“IF that’s not racism, what is it!? screamed Senator Fatima Payman (WA), glaring at Senator Pauline Hanson and slamming her little fist down on the podium.
Almost simultaneously Senator Lidia Thorpe tore up and tossed documents at the One Nation leader and gave the Senate chamber the finger sign as she stormed out.
So what was it that got under the skin of these two senators and Payman in particular? It was Section 44 of the Constitution, which bars senators having an allegiance to a foreign power. The loyalty of these two is seriously in question.
On Wednesday, Labor voted with Hanson to allow documents questioning Payman’s eligibility to sit in the chamber because of her dual citizenship status to be tabled in the Senate. Payman was previously a Labor Party senator and has dual Australian and Afghani citizenship, but claims she has been unable to renounce the latter because of the Taliban regime running the country.
When elected as a Labor Senator in 2022, Payman was forced to prove she had made efforts to revoke her Afghanistan citizenship, but Hanson is not convinced she made sufficient efforts to do that.
Senator Thorpe meanwhile, has publicly and angrily vented her rejection of the English Crown, lawfully the people’s representative and Head of Government represented locally by the Governor General and state Governors.
Thorpe, who carries a Black Lives Matter-style giant chip on her shoulder, would apparently overthrow this government and replace it with some neo-Marxist Indigenous-centric republic beholden to the UN via UNDRIP.
It’s a valid question by Pauline, because too many in our parliaments (at Federal, State and Territory levels) are not there to serve and protect the people or the nation. They are in it for their own nefarious purposes, and perhaps especially for, the excessive parliamentary salaries offered. Parliamentary salaries controlled by public servants – put there with specific instructions that they be increased frequently, and excessively. Not as though we are getting value for this money, given the devious claims any of them made when they were campaigning for these parliamentary slots, and their lacklustre performances once elected.
TIME TO DO SOME WEEDING IN PARLIAMENT IN ORDER TO GET RID OF DOUBLE UP AGENDAS.
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars – The Lawful Path
Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws.
— Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1743 – 1812)
https://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml
Subjected to the foreign owned RBA-
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOL No. 20
TYRANNY OF USURY
30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is – an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty – treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.
31. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealth foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.
32. So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects. [Section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution comes to mind]
““IF that’s not racism, what is it!? ”
It’s Australian law as per Sec 44 of the Australian Constitution, the highest law of the land!! Designed as a safeguard to prevent foreign interests being represented and/or promoted in the Australian Parliament.
But it’s obviously being evaded or ignored by those who are tasked with applying and enforcing it. As is the need for basic IQ and integrity tests for paliamentarians.
Luckily, we have an alternative of sorts in Australia. It’s called the “pub test”. Last time I checked, your score wasn’t anything to write home about.
These two are not mad, they are repositioning, as we saw Lidia Thorpe up in the gallery yelling out “Palestine will be free” and as we saw Fatima Payman calling her proposed party “Australia’s Voice”, these two are going to form their own BRICS inside His Majesty’s Crown Parliament Inc. Good luck to them representing some of the aborigines and the downtrodden brown people who were imported here to do the jobs nobody wanted, which has been the business model of the west since Globalists decided to destroy the west by poison and wars. I don’t use the word represent casually, they are indeed representative unlike the red-blue unaparty swill which relies on questionable voting systems. These two have been nurtured in an atmosphere of feminism ( another Globalist strategy ) so they have a chip on each shoulder and an axe to grind in each hand, they are perfect to run the agenda that the olden days, represented by Pauline Hanson, must end and we all get equality somehow, in the middle of a Globalist depopulation program, it’s a bit like fighting over the liferafts. Nonetheless Senator Hanson is a very easy target and she will be further marginalized unless she can play the victim card more successfully than “Australia’s Voice” party. Senator Hanson needs to remind everyone at every opportunity that the red-blue unaparty had her JAILED and that she has been fighting a lot longer and some successes whereas “Australia’s Voice”is simply a conscience vote with no possible path to any sort of success in the current milieu of corruption and genocides. Palestine will not be free since the Zionist-sponsored “ruling party” Hamas was declared an enemy of the “host state” Israel. And corruption in aboriginal funding needs to be addressed as a bipartisan issue between minor parties, however it seems “Australia’s Voice” is too busy grandstanding ahead of the election to promote useful strategies against corruption, which in any case will just evolve or dissolve into some sort of biometric ID card system.
