The ruins of Laodicea, biblical site of the "lukewarm church" referenced in Revelation. The ruins are located near the modern city of Denizli, Turkey.

BRUCE Gore continues his series on the book of Revelation and notes that it was originally addressed to seven churches in Asia Minor, today’s western Turkey.

“Each of the churches represented a condition of Christian fellowship in crisis, as each faced the prospect of imperial oppression from Rome,” says Gore.

“At the same time, the churches give insight into the conditions of the church throughout her history, and for this reason it is useful to consider the counsel offered by Jesus, through the Apostle John, to each of them.”

Although the existence of the seven churches is not disputed because their locations still exist today in archaeological ruins, they are sometimes taught as symbolic of churches down through history or as representations of types of churches that exist today.

Gore believes that the spiritual strengths or ailments of the seven churches can be seen as a litmus test for present-day churches. The address on YouTube is one of a series.

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

29 thought on “Were the seven churches referenced in the Book of Revelation real or symbolic?”
  1. He, he, he faithful true believers…. You still haven’t worked out who dates and edits your ‘historical’ literature and history? Except for what you’re told and what is officially sanctioned you wouldn’t have a clue what happened even in your grandpa’s time. Believe it or not.

  2. THE JESUITS ARE BEHIND THE FAKE ‘TWO-PARTY’ SYSTEM IN EVERY SPHERE: Catholic vs. Freemason; Labor vs. LNP; Democrat vs. Republican; Irish Republican vs. British – all are infiltrated on both sides of the fictitious divide. THIS IS WHY ANYONE WHO UNDERSTANDS THIS BASIC FACT CAN SAY BRUCE GORE’S WORK IS JESUIT COUNTER-REFORMATION WORK – Jesuits also set up the fake two-horse race between RIBERA’S ‘FUTURISM’ & DE ALCAZAR’S ‘PRETERISM’, BOTH THESE SPURIOUS SCHOOLS OF PROPHECY INTERPRETATION SPAWNED BY THEM IN THE 1500s!
    ALL WHO IGNORE THIS DELIBERATE POLARISATION ARE ALREADY DROWNING IN THE DELUSION – BOTH IN POLITICS & RELIGION, TO THE POINT WHERE HARDLY ANYONE TODAY IS NOT DECEIVED – THIS PERFECTLY FULFILLS REVELATION 13 & 2 THESSALONIANS 2.
    ‘CHRISTIANS’ ARE THE MOST DELUDED, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THEY’VE BEEN FED ON PRIDE & SELF-IMPORTANCE BY THEIR JESUIT-TRAINED PASTORS FOR DECADES – “PRIDE GOETH BEFORE DESTRUCTION” (PROVERBS 16:18).
    DUPLICITY IS THE NAME OF THE JESUIT GAME: “The end justifies the means” & “For the greater glory of God”, now, more commonly, “For the greater good” (because that gets the irreligious on board as well).
    HISTORIAN J.A. WYLIE DESCRIBES THE TREACHERY OF THE JESUITS (1878): “There was no disguise they could not assume, and therefore, there was no place into which they could not penetrate. They could enter unheard the closet of the Monarch, or the Cabinet of the Statesman. They could sit unseen in convocation or General Assembly, and mingle unsuspected in the deliberations and debates. There was no tongue they could not speak, and no creed they could not profess, and thus there was no people among whom they might not sojourn, and no church whose membership they might not enter and whose functions they might not discharge. They could execrate the Pope with the Lutheran, and swear the Solemn League with the Covenantor.” — J. A. Wylie, The History of Protestantism, Vol. II, p. 412.
    Sincerely in Christ’s service,
    Trevor W. Sulllivan, Nanango Christian Faith Centre

  3. The churches were all actual churches. They were also symbolic of the churches from the Resurrection till today. This a list of the approximate dates of each:
    Letters to the Seven Churches:
    Ephesus: The Apostolic Church ≈ 31 – 100
    Smyrna: The Martyr Church ≈ 100 – 312
    Pergamos: The Compromising Church ≈ 312 – 538
    Thyratira: The Roman Catholic Church ≈ 538 -Today
    Sardis: The Reformation Church ≈1517 -1750.
    Philadelphia: The Revival Church ≈1750 -1920.
    Laodicea: The Worldly Church ≈1920 –Today

    Trevor Sullivan is the only one who really knows what he’s talking about, one other gets a few things right. Gore is an RC stooge, possibly a Jesuit himself. John wrote in the final decade of the 1st century AD. Preterism and Dispensationalism came from the 1590ies of the Jesuit Counter Reformation.

    Prophecy complete by 70 AD – give me a break; I can date virtually every event spoken of by Daniel and Revelation in history. “Man of Sin” = the Pope, 538 – till today. Church fathers hadn’t seen enough history except for 2Thess2:1-12.

  4. In this day and age, most human knowledge is actually passed on digitally. Superconductors will soon make this obsolete.
    .
    Hashing will change everything.
    .
    Whenever a new manuscript (MS) is discovered that can be accurately dated prior to the terminus post quem of an existing MS, and the content is the same in both witnesses, this in itself, reveals the antecedent source material for the existing text. In this way, the terminus post quem of the existing MS becomes obsolete and the newly discovered MS becomes the new terminus post quem. This situation remains until the discovery of new evidence, which results with the appropriate amendments to the historical record. This is standard scientific procedure.
    .
    The Gospels existed for two thousand years as the terminus post quem for many sources of historical evidence surrounding the Holy Land at the time of Christ. However, with the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1946, this new evidence immediately pushed the existing terminus post quem of certain Gospel material back to around 50- 100 B.C.. To pre-Christian times.
    .
    Anyone associated with old texts in any meaningful capacity, would certainly understand that since around 2010, the academic milieu has been using an entirely new set of tools and methodology for scriptural examination. With these new computer programs, it is now possible to search unfathomable amounts of digitalised MS’s for key words, passages, etc. This has already changed everything.
    .
    For a few years now, teams in India are in the process of systematically digitising every surviving MS in the country. University teams are methodically going from village to village, temple to temple, collection to collection, etc. This is like a supercharged version of the NGMPP from thirty years ago. It is estimated that around three million items exist. After the digitalisation is done, then the computers will be set to work.
    .
    As an authoritative edited translation requires a standard collation of a minimum of fifteen witnesses, ranging from the earliest to the most complete. This particular project has the unprecedented potential for producing the most complete and most accurate translations of the oldest renditions of a given MS. This is precisely what scholars demand.
    .
    I would guess that some ex-acquaintances will soon be upgrading their existing computers to specialist teams of AI Agents? This is the next step forward. Human scholars poring over dusty MS’s has been obsolete for nearly twenty years. Today’s researchers are digitising everything and feeding it into the computer. The incipient results are already starting to look interesting.
    .
    I’d guess the same is underway with ME MS antiquities? Interesting times.
    .

  5. Most human ‘knowledge’ is generally passed on by word of mouth or in writing. Little of it is really directly and personally experiential!
    .
    Feel free to believe (or ‘know’) whatever somebody says or writes. They’re no doubt telling you because they think their ‘truth’ is in your interest. Their interest is irrelevant, right?

  6. Re: “the great majority of all who express any interest at all in such momentous matters are only ever interested in mystery and fantasy, never in any solid, verifiable truth! This was exactly the case when the Serpent tempted Eve 6,000 years ago”
    .
    You cannot have solid verifiable truth when so many power circles have a vested interest in propagating disinformation, falsehoods and lies. Aas a rational person dealing with ‘facts’ you’re only privileged to make rational and realistic guesses based on what is reasonably possible or probable. That’s your rational brain speaking to you. Anything else is, generally speaking, emotional, feel-good mumbo jumbo.
    .
    Yes, the rationalists say the serpent in the garden was a fantasy, just like in the Zoroastrian and Mesopotamian stories of the Garden of Edom. It comes from the first 4 books of the King James Bible which were deemed direct translations of the medieval Jewish ‘rabbinical scrolls’ known as the Leningrad and Antioch scrolls.
    .
    Those were allegedly the first Jewish rabbinical scrolls on record. You can almost scent the stories of veiled ancient esoteric miracles. Why King James chose to have them directly translated and inserted into the ‘Christian’ Bible is a source of much speculation inevitably centering on the execution of Charles I, the English Revolution and paving the way for the restoration and resettlement of Jews to England by a ‘puritan’ Oliver Cromwell.

  7. Oh and Robert, – I’d also presume that a Church which institutionalised widespread homosexuality and pedophilia within its clerical culture were definitely ‘misinterpreting Gospel scripture’ in a very big way.
    .
    If they got that so very wrong, I guess they got a lot else wrong, right?
    .
    But I guess that’s the kind of scriptural interpretation you subscribe to. Now that’s what the world calls embarrassing.
    .

