By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
ANYONE who remembers the “historic Apollo mission landings on the Moon” 57 years ago should be asking this question: Why aren’t the Artemis crew landing on the Moon again with the massive advances in technology between then and now?
The official Artemis story is that the four astronauts will test the systems of the Orion spacecraft, complete a flyby of the moon, and conduct other tests to support future Artemis missions to establish the first human base on the surface of the moon. They say landing on the moon again is not a necessary objective at this stage.
Perhaps we are being a tad naive, but we do know various people have questioned the veracity of the Apollo mission, which involved an astonishing six trips to the Moon between July 20, 1969 and December 1972, with a total of 12 astronauts walking on the Moon.
A quite devastating critique of the Apollo Mission was published by the late Dave McGowan, a Los Angeles writer, whose 14-part series titled Wagging the Moondoggie in 2009 raised a whole range of “problems” with the Apollo mission.
These included the fact that “moon rocks” i.e. lunar meteorites meteorite samples gathered from Antarctica by NASA are virtually indistinguishable from NASA’s collection of “Moon rocks” and that the “Moon rocks” donated to the Dutch national museum turned out to be petrified wood.
And then there are the questionable European Space Agency photos taken by its unmanned SMART-1 probe in 2003 and NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, whose cameras have reportedly imaged the Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 landing sites. Some of these photos appear to show tracks made in the lunar surface by the Apollo missions including a left-over lunar module.
McGowan even questioned the lunar probe itself with a high-resolution photograph revealing some curious and very rough engineering such as the randomly riveted plates of metal on the exterior and an exterior “that looks like a tubular aluminum framework covered with Mylar and old Christmas wrapping paper”.
There are, of course, the hyper-sceptics who don’t even believe space travel is real or that humans live on a globe. Yes, we can question the Apollo missions, as many have, but that does not make space travel as a whole some colossal conspiracy, a fantasy designed to mislead or distract the masses on a global scale.
We should keep in mind that in 1966, McGowan’s deep scepticism aside, the Soviet Luna 9 spacecraft achieved the first controlled soft landing on the lunar surface, followed later that year by Luna 10, the first spacecraft to enter orbit around the Moon. Then in December 1968, Apollo 8 became the first crewed spacecraft to orbit the Moon – exactly what the Artemis mission is doing 57 years later.
Another bit of context to remember is that the first rocket fired into lower space was a V2 rocket, that the Americans captured from the defeated Germans after World War 2. The rocket was taken to White Sands, New Mexico, and launched on October 21st, 1946, with a movie camera attached that produced the first photographs of earth from 60-miles-high (120km) space.
President John F. Kennedy’s national goal for the 1960s of “landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth” announced on May 25, 1961, was accomplished on the Apollo 11 mission, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed their Apollo Lunar Module (LM) on July 20, 1969.
This happened while Michael Collins remained in lunar orbit in the command and service module (CSM), and all three apparently landed safely on Earth in the Pacific Ocean on July 24 and right there is another problem – only four days lapsed from the landing until the return to Earth?.
We are told that the Artemis launch rocket is the biggest, fastest, most powerful and advanced launch rocked ever built and its mission to around the Moon and back is 10 days, yet it only took four days for Apollo 11 to land and then return to Earth? It’s just another of so many questions around the Apollo mission.
Artemis launched in spectacular fashion last Wednesday (US EST) and is due for the Moon orbit this Monday. It will take Artemis five days to enter lunar orbit from the translunar injection burn to take it out of Earth’s orbit, and four days to return from the lunar sphere of influence to Earth re-entry.
Approximately 650 million people worldwide watched this first landing on television.[2] Five subsequent Apollo missions also landed astronauts on the Moon, the last, Apollo 17, in December 1972. In these six spaceflights, twelve people walked on the Moon.
They never went there first time.. there is documented irrefutable proof.. it was all filmed in a large military hangar on a military base. Note that this first moon landing happened during a time of great unrest in the US, = i.e. Vietnam war and all those killed there for no good reason etc.. people demonstrating about all this.. It was used as a distraction.. Just the same as the Artemis is being used re Trump;s great failure in the middle east.. They always have to look like they are winning at something..
Don’t look at this terrible failure by the US in Iran – look at Artemis and how great we are !!
Bill Francis said – “… The reason for skepticism about the first moon landing was transit through the Van Allen radiation belt…”
There were way more reasons than that, way closer to home…
[ https://www.bitchute.com/video/PLV7k0vuAh1p ]
NASA – Never A Straight Answer.
They say a leopard doesn’t change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes. NASA – an institutionalised nest of grifters, snakes and liars.
The reason for skepticism about the first moon landing was transit through the Van Allen radiation belt and the effect it would have on the astronauts – if it didn’t kill them. It was suggested that to properly protect them, the extra weight from the amount of lead required would prevent the rocket from getting off the ground. It hasn’t been mentioned this time around either, and I suspect today’s astronauts have no greater protection than the Apollo astronauts had. Their physical condition on return will quite likely indicate whether they actually left Earth orbit, and whether the whole episode wasn’t AI generated.
puffin’billy said – “… Artemis II Astronaut Caught With ‘Three Legs’ in Live Feed…”
Well folks, let’s not be jumping to any conclusions on this one, after all NASA wouldn’t be looking to pull a fast one on us, right?
Maybe we should be examining ALL possibilities first, before wildly throwing accusations around.
How about this? Now I know it’s quite a stretch, but try to stay with me here on this folks – what if that third humungous appendage wasn’t actually a LEG, what if the astronaut in question just has an ENORMOUS willy? Hey, it IS an astronaut, the Best of the Best, after all, and you know what they say. Would it be such a surprise, such an unxpected revelation, if he really DID have a leg-sized rocket in his pocket?
I know, I know, an absolutely amazing proposition, but still, you have to admit it’s at least PLAUSIBLE, right? Do they make space suits for that?
Anyway, far better to chew the fat, so to speak, leaving no stones unturned as we try to get to the bottom of this, than to cast aspersions on the honesty and integrity of such a revered and historically reliable institution as NASA.
Artemis II Astronaut Caught With ‘Three Legs’ in Live Feed — NASA Moon Mission Exposed as AI Hoax
https: //thepeoplesvoice.tv/artemis-ii-astronaut-three-legs-nasa-moon-mission-ai-hoax/
Nothing NASA do is the truth…
I would like to believe Kubrick if he was a source but making movies of a moon landing is not confirmation that there was no moon landing, and the titbits dropped in his otherwise fairly awful movie “The Shining” don’t prove anything much. There is a profit motive for faking things but I don’t believe the Saturn V rocket launchings were faked and that is probably the hardest part to get right. You can hardly get lost on the way, there or coming back.
The fake moon landings story may have been started by the DeepState to undermine Nixon’s legacy, they put so much effort into that, they hated him because he stopped the Vietnam war and came out with the truth about the gold standard ( by dumping it ).
Assuming everything was above board with NASA the reason why anything takes twice as long now and is nearly impossible to do is because of red tape, OH&S, kickbacks, software updates/upgrades etc. Has “Artemis” got a transgender on board, if not why not.
Lilith? I thought she was Satan’s “wife”.
Hey folks,
Speaking of fakery, check out this video from Bitchute…
[ https://www.bitchute.com/video/XTJDQ4gJMYYs ]
Notice anything suspicious here?
Okay, let’s just spill the beans and cut to the chase – that’s not Scott Ritter, folks. It looks like Scott Ritter, it has Scott Ritter’s face, it has Scott Ritter’s voice, but it’s NOT Scott Ritter.
What you’re looking at in that Bitchute video is an AVATAR generated by some AI platform which is MIMMICKING Scott Ritter, which is PRETENDING to be Scott Ritter, which is hijacking Scott Ritter’s fame and notoriety to push it’s OWN manufactured narrative.
You can tell fairly easily that it’s NOT Scott Ritter, that it’s just an AI Avatar reading a script. There are actually a LOT of tells, a LOT of giveaways, a LOT of imperfections in the facsimile which betray it’s artificial nature.
Take Avatar Scott’s posture, folks, which barely changes at all but DOES cycle repeatedly through precisely the SAME motions. with a somewhat peculiar carbon-copy semi-shrug of the shoulders, over and over again.
And what about Avatar Scott’s word-perfect articulation, his FLAWLESS rendition of the unusually academically well-structured script, in an emotionally sterile monotone delivery with a passively frozen facial expression, all quite uncharacteristic of the REAL Scott Ritter.
And there’s other stuff too, all of which blows the whistle that you’re looking at an AI generated approximation of the REAL Scott Ritter.
A salient point to be made here is that these AI avatars are presently still evident as fakes to a halfway discerning viewer – so have your wits about you when watching ANY online delivery, as there’s very likely much more of this fake shit heading our way. The first casualty of war is the Truth, as they say, and we have genocidal baby-eating psychopaths making war against all of us from just about every conceivable vector lately.
A concomitant issue is that soon enough, we’ll not even be able to distinguish the computer-generated fakes from real people – so don’t be relying on hero-worship or notions of loyalty or popularity, be prepared to think for yourselves, folks, and don’t be just blindly parroting whatever you see on a news channel or some social media portal.
Just a bit of Moon trivia for you is that the same sort of uranium mined at Rum Jungle Northern Territory in the 1960/70’s ,the same used at Maralinga South Australia to test British nukes is found in the Moon.
Something that caught my attention is that the dunny doesn’t work , I am thinking that NASA engineers accepted the cheapest quote from some dodgy Chinese company most likely the same mob who supplied the EU with all the Covid breathing stuff that all turned out to be duds .
NASA can’t land on the moon because their fake footage would be ripped apart. NASA cannot penetrate the firmament. The occultist Jack Parsons rockets’ end up in the Bermuda triangle.
Julian Assange/Wikileaks released new angles of footage of the moon landings, showing them as utterly staged/faked. Stanley Kubrick admitted his role.
No stars in the sky on the moon? Nope. Not one.
Mars rover? Shot on Devon Island in Canada. Nothing that NASA do is real whatsoever. A ‘spacewalk’ is done in a pool. The ISS is in a pool. The rockets end up in the Bermuda Triangle, there is never ‘Astronauts’ on any of these showpieces.
After Admiral Byrd’s TV interview in the early 50’s about Antarctica, as he led many expeditions, taking a whole fleet every time and the undiscovered land (said something like) ‘over the other side of Antarctica is more land, bigger than the United States, that no man has ever laid his eyes on’, the Antarctic Treaty was formed and so was NASA not long afterwards. You cannot go to Antarctica without permission, you are stopped by a signature countries military, HMAS Hobart is known to patrol there, some adventurers tested it out, were intercepted by that ship,
Absolutely nothing NASA do is real! It is time for us to wake up to the real world, it is all around us.
NASA ‘Spacecraft’/Rocket names
Artemis= Lilith/Kali/Isis/Ishtar/Aphrodite/Persephone/Medusa/Brittania the Great/Nike/Europa/Paris/Achilles/Cupid/Dionysus/Alexander the Great/Alexandra the Great/Moloch/Baphomet/Baal…Helios (of the Heliocentric model), Apollo/Apollyon the Destroyer and many more…
Apollo= Artemis/Lilith/Kali/Isis/Ishtar/Aphrodite/Persephone/Medusa/Brittania the Great/Nike/Europa/Paris/Achilles/Cupid/Dionysus/Alexander the Great/Alexandra the Great/Moloch/Baphomet/Baal…Helios (of the Heliocentric model), Apollyon the Destroyer and many more…
Mercury=Hermes (sibling of the above, Apollyon the Destroyer).
Showing their allegiance…To Lucifer and his Kingdom of Lies. Are we there yet?
Nasa ” NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER ” sports fans
I suspect the movie sound stage used in the first Moon landing got turned into a car park since movie making has gone computer generated so going for a spin into out there somewhere above the black stump will have do do .
They could have flown to Marble Bar or Cooper pedy seeing the landscape isn’t all that much different to the Moon surface.
I was 6 feet away from the space capsule during its world tour and all I saw was a frame wrapped in silver foil so how anyone travelled through the Earth’s atmosphere in that thing is beyond my scope of think
[…] Source link […]
My favourite astronot is Don Pettit. He said the reason for not going back was that the stupids at NASA lost the technology. If only NASA could be tasked with maintaining mRNA tech and digital ID, there’d be a point to their job.
https: //api.bitchute.com/video/K4LZP7xnOikl/ The Best of Don Pettit
The author said – “… in December 1968, Apollo 8 became the first crewed spacecraft to orbit the Moon…”
Did it? Did it really? Really really REALLY?
And the author said – “… President John F. Kennedy’s national goal for the 1960s of “landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth” announced on May 25, 1961, was accomplished on the Apollo 11 mission, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed their Apollo Lunar Module (LM) on July 20, 1969…”
Well, let’s all just agree that SOMETHING was accomplished. What that SOMETHING actually was is subject to debate.
Enquiring minds would like to know why certain government stooges have been confessing on their DEATHBEDS to murdering potential Apollo Program WHISTLE BLOWERS in the midst of the race to the Moon. Why oh why would they feel the need to MURDER anyone, and why would a potential whistle blower have anything to blow the whistle on in the first place, if it was all legit and above board?
Come on, folks, you know the answer. It was all one big choreographed illusion, one big steaming pile of BS. Matter of fact, it still is. Now seems we need ANOTHER big distraction and ANOTHER big injection of hard cash into the almighty NASA BS factory.
If and when the TRUTH finally dawns on the world majority about the FAKE Moon missions, then and NOW, and they finally ACCEPT that fact, then the American Empire will be the laughing stock of history. Don’t know who the bigger clowns were and ARE, really, the ones performing the stage show or the ones believing it all.
Artemis 2 is FAKE | We Never Went to the Moon:
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDbcTmLFGdY
THE ARTEMIS II LAUNCH 🚀 IN 66.6 SECONDS:
rumble.com/v780m1u-the-artemis-ii-launch-in-66.6-seconds-candid-truth-april-fools-.html
(6:33pm…gotta get the 666 in there):
h ttps://old.bitchute.com/video/q2wQ72lH5LEL/