WHO treaty should be ratified by Parliament not Cabinet

by Kev Moore
No Australia is not losing ” sovereignty” to the WHO and China next week.????

Explainer – The Treaty Process in Australia
9 April 2018 |

This explainer sets out the legal process that underpins how a treaty is created under International Law and then incorporated into Australian domestic law. Definitions of key terms related to the treaty process have been taken from the United Nations and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade .

What is a Treaty?

Australia becoming a party to a treaty is a legal process.

The Australian law recognises that a treaty is:

… an agreement between States (countries) which is binding at international law. In some cases international organisations can be parties to treaties. Even if a document is agreed between two or more sovereign countries, it will not be a treaty unless those countries intend the document to be binding at international law. DFAT

Section 61 of the Australian Constitution allows Australia to enter into treaties as an exercise of Executive Power. Treaties are then tabled in both Houses of Parliament.

A treaty is generally tabled after it has been signed for Australia, but before any treaty action is taken which would bind Australia under international law. DFAT

The legal process for Australia to sign, ratify or accede/implement to an international agreement/treaty is set out below:

Signature – agreement in principle, but not legally bound by the treaty.

Ratification – a binding agreement that Australia will implement the treaty. In the case of a multi-lateral United Nations agreement an instrument of ratification prepared by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is deposited with the UN Secretary-General after being approved by the Governor-General in Council.

Accession/Implementation – the Parliament implements the agreement as an Act of Parliament

Example: the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) implements the Convention for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

UN Charter
“Entry into force for Australia 1 November 1945”
In force generally
24 October 1945 description
Charter of the United Nations [UN]
Notes and references to published text
Signed for Australia 26 June 1945 by F M Forde and H V Evatt. Instrument of ratification deposited for Australia 1 November 1945. Entry into force for Australia 1 November 1945. Also applies to Norfolk Island.






It may be of interest to know that Australia ratified the full text of the United Nations Charter as a treaty in 1945 and in so doing gave away its sovereignty. Communist “Doc”Evatt and dupe, P.M. Ford signed on behalf of Australia.

Charter of the United Nations, as amended [1945] ATS 1

[ To understand the UN, see the book, “THE FEARFUL MASTER A SECOND LOOK AT THE UNITED NATIONS” by G. Edward Griffin ]

“Government is not reason;
it is not eloquence;
it is force! Like fire,
it is a dangerous servant
and a fearful master!”
George Washington

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on May 19, 2022, in Agenda 2030, United Nations, WEF, WHO and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. There actually needs to be referendum put before the Australian people, to decide if we want that or not! Then it is up to the Governor General to implement the will of the people.


  2. @Email alert

    The National cabinet was formed in 2020.It should now be dumped! ________________________________


  3. In my humble opinion, speaking from my favourite shade tree in the remote bush of the Outback, Kev Moore is just another deluded ignoramus.

    Mate… invert the equation so that this makes sense.

    This is our country. Whatever the elected representatives do is supposed to be “representing our will”, as MHR and expert on Constitutional Law, Arthur Chresby so correctly put it.

    They are not representing our will. In fact, they have no idea what we want; and we do not know what we want unless we have free access to information of our choosing, and media and universities that are not in the grip of the very globalists who are pushing this agenda in the first place.

    In other words, every word Moore uttered ignores the reality of Murdoch Media control of our information flow, Frank Lowy control over our universities and think tanks, and Ross Garnaut control over our economy and foreign policy. All three are Zionist globalists.

    Remedy these elements, restore genuine democracy, and then that is where the law is a factor. Not before.

    Meanwhile, Kev Moore, after we reclaim our freedom, our democracy, and our nation, you and I have a problem.


  4. This, like the TPP, is an abrogation of the Rights of Australians and is a plank in the NWO platform. Who is backing this “Citizens Party”? Soros or one of his “philanthropic organisations”?


  5. have a referendum

    Liked by 1 person

  6. “Section 61 of the Australian Constitution allows Australia to enter into treaties as an exercise of Executive Power.”

    Sheer fantasy. Only the GG can enter into a treaty on behalf of the Commonwealth. There is nothing in the Constitution that refers to any POWER of a Prime Minister to enter Australia into any treaties.



  7. Trevor W Sullivan

    The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution trumps every so-called ‘International Law’ and every so-called ‘law’ that is counter to the Constitution itself – and that is what Constitutions are all about!
    Section 61 of the Constitution does NOT (as claimed in the article), have anything to do with treaties, and even if it did, it could not contradict Section 44 (i) which disqualifies any Member of Parliament as being “under…..obedience….to a foreign power” – Here it is, word for word, and it is all about the Constitution and the laws of the Commonwealth – NOT INTERNATIONAL TREATIES:
    61. Executive power
    The executive power of the Commonwealth is vested in the Queen and is exercisable by the Governor-General as
    the Queen’s representative, and extends to the execution and maintenance of this Constitution, and of the laws of the
    What has happened to Cairns News?

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Janus kniszka

    This EVIL treaty should not be even brought to the attention of PARLIAMENTS!! WHO is a private company!! Parliament is peoples representative!!!


  9. So, who is telling the truth? Not just in Australia. This is just one of the prime narratives (stories). Is Jimmy a liar?

    “Global WHO Treaty Is Real And Will Control You”. May 18, 2022. The Jimmy Dore Show. YT.


  10. Not sucked in

    Oh yeah right we all trust the UN lol

    Liked by 1 person

  1. Pingback: WHO treaty should be ratified by Parliament not Cabinet – debtstop

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: