Letter to the Editor
Today the NSW State Government has announced its unintentionally ironic ‘Roadmap to Freedom’ which includes specific details as to what will be re-opening and for whom.
Among many other items of concern, there was a particular section that is alarming to me:
Weddings, funerals and places of worship (for fully vaccinated only):
– Up to 50 guests can attend weddings, with dancing permitted and eating and drinking only while seated.
– Up to 50 guests can attend funerals, with eating and drinking while seated.
– Churches and places of worship to open subject to one person per 4sqm rule, with no singing.
There will also be new rules for weddings and funerals, with up to 50 people permitted provided they are vaccinated. Churches can resume services, without singing, but must also enforce the the vaccination requirements and the 4 sq m rules”
We are opposed to the prohibition of singing which is a form of worship. We are also opposed to mandatory vaccination. The Bible teaches us that the Church and Christ’s love, extends to all races, all sexes, all identities and yes even the unvaccinated (modern lepers). Modern secularists have often refer to American Philosopher Thomas Jefferson for the ‘separation of Church and State’ without realising that the intention of Jefferson’s phrase was to separate Church FROM State.
In August Prime Minister Scott Morrison said “The vaccination service is free and it is not mandatory. That’s an important principle. We are not going to seek to impose a mandatory vaccination program by the government by stealth”. Was this a core promise or a non-core promise?
I am utterly opposed to any endeavours to make Covid-19 vaccination a mandatory requirement for Church attendance. I would question the legality of such a measure. To this effect, I am proud to support Sydney Solicitor Tony Nikolic who is challenging the legality of mandatory vaccines for NSW healthcare workers, our prayers are with him.
Please sign and share our petition to get the State out of our Churches.
Yours faithfully,
Rev Hon Fred Nile MLC
CDP Parliamentary Leader
https://christiandemocraticpartynsw.cmail19.com/t/r-l-trniuhy-blkykthnl-h/
www.cairnsnews.org 
Tell this to the politicians –
Divine Law Definition: the law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law
2 Chronicles 7:14-20
New King James Version
14 if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land. 15 Now My eyes will be open and My ears attentive to prayer made in this place. 16 For now I have chosen and [a]sanctified this house, that My name may be there forever; and [b]My eyes and [c]My heart will be there perpetually. 17 As for you, if you walk before Me as your father David walked, and do according to all that I have commanded you, and if you keep My statutes and My judgments, 18 then I will establish the throne of your kingdom, as I covenanted with David your father, saying, ‘You shall not fail to have a man as ruler in Israel.’
19 “But if you turn away and forsake My statutes and My commandments which I have set before you, and go and serve other gods, and worship them, 20 then I will uproot them from My land which I have given them; and this house which I have [d]sanctified for My name I will cast out of My sight, and will make it a proverb and a byword among all peoples.
Read full chapter
Footnotes
2 Chronicles 7:16 set apart
2 Chronicles 7:16 My attention
2 Chronicles 7:16 My concern
2 Chronicles 7:20 set apart
Throughout the scripture, governments have always been the leader in bringing people to sin (Daniel 3:4-6, 1 Kings 12:25:33; 14:21-24, 2 Kings 13:2; 17:21; 21:11,16, 2 Chronicles 21:6,11-13, Isaiah 9:16). God condemned Israel for wanting to be ruled like other nations, by a human king (1 Samuel 8:4-5,20). When they chose to be ruled by a human leader, our Father considered that to be a rejection of Himself because He would not then reign over them (1 Samuel 8:7; 10:19). The people later realized their sin against God when they asked to be ruled by a human government (1 Samuel 12:19). Notice their kings never had any power to make new laws; nor did their best and wisest of kings make any, as in the cases of David and Solomon. And when a return to the ways of the Lord was made among them, as by Hezekiah and Josiah, it was not by making any new regulations, but by putting the original Law into execution; and by directing and requiring of the judges, and other officers, to act according to that Law.
To serve an earthly king, or his government, is to serve other gods (1 Samuel 8:8-9), which is violating the First Commandment (Exodus 20:3). It is wickedness and a sin to ask to be ruled by a human government instead of God (1 Samuel 12:17-19). Our Father condemned Israel for following the statutes of their disobedient government (2 Kings 17:7-8). He rejected those who followed the statutes of governments instead of His Commandments (2 Kings 17:19-20). He specifically said not to follow the ordinances of earthly governments, but to follow his laws, ordinances, and statutes instead (Leviticus 18:1-5). Throughout the history of Israel, the majority of the kings of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord (1 Kings 11:4-9, 2 Kings 8:18), which shows that most rulers and governments are corrupt because of their carnal nature (Romans 8:7). The Jews eventually chose king Caesar over King Jesus (John 19:15). Those who do the same are just like them.
http://ecclesia.org/TRUTH/lawgiver.html
Mark 8:38
New King James Version
38 For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.”
LikeLike
The “MARK” of the beast
“Mark “Strongs concordance 5482 (to sharpen to a point)
“Beast” Strongs concordance 2342 Rev. 14:11 – dangerous venomous animal: a Serpent
Poisoned fangs –
The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Mark of the Beast?
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
All the symbols and emblems for modern medicine have one thing in common: a serpent.
Some, like the Caduceus, have two serpents around a staff, while others, like the rod of Asclepius, have only one serpent.
