes.”
That’s the diplomatic version of we’ve got no one else ready right now, and we’re hoping she doesn’t fall over anytime soon.
But it is clear there is less than low ebb energy from the Coalition in the parliament right now. It’s more of a flat, shell-shocked vibe.
In fact, that vibe was so obvious that Sussan Ley actually asked her backbench to show more energy. Let that sink in. A leader asking her team to fake enthusiasm. Not lead them. Not inspire them. Just pretend.
Meanwhile, across the aisle, Labor looks more comfortable than ever. Arrogant, yes. But confident. Because they know they’re not up against a lion. They’re up against the leader of a hollowed-out Opposition too scared to stand for something, and too lost to know what that something even is.
While it seems many Liberal politicians are willing to wait and see how Ley performs, it is already clear that her leadership is not sustainable. You can’t rebuild a party on platitudes, Instagram photos, and rebranded mediocrity. And you can’t inspire a movement with a leader no one’s genuinely excited about.
The Coalition has just over two years. That’s it. Two years to reconnect with the base, reclaim its courage, and stop this descent into small-target nothingness.
Because if this continues, they won’t just lose. They will be decimated and so too will the country.
And no “Charlie’s Angels” photo shoot is going to save us.
Until next time,
God bless you, your family and nation.
Take care,
George Christensen
Readers have already funded it. Editor
Who’s funding Christensen’s new gig in Canberra?
Ley got the gig because she had to attend a re-education camp in IS RAIL HELL about that tribes version of history and now Sea gull and Lie bler pull her strings which includes controlling all her PR, photo-shoots and work wear (only pant suits like Gillard) to ensure their police state and communist takeover is completed by 2028.
Australia has always had ONE party with two colours.
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
Commenter A
Ugh huh, I see the spell checker is working well as usual stuffing everything up.
So, I am not here to defend vipers. This includes commies with their secret CCP donations such as Kayla Murnain ALP NSW & WEF Swissyland.
I am not here to defend Zionists, what was jooboys name with the house he “forgot”, probably a Zionist, also Lowy maybe still on the RBA board a definite Zionist promoted up from the IDF – an infiltrator.
Also I am not here to defend freemasons Grade 1 – 33+ or whatever they are and whatever they believe and do, satanic occult whatever.
I am not here to defend pedophiles though the context is somewhat unclear since it used to be lawful to marry a 12 year old. My definition would be pre-pubescent is pedophilia and older more likely trafficked. I have some personal experiences as a minor like many others so not speaking from unqualified opinion.
I am not here to defend the illuminati and does Australia have an illuminato ?
I doubt it but Keating probably thinks he’s one.
Likewise I am not here to defend any other minions working against the freedom movement.
And this is one of two motivations for me to defend average joos, the other being a sense of fair play.
People who want to relentlessly attack average joos just because their mothers got them motivated to study harder, are attacking with evident intent because they cannot be bothered to use the word Zionist. They are evidently full of hate and anger and it is misdirected. Look what they achieved in Germany, they got the place smashed up and the German people hate themselves now. What was the outcome, joos who were once perfectly happy in modern Europe decided to go and invade primitive, backwards Palestine.
The joo-haters comprehension of history is mangled and deliberately wrong. Hitler was working towards Greater Zion. He was losing, he cocked the war up, gassing joos was the price for a ticket to Buenos Aires. The 6 million was probably 1 million, likely as not, fewer.
You know there is nothing good about these manic joo-haters, they are trying to split off a very useful contingent from the freedom movement. They are obsessed with Zyklon-B solution one size fits all. They really are rubbish and I am much too kind to them, out of deference to the editor.
The freedom movement had better get it’s act together a bit quicker because the 4th Reich officially known as 4th Industrial Revolution is well underway and to use one of their stoopid analogies, it’s 5 minutes to midnight.
Don’t forget the Lodge. Ed
The two parties have been running in tandem for too long. How does one change it to do something different?
…add to that list Freemasons and pedophiles. The Parliament is a sess pool of vipers actively working against our interests, and towards our subjugation.