  8. My apologies to Michael Slavanos.
    I stated that there could be only two possible reasons for rejecting or deflecting the facts I presented about both Futurism and Preterism being Jesuit inventions (Counter-Reformation lies attempting to overthrow Protestantism – therefore clearly false doctrine).
    There is a third possibility, which escaped my attention at the time, (because I always speak from real Scripture as the only immutable Authority and from real proven history. I sometimes make the mistake of assuming others who argue doctrine actually believe Scripture is God’s Words).
    I hadn’t stopped to think that many readers will have already rejected this whole principle, yet claim to be believers – hence making my comments irrelevant in their minds.
    Here is the crunch – the Jesuits have been at work on their Counter-Reformation programme for about 500 years, with such eventual success that most ‘Christians’ today who think they are ‘Evangelical’ or ‘Protestant’ are really Roman Catholic in mindset (they have the mark of the Roman beast “in their foreheads” – they think Roman Catholic (based on ‘Tradition’) as opposed to ‘Protestant’ (based on Scripture alone).
    Such ‘believers’ are not believers in the Biblical sense: i.e. they are not really Bible believers. They may believe some things the Bible says but are happy to entertain contradictory opinions as well! They have no fear of God, but are presumptuous, spruiking their own opinions or the opinions of other men, as if those opinions have authority – this is fanciful – only Almighty God has authority, as He is the Author of all creation.
    Rome is officially based on the (corrupt) ‘authority’ of Tradition and Magesterium – Scripture gets a mention but it is not the real authority, the Church is! Hence Rome reserves the right to accept, reject, contradict, alter, add to, edit, and override Scripture (it’s why we have hundreds of differing ‘Bible’ versions). This position not only contradicts Scripture but contradicts itself.
    Hence as all the Protestants knew that the Pope, who stands in the place of Almighty God, and claims the right to override Scripture, is revealed as the very Antichrist.
    Michael, doctrine does not evolve and change over the years, as Popery claims, it is established Truth, from Scripture alone, and was set down by Christ and the apostles, never to be added to or changed, without the promises of the awful judgment of God on the perpetrator. Don’t take my word for it. Read the Bible (King James Version).
    Therefore all so-called new doctrine or alternative doctrine is just plain lies.
    You need to consider whether you are following Christ (by following Scripture) or following the Roman Antichrist. Beware, the “mark” is evident. You either have the “mind of Christ”, which Paul said believers have, or the mind of Popery, which allows for ever-changing doctrine and ever-changing ‘bibles’.
    Sincerely in Christ’s service,
    Trevor W. Sullivan,
    Nanango Christian Faith Centre.

  9. Poor old Robert I guess your Catholic? Not to worry, you’ve still got your backward medieval Inquisition, – the problem is – its the XXI Century and no one cares! And AI doesn’t care either.
    .
    Sorry about that, you’ll just have to sulk.

  10. Michael Slavanos, the proof of both Jesuit, Counter-Reformation schemes of “interpretation” (forbidden by Scripture), both Futurism and Preaterism, as I have already stated, is in the plain undeniable facts of history which every honest person can verify. If you have not seen it, as you claim, there can only be two possible explanations:
    1. You haven’t looked (even though I laid it all before you);
    2. You don’t want to admit it.
    This is nothing new to me in over 40 years’ experience in such matters. Very few want to know the truth, and many of those are, no doubt, Jesuit plants (or at least, plants trained by Jesuits).
    The Truth is not difficult: it is receiving the Truth that sorts out the sheep and the goats.
    Sincerely in Christ’s service,
    Trevor W. Sullivan,
    Nanango Christian Faith Centre.

  11. Michael Slovanos comments: Trevor W Sullivan, whether or not preterism has substance rests on history and scripture together, not what a Jesuit wrote. Perhaps that Jesuit you cite had some historical insight to the time of John’s writing of Revelation? That’s all that counts. In fact I have heard it said that Darby’s dispensationalism originated with the Jesuits, although I haven’t seen any evidence of that.

  12. The reason why civilisation is recorded starting around India and such latitudes is because the ice-age didn’t affect the equator so badly, everyone far from the equator would have died off on some particularly harsh winter. The melting of an ice-wall is presumed to have led to stories of a great deluge, for example from the Caspian Sea, Black Sea or wherever there was an ice-wall holding back a body of water.
    People of faith need not give up their faith in the philosophies of Jesus or some of the stuff in books of Revelations and Daniel. Take a more austere approach, go minimalistic, you don’t need to swallow the entire bible whole, that’s limiting yourself to someone else’s version of the truth, the someone else people have their own motivations and have been known to burn people at the stake for disagreeing.

  13. Michael Slovanos or Ed.
    I get your point about the migration.
    But there is also the fact of continental drift.
    “Australia’s Aborigines are clearly related to a subgroup of Indians in addition to Melanesians”
    No resemblance at all.
    Australia’s Aborigines and New Guinea natives look so much like Africans that it made me think of how the continent of Australia fits exactly into the African East coast.
    The evidence of man being on Earth keeps going back as the scientists tune their analysis techniques.
    It’s millions of years. I think they are up to 50 million years now and still looking.
    Australia is said to be the oldest continent with regards to the geology.
    The “African-Australian Eve” could have well been on Australian soil but over the other side of the Indian Ocean when Australia-New Guinea was a part of Africa.
    But that doesn’t really matter when looking at the Mediterranean as the centre of Earth with regards to ancient Sumeria etcetera. I think we should be looking at the time before Antediluvian epoch.
    But that gets tricky because you have to jump backwards in time past the mythical Atlantean times and scientists have a difficult time changing their stance on things like that.
    That Rainbow Serpent starts to make more sense with regards to the Garden of Eden story.

  14. Poor old Galains. You wouldn’t know which way was up if you were laying on your back, and you know less about the Catholic Church than I know about possible quantum physics’ impact on the cashew nut. It’s actually a bit embarrassing.

  15. I thought it would go quiet.
    .
    I guess Ed is Roman Catholic, right?
    .
    He would probably do well to take a sabbatical and look into the findings of his own Church, especially those of the Catholic Modernists.
    .
    In response to certain cultural developments of the nineteenth century, primarily centering upon the Germans meticulous new approach to Biblical scholarship, along with Ernst Renan’s publishing of ‘The Life of Jesus’ (1863), the Catholic Church sought to counter these challenging problems via the creation of the Catholic Modernist Movement. This programme attempted to reverse the highly successful German scientific method through which to provide scriptural support to the Bible of faith.
    .
    Despite the Church’s painstaking training and grooming of a generation of scholars, often referred to as ‘academic shock troops,’ the Catholic programme ultimately backfired, as the more they sought to arm younger clerics with the modern tools requisite for operating within the contemporary polemical arena, – the more these clerics began to desert the cause for which they had been recruited.
    .
    Instead of providing the Modernists with the scriptural tools to support to their faith, their meticulously critical scrutiny of the Bible quickly exposed a multitude of inconsistencies and discrepancies that were positively injurious to Church dogma. So, instead of countering the Church opposition,- as intended, the Catholic Modernists were now questioning and subverting what they were supposed to be defending. Alfred Loisy and Antonio Fogazzaro summed up this ironic dilemma.
    .
    ‘Whilst all this was going on in the ivory towers, many of the better educated Europeans deemed it quite acceptable, or indeed, more respectable to be a ‘Wagnerian’ instead of a Christian.’
    .
    And then we had Garibaldi’s capturing of the Papal States and their integration into a unified Italy in 1870, which effectively reduced Catholicism to a non-secular power. This didn’t help matters either.
    .
    In 1902, Pope Pius X placed Alfred Loisy’s works on the ‘Inquisition Index’ of forbidden books, then in 1904, he issued two encyclicals opposing all scholarship which questioned the origins and early history of Christianity. [That’s right Ed].
    .
    In its attempted defence, the Vatican withdrew into its tried and tested medieval mind set, decrying it own self-created Modernists as ‘heretics,’ which resulted with the Vatican’s formal banning of Modernism as a heresy in 1907.
    .
    No wonder the Vatican’s hardliners at the Ecole Biblique et Archologique Franchise de Jerusalem came to dominate control of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
    .

  16. It’s incredible to anyone with a rational mind, and yet so obviously true, based on the comments that always follow articles like this, that the great majority of all who express any interest at all in such momentous matters are only ever interested in mystery and fantasy, never in any solid, verifiable truth!
    This was exactly the case when the Serpent tempted Eve 6,000 years ago (Genesis 3). God had already told Adam everything needful to him, including a strict prohibition against eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, but for the distracted mind of Eve, mystery from the Devil was more attractive than plain Truth and life itself! – hence, all that followed in the misery and destruction of all the earth for 6,000 years and ongoing, which was the due penalty (“death” – i.e. separation from God and His blessings, both temporal and eternal).
    I know that very few read the Bible, but it would be interesting to know, of those who do, how many only read it, (or bits of it, or some perverted writings that falsely claim to be ‘the Bible’), only to feed their own lust for fantasy.
    In the end it won’t matter, because all who approach God’s Words with such frivolity and blasphemy in their hearts will receive no benefit from it, and will be justly committed to the “fire (that) is not quenched” (Mark 9) which Jesus warned about.
    Only those whom God has given “an honest and good heart” (Luke 8) have the right attitude to approach God’s Words with reverence and fear, and receive His blessing.
    Sincerely in Christ’s service
    Trevor W. Sullivan
    Nanango Christian Faith Centre.

  17. Michael Slovanos comments: Debbie, you might ask yourself where all those dispersed peoples of China, Polynesia, North America, South America and Australia came from. Australia’s Aborigines are clearly related to a subgroup of Indians in addition to Melanesians. I seriously doubt the evolutionary model. What makes more sense is the migratory model that began in Babylon when God scattered the people and confused their language. Genetics also tells us mankind is derived from one “African Eve”, which also aligns with biblical history.

  18. Debbie with Reality you may find some answers by searching the following..(form your own opinion)

    1)Photos of large neolithic buildings around the world.(Nephilim era)
    2)North America-Hopi Indians (Ant People.)
    3) The three Pyramids in Egypt China and Mexico was said to be built to the scale of the Orion Belt.
    4)Polynesia has giant statues on Easter Island.
    5)The Vatican has a serpent room (photos and videos)
    Aust aboriginal dreamtime has stories of the rainbow serpent.
    6)All the world leaders all agreed to Agenda 2030.
    7) Read the book description of he Kali Yuga Shift at amazon.com.au.
    8)The Nazca Lines in Peru that can be seen from above.

  19. If we take a step back and look at all of this, it’s obvious it is all centred around the Mediterranean.
    It is sort of like an ancient Mediterranean Gossip Column.
    I wonder what the ancient Nth and Sth American people said.
    Or the Australian Aboriginal.
    Or the ancient Polynesian people said.
    Oh! Hang on!
    That’s right.
    The Roman Catholic Church mandated all of those records to be wiped out.
    Why would that be?
    And why do the clever people here in these comment sections at CN keep that Mediterranean Gossip alive? Ancient the Egypt, Sumerian and ancient Greece and other associated near and far East stuff is gospel to them. Never mind the rest of the world.
    Does the Bible mention any wise men coming from Australia or Nth or Sth America? Maybe Tahiti said something notable.
    Not that I know if
    In the Mediterranean Gossip Column it’s all he said that they said and that it is written so it must be true sort of stuff.
    Even when ancient Egyptian and Summation texts and alike are translated by God knows who, people take them as truthful or correct translations and then repeat them as if they know the facts.
    They are not facts. They are most probably heavily manipulated to suit their objectives.
    I would love to get an unhindered tour of the Vatican archives, plus the Smithsonian vaults.
    Then we might have something real to talk about.
    But that is not allowed is it.
    We are not allowed to know the truth are we.

  20. Whatever happened to “love your neighbour.”

    Not much fun when investment in fireworks and blowin’ them out of existence is way more profitable for some.

  21. Praeterism came from the Jesuits, NOT the Bible!
    All Praeterists follow Rome, NOT Scripture!
    Praeterism did NOT exist until Luis De Alcazar invented it to cover Papa Rome’s fat ‘666’ acre – see excerpt from Wikipedia for the basic facts:
    Luis del Alcázar (Ludovicus ab Alcasar, Louis of Alcazar) (1554–1613) was a Spanish Jesuit theologian.
    Life
    He was the eldest son of Melchor del Alcázar, a jurist,[1] and nephew of the poet Baltasar del Alcázar, and was born in Seville. He studied at Seville, Cordova and Salamanca, entered the Society of Jesus in 1568, and became a priest in 1578. Alcázar was a friend of the Jesuit Juan de Pineda (1552–1637) (also a pupil of Jerome de Prado),[2] and the Dominican Agustin Salucio; he died in Rome.[3][4]
    Works
    He is known for his Vestigatio arcani sensus in Apocalypsi (1614) published after his death, putting forward what would later be called a preterist view of Biblical prophecy, in commentary on the Book of Revelation; his work is regarded as the first major application of the method of interpretation of prophecy by reading in terms of the author’s contemporary concerns.[5] His view was that everything in the Apocalypse, apart from the three final chapters, referred to events that had already come to pass when John of Patmos was writing. …… Henry Hammond was an exception, among English Protestants, in following Alcázar’s interpretation.[10]
    In a world ruled by the Roman Antichrist, it is very obvious why real Protestants are not popular speakers – so long as they promote something for Rome, Rome is happy, but they do not realize that they are enslaved to the Antichrist when they join with him, as did Billy Graham and all the ‘greats’. Some of course, are Jesuit agents themselves.
    Sincerely in Christ’s service,
    Trevor W Sullivan, Nanango Christian Faith Centre.

