Letter to the Editor
It is blindingly obvious from published information that the UK’s current annual effect on global temperature can be measured in millionths of 1°C. Hence, it is also blindingly obvious that Miliband’s persistent refusal to quote this figure, even when asked for it in Parliament, is because it is so small that it would make the public realise that his drive to net zero is completely ridiculous, which it is.
Therefore, the possibility must be considered that net zero is being used to achieve a different objective to that of reducing global temperature. One possible objective is that it might be being deliberately pursued to destroy the economy of the UK and thereby the UK itself. This is a distinct possibility, bearing in mind the horrendous costs of net zero, the certainty of its causing blackouts and the completely unrealistic chance of it being achieved
Obviously, if true, this alleged Labour Party policy of self destruction was allegedly also fully supported by the Conservative, Lib Dem and Green parties as well, as they all fully supported the application of net zero. In addition, the EU must have known what it was doing when it insisted that the UK maintain its environmental commitments as part of the Withdrawal Agreement. Indeed, this was fully accepted by Conservative PM Theresa May, who allegedly even guaranteed the potential eventual destruction of the UK by making the net zero policy a legal requirement. So, Kemi Badenoch’s recent statements apparently abandoning net zero are a sick joke, as they are decades late!
Clearly, the best way out of this horrendous state of affairs may be for the King to dissolve Parliament and call another general election. This is most likely to lead to a Reform government which is committed to abolishing net zero. Unfortunately, from his ludicrously stupid dire predictions when Prince of Wales it is evident that the King is possibly still wholly in favour of trying to limit Anthropogenic Global Warming. This may mean He is in favour of net zero as well. If so, whether or not He is also in favour of destroying the UK is open to question and the best way for HIM to refute this suggestion is for HIM to dissolve parliament as suggested. If not, His reasons for promoting this obviously ruinously expensive and destructive scam must be fully examined by an independent and professional non-governmental technical organisation.
This problem must be tackled immediately as a top priority, as the complete collapse of the UK economy is highly likely to be achieved within the remaining period of this Labour government.
Yours faithfully
J Wraith
United Kingdom
The ice at the poles is because we have cooling, not warming.
The UN is saying dirty fossil fuels are contributing to global warming, which is not possible on a
number of points:
1). Dirty fossil fuels are not just carbon dioxide; they are rubbish as well, and how can this rubbish
be removed so as to leave pure carbon dioxide? It cannot, so it all just falls to the ground as rubbish.
2). The UN is saying the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is causing global warming, which is not
possible as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere. So it is impossible to cause warming. Also, carbon
dioxide absorbs heat and then cools at night. Therefore, the UN has got it all wrong again. If all
carbon dioxide was removed, everything on earth would die. Is that good?
3). When you freeze water, it expands about 10%. So when it melts, it shrinks the same amount, so
it will not cause the ocean to rise. (The ocean is rising because we have cooling, and that is less
evaporation, so the ocean will rise. With warming, there is more evaporation, so the ocean will go
down. You can easily check this by getting three cups or small cans the same size and filling them
up with water (the same amount of water in all three) and putting one in the deep freezer, one out in
the sun on a hot day, and the third one in the refrigerator so the temperature is about 2 degrees so it
will not freeze or evaporate; leave them for maybe 2 or 3 days. (Evaporation will not happen at a low
temperature.) Now when you check them, you will find the one out in the sun has had a lot of
evaporation, or maybe there is no water left. The one in the refrigerator is the same, but the one in
the deep freezer has frozen, and it has expanded about 10%, as it has risen up in the center. So now
we will put the one in the deep freezer in the refrigerator and leave it for about a day, then see what
has happened. You will see ice has melted, and it has the same amount of water as the one that has
been in the refrigerator all the time. This is proof that when you freeze water, it expands about 10%,
and when it melts, it shrinks the same amount, so what the scientists say is all lies. If what the
scientists are saying is correct, then if your water is running low, just freeze it, and then when it
melts, it will have increased by 10%. That has got to be the silliest claim I have ever heard of, but
that is what the UN is saying and telling scientists to agree with. The scientists must think we are all
silly.