A con-sensus of opinion and a democratic majority view must always be right … right?” –
“Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.” – H. Mencken.
Democracy Is A Front For Central Bank Rule
“……… Why do “democratic Western democracies” have central banks that do nothing except protect big banks at the expense of the people?
How long will the insouciant peoples of the West continue to conspire in their own demise?
h ttp://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/06/19/democracy-front-central-bank-rule/
Be nice to America. Or we’ll bring democracy to your country!
PROTOCOL No. 4
2. Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.
The Truth of Democracy. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion by Dr William Pierce.
Did you ever wonder why the Jews are such great proponents of democracy? Whether in Indonesia or Pakistan or Serbia or you name it, whenever there is some threat to universal suffrage, the Jews are ready to send the U.S. armed forces in to bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to vote.
https://lorddreadnought.livejournal.com/14093.html
@Mohamet Bogan, Ugh huh, and how many Parliamentarians are Zionists, members of the Illuminati and/or Communists?
I asked the bot.
Its words not mine.
“As of the latest data, approximately 6 members of the Australian Parliament identify as Jewish. Given that the total number of members in the Parliament is 227, this results in a percentage of about 2.64%.”
New World Order Quotes 1920-24
“6. By the ceaseless praise of DEMOCRATIC RULE we shall divide the Christians into political parties, we shall destroy the unity of their nations, we shall sow discord everywhere. Reduced to impotence, they will bow before the LAW of OUR BANK, always united, and always devoted to our Cause.”
“7. We shall force the Christians into wars by exploiting their pride and their stupidity. They will massacre each other, and clear the ground for us to put our people into.”
https://www.overlordsofchaos.com/index.php/main-subjects/new-world-order-quotes/598-new-world-order-quotes-1920-24/
The straw man is Big Joo.
This is a confederation, a big one, and you ain’t in it.
Division and lies are their preferred methods and non-thinkers their minions.
Anyone who would advocate for a strong opposition, or the Westminster two party preferred system Australia adopted needs to watch Larkin Rose’s film “The Jones Plantation”, Cato’s letters by John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon published in 1721, The Secret Covenant of the Illuminati, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, the Rockefeller document “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” and read about Maritime vs Common law (aka: your Strawman). The fact is we have an ‘illusion of choice’ and were born into slavery when our parents signed our Birth Certificates.
Commenter kev
Axe grinder and infinitum.
Not another bunkum regurgitation, Les Protocoles Des Sages de Sion was repackaged for the Russian Revolution where Tsar Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm were taken out by their relative King George 5, who was first cousin of the Kaiser.
How could George ( himself a German ) afford another major war to secure the oilfields, instead they organised a communist revolution. These people are much smarter than you think. But, for his trouble George was poisoned by his doc later. A corollary to ww1, which was about stopping the German train line to Baghdad, was Greater Zion. Obviously Rotschilds were involved in all of this but the entire project of the 20th century was a big confederation. Britain ultimately bankrupted as the elites grabbed all the profits. Were Rotschilds authentic joos or implanted ? Possibly French fake joos. Their former name “Bauer” dates from when joos were compelled to adopt proper surnames. How convenient. However Bauer means something like bogan in German. Just some idiot peasant clodhopper with not much brains, bloodline, clues about anything really. From there within a generation they had founded a massive dynasty … off the back of one of the richest people in the world, Wihelm 1 & 9, Elector of Hesse. Commemorated even today by the Eurodollar HQ in Frankfurt. So, no, the Rotschild story lacks plausibility. The Protocoles are from Sion. You cannot maintain a vast fortune without an army. You cannot fund an army without a fortune. Everyone with a fortune needs a front-man. The company director is not the owner. Love them or hate them, joos working as front men are not the owners of the companies, unless they are the majority shareholders. But it seems they never are.
From the bot
Tsar Nicholas II of Russia and Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany were third cousins, both being great-great-grandsons of Paul I of Russia. Their familial ties extended further, as they were also second cousins once removed through their descent from Frederick William III of Prussia. This complex relationship was underscored by their shared lineage from Queen Victoria of Britain, with Wilhelm being a direct descendant and Nicholas connected through his marriage to Alexandra, Wilhelm’s first cousin.Despite their familial connections, the political landscape of early 20th-century Europe strained their relationship. As monarchs, they exchanged frantic telegrams during the onset of World War I, attempting to navigate the tensions that ultimately led to conflict. Their correspondence, known as the “Willy-Nicky” letters, highlighted the personal bonds overshadowed by the pressures of national interests.
@Aussiemal, I agree with your comments. Though let’s not forget that Howard tried to bring in Work Choices which was a blatant attack on the Unions and Unfair dismissal laws, which, if it had’ve passed into law would have lead to widespread exploitation of workers who would have had little to no recourse to appeal grievances like wage theft, workplace bullying and unfair dismissal. The legislation was effectively designed to widen the gap between the “haves” and “have nots”, creating a slave class of workers. And as you mentioned, Howard dragged us into wars that history has shown were contrived to benefit US interests.
The Protocols of Zion, Irrefutable Proof of the Jewish Roadmap For World Domination from 1905
https://goyimgazette.com/protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion/
Sorry George your article might have been going in right direction until you mention two arrogant “leaders” of our past. I will forgive you because of your age. Firstly Bob Menzies did nothing for Australians living on life’s edge of poverty. However whenever the UK or US said jump, Australia was forced to jump. (Borrow any amount to follow orders from afar. Much as today.) That is how those of my age group ended up in South Vietnam as corpses or with medical injuries for the extent of their lives. There was no reason for Australian Forces to be in conflict in S.E. Asia. Even JFK of the U.S. knew this so he had to murdered.
Second problem, John Howard. Even if he was not involved in the planning of the Port Arthur Massacre he made sure that none of the offenders (planners and those involved in the action) were ever indicted or punished. Martin Bryant still in jail 29 years after the event without a trial, an event he took no part in.
He also began the rot of Australia’s economic success by introduction of the GST and the “privatisation” of government departments and instrumentalities, such as Qantas Airlines, the Commonwealth Bank, Telecom, Australian National Railways, Australian National Lines, Australian Airports and several more which are now in the hands of international rip-off merchants to the detriment of the Australian public.
Come on George spill the beans.
The Liberal party nucular buro chiefs are Old Fishnets, Mr Trumbull and Burmese agent Julie Bishop, buro now backed by globalists who want secure power for their massive data centres, one for each capital more or less ( more I think ). Chromedome was never going to sell this shit, but GlobalWarming is supposed to push it along. Funny thing is the same crowd who think the sky is falling are easily spooked by nucular anything.
Now for Charlies Angels, Charlie is Baron S. Hacca, nephew of the original S. Hacca who long ago disappeared under mysterious circumstances. Trump is also a Charlie, with all his conservative girls, he carries it off but Demonrat feminists won’t buy.
Liberal’s Charlie is Mr Trumbull but he is hiding in the shadows, keeping his shirt-front clean.
That nice Susan Ley can do the job with some media training. Look how much progress Elbow made when he was botching everything during campaign #1 they dragged him into Covid intensive care for a week for the most gruelling media training session ever in history given to anyone bar none and created the monster we have today.
The real question is how can that nice Susan Ley ditch the nucular lobby and the answer is she can’t.
Anyone-and that includes the deluded rusted-on Labor and Liberal crackheads-who thinks anyone in a Parliament, anywhere, gives a proverbial RATS about anyone needs to go to the local psych unit and get on the electro shock machine and get rewired.
Politics in Australia is tow things:
-an extended episode of the Twilight Zone turbocharged;
-and what hap[pens politically, in Australia, makes a South American banana republic look like Nirvana.
Trouble is that our country, which should be a paradise, will never be anything like it should be until Pat From Vic gets his way and strings them all up.
I wish you all the best, Pat, whilst not condoning such a thing, as I would not like to be accused of anything like that awful hate speech thing they all talk about.
Isaiah 3:12
New King James Version
12 As for My people, children are their oppressors,
And women rule over them.
O My people! Those who lead you cause you to err,
And destroy the way of your paths.”
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]