” Telling Senator Hanson to piss off back to Afghanistan to take up her citizenship matter with the Taliban is the last straw.”
Absolutely! Either she’s on drugs or has a bad case of mental deficiency.
BTW, where are our fearless guardians who are supposed to protect and ensure the integrity of our Constitution and Parliament ? Missing in action?
In regard to crisscross’s Basic Fraud document, which I’ve had a bit of a look at, I have a problem with being an “Australian CITIZEN” the legal definition of Australia is that this continent is not Australia, but Norfolk Island and a couple of others are. And a CITIZEN has no rights, only privileges, and the CITIZEN’s duty is to serve the government.
If the Constitution is illegal and invalid, then what are we to make of the Commonwealth then? Dunno.
Lots of food for thought though.
And I have a photo of a sandstone plaque embedded in the wall of the Gordon TAFE in Geelong that says that that building was opened by the Administrator of the Commonwealth of Australia, Sir John Northcott, on August 14 1951.
And the UN is a corporation, 52% owned by the Rothschilds, so that sucks even more, and any treaty made by our bogus corporate AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT only amounts to a CON-TRACT between two corporations, though the OZ GOVT does have the grunts to do the enforcing-whether we like it or not.
So I’d like to know when and where the Basic Fraud peopel intend to venture out and make what they think they want to happen actually happen?
They’ll have to get their words and terminology corrected, because they have no hope in Hell of getting me to identify as an AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN for a start.
And I will not trust Wayne Levick unless he can state that he has repudiated his Oath to the BAR, as lawyers are not to be trusted and human rights are not enforceable.
“This needs a resolution pronto!”
No referendum or Constitutional change required.
Just ENFORCE the Constitution AND intent of Sec 44. In the case of attempted subversion, any deliberate and malicious interference by a foreign entity can be discarded by the High Court as inconsistent with and subversive of the intent of Sec 44.
The intent being to prevent “blow ins” from sitting in parliament or any parliamentarian having a “sanctuary” to retire to in a foreign state. Think preventing “off shore havens”! 🙂
She is off her hajib anyway. Telling Senator Hanson to piss off back to Afghanistan to take up her citizenship matter with the Taliban is the last straw.
Australia’s Illegal and Invalid Constitution
https://www.harold-holt.net/Australian-Constitution-is-illegal-and-invalid.html
Handy guide for foreign nation to remove any Australian politican. Give them “entitlements” of dual Citizenship. « JoNova
https://joannenova.com.au/2017/08/handy-guide-for-foreign-nation-to-remove-any-australian-politican-give-them-entitlements-of-dual-citizenship/
This needs a resolution pronto!
The constitution can only be changed by a referendum, but a referendum can only be initiated by legislation passed by the Australian Parliament. If the New Zealand angle is correct, then all our current politicians are ineligible to be in Parliament and therefore cannot pass the legislation needed to initiate the referendum. No new politicians can be elected without a change to the constitution by a referendum. Checkmate, Australian Government.
Sheesh! Somebody in Parliament or in the High Court should tell Fatima Payman that compliance with the Australian Constitution and Australian laws is definitely NOT a matter of racism.
Can’t be that hard, can it?
Pretty pathetic, crisscross. God helps those who helps themselves too; which is the big test.
Are you going to fail that test?
@obvious_bob
Christ said – “My kingdom is not of this world”
I have a duty to say and do what is lawful as far as I understand from that perspective. “The workman is worthy of his hire”.
FYI
‘The Great Taking’ is well worth a watch to see what the small percentage of parasites don’t want you to know about the financial system disclosed by a former insider David Webb.
The Great Taking Documentary
https://rumble.com/v3yptkd-the-great-taking-documentary.html
Credit: The Great Taking on Rumble
Just a friendly reminder of what we are up against
Stop giving your power away and voting for parasites who pretend to care while they put on a dog and pony show to distract us!
Piss them all off
https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/1850863936536465851
Credit: Liz Churchhill
That people just don’t get it is apparent –
No Australian citizen is eligible to sit in parliament because we are all subjects of a foreign power – Pandemic treaties, the RBA, the United Nations and if “THE VOICE” referendum was affirmed, Aboriginals.
Under section 44 of the Constitution those subject to foreign power are ineligible to sit in parliament.
“Any person who:
“is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is …………..”
Then in contradiction to the Constitution the Ju diciary through the court system have made it law that dual citizenship is legal thus accommodating the dual citizen Jews and others in parliament.
