REFERENDUM FOR AN ABORIGINAL ‘VOICE’
What is this hopelessly confused issue all about?
So-called “Representational Democracy” means that we elect a representative, who then conveys our constitutional will to the Parliament wherein this is homogenized and condensed into national consensus, to then be implemented by the Public Service.
As it happens, every single adult Australian shares equal opportunity to participate in this highly neglected process, regardless of whether they are male or female, European, Aboriginal, or immigrant.
The “Voice” proposal means that a special committee of the self-appointed Aboriginal Academic Elite will have the power to veto any legislative bill before Parliament, even if 99% of the total population demands this bill, or that it’s passing into law is urgent. This veto can last forever.
In other words, based entirely on supposed race, a dictatorship of a dozen or so people can control the entire nation, purely on ill-informed whim.
Is it unreasonable to describe such deliberation as a “whim”?
Considering the record of the Voice’s architects, led by academic Marcia Langton and hat ‘n beard theatrics clown, Patrick Dodson (Special Envoy for the Uluru Statement and Reconciliation) neither of whom possess any Aboriginal culture, nor speak any Aboriginal languages, and who have never asked the culturally Aboriginal people of the north and centre of Australia about their needs of government, this is a more than fair criticism. They have no knowledge or insights to contribute.
The same criticism applies to Professor Megan Davis, an architect of the ‘Voice’. She clearly has no idea what defines a democracy while promoting the very anthesis of democracy… an extra veto voice in Parliament. Meanwhile, NT Aboriginal Senator Jacinta Price pointed out that the ‘Voice’ is a Trojan Horse for elitism.
Typically, Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney has never evidenced any comprehension of issues relevant to Central and Northern Australian Aborigines.
Constitutional law ‘expert’ Professor Anne Twomey outrageously claims it would be inappropriate for the government to release draft legislation details ahead of the vote. She claims that Australia’s most successful (1967) referendum would not have succeeded if details had been provided, which is arrant nonsense because large teams of Aboriginal women traversed the nation in the ten-year lead-up to the vote, explaining to anyone who would listen what the referendum meant to Aboriginal people. That is the reason it was the most successful referendum.
It is significant that ordinary Australians, by then fully informed, were very happy to support Aborigines, yet politicians of 1967 were still hopelessly divided.
A ‘Voice’ to represent… precisely what issues?
Readers of this document are understandably confused about the actual issues of policy failures in the past that the ‘Voice’ is intended to remedy. The author of this document has studied and worked with these for half a century, however, our focus is the Aboriginal-intensive Northern regions and on Arnhem Land in particular. Although we are familiar with southern and eastern state conditions, our mandate is the linguistically defined northern commentariat. Our issues of commonality are:
The all-pervading preponderance of indigenous languages in the north, with not even basic comprehension of English language;
A culture that is in almost every way different from European culture;
Vast geographical distances from information and resource centres;
High expense of basics for survival;
The indifference or even hostility of Government.
Liaison personnel representing government services and funding are profoundly ignorant of Aboriginal languages and culture, even though many profess to be Aboriginal and that such knowledge is their primary qualification, ascertained essentially by fraudulent job application form tick-boxes.
Thanks to failures of government, most NT Aborigines, particularly the young, are now illiterate… in any language. The immediate outcome is that almost no NT Aborigines comprehend nutrition, hygiene, food-toxicity, job accountability, western law, or the role of political representation; and very few have any idea of what is happening beyond their community, let alone Australia or the world. Basically, if it is not a family issue they have no interest, which is what being tribal actually means.
These factors reveal a never-acknowledged reality: that although Australia is one country, it consists of two different worlds. There is virtually no transmission between the two; a profound language and cultural communication gulf that is millennia apart. The urbanite ‘Voice’ cannot even begin to address this.
What is needed is:
Recognition of Aboriginal languages, which means all Government liaison personnel being proficient in at least one local Aboriginal language per linguistic region. Is this possible? I do it every day, badly, in two languages, and if I can do it anybody can do it, better. The ‘Voice’ would actually be a terminal hindrance.
Recognition of Aboriginal law. Can this be done? Yes, validated by an Australian Court, applying Aboriginal Law enabled a ”basket case” dysfunctional community to become famously functional following three months application, precipitated by a mere twenty minutes consultation with tribal authorities. The ‘Voice’ would terminally inhibit Recognition because it would threaten the power base of the ‘Voice’ Elite.
The joke is, none of our elected representatives have any interest in what laws or services we want anyway. No politicians, Aboriginal or European, listen to us.
Vote NO to this absurdity.