4). With the UN saying carbon dioxide is causing global warming, when actually we have global
cooling, and this will go on for about 14,539 years. The UN does not know the difference between
cooling and warming. Just all lies, just lies and more lies.
5). The UN is just trying to take control of Australia, and our government is being paid by the UN to
hand Australia over to the UN. Our government is committing an act of treason. AC S.44 should be
used to remove all government ministers that support the UN and senators that state we must reduce
the Carbon Dioxide.
6). From 1890 to 1910, the temperature right across Australia was in the low 50s; it does not get that
hot anymore. That means that we have cooling, not warming.
7). This is all proof that we do NOT have global warming caused by man or anything else, but it
is pointing to cooling, and this is what we have, and it is not caused by man. We do have cooling as
the ocean is rising, and this will go on for about 14,539 years. The ocean will rise about 20 to 30
meters (20 to 30 meters—that is my guess, but the ocean will rise) because we have less
evaporation. What the scientists are saying about global warming is all lies; they are making up stories to suit what the UN and this is the opposite of what
is happening.
8). With cooling there is less evaporation, so the ocean will rise; with warming there is more
evaporation, so the ocean will go down. Evaporation is the process that changes liquid water to
gaseous water (water vapor). Water moves from the Earth’s surface to the atmosphere via
evaporation. Then, when there is enough water vapor in the atmosphere, it forms clouds and then
rains.
9). At the pyramids, it showed that about 5000 years ago, the earth was vertical, but now the earth is
23 degrees, so this is proof that the earth is rotating on two different axes. Now, with the large,
heavenly bodies, they cannot stop and start in their movement, so what they are doing (movement)
they will keep doing. For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction.
10). To point this out and explain, I am going to get a ball about ¼ meter in diameter and mark the
top North and the bottom South, and then put a shaft through North and South so it can rotate, and I
will call this rotation day and night rotation. Now we have cooling and warming. So to point that out,
I will put a shaft through the equator so it is 90 degrees to the day and night axis and halfway
between the North and South poles, and now the earth can rotate on that axis, and I will call this
axis the cooling and warming axis. Now the earth at this time is about 23 degrees on the cooling and
warming axis; if it were greater than 90 degrees, then we would have warming.
11). About 5000 years ago there was a big flood; see the Bible, Genesis 7:4, rain “for forty days and
forty nights,” and the big flood also. The American Indians were dreaming of a big flood, and they
had to make something that would float and tie it so it would not float away. And the Aborigines
knew about a big flood, and it took a lot of land off Australia. We know that Tasmania and mainland
Australia you could walk between them, and you may have been able to walk to New Zealand; that
was before the big flood. The heavenly bodies will keep doing what they have been doing; that is,
moving.
_________________________________________________________________________
12). Earth was at 0 degrees about 5000 years ago; now Earth is at 23 degrees. Therefore, 5000/23 =
217. That means it takes about 217 years to move 1 degree. 90-23 = 67; 67 x 217 = 14,539 years
before cooling stops and warming starts. A new big flood would be 90 + 67 = 157 x 217 = 34,069
years for a new big flood. This is based on the last big flood being 5000 years ago, and the earth
would have been about 3 degrees, as the big flood would have been when cooling had started.
____________________________________________________________________________
13). We have cooling, and that will go on for 14,539 years. Do not forget that the Earth is 70%
water, land is 30%, and polar ice is only 1.7%, so if you went to the poles with a super heater and
melted all the ice, remember it is only 1.7%, so it would make very little difference; the Greens
would not notice the difference. This is proof that the Greens are working for the UN and do not
care about the planet, just themselves. How dumb are the Greens?
14). About 1946 my father was running the car on wood (threes); he was getting the gas from the
wood. Anything that grows under the sun has the power of the sun in it. You may think I am going
mad, but it is true. Why not use sugarcane to make alcohol to run vehicles on? It can be done; that
would keep the cost of fuel down. Remember, coal-fired power is good and reliable. So why move away from coal-fired power?