  22. 1599 Geneva Bible
    Revelation 11:1 [a]Then was given me a reed like unto a rod, and the Angel stood by, saying, Rise and [b]mete the Temple of God, and the Altar, and them that worship therein.

    2 [c]But the [d]Court which is without the Temple [e]cast out, and mete it not: for it is given unto the [f]Gentiles, and the holy city shall they tread under foot, [g]two and forty Months.

    3 But [h]I will give power unto my two witnesses and they shall [i]prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.

    4 These [j]are two olive trees, and two candlesticks, standing before the God of the earth.

    5 [k]And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouths and devoureth their enemies: for if any man would hurt them, thus must he be killed.

    6 These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophesying, and have power over waters to turn them into blood, and to smite the earth with all manner plagues, as often as they will.

    7 [l]And when they have [m]finished their testimony, [n]the beast that cometh out of the bottomless pit, shall make war against them, and shall [o]overcome them, and kill them,

    8 And their corpses shall lie in the [p]streets of the great city, which [q]spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, [r]where our Lord also was crucified.
    +
    As far as I remember the two olive trees represent the Royal House Of Judah (which are Nordic Germans, not those liars who call themselves Jews) and the House of Israel (Lost Tribes of Israel, Anglo-Saxon-Celtic-Scandinavian-Nordics), the two candlesticks representing the faithful, being two candlesticks (also called lamp stands in other versions) of the seven, whereas 2 were faithful and five were not…Those who ‘Come to Christ’ will have their branch grafted into the Tribe of Israel (Tribe of God, not a place in the middle east) ‘Olive tree’ and the Tribe of Judah will remember who they are (finally!).
    +
    Judaism is Satanism, it is Anti-Christ, as their ‘Satan’ (one who opposes God’s plan) embodies the entirety of the ‘Jews’ in the material plane which are sometimes called ‘The Children of Cain’ or ‘The Serpent People’ in Asia.
    +
    Examples…The Anti-Defamation League is considered some of the teeth and claws of Satan, the twelve highest B’nai B’rith, the highest ranked ‘Jew’ only Freemason order, is considered ‘the brains of Satan’ and the Cahilla/Kahal/Kahilla is the 1.922+million ‘Jews’, beginning with their uncrowned King (When ‘crowned’, is then I bet is revealed as the Anti-Christ/Mahdi to some of us), two Princes and an ambassador, under them are seven, who each have seven under them and so on until you reach over 1.922+ million ‘Jews’, equally divided between east and west, RUNNING THE WORLD! ‘We will rule through terror and make believe’…
    +
    They control the media…’the make believe’ part mixed with terror. They put on a show for the world, it is all theatrical of course, of our supposed self-governance right across the world, actors reading scripts on THEIR media, we keep calling them politicians because we don’t know any better, some might guess that is by design. They have all our politicians/actors ‘on the hook’, so who do you blame for the climate scam lowering our standard of living, the useless, toxic an un-renewability of ‘renewables’, who do you blame for all decades of attacks on the viability of farming in this country, who do you blame for the mass immigration, the homelessness of Australians while migrants fill public housing by priority, which is well-known to be the Coudonhove-Kalergi Plan? To ‘breed out white people’ is called GENOCIDE! Those Jews, they give themselves a free pass to do as they please! YOU BLAME THE GOVERNMENT! Who are all ‘on the hook!’ They are all secret society…’If you took Judaism out of Freemasonry what have you got eft? Nothing!’ Quoted from some Jew. So Freemasonry and all other secret societies all do exactly the same initiation rituals right up to the 33rd level, the B’nai B’rith -Jew only- order being the ultimate world authority in that secret world.
    +
