By George Christensen
Australia may soon be handing the World Health Organization a master key to our laws.
The Albanese Government has tabled its Australian Centre for Disease Control (CDC) Bills in parliament.
These proposed laws would create a central command agency led by an unelected Director-General who can seize your data, rewrite the rules in a “health emergency,” and lock Australia to the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty agenda.
The WHO’s treaty (also called the Pandemic Agreement) pushes nations to align laws, share data, and follow WHO directions during crises.
The CDC Bills embed the WHO’s “One Health” model, which stretches “public health” into climate, food systems, livestock and land use.
The CDC will be a Trojan Horse: it looks like health protection agency but it smuggles in foreign control and permanent surveillance.
A Senate Committee has been tasked with conducting an inquiry into these dangerous bills. Public submissions to that Senate Committee closed on 26 September 2025.
If we do not hit them hard now, they will quickly vote on it, pass it, and then these bills will become law and be almost impossible to unwind.
There are many reasons why these CDC bills should not be passed by the parliament. They include the fact that the bills allow for:
- Foreign control without a vote: The CDC boss could sign written deals with foreign governments, UN bodies and public-private partnerships. These are not treaties, so Parliament does not vote. WHO policies arrive through the back door.
- Data overrides “despite any other law”: In a declared severe or unforeseen threat, the CDC can authorise collection and disclosure of “relevant information,” including to international recipients, even where other Australian laws would say no. Your information can cross borders when you least expect it.
- WHO plug-in built inside the CDC: The Bills move Australia’s International Health Regulations (IHR) focal-point role into the CDC. That locks the agency onto WHO timelines and notifications, reducing ministerial and parliamentary gatekeeping when Geneva declares a crisis.
- Mission creep by design: One Health treats climate effects, land use, wildlife, livestock, food standards and urban planning as “health.” A climate spike or livestock incident can become the pretext for new directives on your farm, your business, your church and your kids’ school.
- Secrecy when scrutiny is needed most: The CDC must publish some advice, but wide “exempt material” carve-outs and secrecy offences mean the most controversial directions, declarations and foreign arrangements can be withheld.
- Compulsion powers and penalties: Individuals and businesses can be compelled to hand over data, with civil penalties for refusal. This is the architecture for permanent centralised surveillance that can be switched on at the next declaration.
At its core, the CDC Bill takes power away from Australians and hands it to unelected bureaucrats and foreign bodies, stripping our Parliament of control, erasing safeguards on our data and privacy, and opening the door for the WHO to dictate what happens in our homes, our farms, and our daily lives.
You might be asking: Why would they listen to us? Well, politicians fear numbers. Senate committees log the volume first, then read the detail.
Marginal-seat MPs know mandates, censorship and overreach cost votes.
A surge of submissions, signatures and submissions makes this Bill politically radioactive.
When the numbers spike, media silence breaks, talkback lights up and MPs retreat.
We have forced back overreach before. We can do it again here by making the political cost obvious and immediate.
What happens if we win, and if we lose? If we win, the Committee recommends against the Bills, Parliament shelves the CDC plan, and Australia keeps democratic control over health policy, data and international commitments. Informed consent, transparency and proportionality remain non-negotiable.
If we lose, an unelected CDC can trigger restrictions on movement, work, worship and farming off WHO timelines, broaden “health” into climate and food controls, and share Australians’ data across borders in the name of “safety.” Once embedded, these powers will not be repealed easily. Children will grow up thinking emergency rule is normal.
In Solidarity,
George Christensen and the team at CitizenGO,.
P.S. The CDC Bills are the Trojan Horse for the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty in Australia. Stop foreign control and permanent emergency powers at the door.
More information:
“Australian Centre for Disease Control Bill 2025: Bill home page,” Parliament of Australia
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7369
“Australian Centre for Disease Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025: Bill home page,” Parliament of Australia
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7372
“Australian Centre for Disease Control Bill 2025 and a related bill: Senate Committee inquiry (submissions close 26 Sept 2025),” Parliament of Australia
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/DiseaseControlBill2025
“Second Reading Speeches: Australian Centre for Disease Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025,” Parliament of Australia (Hansard)
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result/Second_Reading_Speeches?BillId=r7372
“AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL BILL 2025: Full text,” AustLII
https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/bill/acfdcb2025377/
“AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 2025: Explanatory Memorandum,” AustLII
https://www8.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/bill_em/acfdcaatpb2025919/memo_0.html
“Australian CDC legislation: overview and links to Bills,” Australian Centre for Disease Control (Australian Government)
https://www.cdc.gov.au/about/about-interim-australian-centre-disease-control-cdc/legislation
“Delivering on the Australian Centre for Disease Control,” Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing (Media Release)
https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-mark-butler-mp/media/cdc-legislation-introduced
“WHO Pandemic Agreement (A78/10): Draft text,” World Health Organization
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA78/A78_10-en.pdf
“One Health Initiative: WHO,” World Health Organization
https://www.who.int/teams/one-health-initiative
“One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026): Full document (PDF),” World Health Organization / Quadripartite
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/363518/9789240059139-eng.pdf
“A guide to implementing the One Health Joint Plan of Action at national level (PDF),” World Health Organization / Quadripartite
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/374825/9789240082069-eng.pdf
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
Good info Gerrit but a bit too long. Editor
The Commonwealth of Australia has original legislative, executive and administrative powers as to all items listed in sections 51 & 52, however until the Commonwealth commences to legislate upon any Subsection listed in Section 51 the States would have the ” concurrent” legislative powers to on each particular subsection, and once the Commonwealth legislated upon a certain subsection than the States has to retire from this (Consider Income Tax 1943 ruling HCA for this also) When then the Commonwealth legislated the Quarantine Act 1908 the States no longer had any legislative powers as to “man-kind” infectious diseases for which quarantine in any form was required. Meaning, that for example the states covid-19 covid MANDATES scam were all along UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
END QUOTE
and
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his mind to the subject he will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the states Parliament be taken into court the court is bound to give an interpretation according to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law passed by “the sovereign will of the people,” although that latter phrase is a common one which I do not care much about. The court may say-“It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution we will have to wipe it out.” As I have said, the proposal I support retains some remnant of parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either side to attack each other’s laws.
END QUOTE
As such the High Court of Australia in ‘Palmer v WA’ was wrong as it relied upon a 1897 part of Hansard instead of the 7-2-198 statement.
However, while the Commonwealth has legislative powers as to “man-kind” infectious diseases, it cannot however interfere with the “CIVIL RIGHTS” of Australians!
HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the rights of the Crown in prosecuting criminals are.
END QUOTE
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
for the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
.
HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE
HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-We do not propose to hand over contracts and civil rights to the Federation, and they are intimately allied to this question.
END QUOTE
HANSARD 31-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. SOLOMON.- We shall not only look to the Federal Judiciary for the protection of our interests, but also for the just interpretation of the Constitution:
END QUOTE
Hansard 5-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Captain RUSSELL:
It is a matter for social dealing. It is a matter with which men will deal rather through municipalities than through a great federation in advancing, what I believe it is necessary we should advance, the true liberties and freedom of the people.
END QUOTE
Hansard 15-9-1897 Constitution convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. SYMON: We are the one country of freemen on the continent!
Mr. TRENWITH: I thank my hon. and learned friend for that term. There is one colony of freemen on the continent. Why? Because every voter in South Australia has equal power with every other voter. We are now going to create another form of citizenship, and we must create it under conditions that will maintain freedom to the citizens of the nation, as South Australia has obtained freedom for the citizens of the state. Therefore, I am justified in saying that we have a right to consider the people of the larger states must and will consider whether we shall hand to posterity a heritage of slavery or of freedom. If we vote for equal power to every citizen, we shall be making free people of the future Australians; if we vote for greater power for one citizen than for another, we shall be putting chains upon the legs of the citizens in the larger states of this commonwealth.
END QUOTE
Hansard 6-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
I hope that I am at any rate acting in the spirit in which we all labour together, and that the result of our labour will be to found a state of high and august aims, working by the eternal principles of justice and not to the music of bullets, and affording an example of freedom, political ity, and just action to the individual, the state and the nation which will one day be the envy of the world.
END QUOTE
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
END QUOTE
And
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
END QUOTE
And
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth.
END QUOTE
.