BHP has dumped its solar and battery plans
It’s over thanks to Matt Canavan and Barnaby Joyce
I love Organic farming, but I’m baffled that anyone still believes in NetZero…
King Charles Signs WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM Treaty Authorizing ‘One World Government’ – Media Blackout! Watch The People’s Voice Video – December 29, 2024.
https://amg-news.com/breaking-news-king-charles-signs-wef-treaty-authorizing-one-world-government-media-blackout-watch-the-peoples-voice-video/
“They’ve been training and inserting graduates of their Young Global Leaders program (YGL’s) into governments and positions of power for decades, Macron, Trudeau, Newsom, Buttigieg, Musk and Gates are examples and I’m almost certain Trump is part of it too.”
And I’m totally, not just ‘almost’ certain you’re right. But you can’t convince most of the deluded false god worshippers here that he is.
1. First, a list of all the points that are correct about the greenhouse theory:
Polyatomic gas molecules such as water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone, methane, and others
absorb a portion of the infrared radiation emitted by the Earth’s surface and emit
infrared radiation according to their temperature.
So, that was the complete list, because the alleged calculations, projections, and horror scenarios derived from it, as interpreted
by agenda scientists and profiteers in the media, politics, and business, are based
exclusively on models and contradict the measurements.
2. Why the greenhouse theory is wrong – Example: Venus
The atmosphere of Venus consists of 97% carbon dioxide, and the temperature at the surface is
464°C. Some have deduced a “runaway greenhouse effect” from this, starting with NASA scientist Carl Sagan in 1960. He had attempted to calculate the temperature of Venus using the convective-diabatic model that Lord Kelvin and James Clerk Maxwell had described and quantified 100 years earlier. Sagan failed because, at the time, the temperature of the atmosphere and the pressure at ground level (92 times that on Earth) were incorrectly estimated. There were no Venus probes with precise measurements yet. With the correct values for the atmosphere, the correct temperature is obtained! If the CO2 on Venus were replaced with a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen (like on Earth), the temperature would be even 150°C higher, i.e., over 600°C. The myth of the “runaway greenhouse effect on Venus” is therefore based on measurement errors. If Sagan had known about the actual temperature and pressure conditions on Venus at that time, the postulate of the “runaway greenhouse effect,” which many climate scientists still believe today, would not have existed.
3. Why the theory of overall positive feedbacks is wrong
The carbon dioxide content of the Earth’s atmosphere is 0.04%. Because increasing carbon dioxide levels alone cannot cause a significant increase in temperature, even according to the calculations of greenhouse theorists, various positive (amplifying) feedbacks are postulated, primarily through water vapor. NASA describes it this way
(https://web.archive.org/web/20230326231638/https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/
vapor_warming.html): “Increasing water vapor leads to warmer temperatures, which causes more water vapor to be absorbed into the air. Warming and water absorption increase in a constant cycle.” This is wrong, because this water vapor death spiral would have been triggered by any kind of warming and would not have waited for a temperature increase caused by carbon dioxide.
Any system with an overall positive feedback is unstable, as every engineer knows. Because the climate is stable over long periods of time, the feedbacks, e.g., through cloud formation,
must be overall negative, i.e., dampening. Nobel Prize winner in physics John Clauser says: “Clouds are the natural thermostat of the atmosphere.” The unrealistic assumptions about positive feedbacks – the extent of which is not agreed upon – lead the scientists of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) to predict in their 2013 report that if the CO2 content of the atmosphere doubles, there is an 85% probability that the global temperature will rise by 1 to 6°C.
Conclusion: Not God but climate-change save the King!
EDIT: and millions worldwide have made money from him getting there, they love him.
Tony James it’s common knowledge plans for global domination go back centuries and after much research over many years, I’ve concluded damn near every organisation, think tank, society (secret the otherwise), institution, foundation, billionaire, trillionaire, corporate leader, financier, banker, gangster and shankster is a member of the WEF and not the other way around.
If you look, almost every policy our alleged duly elected leaders of the Anglosphere throw at us can be found on WEF websites and in Schwab’s books long before our leaders even mention them. Even the Sustainable Goals are WEF in origin but none of them are WEF policy,
The WEF was formed to implement the plans of it’s members. The WEF didn’t create this madness, it’s role is to make the madness reality. They’ve been training and inserting graduates of their Young Global Leaders program (YGL’s) into governments and positions of power for decades, Macron, Trudeau, Newsom, Buttigieg, Musk and Gates are examples and I’m almost certain Trump is part of it too.
Schwab’s stepped down as leader and the WEF are concentrating on rebuilding their image. Who better to replace him than Larry Fink. Blackrock is the major shareholder of nearly every listed company and millions worldwide from him getting there, they love him.
You can argue all you like about who’s behind it, at this stage it’s irrelevant. It’s who’s making it happen that matters. The media never mentions it and while everyone’s distracted with a false or misleading narrative they’re preparing to rise from the ashes.
Maybe JFK Jr should have a inquiry into why people have unbelievably short memories when he’s done with the Autism one because it was Prince (now King) Charles who publicly and officially announced the WEF’s Great Reset boasting over 40 years involvement.
As you may or may not know, think you know, think you better, not think at all or not bother to look, the Great Reset includes (but not limited to) the UN released Sustainable Goals. One of them is Net Zero.
Interestingly, the WEF blueprint includes an AI controlled technocracy and smart cities. Some of the first things Trump did was announce a AI hub in every city, delete as many humans as possible from government, streamline efficiency with DOGE and now he’s talking about freedom (smart) cities.
It looks like that white horse Trump rode in on is a Trojan after all.
King Chuck III is a committed Soros, Davos, WEF. Globalist ideologue. He has always been a tree-hugger and was frequently reported speaking to plants. He is a strong supporter of Net Zero but only to the degree that any restrictions on CO2 emissions should apply to others … not to himself and his immediate family.
Worth researching whether the King is the ‘human’ master puppeteer pulling the strings behind just about everything we are seeing today eg the supposed head of the now extremely liberal Church of England (think pro LBGTQ etc); he introduced the first mosques into England, am pretty sure he controls the WEF, he is a 100% greenie, possible pedo and probably behind Diana’s death…..
For anyone who believes in a Monarchy it must be terribly embarrassing having that idiot as King.
For those who wish to control the Monarchy the idiot is wonderfully helpful.
While I am not a great supporter of Monarchies I had great respect for Queen Elizabeth II.
Oh you’ve found our AWOL king!, – please don’t send him back!
Reform UK’s excellent Richard Tice, recently exposed Labour’s absolute incompetence at managing the nation’s pension funds. Having exposed their idiotic ‘Woke investments’ (wind farms, etc), Tice calculates that Reform could easily generate £8 to £10 billion per year in savings.
What they’ve discovered amounts to gross negligence, involving Labour’s investment into ‘Woke investment funds,’ consisting of high management fees, low liquidity, trapped investments, which consistently underperform their benchmarks [unlike trackers], hence, losing billions of pounds a year. Reform intends to rectify this fiscal incompetence and redirect the billions back to the elderly where it belongs. (45:04 – 46:10).
Instead of these capital losing ‘Woke investments,’ properly managed pension funds should be invested in low cost trackers (75%) and short-term bonds (25%).
Richard Tice explains.
‘We’re going to urge all our pension committees to urgently change course. This cannot go on, it is simply unacceptable. And today we’re launching an urgent question to the speaker to raise this issue in the House of Commons first day back after the holidays, the numbers are enormous, – £8 to £10 billion pounds a year is the potential if this is done properly.
And any council committee that says no, we’re not going to do this, we’re quite happy with the status quo. Mark my words, if you do that, you are showing you are on the side of the rich city investment managers. We at Reform, we’re on the side of the elderly vulnerable residents in our council areas who need better social care. That is the difference ladies and gentlemen.’ (Richard Tice). [46:37-47:30].
ht tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeqO1A0pLQI
I would bet Australia’s pension funds are similarly invested, and likewise, haemorrhaging billions a year. So it’s probably time to investigate your own pension fund portfolios?
[…] Source link […]