From a Northern Territory reader
Some very interesting comments there. Some very well versed people reading your paper I’m just scratching the surface. I do agree with saying ‘NO’ to the ‘Voice’ but like the last person said I fear it’s already a done deal because we are not being given ‘a Voice ‘ but a charade.
I am an avid reader of the articles I receive from Cairns News & have attached text which was sent to me from another source. However, I am sure you have seen this, but if you have not, here it is:
The real reason why the Labor Party are pursuing a Voice referendum
👉The Australian Labor Party in promoting its “YES” vote for a voice to parliament to have the Constitution changed by referendum. The Labor Party is not being open and truthful as to the real reason it is conducting this referendum
👉In 1990, Federal Politician Kim Beasley made a statement in response to Senator Button’s question in the Australian Federal Parliament about whether there should be a republic. His reply was
👉Kim Beasley Quote: “The United Nations has given the Federal Government a mandate of ownership for housing, farms, property and business to government control once the REPUBLIC has been proclaimed”
👉The comment by Kim Beasley in parliament back in 1990 should be ringing alarm bells. The United Nations is the NWO in waiting for a one world government
👉The current push by the Labor Party for the ‘Voice’ referendum is the single most important part of their plan, which is to include the ‘ORIGINAL’ Men, Women and children of this Country (Indigenous people) into the Commonwealth Constitution because, at the moment they have ‘NO CONTRACT’ with the ‘ORIGINAL’ Men, Women and children of this Country
👉Because there is ‘No Contract’ with the Indigenous people of Australia, a republic would not be achieved because the ‘ORIGINAL’ Men, Women and children of this country are the lawful land owners and the government would be unable to take control over ownership of housing, farms, property and business, thus thwarting its secretive push for a totalitarian republic where you would own nothing and be happy
👉This plan as you can see was already underway back in 1990. Every State in Australia has already sold off the Lands and Title Office, your original titles have been destroyed. The value of your property is in the TITLE
👉All properties certificate of title has been digitised and this is not a lawful proof of historical ownership
👉Say ‘NO’ to the Voice and say ‘NO’ to a totalitarian republic they have planned for us Australians
LikeLiked by 1 person
Questions re the photo above –
Proclamation under the Flags Act 1953 (Australian Aboriginal Flag)
I, PHILIP MICHAEL JEFFERY, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council and noting the fact that the flag reproduced in Schedule 1 and described in Schedule 2 is recognised as the flag of the Aboriginal peoples of Australia and a flag of significance to the Australian nation generally, …
Flags Act 1953 – legislation.gov.au
7 Rules as to use of flags
The Governor-General may make, and cause to be published, rules for the guidance of persons in connection with the flying or use of flags or ensigns referred to in, or appointed under, this Act.
Guidelines for Flying Flags
How to fly the three flags together – Aboriginal and Torres Strait with Australian flag
From a stand with three flagpoles
When flying all three flags together, the Australian National Flag takes precedence
over the other flags
When using the stand provided, the Australian National Flag flies from the central pole as this is the highest pole. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags are equal in status and can be flown on either side of the national flag. There is no rule stating that the Aboriginal flag must be to the right of the Australian National Flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag on the left of the Australian National Flag or vice versa.
These rules also apply when displaying the desk set flags.
“What is democracy? We should avoid painting it with a broad brush. My understanding is that democracy in a socialist country is manifested in a legal system that promotes the people’s interests. Democracy should neither cater to the whims of specific groups or social strata, nor meet their demands. Those who go to extremes to place demands on the people and the country are really just insisting that they receive democratic treatment, with no restrictions on what they do or say and carrying no responsibilities to the government or other people. Does that sound right?! Would you accept this behavior or agree if everyone demanded to enjoy this kind of democracy?! Of course not. By allowing a specific person or people to enjoy this kind of democracy, not only do you lose your democratic rights, you deprive others of theirs.
Imagine if people did as they pleased. Family planning is ignored, taxes are not paid, and the army and police are disbanded. Finally, the prisons are opened up, and the inmates released. Work standards go out the window. Life no longer has any restrictions. Would you still feel confident about your democratic rights or your safety? Does this sound like a good idea? Real democracy does not come in the form of absolutes. It is subject to specific constraints”
… Xi Jinping in “Journalism: Mastering the Fundamentals” May 1989
(note the author AND the date)
• Xi Jinping – Up And Out Of Poverty
Audio reading (playlist) …
[Disclaimer – I find some of the Marxist basis of Xi Jinping’s thinking problematic but we can get our heads around that later.]
And from earlier …
• “The purpose of being an official is to contribute. And when it comes to profiting, we cannot “take it as our own” or covet material benefit and scheme for private gain.”