Meaning, that the Commonwealth has no constitutional legislative powers to provide our private/confidential including medical details to a foreign (enemy) entity like the WHO, UN and/or W.E.F. as this in my view constitute TREASON! Then Section 44 and 45 apply!
Neither can the Commonwealth allow a foreign (enemy) entity to make or direct decisions not being those of the Commonwealth Parliament. Each and every decision can only be made by the Commonwealth of Australia, not WHO, UN and/or W.E.F.!
Furthermore, constitutionally the Commonwealth has no legislative powers to deal with environment (such as NetZERO) and other such issues that were to apply to the States!
Neither does the Commonwealth of Australia has any legislative powers as to ‘minimum wages” other than regarding its own Commonwealth employees!
Neither can the Commonwealth dictate/interfere with employments contracts created within a State!
As such, the Commonwealth neither has any constitutional valid legislative powers to provide the UN, WHO and/or W.E.F. with any purported powers to dictate Australians in those issues!
The reason electors are to have elections is that only those elected to the Parliament are the “LAW MAKERS” and not some bunch of terrorist/criminals/etc who desire to flex their powers unconstitutionally merely because politicians collaborate with foreign (enemy) powers against the interest of Australians.
This post doesn’t allow me to set out in extensive details all relevant details but if you log in to Scribd “inspectorrikati” then you can download documents setting out a lot more set outs and I do not charge for anyone downloading the documents!
Joe Bogan 2 said – “… Besides, hanging’s too good for them…”
I agree, how about we bring back Ye Olde English Traditions of burning them at the stake and drawing and quartering the bastards?
Hey, if it was good enough for the British justice system, surely it’s good enough for a colonial outpost down here at the arse end of the Earth?
Or we could just take a page out of Fargo and feed them feet-first into industrial wood-chippers – real slow like. Mind you, they’d have to be good old fashioned gas-powered chippers, seeing as how we don’t have electricity any more here in Australia unless you first sell your kidneys or fart gold bricks to pay the bill, if there’s any electricity to be had at all.
Commenter from Vic
How are they going to rat on their mates if they are all dangling from your lamp-post ? Besides, hanging’s too good for them. Have you for example followed the torments that have been visited upon Harry’s father, for his brief dalliance, it seems his life has been ruined, by specialists in “doing you slowly” as the upstart Keating once boasted, having mistaken himself for a person of consequence. ( Sam Newman was paid more for his clowning. ) Another sound principle: never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Keep calm, maintain focus.
Aussiemal said – “… Why has there been no suggestion by our politicians to pulled out of the criminal United Nations Organisation and therefore the W.H.O. and the World Economic Forum?”
Because they WORK for them, Dude, that’s who PAYS these Treasonous corporate-owned baby-eating bastards, all through a sophisticated shell structure winding all the way from the World Economic Forum through the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION and all the way down to the foreign-owned Luciferian parliaments in every Australian state and territory and even into the commercial corporate “council chambers” in every single city, town, village and hamlet all across the Australian continent.
They know who butters their bread, NO WAY they’ll even BREATHE about rebelling against their OWNERS, especially when the entire fake corporate sold-out paid-off “judiciary” and the ARMIES of utterly remorseless heavily armed shit-for-brains pig-raping pack-hunting mass-murdering Hired Mercenary Thugs are owned lock, stock & barrel by the SAME PEOPLE.
Just ask Snuff Scotty doing the Kiddy Fiddler Jig with his $52 MILLION Genocide Bonus stuffed into his black leather G-string down there with all his paedophile bum buddies at the local Hillsong Child Molesting Club. He MURDERED over 100,000 Australian men, women, children and babies and has nothing but a life of unmatched unfettered LUXURY & FREEDOM & WEALTH & PRIVELEGE to look forward to, he’s a MADE MAN, literally UNTOUCHABLE.
What’s not like about THAT? Who WOULDN’T be lining up for THEIR turn at the pig trough?
The only way to beat these ass holes is by massive non compliance and to start some guerilla warfare against these grubs . make a few examples . just don,t tell anybody .
The Digital ID is the operating platform for the entire Communist Control grid. CDC is essential to UN governance under the Pandemic Treaty.
The rising Australian nationalism must see all of it scrapped.
They talked and wrote all day, and nothing happened. On this basis, corrupt politicians go unpunished, and Jesus watched in heaven without doing anything about it. The French have a better idea and are taking to the barrigades. Since 1975 and Whitlam, some real crap has happened in Australia, and nothing is going right, but Jesus saves—but only in your continuing dreams.
Why has there been no suggestion by our politicians to pulled out of the criminal United Nations Organisation and therefore the W.H.O. and the World Economic Forum? We would be better off joining, if we must belong to an outside organisation, to the BRICS Nations.
Trump went only part of the way by withdrawing from the W.H.O. As per usual he cannot be countered on to do anything properly.
It is useful to remember that politicians world wide still cannot bring themselves to believe the statistics that there was no such thing as a pandemic during 2020. As I have mentioned before there have only been THREE pandemics since 1900 and they were all man made. So pulling out of the U.N.O. should be a necessity on that count alone. They are, as I say, a criminal organisation so why are we part of that criminal association, it goes against anything we were taught as a child.
Catrop you have it in black and white. So I should think at least 50% of our now sitting senators and members should step down immediately. Having gathered payments (bribes) from foreign sources and other financial sources such as the Banking Industry.
To other commenters, if you forgot about supplying religious quotes, maybe if you actually did something useful with your time maybe we could make some inroads to the evil over our lives.
Joe Bogan 2 said – “… The cure for sold-out politicians should be put them in the public stocks for a month to allow them to proclaim their innocence…”
Joe, Joe, Joe, always so timid and hesitant, just like so many other Australians, when our adversaries enthusiastically kill THOUSANDS of US without the slightest hesitation or remorse, and never even a second thought.
Of course, that’s the way it is in the Wild Wild West when we’re little more than livestock fit only for slaughter.
I rather think that the cure for sold-out politicians should be to put them in the ground – permanently. Pretty soon we’d be running out of sold-out Traitors to plant, after the first few thousand they’d be rare as hen’s teeth.
A village pillory will do to solve the problems with politicians who do not care about their own people but just to get their own pockets full of money-bribes.
The cure for sold-out politicians should be put them in the public stocks for a month to allow them to proclaim their innocence, if nobody buys that then tar and feather them, also asset strip them and their family, they would all behave correctly after that. The same cure for public servants and minions such as cops and the village quack.
Blessed are the meek in heart and low in spirit, for they have no chance of inheriting the earth but must continue to slave on like faithful sheep.
Cracking the Canberra Code
https://wakeup-world.com/2014/10/27/cracking-the-canberra-code/
A working link to previous post –
Quote, “………..With the establishment of Christianity, the ‘cross’ of Rome became the model for the development of many European cities?.
https://online.pubhtml5.com/rukq/auqx/#p=6
It all boils down to fear of losing control
Which is one and the same as an unwillingness to acknowledge Omnipotence for what it is
So just stand back and watch the network get jammed up with countless naff/unregenerate theories about what strings are being pulled and by whom
When all the while the Sceptre continues to rest in Christ’s admonition that we DO have power over how things will ultimately pan out:
https://biblehub.com/matthew/24-22.htm
And no, he’s not talking about Freemasonry or some Cabal, as the resident occultists would have it
The balance of the gospels does, in fact, affirm that “the elect” is simply all those who’re intent on following in His footsteps, all those who’re prepared to invoke the power of the cross, all those who’re prepared to take the bull by the horns per His John 14:12 edict, quote “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do”
Germany is a top contributor-problem to the World Health Organization (WHO), having been the largest overall contributor in the 2020-2021 biennium and the second-largest in the 2022-2023 biennium. The country provides both mandatory assessed contributions and significant flexible and thematic voluntary funding, playing a crucial role in global health security and the WHO’s core programmes.
Quote, “………..With the establishment of Christianity, the ‘cross’ of Rome became the model for the development of many European cities?.
.
https://ia800403.us.archive.org/13/items/TheSecretPlanOfCanberraMasonicArchitectureOfAustraliasCapital1994_201603/TheSecretPlanOfCanberramasonicArchitectureOfAustraliasCapital1994.pdf
The so-called ‘World Health Organization (WHO)’ = 𝗔 𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗥𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗧 𝗢𝗥𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗭𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 ☣️🧪☠️
🔎 https://rumble.com/v2qc9yq-the-world-health-organization-a-terrorist-organization.html 🔍
ZZZ3856 said, Why is Australia such a push over.. just what do they hold over us? Other countries are saying no.
Because of what we have here. We would literally be the cash cow for these Globalist outfits. The US is pulling out of funding International Organisations. No EU nation could sponsor these outfits, firstly they are broke and secondly without any abundant natural resources in proportion to what we have here would not feed these mongrels the way we could afford their luxuries. So maybe K Charlie just told Albo to add a component to mining in the way of climate royalties transferable to the UN. WHO etc.
Budgets per annum for:
UN – 3.8bil
WHO – 6.7bil
Why are we seeing so many adds on tv lately with mining companies. It’s not like I have any use of a kilo of iron ore. Just forward planning in massaging us to feel good in their contribution to climate sponsorship.
The basis for these laws has been sitting in our Bio Security Act since its inception in 2015. Sections 478 and 479 should be made invalid by application from anyone in original jurisdiction under section 75 of the Commonwealth Constitution in the High Court of Australia.
Section 478 https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ba2015156/s478.html
and section 479 https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ba2015156/s479.html
It will be self evident upon reading these sections that our Minister for health and any person is under a threat of possible imprisonment if orders from the WHO are not followed via the International Health Regulations which is here via a treaty with the Department of Foreign Affairs.
Anyone can challenge a law by testing that law in the High Court or a Supreme court of the State through original jurisdiction using Judicial review of a law. The last time that power was expressed in the High Court was in October 23 when the High Court made invalid a Victorian law which was taxing electric vehicles , Vanderstock v State of Victoria.
So we need to be proactive and have those sections of the Bio Security Act repealed ASAP and our group will do the paperwork and the filing . We have 2 cases now in the High court so it is not impossible for a punter to file a case we are looking for plaintiffs. Contact Know Your Rights group.
info@knowyourrightsgroup.com.au
Rare Earth said – “What, starving, shooting and bombing the children in Gaza was not enough for the Zionist and their buddies in Swissy land?”
What does the Red Cross overlay of the Criss/Christ cross on the Australian flag mean?
The first letter of the name Christ in Greek is X
The sign of Tammuz Ezekiel 8:14 What does the worship of Tammuz have to do with the sign of the cross? According to historian Alexander Hislop, Tammuz was intimately associated with the Babylonian mystery religions begun by the worship of Nimrod, Semiramis, and her illegitimate son, Horus. The original form of the Babylonian letter T was † (tau), identical to the crosses used today in this world’s Christianity. This was the initial of Tammuz. Referring to this sign of Tammuz, Hislop writes: ……………….”
https://ucgfiles.s3.amazonaws.com/sermons/the_sign_of_tammuz_ezekiel_8.pdf
Red Cross – How Did The Symbol Originate?
The headquarters of the International Red Cross are in Geneva, Switzerland. The organization chose a red cross on a white background to be the symbol, which is an inversion of the Swiss flag – a white cross on a red background.
H ttps://symbolsage.com/red-cross-symbol-meaning/
WHO: 7 months ago they were joined by UNICEF in support of giving children in Gaza polio ‘vaccine’. About 600k children under 10 years of age were dosed with novel oral polio vaccine type 2 (nOPV2).
What, starving, shooting and bombing the children in Gaza was not enough for the Zionist and their buddies in Swissy land?
“In 2017 the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine surpassed the number of children paralyzed by polio itself.” https://thehighwire.com/editorial/whos-problem-vaccine-derived-polio-sanitation-next-steps/
Anyone believe the WHO has any good intention for public health?
Keep the WHO out of Oz.
Why is Australia such a push over.. just what do they hold over us? Other countries are saying no.
People must not comply. WHO has just been sued for contempt of court.
https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/breaking-who-sued-for-contempt-after?publication_id=825071&post_id=174724117&isFreemail=true&r=28t7zw&triedRedirect=true
Allegiance to a foreign power renders anyone as being incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
What is Section 44?
Section 44 of the Constitution sets out restrictions on who can be a candidate for Federal parliament. In full it reads:
44. Any person who –
(i.) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power: or
(ii.) Is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offense punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer: or
(iii.) Is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent: or
(iv.) Holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth: or
(v.) Has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons: shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
The Constitution of Australia is the supreme law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates.
[…] Source link […]