There are various interpretations as to the difference in meaning between the two, as well as the history of their origins, but the oldest reference to the serpent and its role in human suffering or healing, is contained in the earliest records of the Bible, in the writings of Moses, who is credited with writing most of the first 5 books of the Old Testament portion of the Bible around 3500 years ago.
Since these writings pre-date anything written in Greek mythology by almost 1000 years, I am going to base this article on the Bible, the oldest and the most widely circulated and most frequently translated collection of ancient writings in the world, by far, with no serious competitors in ancient or modern literature.
read further……………..
https://created4health.org/the-satanic-roots-to-modern-medicine-the-mark-of-the-beast/
LikeLike
Would like to support the petition, could not find link, ifpossible, please supply the link
LikeLike
This is their NWO pushed by Health Hazzard and the Satanic Chant
Get Outlook for Android ________________________________
LikeLike
The government’s constant mantra that we might have to get used to living with this pandemic for a long haul; perhaps 3 to 4 yrs only reinforced my belief that they never intended to eradicate the covid19 for life. Unlike previous vaccines for polio or small pox in the years before once someone is vaccinated they are immuned from it & cannot get sick. with it. guaranteed.. These vaccines. concocted now that they are injecting everyone does not do that at all. Your immunity is only temporary about 8 or 9 months in which case you can still be infected again and that is why they are preparing your mind to keep presenting for more shots ( booster shots they call it ) in the succeeding years to come.if that’s the case; why can’t generally healthy people. who has never been seriously sick in their life, never had a major medical pricedure done on them, hardly even gets a headache , & never ever reach for any painkillers because they are no good for the liver & kidneys, never been hospitalized for any condition; be forced to get this jab? That is nonsense because that is taking risks with this experimental emergency treatment for covid. It is a farce when they tell us that they are concern with our health, they are not . If they are why don’t they let people who doesn ‘t want the vaccine to be free to look after themselves as I have in my case to prevent covid . There are many ways of killing a cat, the saying goes..So too there are other ways one can protect themselves from covid; not just through vaccination, especially that these vaccines available do not eradicate the disease they are trying to protect us from. So, what is the point of being vaccinated ? So perplexing i.Sa
LikeLike
What are the chances of obtaining a court order for the Psychological Assessment of :- Plibbersec; Gladass; Brad the Brat; Cherry Kant; and Dan the scam? [And that peanut in WA].
Anyone up for starting the ball rolling?
Has anyone in ‘guvmint’ been mentally assessed before? I personally believe it is overdue!!
LikeLike
Squash this grub asap
LikeLike
It is time for Australians to rise up in protest against the erosion of our freedoms. We need organised public rally’s across Australia
LikeLike
That hazard needs to be given a flogging that he doesn’t survive from
LikeLike
Pure evil, written in his eyes and on his face. Be careful who you vote for next time! Vote for an independent someone who has the Australian people at heart. Ditch the mercenary main stream servants. Break the stranglehold.
LikeLike
Brad Hazard is reported in the US media as saying we “Australian are in a New World Order!”
He is totally unfit to comment on NSW Health let alone the other States and territories!
I am in total agreement with Rev. Hon. Fred Nile’s statement.
We should offer prayers ,the sacrifice of praise and worship to Our Heavenly Father for the eyes of the ignorant to be opened to the Truth!
LikeLike
It’s an excellent marketing plan by the govt to try and push those holding strong off the edge, they will go every angle to get as many people jabbed (give over their body) as they can.
Thank you Rev Hon Fred Nile for speaking your truth and standing up to these bullying tactics of the govt. Hold strong Christians, God is watching and these poli’s will have their judgement day. Xx
LikeLike
As a Health Minister Brad Hazzard’s mental health is in serious question. But perhaps not. because he may not have any mental health at all, being the crazed psychopath that he seems to be.
LikeLike
hazzard is an oxygen thief . If he has been vaxd I hope he will be one of the first to get a Darwin award .posthumously. what right do these cess pool scum to force people to take poison. MY BODY .MY CHOICE. THIS IS THE HOLOUCAUST BUT 1000 TIMES MORE.
LikeLike
You unintentionally perpetuate the myth of “separation of church and state,” something invented by our courts as they metastasized.
The Founders (not just Jefferson) included a prohibition of the central government ESTABLISHING a religion or prohibiting the free exercise of a particular religion. This was to secure enough affirmative state ratifications to adopt the Constitution in 1787. Why? Because 4 states already HAD official religions, although they all petered out by themselves. All of the Founders were deeply religious Christians and religion and politics were woven together and inseparable. George Washington began each assembly with a prayer.
LikeLike
Are Nanny Gladys days numbered ? The Extremist Hazard seems to be trying to project an image of himself as a Can-Do, Strongman, just what the country needs to defeat “covid”.
So, is he positioning himself a stronger leader than Nanny Gladys, or does he feel he has to compete with Extremist Dan in Melbourne for the title of “strongest, most insensitive” ?
How soon will he launch his bid for TV celebrity Nanny Gladys job ?
(as mouthpiece and chief promoter for the drug corporations)
LikeLike
Get the Aboriginal witchdoctor to point the death bone on him.!
LikeLike
This is why I commenced singing lessons this year, partly as a direct opposing move to this wicked invented rule about no singing. And when Paul and Silas were thrown in jail, they sang even at midnight!
LikeLike
Look at him! Honestly look at this mean and nasty face! This man is not interested in Australia! He has his own agenda! Never ever trust him!
LikeLiked by 1 person