CAN the Federal Court of Australia do what a single judge in the NSW Supreme Court failed to do, which was to hold government accountable for harm and gross violations of the rights of people during the “pandemic”.
We at Cairns News can only hope the best for NR Barbi Solicitor Pty Ltd of Queensland, a legal firm which has filed a class action against “the Australian Government, the Department of Health and Aged Care secretary Dr Brendan Murphy and the deputy secretary of Health Products Regulation Group Adjunct Professor John Skerrit” (respondents) in the Federal Court of Australia.
The class action is on behalf of a lead applicant and other Covid-19 vaccination-injured parties (“Group Members”) to recover compensation for injuries obtained as a result of taking one or more Covid-19 vaccines.
The applicant alleges that the respondents’ actions to advance the acceptance and use of the various approved Covid-19 vaccines constitutes negligence and/or misfeasance. They further allege that such negligence/misfeasance caused class members to suffer loss or damage, including but not limited to personal injury, health care expenses, additional out-of-pocket expenses, economic loss, the need for gratuitous care and/or commercial care and/or non-economic loss.
The procedural rules for class actions in the Federal Court are set out in Division 9.3 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth); Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth); and the Federal Court of Australia Class Actions Practice Note GPN-CA. which can be accessed on line.
On the question of who is eligible to join the class action, the legal firm notes that class actions typically function on an ‘opt-out’ basis, meaning that all class members will be bound by the case’s outcome unless they opt-out by a date set by the court.
Those who are “likely to form part of the ascertainable class” are those who believe they fall into one of the categories outline in the fourth paragraph.
“Only class members who opt out of the proceedings may be able to commence separate but similar litigation in their state or territory. NR Barbi Solicitor Pty Ltd does not represent you in relation to separate individual claims and we recommend that you seek independent legal advice for further information about opting out or commencing your own proceedings,” the solicitors note.
They stressed that if members in the action wanted to receive compensation if the proceeding was successful, then it was essential to register. “Please be assured that, if you choose to register, we will not disclose your identity to any third party, including the Respondents, without your consent,” they note.
Those interested but unsure if they would be eligible are asked to register their interest at the links provided at the website. Vaccines specifically named by the law firm are Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine, the Pfizer child vaccine, the Astra Zeneca Vaxzevria, Moderna’s Spikevax, child and infant vaccines.
The solicitors note that in class actions the initial trial involves the court hearing evidence about the lead applicant’s claim to determine the factual and legal questions that are common to the lead applicant and the class members.
“If the class action is successful in respect of these common questions, the rest of the class members’ individual claims will then be considered through a settlement scheme devised by the parties.
“Several factors are likely to impact on whether an individual is entitled to compensation, including the findings of the court in relation to the common questions, whether an individual’s injury was caused by their taking a Covid-19 vaccine; and the severity and extent of any loss or damage that has been suffered.”
Hi Mr. Yardley. I have a copy of your book.
Amazing job you did there.
Thank you for your insight.
I see all your videos with Mike Holt.
I’m a living woman of the Land thanks to you guys 👏
There is no justice in the judiciary.
They all sit in high treason as do the corporate government.
All are apart of the same secret society.
Freemasons. They are useless eaters and a cancer on this world.
Justice will come at the return of our Saviour.
Frankly said -“The only thing that will work is a bunch of vigilantes that have lost their loved ones and everything that matters to them in life.”
… what he said.
It ain’t over until the Fat Lady sings, and she’s not even going to start clearing her throat until about 100,000 mass-murdering Globalist stooges are swinging from lamp posts right here in Australia.
Editor, cairnsnews said – “We at Cairns News can only hope the best…”
Indeed, there’s the cold hard reality.
In concert with other commenters here, it’s REALLY HARD to get excited about a remedial process which depends ABSOLUTELY upon the good faith of the VERY SAME corporate structures which have been so very determined to KILL US ALL over the last three years.
Nothing that I have seen, in ANY direction, suggests that these Globalist stooges have retreated a single inch from their intention to KILL US ALL. Any seeming respite is just the quiet before the storm, while they gather their resources and plan their tactics for the next battery of assaults.
In fact, everything now unfolding in the legislative and policy initiatives of our fake “governments” points to ACCELERATION of the INTERNATIONAL LOCKSTEP trajectory to 90% depopulation and the New World Order.
How many ways can they kill us? Just ask AnAL and the rest of the Globalist stooges for a summary. And maybe creepy Bill if he happens to be passing through Kirribilli house.
So FWIW, good luck with the class action. At risk of beating a dead horse, it’s sounding like just more chickens going cap in hand to a bunch of foxes (and if the horse is dead, what else can you do besides beat the bastard?).
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. And clench those butt cheeks while you’re at it.
Get positive guys. This is the beginning.
Those politicians will have to provide the evidence they relied upon to support their decisions. It wont be nice for them.
Why are there only 500? ?
And good luck finding an honest judge ..
First person they need to front the bench is Scomo for manipulation in the form of encouraging and instructing a discriminative coercive control subjected towards employees by their employer resulting a financial, psychological, family separations and now evidence of medical malpractices.
But Nationally what justice system will honour their duties to society even though we always address the person upholding the law of the nation “the Honourable so and so“.
We saw the first farcical case against Hazard in the NSW Supreme Court referring to the constitution and medical conscription. I will never forget the comment coming from the judge “ but doesn’t that just mean we won’t send dentists and doctors or medical practitioners to the frontline” or words to that effect. That was enough to know there was a controlled order at play as he tried to imply an opinion with a differing meaning.
The only thing that will work is a bunch of vigilantes that have lost their loved ones and everything that matters to them in life.
how much evidence will be required to obtain an impartial verdict from the comprimised judiciary appointed by an illegal Government under the Australian unconstituional Corporation doing as they are told .I hope this is not the case call me a skeptic and would like to be proven wrong.More and more I feel that our legal so called system answers to their masters and not to the rule of law for the Australian people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Editor Federal Court of Australiacreated in 1976 for the Treasonous Political Parties sovereign, independent and federal nation under the abstract Queen of Australia. No Crown and Constitutional Authority. The so-called Judiciary sits in Treason. NR Barbi Solicitor Pty Ltd of Queensland. Lawyers (Liars)
*We congratulate you on your admission to *
*the legal profession. You have become what *
*we term “officers of the court”. “That *
*terminology reflects your predominant duty, *
*to the court and the administration of the *
*law, a duty which * *predominates over the duty *
*to the client and is important to the court’s *
*discharge of its role – the delivery of justice *
*according to law. That designation also *
*reflects the reality that you owe your professional *
*legitimacy to the court: it is the court which admits *
*you, and it is the court which will as necessary *
impose sanctions for ethical dereliction.
So who do these so-called lawyers represent.??
LikeLiked by 1 person