Rowan Atkinson says more insults are needed to keep free speech, in direct opposition to Labor ideology

• John Sack – An Eye For an Eye

“The first shells landed on Kaiser Wilhelm Street and killed two German schoolgirls. In the days after that, the Russians—all Asiatics, covered like so many coat-racks in fur, concertinas, guns, and X-shaped bullet belts-killed the people of Gleiwitz practically aimlessly. They shouted, “Du Gitler! You Hitler!” and they shot policemen, firemen, postmen, and train conductors in navy-blue uniforms, even a man in whose home was a gold-braided epaulet from World War I. They shot some doctors, lawyers, tailors, nurses, carpenters, sculptors, coiffeurs, auditors, watch-store owners, cigar-store owners, shoemakers, bookbinders, principals, miners, even a few escapees from Auschwitz, even Jews. In their cellars the Germans poured schnapps down the drains so the Russians couldn’t become drunker, and the women cut off their hair so the Russians wouldn’t rape them. “Frau komm! Woman come!” the Russians said anyhow, as they lined up to rape even eight-year-olds and eighty-year-old nuns.”
[…]
Gleiwitz was the Wild West. The bad guys were the Russians—the Asiatics, and the criminals doing their time in the Russian army. On foot, canes, crutches and bicycles that, like broncos, tossed them into the snow, they came into Gleiwitz on one-day passes like Jesse Jameses. Up to their armpits and up to their knees were the watches they’d robbed by grunting like in the Stone Age, “Urr!” meaning “Uhr!” the German for “Watch!” They kept winding these as if, if they didn’t, their limbs might stop like an animatronic man’s at midnight in Disneyland. They also took lighters to light their fires, light bulbs to light their tents, and Nuit de Paris perfume in lieu of Smirnoff. “Otvirai! Open up!” they shouted at German homes and, on entering, robbed the men, raped the women, played with the children, washed in the toilet bowls, and got even drunker, telling the Germans to drink and say, “Long live Stalin!”
[…]
Through the character Lola, John Sack takes great pleasure in [boastfully] describing the anti-human atrocities the Jews committed against German civilians including women and children. In projecting their [in their minds “justified”] hatred for humanity they sometimes overdo the narrative and slip up on a few details, apart from what you have written. Maybe Lola’s opposition to the book being published reflected her dread of being cross-examined and thoroughly exposed, just like Irene Zisblatt.

On Page 44 Sack [through Lola] is claiming that it was actually the Jews who treated the Germans for lice [reverse projection] …

“She [Lola] knew that the Germans might have lice, the near invisible carriers of typhus, the disease that had decimated the Jews at Auschwitz. Even in Lola’s stable there’d been a sign that said, ONE LOUSE YOU’RE DEAD, and Lola didn’t want one in her own lodgings in Gleiwitz. She watched while the Germans showered, dried, and painted themselves with Lysol, and while a German barber cut off their hair and, his clippers in hand, then left to the women’s prison to cut off the women’s hair too.”

The book also (fondly) mentions the swimming pool (page 28) which was called upon when a fire broke out in one of the buildings, and includes this testimony by Lola:

“At Auschwitz the Jews weren’t raped (the SS men could be hanged for it)”

Regarding the sadistic torture by the jews upon the German civilians, Sack [Lola] also lets out that the Germans SS were not allowed to inflict any form of physical or mental torture on the Jews at risk of severe punishment themselves. After all, they needed healthy, content, safe workers.

• John Wear – Germany’s War

The savagery of Soviet soldiers was acknowledged by British Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery in his Memoirs. Montgomery states: “From their behavior it soon became clear that the Russians, though a fine fighting race, were in fact barbarous Asiatics who had never enjoyed a civilization comparable to that of the rest of Europe. Their approach to every problem was utterly different from ours, and their behavior, especially in their treatment of women, was abhorrent to us.”[15]
Russian soldiers continually raped German women as the Red Army advanced through Silesia and Pomerania towards Berlin. The German women were frequently gang raped, often again and again on successive nights. A woman interviewed in Schwerin reported that she had “already been raped by 10 men today.” A German officer in East Prussia claims to have saved a few dozen women from a villa where “on average they had been raped 60 to 70 times a day.” Another woman in Berlin stated: “Twenty-three soldiers one after the other. I had to be stitched up in a hospital. I never want to have anything to do with any man again.”[16]
Churches were frequently used by Russian soldiers to rape German women. A priest from Neisse reports:
The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims. During the first night many of the nuns and other women were raped as many as 50 times. Some of the nuns who resisted with all their strength were shot, others were ill treated in a dreadful manner until they were too exhausted to offer any resistance. The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles, until they finally collapsed and in this unconscious condition became the helpless victims of brutish passion, which was so inhuman as to be inconceivable. The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were 70 and 80 years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill treated by these barbarians.[17]
A letter written by a priest smuggled out of Breslau, Germany on Sept. 3, 1945, states:
In unending succession were girls, women and nuns violated. Not merely in secret, in hidden corners, but in the sight of everybody, even in churches, in the streets and in public places were nuns, women and even eight-year-old girls attacked again and again. Mothers were violated before the eyes of their children; girls in the presence of their brothers; nuns, in the sight of pupils, were outraged again and again to their very death and even as corpses.[18]
When Russian soldiers “liberated” Danzig they promptly liberated all the women of their virtue and chastity. A Russian soldier told the Danzig women to seek shelter in the Catholic cathedral to protect them from the rapes. After hundreds of women and girls were securely inside, the Russian soldiers entered and “playing the organ and ringing the bells, kept up a foul orgy through the night, raping all the women, some more than 30 times.” A Catholic pastor in Danzig states: “They even violated eight-year-old girls and shot boys who tried to shield their mothers.”[19]

Rowan knows what he is talking about, Labor doesn’t have a clue.

Could having “serious contempt” for paedophiles be an offence under these Criminal Code Amendments?

*Criminals who commit these offences while motivated, wholly or partly, by hatred or serious contempt based on race, religion, sexuality, sex characteristics or gender identity will face increased penalties including longer custodial sentences.

As long as the ‘prohibited symbols’ includes that offensive Labor party logo then okay. As well as the LNP logo, Greens logo …
And those offensive gang flashes – the triple six, (Anna’s flashed that one herself). The One eye. Horny hands. Triad claw etc. etc.

You are so right as always.

It’s weird that Queensland Labor would be banning Nazi symbols and tattoos when Albo is openly backing a bunch of Nazi’s who proudly celebrate Bandera, wear SS uniform patches and torture and murder Russian captives just like the good old days.