The UN wants to control everything and every aspect of our lives:
The UN, a Trojan Horse to world tyranny
https://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2024/11/28/the-un-a-trojan-horse-to-world-tyranny/
“Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end” – Rabbi Isaac Wise (of B’nai B’rith, quoted in Israelite of America, Aug 3, 1866)
Freemasonry is based on Judaism. What is left of the Freemasonic rituals, when eliminating Judaism doctrines? – The Jewish Tribune. New York, 29. okt. 1925.
“The priests of Nimrod the founder of Babylon wore black robes.”
The Chemarims or Khamarim are the black-robed priests of Baal , who were appointed by the kings of Judah to conduct worship In high places.
Chemarims ” Idolatrous Priest ”, comes from the root word Kamar meaning ”to be black”, which explains the ”idolatrous priest” wore black garments (Zephaniah 1:4), which the judges, priests, rabbis and Cohen’s wear today.
Bad and misguided individuals inhabit the Parliaments of both OZzzz and NZzzz.
The blatant thuggery, and the absence of respect and self-respect on on display by bands of hysterical goons appears yet another sign of these demonic, disintegrating, and delegitimising times.
Payman could not be much chop as a Senator if she did not stand aside from the Senate. Maybe she had too much of a Labor agenda to push-something like giving the implementation of Sharia’a Law a bit of a push?
And CrissCross should realise that a CITIZEN has no rights, and only exists to serve the government (that he rails against!).
Bad call, that one, Criss.
A good rundown on the YGLs of this world-and thanks to the commenter who put the WEF YGLs link up:
https://humanevents.com/2022/11/10/world-economic-forum-young-global-leaders
I am going to be writing to the Senators again to ask them to out themselves if they are a YGL grad,\ (like former Health Minister Greg Hunt) because our Senators are supposed to be the guardians of the Constitution (sounds like the X Men, doesn’t it?) and not come into the Parliament with any agendas, hidden or not, as the Senate is supposedly a house of review that is meant to send bad legislation back for re-jigging to acceptability.
From the article:
“Either way, it’s alarming how many elected representatives have any ties at all to the WEF, let alone via this specific program that is designed to subvert governments around the world.”
The he/she/it/they has a bigger mouth than a brain. He/she/it/they must think we’re similarly stupid to swallow his/her/its/their distraction and obfuscation by swallowing his/her/its/their “racism” card.
The question is simple. Is he/she/it/they ENTITLED to the rights and privileges of a foreign citizenship, irrespective of whether he/she/it/they actually holds one or wants one.
If he/she/it/they is so entitled, he/she/it/they needs to go!
Same applies to anyone else in Parliament so where is he/she/it/they going with his/her/its/their “racism” claim save to distraction and obfuscation?
NB I trust I’ve eliminated any basis for similarly groundless accusations of toxic, sexist bias on my part.
Sec 44 says the people who approved the Constitution obviously did not want foreign blow-ins or the immediate descendants of foreign blow-ins to be in Parliament. There’s plenty of sense in that.
They were obviously well aware of the distinction between having actual foreign citizenship and having an ENTITLEMENT to its rights and privileges. It’s a distinction many insist on pretending doesn’t exist. And there’s not much sense in that.
Obviously there must be a reason that so many people who should know better turn a blind eye when they shouldn’t.
Thank You Pauline Hanson!
Perhaps this is the beginning of CLEAN UP THE SWAMP in Australian Parliaments!
Overheard..
Anyone who thinks “the constitution” is lawfully binding upon themselves, is submitting themselves to slavery, and writing their own death sentence.
Another psy op.
If they can have you believing an agreement you never agreed to has authority over you, then they will always have that authority / control over you.
Become so free your mere existence is an act of rebellion.
And while we’re on the subject of lists, no one beats
Swedish researcher Jacob Nordangard, Ph.D for the Young Global Leaders page on his extensive website worthy of a few hours of your time…
https://blog.jacobnordangard.se/wef-ygl-list/
List of Jewish heads of state and government
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_heads_of_state_and_government
List of Jewish feminists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists
They will try everything, and unless WE SPEAK OUT, they bully their way through! Reminds me of those bullies in Junior School; quite amazing!
I wonder when the LAW changed?
AMAZING HOW THEY ARE ALL MISSING THE POINT.
Who changed the LAW governing that Australian Politicians need to be AU Citizens and do NOT hold dual citizenship.
IS THAT NOT THE POINT
All Smoke and Mirrors
This is how they are taught to bully at the KS School!
List of Jewish members of Australian parliaments – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_members_of_Australian_parliaments
Going by the comments, 2 says you can and 2 says you can’t be dual citizen in politics. Just one more opinion needed for a tie breaker.
Any one else have an opinion?
Joe Bogan: “Commenter dd2, that disqualifies jews as well then”
Oh! Why would that be?
In my opinion the Court has no right to make or change laws. The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia is the law of our country until the people change a particular part by referendum. No body else or organisation has the right to fiddle with the Constitution. Not even those that see themselves as gods, the politicians in Canberra.
List of countries that allow Dual Citizenship (and those that don’t) – Flag Theory
Australia. – YES
Dual citizenship is recognized in Australia, which also has a very favorable residency and citizenship-by-investment program.
Reference: People can become dual citizens automatically, or after being granted citizenship of another country. For example, an Australian citizen may automatically gain citizenship of another country through marriage, while a permanent resident of Australia may become a dual citizen by becoming an Australian citizen. Prior to 4 April 2002, Australian citizens who became citizens of another country lost their Australian citizenship automatically. Reference here.
https://flagtheory.com/dual-citizenship/
Commenter dd2, that disqualifies jews as well then
Is there no one in this once great nation with some form of authority willing to question the government’s integrity? No judge, no lawyer, no one?
Surely they can’t all be compromised or too scared of ending up like constitutional historian and political adviser Steven Harrison who was found dead in his home in Warwick, Queensland after being subjected overnight to a sonic weapon by Queensland police.
https://cairnsnews.org/2023/03/19/qld-police-surround-home-of-warwick-intellectual-who-apparently-shot-and-killed-himself-with-a-gel-blaster/
… and what happened to that official inquiry into his extremely suspicious death?
https://cairnsnews.org/2023/03/21/queensland-cops-have-some-explaining-to-do-over-death-of-steven-harrison/
The racism, anti semitic, homophonic slur is played all the time when they can’t answer the question. Senator Hanson deserves a medal for what she puts up with.
She said that she can’t as Sharia law won’t allow it, then if that’s the case she should not be in our political system.
It doesn’t matter whether you “renounce” foreign citizenship or not.
The Constitution UNAMBIGUOUSLY states that anybody entitled to the rights or privileges of foreign citizenship is ineligible to sit in Parliament, irrespective whether they ACTUALLY hold or do not hold foreign citizenship.
“sec 44 Disqualification
Any person who:
is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or ENTITLED to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power.”
Needless to say, you don’t have to have foreign citizenship, it is sufficient that you are ENTITLED to its rights or privileges.
How much plainer can it get!!!! Those who count are obviously desperate not to see the elephant in the Constitution.
“is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power”
Notice it says power and not nation? Notice no one mentions the WEF yet according to a simple search of the Federal Parliament’s website ‘WEF’ appears no less than 4200 times?
Maybe it’s just a coincidence nearly every policy AnAl has introduced can be found on WEF websites long before they’re tabled. Maybe the WEF are never mentioned because every damn one them is guilty of treason.
FYI
Some good news…
https://x.com/TinaZimmermann4/status/1861755337222635651
Credit: Tina Zimmermann on X
Dual Citizenship Australia – All You Need to Know
Can You Have Dual Citizenship In Australia?
Yes, absolutely! Anyone can have dual citizenship in Australia if the native country also allows dual citizenship. In regards to dual citizenship, from April 4, 2002, the Australian court removed all restrictions (under Australian Law). The Government recognised dual Citizenship on that day. Even before this date, Australians could be dual citizens in certain special circumstances.
https://australiantranslationservices.com.au/dual-citizenship-australia/
CLEAN OUT THE SWAMP!
[…] Source link […]
Why was this disgusting behaviour from both Rayman and Thorpe allowed? Mentioning a name of a country is not racism. These two woman are disgrace to the country and their behaviour is abusive. When is abusing someone acceptable?
We know that it is a circus most of the time, with highly paid clowns, but these two overstepped the lowest form of circus act.
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
No Australian citizen is eligible to sit in parliament because we are all subjects of a foreign power – Pandemic treaties, the RBA, the United Nations and if “THE VOICE” referendum was affirmed, Aboriginals.
Under section 44 of the Constitution those subject to foreign power are ineligible to sit in parliament.
“Any person who:
is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or
is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer; or
is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth: or
has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;
shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives…………………….”