    They control education/science too with funding, even medicine too [1], so with the media control, government control, judicial control (Talmudic/Satan’s Law/Admiralty law/Contract Law/Administrative Law/Corporate Law/Law of the Sea/Law of the Holy See-Who is in charge of the Vatican?)- I have explained what Satan is to them people, it is the Jews law) all the banks, investment funds, loans without usury (interest-competitive advantage across the world), control of our resources, they at least attempt with a massive effort right across the board to control what you know and what you think you know to be true. In fact they have created a Kingdom of Lies. Created a fictional reality! ‘We will rule by terror and make believe..’ Protocols of Zion.
    +
    Footnote 1- Wikipedia “The caduceus is the staff carried by Hermes in Greek mythology and consequently by Hermes Trismegistus in Greco-Egyptian mythology. The same staff was borne by other heralds like Iris, the messenger of Hera. The short staff is entwined by two serpents, sometimes surmounted by wings. In Roman iconography, it was depicted being carried in the left hand of Mercury, the messenger of the gods…”You should see the pornographic version with the Baphomet! In that version the rod is Hermes (of the Hermetic Principles)/Mercury’s penis (NASA rocket! do you get the joke they made?), it is the same Nephilim, they aren’t ‘mythology’, it actually is a symbol which has been decoded and means ‘Hermaphrodite/Nephilim’, there is a documentary on it ‘Apollyon the Destroyer is a Hermaphrodite’ I think it is called, on bitchute. I dare say this symbol is used to show is in charge and has been in charge of Medicine for well over a hundred years now! Satanists! Big Pharmaceutical? “Pharmakeia is an ancient Greek word meaning the use of drugs, potions, or magic. It is the root for modern words like pharmacy, but in the Bible, it is translated as sorcery or witchcraft.”
    +
    They rule from the shadows, with what is like an intricate spiders web across the world of secret societies/corporations, history has been completely changed, the world is full of an old world style buildings with an obvious AI written history, some of the work of the past is like pure art that we can’t replicate today, especially with a hammer and chisel, horse and cart…B’nai B’rith gave the game away to me, with their allowing Jewish women to join their order. The why of it. ‘To represent the spirit of their mother, Lilith/Isis/Ishtar/Kali’ who is also Hera from the previous Wikipedia quote, who married Zeus (its father Lucifer!) also Aphrodite (with Hermes -Hermaphrodite, they both were), Iris, Persephone, Medusa (‘Men froze like stone in terror’), Artemis + Apollo (NASA Rockets!), Apollyon the Destroyer, Helios (of the easily disproven Heliocentric model- fictional solar system!), Dionysus, Diana, Britannia the Great, Europa, Paris, Achilles, Alexander and Alexandra the Great…Baal, Baphomet (find a detailed picture of this and you will see the Rod of Hermes, but the penis is the Baphomets), Moloch. ‘The Whore of Babylon’, ‘The Beast from the Pit’, ‘The Man of lawlessness’, ‘The Son of Perdition’. ‘The King/Queen with many names’.
    +
    Now this isn’t what they advertise to the world about who they really are is it? What they publicly tell us is completely inverted from the truth/reality, which is purely Satanic! They are the ‘chosen of Lucifer’, revealed in their Kabbalah, the ‘Serpent people’, ‘I will make them the synagogue of Satan!’ said Jesus, ‘The Children of Cain’ they are, John 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he hath been a murderer from the [a]beginning, and [b]abode not in the [c]truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh he of his [d]own: for he is a liar, and the [e]father thereof.
    +
    45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.”
    +
    The ‘spiritual war’ is with them in the material plane! For they are the representatives of Satan and his demons in the spiritual realm, in the material realm and they firmly believe that. They want to ‘spiritually murder you’, before they kill you…what is that? To separate you from the truth/reality/God is my best short explanation! ‘Space may be the final frontier but it is made in a Hollywood basement…’…Kingdom of Lies! Everything is connected. Their ‘spirit’ infests everything!

  23. Really Ed?
    .
    Which part are you contesting exactly?, can you be more precise please? So we can continue the discussion further.
    .

  24. Michael Slovanos comments: Galains d’Vienne, your fantastical version of the gospel sounds like something the neo-gnostics would dredge up. There are differing versions of what the New Jerusalem refers to but none in any credible theological circles the one you are claiming.