• “The main responsibility of leaders is to resolve problems of “bridges” and “paths.””
• “We despise those who use their own power to seek personal gain, who are corrupt and accept bribes, and who throw their weight around.”
In the Global Pandemic Hoax 2020 we witnessed the Manifesto of the Marxist-Leninist coup d’etat that had been positioning itself at the choke points of government and all institutions of social influence for decades.
Within a month they had created a Politburo / National Cabinet and shielded the role of the military (and its vaxx contracts) with Operation CoVID Shield. NKVDs and Stasis were operational and before the year was out the Australian CoVID Regime of the United [Communist] Nations had legislated for foreign militaries and security forces outside of any treaty (like ANZUS for example) on Australian soil and indemnified them for all crimes they will commit in carrying out their tasks. And this was only in one year.
To legitimize this this Regime under the UN they are going to set up Black Minority government under UNDRIP. The Aboriginal people themselves have been getting the worst of the Aboriginal Industry Box Ticker racket and its corporations for years. And I am sad to write that as Anti-White as they are, I expect they will get the worst of it when this racket become the political elite of the Australian COMMUNIST regime. Like the ANC in South Africa, the Aboriginal Industry Box Ticker Party and its corporate rackets is a COMMUNIST FRONT.
The permanent world-wide Communist Revolution of the Fourth ComIntern is the secret of the Perestroika Deception. During the 20th century it was the Communist Eastern Bloc which supplied, equipped, trained the armed aggression of ‘national liberation’ Gook forces against the de-colonized populations of the world. But the operational command of the Revolution itself was distributed on the Moscow, Tel Aviv and New York Triangle as Jack Bernstein documented in his work (for which he was assassinated) “The Life of an American Jew in Racist Apartheid Israel” https://ia803206.us.archive.org/15/items/1985-the-life-of-an-american-jew-in-racist-marxist-israel/1985%20-%20The%20Life%20of%20an%20American%20Jew%20in%20Racist%20Marxist%20Israel%20-%20J%20Bernstein.pdf.
With the dissolution of the Supreme Soviet in 1993, the praesidium of the ComIntern shifted to the UN which incorporates every plank of Karl Marx into its Charter. And the US took on the role of backing, supplying, equipping, training Gooks with the US military. This was the 7 nation take-down in 5 year plan after 9-11 of which General Wesley Clark spoke in many interviews which can be seen on YouTube. This was not about oil as he also stated. It was about the geopolitics of regime change upon nations for the emergence of Eurasia as the centrepiece of the world soviet. These Muslim nations were regime changed and made over into ZOGs managed by Russian KGB / FSB.
From the image there is hardly a black face in sight. Appears the self elected mob is many generations removed from it’s original roots, if any at all. These people are likely all millionaires, certainly not under privileged.
Well said Pat!
The author said – “No politicians, Aboriginal or European, listen to us.”
… or Australian, either.
It’s a quandry, indeed it is. The crux of the problem seems to be that they don’t work for US, they’re actually corporate employees who serve their TRUE masters, the genocidal Globalists (and they get paid exceedingly well for their service by the Globalists, far more than their already obscenely bloated salaries and unfunded superannuation packages paid for by the poor clueless Australian tax payers – just ask unrepentant Hillsong paedophile and closet Satanist “Scotty from Marketing” now enjoying a luxurious lifestyle most of us don’t even dare to dream of).
The author also said – “Vote NO to this absurdity.”
Well, there’s a problem. Since when did a “vote” for anything ever mean anything here in Australia? Probably never. After all, we DO know without any shadow of a doubt that EVERY Australian “electoral commission” in every state and territory is absolutely rotten to the core, completely and utterly corrupt and beholden to – you guessed it – the genocidal Globalists.
Australian “electoral commissions” deliver WHATEVER outcome their corporate masters require. All the campaigning and polling and voting is just theatre for the masses, a smokescreen to obscure the FACT that we have no say in the matter. And BTW, have you noticed in recent state “elections” how LITTLE “campaigning” by the major parties actually took place? That’s because they were fully aware that the FIX WAS IN before the so-called “elections” even took place. So why waste the time and effort, apart from a lacklustre attempt at “keeping up appearances”?
So don’t get too ambitious about using your “vote” to defeat the “Voice” scam. Every single Australian from shore to sunny shore, from North to South and from East to West, can “vote” NO to the “Voice”, but it will still be passed in a f*cking LANDSLIDE. Voting won’t cut it – that’s just pissing into the wind, because the fix is already in.
LikeLiked by 2 people