By staff writers
How did the Labor Party manage to rush its hated Hate Speech bill through the parliament on January 20, 2026? Or the attached bill to initiate a gun buyback scheme which Queenslanders opposed by 67 per cent in a News Ltd public poll held in December?
PM Albanese, although ignorant of the basic tenets of law, like the Liberals, believe that parliament is supreme and can do as it pleases. Many members of the judiciary naively have the same belief.
Nearly all of the university lecturers were trained under the same tertiary curriculum which their pupils, now magistrates and judges put into practice when in court. This is why Maritime Magistrates Courts simply follow the parliamentary dictum of sovereignty when it is the people who are actually sovereign.
Numerous legal scholars have questioned summary jurisdiction because at Common Law and Chapter Three of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1901 every accused person is entitled to have their case heard by a jury. Furthermore as Dr John Wilson maintains a jury can nullify a repugnant ‘law’ when hearing a case and the judiciary must take notice, because the people are the final arbiters.
District Court judges on appeals imbued by Dicey blindly follow a Magistrate’s decision. Similarly the Supreme Court which sometimes can trim the edges.
Other researchers maintain Australia is largely governed by Canon law. Canon law is the internal, oldest continuously functioning legal system in the Western world, governing the Catholic Church’s organization, sacraments, and hierarchy. It consists of 1,752 laws—codified in 1983 for the Latin Church—aimed at ordering ecclesial life, safeguarding rights, and promoting the “salvation of souls.”
This subject we will leave for another day.
Here we analyse Dicey’s parliamentary sovereignty with the essence of Plato The Republic as a valuable research tool.
Plato’s ideal and just state is an aristocracy, the rule of the best. He believed leaders needed to be wise and trained in how to run a state, just as captains of ships are trained in how to run a ship.
In constitutional law,
A.V. Dicey’s (1835–1922) conception of parliamentary sovereignty is the bedrock of the UK’s unwritten constitution. His theory, famously articulated in An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885), defines Parliament as the supreme legal authority.
Dicey’s doctrine is traditionally split into two “limbs”:
- Positive Limb: Parliament has the right to “make or unmake any law whatever” on any subject.
- Negative Limb: No person or body (including courts) has the right to override or set aside the legislation of parliament
Core Tenets of the Diceyan View
- Unlimited Legislative Authority: Parliament can legislate on anything, from extending its own life (e.g., the Septennial Act 1715) to abolishing fundamental rights.
- No Binding of Successors: One Parliament cannot pass a law that a future Parliament cannot repeal. This is maintained through the doctrine of implied repeal, where a later Act automatically overrides a prior inconsistent one.
- Legal vs. Political Sovereignty: Dicey distinguished “legal sovereignty” (the absolute power of Parliament) from “political sovereignty,” which resides with the electorate. He argued that while Parliament is legally omnipotent, it is practically limited by the “external” fear of popular resistance and the “internal” character of the lawmakers themselves.
Modern Challenges to the Doctrine
The “absolutist” Diceyan view has faced significant pressure in the 20th and 21st centuries:
- The Rule of Law: Critics argue that if the rule of law is the ultimate controlling factor, then Parliament cannot be truly absolute. In the landmark Jackson v Attorney General (2005) case, several judges suggested obiter that courts might reject legislation that attempted to subvert the rule of law or abolish judicial review.
- New Zealand’s “Quiet Revolution”: In New Zealand, which follows the Diceyan tradition, former President of the Court of Appeal Sir Robin Cooke suggested that some common law rights “lie so deep” that even Parliament cannot override them (e.g., in Taylor v NZ Poultry Board). (Magna Carta and 1688 Bill of Rights enshrined in Australian law)
- Human Rights and Devolution: The Human Rights Act 1998 and the devolution of powers to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have created practical limits. While Westminster technically retains the power to override these, constitutional conventions (like the Sewel Convention) make it politically difficult or impossible to do so.
- Australia’s Modification: Australia does not follow the “purest form” of Diceyan sovereignty because its Parliament’s powers are limited by a codified constitution and the High Court’s power of judicial review.
In Australia numerous lawyers, magistrates and judges, indeed politicians themselves mistakenly believe that Dicey’s parliament is supreme.
This is a political misjudgement as the parliament indeed is not sovereign. One cannot put the cart before the horse. If there were no people then there would be no parliament, therefore without people the parliament cannot exist.
Take one step back and it is entirely evident the people are supreme, sovereign. The people are the final arbiters which is why elections, the cornerstone of democracy, are embedded into the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia Act 1901.
One could ask why political parties are not mentioned in the Constitution?
Similarly any reference to a premier or a prime minister cannot be found in the Constitution.
Ah! they say but we have the Westminister Tradition, yes, and according to the late Constitutional analyst and former MHR Arthur Chresby, this UK derived conspiracy of the oligarchs is a concoction of the corrupt political parties enabling them to take control of and manipulate the parliament.
It has no Constitutional validity and Westminster is not mentioned in the Australian Constitution.
Several scholars and judges have provided dicta that oppose or challenge the strict interpretation of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law as formulated by A.V. Dicey in the late 19th century. Key figures who presented opposing or alternative views include:
- Sir Edward Coke (Dr. Bonham’s Case, 1610): While predating Dicey, Coke’s dictum that the common law could control acts of Parliament and adjudge them void is the foundational alternative to Dicey’s absolute parliamentary sovereignty.
- Sir Ivor Jennings: Challenged Dicey’s interpretation of the “rule of law,” arguing that it was a political maxim rather than a legal principle, and criticized his view of the “public order” state in favor of a “public service” state.
- Sir John Laws & Sir Stephen Sedley: In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, these judges expressed views questioning absolute sovereignty, with Sedley famously stating, “The Crown is as Sovereign in the Courts as it is in Parliament”.(The Crown was removed from Australian law by the High Court in Sue-v-Hill, 1999, albeit this decision was founded on the unlawful Australia Act 1987)
- Iain Stewart: Challenged the intellectual foundations of Dicey’s work, arguing that his fear of arbitrary power did not extend to the judiciary and that his views were based on ideological, rather than purely legal, grounds.
- Joseph Raz: Identified Dicey’s formulation of the rule of law as a “perversion of the doctrine,” arguing instead that the rule of law is a matter of degree, not an absolute, and must be balanced against other values.
- H.W.R. Wade: Argued that Dicey’s view of absolute sovereignty was challenged by the idea that the rule of law is a “fundamental political fact” that ultimately rests on the behavior of judges, not just acts of Parliament.
Dicey’s own views were not entirely monolithic, as he shifted from endorsing absolute sovereignty (1885) to acknowledging popular sovereignty (1913)
Plato The Republic
Plato’s philosophical concerns in the dialogue are ethical and political. In order to address these two questions, Socrates and his interlocutors construct a just city in speech, the Kallipolis. They do this in order to explain what justice is and then they proceed to illustrate justice by analogy in the human soul. On the way to defending the just life, Socrates considers a tremendous variety of subjects such as several rival theories of justice, competing views of human happiness, education, the nature and importance of philosophy and philosophers, knowledge, the structure of reality, the Forms, the virtues and vices, good and bad souls, good and bad political regimes, the family, the role of women in society, the role of art in society, and even the afterlife.
Plato’s ideal and just state is an aristocracy, the rule of the best. He believed leaders needed to be wise and trained in how to run a state, just as captains of ships are trained in how to run a ship.
He divided his ideal state into three classes. The lowest and largest class is the producers: the farmers, craftsmen, traders, and others involved in commerce. The next class is the warriors, those who defend the state. They are educated in sports, combat, and philosophy and tested by both terrifying and tempting situations. From the best of warrior class, the ruling class is drawn. Its members will study philosophy and be given government and military positions until age 50, when the best of them become philosopher kings.
Plato believed every human’s soul is divided into three parts: appetite, spirit, and reason. Each of his three classes matches one aspect of a person’s soul. The lower class is linked to appetite, and it owns all the land and controls all the wealth. The warrior class is spirited and lives by a code of honor. The ruling class is linked to reason and lives to gain wisdom.
The philosopher kings will prefer seeking truth to ruling, but a law will compel them to rule. They will obey the law and take their turns as rulers.
The truth is that the State in which the rulers are most reluctant to govern is always the best and most quietly governed, and the State in which they are most eager, the worst.
The warrior and ruling classes live in barracks, eat together, and share possessions. None has families. All children of these classes are brought up without knowing their parents. In this way, Plato tries to keep these classes from gaining wealth or producing family dynasties.
Plato concluded:
Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, and political greatness and wisdom meet in one, . . . cities will never have rest from their evils . . . .
Even if the British parliament is sovereign, the Australian parliament can never given it was an act of the British Parliament that created it. It is a federated parliament, as Quick and Garran so very clearly pointed out. And even if the parliament was sovereign, it would replace the King right? So how then would the parliament claim privileges denied the King it supposedly replaced? Only a moron would believe that possible. That explains why politicians believe it, but it adequately shows that lawyers are not nearly so smart as they like to convince us they are!
Gaz
Russia, Alaska, Canada, Greenland are presently under the grip of extreme cold weather that just happens to follow the U.S.-Canada border.
Recent videos from the U.S. have shown plebs with gas torches unsuccessfully trying to melt ice in their yards and what were healthy trees splintered by the weight of the “Ice”.
Rumble channel ProgressiveTruthSeekers have a twenty six minutes video by Jimmy Dore from three days ago, “Massive Winter Storm Is COMPLETELY ENGINEERED – Dane Wiggington” that is worth a look.
Nice Peter but the bloody judiciary have been brainwashed, so far…. Ed
I have been asked, tonight, to vet a document noticing the government about the chemtrails and geoengineering, and looking at the last two posts here am minded to give you this excellent article by the great Clint Richardson.
He may have updated it by now, as it is a few years old, but well worth a read, as the nub of it is that informed consent has been achieved due to the fact that the intention to spray has been Noticed in the Public Notices in the local papers in the intended areas, and no-one objected.
It might be well then that people start asking, for a start, where and when any Noticing was done in any location in this country, and taking it from there:
https://www.ascensionwithearth.com/2013/06/the-only-way-we-can-stop-geoengineering.html
Hey folks,
Just an observation here, has anyone noticed how THEY get to bill us and THEY get to KILL us.
And “commercial liability” targets the FIRST of those two features, albeit with no discernible effect on the perps beyond maybe “stepping down” to live their lives of obscene wealth AT OUR EXPENSE while being REPLACED with yet ANOTHER Globalist arsehole. And just BTW, folks, remember that WE pay for ALL of it. Yeah sure we can argue the details, but just remember that THEY have ARMIES of sadistic utterly remorseless shit-for-brains hired mercenary thugs to DEAL with you if you try to NOT pay the protection money.
But what about the SECOND item, folks? They get to KILL us, their ARMIES of shit-for-brains hired mercenary thugs DELIGHT in doing exactly that, and there’s not a DAMN THING in the world you can do about it. Lots and lots and LOTS of fresh graves out there in the cemeteries of Australia, hundreds and hundreds of thousands of them. Let’s see “commercial liability” set THAT right.
And just BTW, folks, these low-life Treasonous pieces of filth have WAY more murder and mayhem planned for us, because as should be obvious by now, they have their orders and they NEVER back down, they only ever DOUBLE DOWN. Oh sure, they may duck and weave and spin some BS just to keep us all properly gas-lit and off-balance, but they NEVER take a backward step.
Do what you must, folks, and do what you can, but a dark day of reckoning is coming in a scant few years that WILL set things right.
During the covid fraud, Boris Johnson sought to get the court to ratify the supremacy of the executive arm of government over parliament.
The court cases known as R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland ([2019] UKSC41) had the 11 sitting justices determining that neither Parliament or the Government had sovereignty, but sovereignty was vested in the people and it has been so for centuries.
Further it was affirmed those governing are, and have been, subject to the law of the land (common law precedence) for centuries.
Terry Shulze said – “… A stream cannot rise above it’s source…”
Except it CAN when it’s NOT the same source. What we have is a pack of Satanic GANGSTERS running the joint under the facade of a CORPORATE paradigm.
Terry Shulze said – “… All you have to do is get a honest judiciary to make a ruling on the merits…”
HOW?
They’re ALL counterfeits, they’re ALL employed by the foreign-owned GANGSTER CORPORATION without exception, they play by THEIR rules, their GANGSTER CORPORATE rules, at every possible level of our fake corporate “governance”, our country has been INFESTED from top to bottom and INSIDE OUT.
Seems that Frankly gets it – “… Trevor your “Truth” analogy can only work when your overlords are abiding by the same principle…”
… indeed, because our fake CORPORATE “government” plays by CORPORATE GANGSTER rules. And they have the gun-toting utterly remorseless sadistic mass-murdering ARMIES of shit-for-brains hired mercenary thugs to ENFORCE it.
Sorry, folks, it would be nice to be nice, but that doesn’t cut it when your adversary DOESN’T play nice and wants us all DEAD, not just here in Australia but all across the Western world, because that’s how the World Economic Forum’s CORPORATE Globalist “governance” works – in LOCKSTEP.
Obvious Bob likes to rabbit on about the commercial liability of these Hell-spawned CORPORATIONS, and to be fair his efforts and the globally moving Inpower crew HAVE found an Achille’s Heel to IRRITATE these mongrels somewhat, by interfering with the apparatus of their DEATH MACHINE.
And that’s encouraging, but it’s not SUFFICIENT to REMOVE these infernal abominations from off our backs and out of our countries. Sure, that disgusting blood-thirsty walking dog turd Dictator Dan has “stepped down”, but he’s NOT been held accountable for MASS MURDER and wrecking MILLIONS of lives across Victoria, he’s free as a Magpie in mating season to enjoy the profits of his plunder and live the life of a King AT OUR EXPENSE. Meanwhile, all those HORDES of MURDERED men, women & children are STILL rotting in their graves, strange that we don’t see any of them miraculously resurrected from the dead and everything set RIGHT now that Deadly Dan has ‘stepped down”.
And what about that known paedophile and pathologic embezzler Snuff Scotty, folks, who presided over and managed the DEMOCIDE of over 100,000 Australian men, women & children throughout Australia? He pocketed his $52 MILLION Genocide Bonus and now lives a life of unfettered wealth and luxury, while his VICTIMS remain forever in their GRAVES and thousands of people live in their cars and under bridges and MILLIONS more are getting poorer and poorer and the country is a ramshackle pile of smouldering RUINS. Who can possibly imagine the corporate canard of “commercial liability” will suffice to ARREST our country’s cascading destruction by a rampaging horde of F*CKING GLOBALIST GANGSTERS and finally SET THINGS RIGHT after so many DECADES of this malevolent Globalist GANGSTER shit?
To the contrary, that fetid craven SCUM Dangerous Dan has just been REPLACED with yet another CORPORATE GANGSTER to continue on with the UNINTERRUPTED agenda, rolling on in LOCKSTEP with every other nation all around the world. And Snuff Scotty has been REPLACED by just one more CORPORATE CLONE selected, yes SELECTED, to carry on the genocidal Globalist agenda in LOCKSTEP with every other Western nation all across the planet.
Hate to say it, folks, but it has to be said, ain’t NOTHING gonna be fixed until the Fat Lady sings – and like it or not, you know what that means.
I wouldn’t even mention Plato if I were to expand the notion of natural law, ‘Law and Order’, ‘Sovereign’ and ‘Justice’
Today’s Blood Libel and Adrenochrome business wasn’t invented recently. ..
This shit seems to have started with the likes of Plato and his cohorts within the Mushroom Cult ( maybe before).. (and is still practiced to this day with blood libel etc)
Plato’s mob (The Eleusinian Mystery Schools) performed serious ceremonial initiations using the magic mushroom and rape/murder with most likely Adrenochrome.
“They were forbidden by Athenian law from disclosing the secrets of the Mysteries. Those who disobeyed were punished with the death penalty. Consequently, all took a vow of secrecy then and there.”
They did this ceremony so that they could not only speak to the dead… but to also have a Daemon inhabit their minds (called a Chohan) so as to get instructions on how to dominate the LIVING… (including the planet as a whole)
They still do it today.
The ‘yew know hew’
Oh !!! Hang on… It’s not them.
It’s the Kazarians.. it’s the Catholics.. it’s the Zionists… It’s the Chinese Communists…
DUH!!
There’s a LOT of misdirection going on these days.
“It’s not us” “It’s not us”
“It’s it’s anti-Semitic.”
“We are gods chosen ones”
Yep…
They must be feeling the pressure building up.
The crooked ABC-TV and the crooked Australian Electoral Commission have a lot to answer for.
“Compulsory preferential voting” is how the nasty UnaParty functions. If you don’t let “your preference” flow to the first 2 past the post, your vote will be disqualified. Let’s say I want my vote to go to the Yellow Party and nowhere else, I would write 1 in their box and X in all the other boxes, when the first preference votes were piled up the highest two piles would scrounge through the preferences. At that point my vote would be discovered to be non-compliant, and scrapped.
This isn’t about your preference, it’s about funneling votes, a system which then becomes perverted as all the crooked backbenchers romp into their seats even though they have NOTHING TO CONTRIBUTE
AUSTRALIA is the name of a Corporation registered in Washington DC.
It is a Foreign Entity and as such these perps must have filled in a Foreign Agents Registration Application to act as administrators on the land and soil of Terra Australis and if they haven’t then they are breaking their own rules.
The rule of Law is the Constitution, the law of the Land and soil.
They have flipped the table on the People…
Buckle up buttercups when the Banks fold there will be no turning back and that is coming like a freight train at full noise………….
Rip into it, Dokey. And have a look at the Cal Washington video I posted. Excellent stuff, very informative, else I would not have put it up.
Thanks Bob, interesting piece of the puzzle.
It seems to offer a simple solution.
I already have my brand new name, DOKEY.
I might have some fun with this 🙂
Dokey, the web has been unraveled, If you had cared to look at the videos and whatnot I posted (I know time is involved) you would have found out from Cal Washington how he makes fudges run out of the court room-because he has worked it out.
So this shows that the show is not over just because you are registered and in Admiralty, because you can get your self out of it, by a bit of judicious research and taking the clues people give you.
Try this one-and Anna received correspondence from the Vatican Chancery Court establishing her “vessel” as being land based and not in Admiralty’s Sea of Commerce any longer.
This happened because she is super smart and has done the homework, and most notably, because she called out the fraud:
http://annavonreitz.com/aboutyournameagain.pdf
Well, it is 1984, so what else to expect?
I read snippets of the ongoing battle between the ruling parasites, the shysters, the Common Law, the People, the Parliament, the King or Queens perogative, Maritime law, Equity courts etc. The early UK settlers to America apparently took 2 books with them – the Bible and Blackstone Law Commentaries. Whoever William Blackstone was, if he was an example of the thinkers of the day, wow. LONANG.com has a PDF version of his work. WB was writing some 100 years after Shakespeare exposed the nature of the legal rorts. Tim Stretton has written about this topic ‘Contract, Debt Litigation and Shakespeares Merchant of Venice’. With the criminal cabals chomping at the bit to completely shut down human interactions in Courts and replace with judges with AI algos, we are at the pointy end of things. Some say throw metaphorical spanners in the works, others say never mention the genocide lest you hurt some genocidal maniacs feelings.
I say OKEY DOKEY.
There you go Trevor. Can you do anything like this with your slef-righteous faith and hope?
Lawful Notice
And Statement of Truth
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
Notice to Agent Is Notice to Principal
In regard to imminent proposed Bike Lane Vote
To:
Martin Cutter
Acting as:
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CITY OF GREATER GEELONG CORPORATION (COGG)
PO Box 104 Geelong 3220
Peter Murrihy
Acting as:
Mayor
CITY OF GREATER GEELONG CORPORATION
PO Box 104 Geelong 3220
And: all people acting as Councilors at the:
CITY OF GREATER GEELONG CORPORATION
PO Box 104 Geelong 3220
26 July 2022
Greetings All
I write to thee all as the living man, born on the land at Geelong, in the month of November, in the Year of Our Lord 1955, on the land mass of Terra Australis (commonly referred to as Australia).
All of thee are hereby Lawfully Noticed that, should the vote on the bike lane project that is the subject of thine collective vote is in favour of the bike lane project proceeding, all of thee, the Council organisation also, and all other relative parties and people, must accept full commercial liability for all loss, harm and injury incurred on all and any people affected by the bike lane project.
Such liability obviously refers to affected traders along the proposed bike lane route.
I, gary, have previously Lawfully Noticed the CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, all sitting councilors attending, at the COGG Council meeting on Tuesday, April 30, 2019, verbally, whilst at the microphone at question time:
https://webcast.geelongaustralia.com.au/archive/video19-0430.php
My address to the councilors and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER can be seen on the live-stream video of that meeting, beginning, approximately, at the 42 minute mark.
The CITY OF GREATER GEELONG CORPORATION and all local government operations in Australia are not lawful government, as local government does not have Constitutional recognition.
This being so, the CITY OF GREATER GEELONG CORPORATION is, in fact, a private commercial trading entity and so subject-as are all people working inside that organisation-to full commercial liability for all loss, harm and injury perpetrated in the course of operations.
All relevant parties need to be fully and completely aware of the applicability of this commercial liability.
I also delivered Lawful Notice, verbally, to Councilor Sarah Mansfield, in a phone conversation at the time of the Pakington St redevelopment community consultation.
I am hoping that Cr Mansfield relayed those concerns to her colleague councilors, as the information and concerns imparted by i are relevant to all parties concerned.
I thank thee all, collectively, for thine time and consideration, and look forward to a result that is satisfactory for the people of Geelong.
Best regards
Well, Trevor, tell me where I have told any lies, as I have a list of achievements that Trevor might never go anywhere near doing, starting here:
https://cairnsnews.org/2024/01/09/council-watch-groups-bleat-about-unaccountability-but-reject-liability-solution/
The article does not tell the full story, but that was a win, both for me, and the 55 businesses that have been trading,uninterrupted, for more what will be seven years come April 2 this year.
For me, the reward was not an ego boost, as I do not have one, but the fact that what I did was of benefit to my community, and the consequent credibility associated with that victory for the community.
I have posted that article here many times, with not one report, yet, by someone who used that information to enable a similar win in their own council jurisdiction.
This is likely so because the noggins like you, posting here, would not have the smarts to perpetrate such an act, firstly, because they have not realised that their local council is a corporation-a private commercial trading entity using ratepayer finds to enrich itself-and thus subject to full commercial liability for all loss, harm and injury it perpetrates on its constituents.
If you tap the livestream link in the article you will hear exactly what I told those councilors.
The bike lanes contract was scrapped, entirely, by Council, in August 2022.
My latest council win was in Swan Hill, where I was the only one-anyone on any state can Notice any state council, because they are a department and agent of the state government, and this being so are fair game-who Noticed those councilors of the fact that should they close the yards they could be sued to into poverty. Those saleyards are the lifeblood of Swan Hill, with the local abattoirs some months ago having secured a beef supply contract with China that would result in another 600 jobs in Swan Hill.
So I have no need to big myself up like an Ali G, as I am happy to get the job done, and be of benefit to my community-anyone’s community, for that matter, Trevor.
So go and hope and pray yourself to death Trevor, because by doing that you ill achieve exactly nothing except to reinforce your own delusion.
For my next post I will post the Lawful Notice that did the job on the bike lanes.
“Ah! they say but we have the Westminister Tradition, yes, and according to the late Constitutional analyst and former MHR Arthur Chresby, this UK derived conspiracy of the oligarchs is a concoction of the corrupt political parties enabling them to take control of and manipulate the parliament.”
The conspiracy of the oligarchs has bought out our rights and freedoms from our slug politicians which we are obliged to ‘elect’ so they can sell us out. And then we can pretend we’re all happy our ‘elected’ representatives are looking after us rather than their own pockets and interests.
Everybody seems happy to play the pretend game. So a minority is now disgruntled. That’s not going to change anything,specially if it interferes with the cricket or the footy.
The water runs off the land as it should.
The true border of land and maritime jurisdictions is between the high and low tide marks.
So “get back in the sea” has meaning.
Trevor your “Truth” analogy can only work when your overlords are abiding by the same principle. That’s why we come across instances of injustices, who are we to believe. Five years of C19 exposed the overreach of these powers a supposed virus plague that spreads the globe in unison “think about that” how that is truely possible “lockstep”.
All Christian denominated leaders went quiet in this period no one questioned the truth.
So we do have reasons to stand together and question these overlords at every moment as we just don’t trust them anymore.
The former ‘Sovereign’, the King or Queen, was required to respect the fundamental principles of English law and the rights of the people. If the present ‘Sovereign’ (Parliament) steps into the shoes of the former sovereign then the Parliament must also respect the fundamental principles of English law and the rights of the people. A stream cannot rise above it’s source.
https://gumshoenews.com/review-of-australian-law-and-its-decline/
All you have to do is get a honest judiciary to make a ruling on the merits. To weigh the competing arguments on the scales of justice. – Good luck…
Christians of Australia, WAKE UP !!!
Forget all the above and take your GOD GIVEN AUTHORITY TO BE HIS IMAGE ON EARTH WITH ABSOLUTE DOMINION OVER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL RESIDE IN YOU, TEACH YOU, CORRECT YOU, AUTHORIZE YOU TO RUN OUR WORLD, BUT … YOU MUST INVITE HIM IN, YOU CAN GET THIS INFILLING BY THE LAYING ON OF HANDS AS DESCRIBED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT.
YOU DECLARE AND COMMAND EARTH’S FUTURE, PIECE BY PIECE, AS GOD IMPRESSES YOU AND YOU UNDERSTAND THOSE IMPRESSIONS BY FAITH ‘AS SMALL AS A GRAIN OF MUSTARD SEED TO MOVE MOUNTAINS INTO THE SEA’. GREATER THINGS THAN JESUS DID, YOU WILL DO IN JESUS NAME. IF YOU ARE A BELIEVER, SAVED FROM SINS, WASHED IN JESUS BLOOD, YOU QUALIFY FOR THE INFILLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. THE ‘church’ THROUGH ROME DENIED THIS POWER. YOU NEED IT NOW TO OVERCOME SATAN’S RULE THROUGH CORPORATE GOVERNMENTS THAT IGNORE CONSTITUTIONS. SO TAKE THE BULL BY THE HORNS AND BECOME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM, AND FULFIL GOD’S WILL ON THE EARTH.THERE IS NO ENEMY THAT CAN DEFEAT YOU IN THIS ACTION, THANK GOD AND HIS SON, JESUS CHRIST.
WE ARE IN A WAR DIRECTLY AGAINST THE gods OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, SO DO NOT TURN THE OTHER CHEEK, OR ALLOW THE DISFUNCTION OF THINKING YOU MUST SAVE YOUR ENEMY AT YOUR EXPENSE. IF THEY ARE TO BE SAVED, GOD WILL SAVE THEM. NOT ALL PEOPLE ARE THE ELECT. SATAN’S SERVANTS HAVE MADE THEIR OWN CHOICES.
To ‘Obvious Bob’: The answer is obvious, but not to Bob, the ‘two-bob’ expert. Bob talks about ‘good men’ doing nothing. Bob is right on this point, in principle, probably because he just quoted somebody else who got something right, instead of stopping to think for himself. If you think at all, Bob, you will realise that the first thing that good men do is to speak the Truth, and nobody has any measure of good in him unless he speaks the Truth. Truth is something Bob is Obviously a stranger to, as are most of this arrogant, self-important and self-promoting generation, promoting the Devil’s ideas as a solution to God’s wrath! It’s the main reason we are where we are. God does NOT help fools who deny His Words! You need to repent Bob, or face the only Just Judge there is – Jesus Christ, “the Lord from heaven.”
Trevor Sullivan: what a dummy: “We can only hope and pray.” Is this again some of this Satanic drivel emerging form your own Christian centre?
Unbelievable. A couple of pithy one:
“Go helps those who help themselves…” so are you a helpless babe in arms, Trevor?
“When good men do nothing evil triumphs.
So are you a “good man” sitting on the sidelines doing nothing and spouting scripture whilst all this EVIL goes on, right in front of your face.
That makes you not a good man, Trevor, as far as I am concerned, because even if you are going down, you do it fighting.
Pathetic.
And that is not hate speech, Trevor, just a statement of fact.
Practically every concept mentioned above is humanistic, therefore Satanic. It is the ‘wisdom’ of “the Serpent” (Genesis 3), which deceived Eve and brought death on all humanity following Adam’s capitulation to it. So is every ‘wisdom’ that is not directly from God (i.e. from God’s Words – the Authorised, King James Bible). Whatever is of unbelieving man is of the Devil himself, for he is the deceiver of all men.
Satan is “the god of this world” (2 Corinthians 4:4), who, “hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.”
Jesus Christ, (“the Lord from heaven” – 1 Corinthians 15:47), is the “Almighty God” of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution – therefore, HE is the Cornerstone of our nation. Our Constitution, parliament, and law all rest squarely on Him, and Him only! (Revelation 1:8, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, THE ALMIGHTY”). This cannot be denied – it is written in black and white!
The nation is ‘all at sea’ for one reason only – the people (yes, “we, the people of ….”) have turned our backs on our very Foundation, Jesus Christ, and prefer the wisdom of the Serpent, and to make matters worse, we are PROUD of it, just like the author of this article! I have never seen so much Satanic twaddle on one page.
There is no remedy for a nation that rejects its Maker – “The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God” (Psalm 9:17).
Repentance, for Satan-worship and Pope-worship (blindly following “the beast” of Revelation 13, the New World Order, which is not new, but as old as Constantine!), is the only hope for Australia – BUT repentance is the gift of God (Acts 11:18).
Will God give the gift of repentance to a people like Esau, “who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright” (Hebrews 12:16)?
We can only hope and pray.
Well apparently if you wear dicyanin goggles, you can see Demons. Seems to fit right in with Dicey’s theory of Parliamentary supremacy.
The Satanite Army with their, fake, false and fatal, Corpo Governments, especially in the FEYS Countries. Inversion, we pay our Pollies to Harm us, WHY?, Treason on a Huge scale, how so, Source…. https://odysee.com/TheOccultArtOfLaw:3 REMINDER,. Stalins 3x levels of Anti Semite laws, 1st Level, Fine, 2nd Level, Jail, 3rd Level, Shot or Baynot, we are at Level 3x.. prepare accordingly. ps Anti Semite means Anti Shem, thats it, nothing more….
Sorry. Forgot the Cal video (am posting at 1 am!):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEid0agnlUY
Cal’s InPower movement is responsible for the resignations of both Daniel Andrews and Tim Pallas, the former Victorian Treasurer.
I know one of the group who issued the Notice Of Liability to Pallas that made him step down.
Readers would all do well to get a sub to InPower, as the monthly fee is only $US 15:00, which works out at $22:00 a month.
On that site are some sample NoLs for people to read-and they are technically brilliant.
The lady who wrote the Great Maui Land Grab book, Michelle Melendez, is an InPower member and likely to do some NoLs against the various authorities in Hawaii.
If you are serious about the issues you all comment on here, a visit to InPower is a must, as thyme are doing a chemtrails “wave” of NoLs around the world and including Australia.
My video, made today whilst watching the livestream of the Melbourne Aussie Day March, detailing the protection of people’s political rights and duties:
https://rumble.com/v74v04e-australia-day-marchers-some-things-you-need-to-know..html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_a
Also, Cal Washington’s brilliant appearance on the English Never Settle podcast, where he acquaints people with his efforts inholding corporate governments to their commercial liability, corporate being the operative word.
All governments are corporate now, however, the vulnerability is that they are subject to full commercial liability for every bit of harm they do.
As corporations-Albo is the CEO of the Australian Government Corporation, just as Dan Andrews was the CEO and supreme leader of the VIC Gov Corp-and they indeed are supreme, until confronted with their commercial liability.
Cal Washington says, in the video, that he is now pursuing the $300 million he billed The Queen, because Canada is up for sale, and his documents related to the $300 million are included in the documentation related to the sale.
A fascinating video, so don’t give up hope< Folks, just get with the program and learn a bit.
Well folks,
All very nice in theory.
In practice, here in the real world outside of academic postulation, what we thought was our country has been hijacked lock, stock & barrel, from East to West and North to South, by a pack of Treasonous foreign-owned corporate Luciferian gangsters.
They don’t work for us and they don’t answer to us, folks, so OF COURSE all their schemes and machinations are undertaken without the slightest shred of consultation or consent of the Australian people. They CAN do whatever the Hell they like whenever they like to whomsoever they choose, and they have the ARMIES of gun-toting shit-for-brains hired mercenary thugs to prove it.
That’s right, folks, they ARE supreme, they can even KILL anyone they feel like killing in broad daylight on national television and get away with it scot free, with not the slightest threat of any blowback or repercussion or consequence at all, EVER. We know this for a fact, folks, because they DID and they DO exactly that.
So there’s the problem, folks, talking about the way things are SUPPOSED to be doesn’t MAKE it that way. Far from it. Chances are anyone who tries to piously wag the finger and assert the non-existent “people’s authority” will end up dead, because that’s what those ARMIES of gun-toting shit-for-brains hired mercenary thugs are there for.
If you ever want to see some REAL change, then be prepared to PHYSICALLY ENFORCE the change. Think of Nepal, folks, and maybe Mr. Rope and Mr. Lamp Post. Anything less kinetic, anything less emphatic, will just see us all continue down the utterly impotent meekly compliant voting and petitioning path to extermination and national extinction at the hands of a ruthless relentless utterly remorseless pack of foreign-owned thieving blood-thirsty mass-murdering corporate Globalist gangsters.
“Hate speech”: what was once known broadly by adults as defamation – slander if it was purely oral, libel if it was put in writing
The employment of baba-speak says it all
We need a new Monarchy who will serve its purpose to protect the rights of the common people .