  25. Since the time of Rome’s installation of its Herodian puppet rulers, Judea had essentially been split into two distinct priestly factions: [i]. The illegitimate Herodian priests who occupied the Temple of Jerusalem under the authority of Rome, and [ii]. The legitimate Zadokite priests who were exiled out of Jerusalem. Jesus belonged to the latter group: the Order of Melchizedek.
    .
    As the Zadokites no longer held control of the Temple of Jerusalem they were forced to rebuild the temple elsewhere [N.B. This procedure was no different to the contemporary Tibetan Dalai Lama rebuilding his temple and government in exile in Dharamsala, India]. This location was known as the ‘New Jerusalem,’ and despite what most ‘believe,’ the vast majority of the important aspects concerning Jesus’s ministry and Jerusalem, i.e., the money-changer incident, trial, crucifixion and ascension, etc, were in actuality, references to the New Jerusalem, i.e. the Jerusalem in exile.
    .
    As the corpus surrounding Jesus’s ministry were composed by, and for, this particular priesthood, the contemporary Jerusalem they were writing about – was not the same as the Jerusalem of the Old Testament, – which was now under Roman ‘puppet’ administration.
    .
    After Rome installed a statue of Emperor Gaius Caligula (A.D. 12-41) within the Temple of Jerusalem, – a blasphemous profanity in the eyes of the traditional Zadokite priests, – it was then, in A.D. 40, when the various Jewish leaders instigated the conference in Damascus with regards to their latest position with Rome. These meetings continued over the next few years.
    .
    In the contemporary Pesher code, the exiled Zadokite priests always used the singular (Gk. Hierousalm) when referring to ‘Jerusalem,’ and the plural (Gk. Hierosolyma) when referring to the ‘New Jerusalem.’ So for example, when Saul/Paul was said to have travelled from Jerusalem to Jerusalem (Acts. 11: 22, 27-30, 12: 25), which superficially appears as another seemingly absurd statement, what we are actually reading is an accurate description of Saul’s journey between the two distinct locations, – and his mission between the two competing communities of priests.
    .
    Moreover, the Pesher code also employs the present tense – ‘in these days’ – for the solstices, or the past tense – ‘in those days’ – for the equinoxes. Through a simple but strict interchanging of words the Pesharist scribes accurately conveyed the precise details as follows, i.e., ‘in the days these’ (Summer Solstice), or ‘in these days’ (Winter Solstice), or likewise, ‘in the days those’ (Vernal Equinox), or ‘in those the days’ (Autumnal Equinox).
    .
    So, not only do we know that Saul was travelling between the two Jerusalems, i.e., the two Churches, but we can also pinpoint the exact time of his journey to the Winter Solstice of A.D. 43.
    .
    [quote]. – ‘And in these days (winter solstice A.D. 43) came prophets from Jerusalem (Gk. Hierosolyma – i.e. New Jerusalem) to Antioch’ (Acts. 11: 27). . . . ‘And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem (Gk. Hierousalam – i.e. Jerusalem), when they had fulfilled their ministry, . . .’ (Acts. 12: 25).
    .
    When comparing the archaeological ground plan of the New Jerusalem with the details preserved in the manuscripts recovered from the site, it then becomes clear, that most of the important events surrounding Jesus’s ministry prior to the Jewish expulsion from Judea were those pertaining to the events surrounding the New Jerusalem and its wider environs.
    .
    This is but one example of how the scribes composed their sectarian texts. Everything was purposely written to convey accuracy of reading. Any inaccuracy of readings mostly derive the reader’s untrained inaccuracies of reading.
    .
    The superficial confusion is further exacerbated as the New Jerusalem was to a lesser extent referred to as ‘Damascus.’ This term appears to have been used following the community’s evacuation of New Jerusalem and relocation to Damascus. Many of the contemporary churches were similarly encoded.
    .

  26. Just look at the leadership these days with out-of-control liars running everything and ask yourself was it somehow better in ancient Rome. There were so many cooks in the bible kitchen it’s a miracle anything useful or true survived. Another commenter said Revelations was by a guy called John of Zebedee who predated all these churches. To me the churches thing reads like a cut and paste. Why does it need an intro ? It’s there to legitimise these churches. If the bible was all true they would not have tortured disbelievers. It’s obvious it is cooked and it’s totally naive to think it could come down since Rameses 2 wrote Genesis, without being edited. It’s even used or abused by the selectively truthful judiciary, which needs some divine authority to pin to itself, like every other master of statecraft. The rap song “Truth Is Outta Style” by MC 900 foot Jesus first appeared in 1990, that’s 36 years ago, people should have wised up by now. It’s always been outta style.

  27. “Were the seven churches referenced in the Book of Revelation real or symbolic?”

    Both.
    Like virtually every other biblical account

Leave a Reply

https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v7.0&appId=https://www.facebook.com/groups/cairnsnews

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading