King Charles 111, must seek his Royal Style and Title through the Commonwealth Parliament of Australia, but we don’t have one
Letter to the Editor
At the death of Her Majesty the Queen, King Charles was her heir and her assign and subsequently to be the new King His Majesty Charles 111, holding two functions as the head of State and the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and holding the separation of powers between Church and State held to the Common Law of England.
Everything so far is just show.
The real test comes next and unless that test is held to the Common Law of England then, if not conducted properly the position of the new King Charles 111, will not be filled and the King will have only the power of an individual, the same as you and I and then other 8 billion people on this planet…..
The new King His Majesty Charles 111, must seek his Royal Style and Title through the elected representatives of the people, here in Australia in the Parliament House of the people, which has lain vacant since at least 1988.
Also there is no Governor General sworn and appointed by Her Majesty the Queen as held to Governor-General Establishment Act 1902.
This leaves not only every person living in Australia but every one of the rest of the 2.2 billion people in the Kings dominions and living on the land of the King having no protection from the political parties who have seized power over and above the people and the Crown ?
I refer to the words of the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in 1985 Sr. Harry Gibbs in short – The Commonwealth is without law and it is the politicians who are treating us as pawns and they are responsible for their actions….
Is it not time for we the pawns to stand up … as the elected Members of the political parties are no are that only of an International Trading Corporation Registered on the New York Stock Exchange and trading in AUS$ worldwide, they must be held accountable to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Are these private people above the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and the Constitution of the United States of America ?….
If the new King His Majesty Charles 111 accepts a private Royal Style and Title from the elected representatives of the political parties of the Australian Government, that would leave him King Charles in a very difficult situation, he would be subservient to the policies and philosophies of the political parties and could not delegate any separation of powers between church and state to any politically appointed and paid Judges and Magistrates of the political parties, to uphold only the private Civil Law of the Australian Government’s all being private International Trading Corporations who are all held to American Civil Law of the Constitution of the United States only, as are you.
In other words the King has accepted their private money and run … the Monarchy is dead and the sun has totally set on the once great British Empire and we the people of Australia must stand alone…. As always follow the money regardless what type of money it is…
As private persons we are still protected under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and ten Constitutions of the former 6 colonies of the Australian Commonwealth and here in Queensland the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld).