Covid patients successfully treated with hydroxychloroquine – Professor Borody

by Alison Ryan

This is an interesting article published 30 January 2020. One of the authors is Thomas Borody, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Sydney, Australia

December 2019, the virus, which would cause a worldwide pandemic, was first identified in the city of Wuhan, China. In January 2020, it was implicated in various pneumonia cases, and was rapidly isolated from a bronchoalveolar lavage sample, analyzed via next-generation sequencing (NGS), and identified to be a novel betacoronavirus, the same family of viruses responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS).

This new virus, named the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on February 11, 2020 by the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), has now been implicated in over 13.4 million cases worldwide, and over 580,000 deaths. Over 138,000 of these deaths have been in the United States alone.

Patients tested PCR positive by nasopharyngeal swab were treated by their primary care physicians with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Azithromycin (Zpack), vitamin C (3000 mg), vitamin D (3000 IU), and zinc (50 mg) for 10 days…5 and 6 days respectively after therapy regimens were initiated patients reported symptom clearance.

Coronaviridae is a family of enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses. The total length of the genome is 30 Kb, consisting of a 5′-terminal noncoding region, an open reading frame (ORF) 1a/b-coding region, an S region encoding the spike glycoprotein (S protein), an E region encoding the envelope protein (E protein), an M region encoding the membrane protein (M protein), an N region encoding the nucleocapsid protein (N protein), and a 3′-terminal noncoding region. Among them, the poly protein encoded in the ORF1a/b region of the nonstructural protein can be cut by 3CLpro and PLpro of the virus to form RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and helicase, which guides the replication, transcription, and translation of the virus genome. The M and E proteins are involved in the formation of the envelope, while the N protein is involved in assembly. The spike protein which binds to the receptor of the host cell confers specificity for viral invasion into susceptible cells.

Once decoded, the SARS-CoV-2 genome was found to share high sequence identity with the bat coronavirus, BatCoV RaTG13 (96.2%). Upon further investigation, it was discovered that SARS-CoV-2 harbored significant sequence homology with the viruses responsible for SARS and MERS, with a notable exception found in the receptor binding domain (RBD). Shang et al. elucidated the RBD structure of the human of the human ACE2 receptor (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), demonstrating that the replacement of several residues within the protein caused it to have a much more compact hydrophobic pocket. This change increased the binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 as compared to SARS-CoV.

While this has contributed to its greater virulence, it also represents a potential therapeutic target…the therapeutic effect of CQ may be a result of its ability to neutralize the endosome-lysosomal acidic pH and block the protease activity necessary for viral entry – possibly evidenced by the HCQ treated patients in this study that appeared to have cleared the virus.

SARS-CoV-2 appears to be mutating at an alarming rate, as reported in the Icelandic study which identified the presence of 291 sequence variants that were not present in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) reference database as of March 22, 2020.

Thomas Borody is one of the authors for this study.
Centre for Digestive Diseases, Sydney, Australia
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from patient fecal samples by whole genome sequencing | Gut Pathogens | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on January 21, 2022, in Covid Cops, covid lockdown, covid mandate, Covid Omicron, Covid passport, Covid vaccines, Covid-19, General and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 17 Comments.

  1. Fauci and Co have had a universal “flu” injection in the pipeline for years. They staged the opportunity to achieve that as a vehicle for much bigger things Imagine if they were going to let any non patented medication spoil their show! Fauci and Co and the entire global propaganda are run by much bigger fish with far bigger agendas. They want them carried out quickly hence the coercion and fascist dictatorial MO on a global scale.

    Like

  2. It’s totally criminal what is happening in Australia re persecution on any person in the media or medical profession who suggest using Ivermectin.. One third of the World use it. Professor Thomas Borody was threatened with de registration and has been closed down from talking about virus cures. See Countries successfully using Ivermectin https://ivmstatus.com/

    Like

  3. daviddd2, “If ivermectin were allowed, the injections wouldn’t get emergency approval”.

    Herein lies the rub:

    January 13, 2022
    Documents that showed Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were effective in treating COVID were buried

    There are 67 controlled studies of Ivermectin’s effect on COVID-19 that show a 67% improvement in COVID patients. There are 298 Hydroxychloroquine studies that show a 64% improvement in patients for COVID-19 patients. Despite the science, Dr. Fauci and the medical elites have blocked the use of these effective treatments for coronavirus patients. Fauci and other top US medical leaders were in on the hydroxychloroquine lie that smeared the treatment as being ineffective and dangerous. Jeremy Farrar, director of Wellcome Trust and a WHO advisory group, was involved in two large hydroxychloroquine trials that used extreme doses that killed about 500 people and was used to sink the use of the drug for COVID.
    Documents stored on the computers of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) prove that the medicines Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and Interferon were proven “Curative” for COVID-19 in April, 2020, but the cures were buried as “Top Secret.”
    more >

    https://needtoknow.news/2022/01/documents-showing-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine-effective-in-treating-covid-were-buried/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=documents-showing-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine-effective-in-treating-covid-were-buried

    Like

  4. In response to rexiedexie:
    Reference: noqreport. com
    Search “New Ivermectin Protocols”

    This report also supports Professor Barody’s claims in relation to the value of Ivermectin.

    Dr Carvallo, a retired Medical Professor in Argentina, devised two Ivermectin trials and his treatment protocols have been used in five Argentinian provinces.
    In one province, the death rate was reduced to one-third in less than a month in the middle of the ‘outbreak’ using his protocol.

    Ivermectin may well be of benefit for those who have already been injected from vials that appeared to have microscopic parasites that looked like trypanosomes in them.
    This observation was noted by Dr Young under his microscope.
    Reference: drrobertyoung. com

    Ivermectin is well known as an anti parasitic treatment for Toxoplasmosis which is very common worldwide including in Australia and can also be used for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (TB) as well.

    Will TB be on the rise in the future now?
    Reference: Dr Bhakdi, microbiologist infectious diseases, doctors4covidethics.org

    Whether it is because of claimed ‘antiviral’ or the anti parasitic benefits, Ivermectin seems to cover a number of bases.

    It doesn’t make sense if there really is something that effective, why they wouldn’t they want to use it (or at least try) …..

    All they have to do is offer Ivermectin with Informed Consent.

    Like they did with the Clinical Trial injections….let the people decide.

    (It has been claimed that they may be giving Ivermectin to hospitalised ‘covid’ patients, but only the vaccinated ones)

    Like

  5. If ivermectin were allowed, the injections wouldn’t get emergency approval.

    Like

  6. You got that right David…ED2

    Like

  7. Aussie scientist ‘mocked’ by left bureaucrats after discovering COVID treatment. Sky News host Rowan Dean says Australian health bureaucrats “scandalously stopped” Professor Thomas Borody from saving thousands of lives and putting Australia at the forefront of COVID-19 treatments worldwide.

    Mr Borody discovered Ivermectin was an effective preventative treatment for the coronavirus earlier in the year but was “mocked” and “ridiculed” by activists with a leftist agenda.

    “Every Australian health bureaucrat and politician should hang their heads in shame,” Mr Dean said.

    This week, Dr. Pierre Kory a pulmonary and critical care specialist in Milwaukee testified before the US Congress saying Ivermectin was proving to be a “miraculous” treatment based on “mountains of data” released over the last few months.

    Mr Dean said “I suspect future generations will look at us with a mixture of horror and bemusement that we over-reacted the way we have done particularly in terms of the unnecessary damage inflicted on our economies and on our individual freedoms.”

    https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/outsiders/aussie-scientist-mocked-by-left-bureaucrats-after-discovering-covid-treatment/video/95c8e9c768e1d5eb11e87c77e2232f48

    Like

  8. Ed: Didn’t Pfizer’s own study warn against shedding problems particularly with respect to pregnant women?

    Like

  9. Seb: As a rough guess, persons injected with the bio-engineering potions are now producing their own particular type of spike protein versions depending on their cellular function?

    It’s also been a major tenet in epidemiology that mass vaccinations which do not prevent transmission should NEVER be administered in the course of an epidemic as that strategy encourages variants.

    But whatever possibilities are operative, be sure that we’ll only get the one that suits the agenda narrative. The rest will be cancelled and destroyed by the propaganda leaving us none the wiser.

    Like

  10. Shedding is the 21st century way of poisoning the well.

    Like

  11. Yep Norm your naturopath is correct. There have been documented cases of unvaxxed ppl getting sick from the vaxxed
    by shedding on the Tablelands. Ed

    Like

  12. I noted at the end of the article that Fecal matter (Excrement) was used to draw the virus from.
    Thus it would be reasonable to assume that those, initially, who had become infected with the wild virus are passing it out (shedding it) in their stools both then and now, which further means that the vaxxed are also doing the same to a greater extent! perhaps it is also shed via urine.
    It has long been known that recycled water contains many drugs because the recycling process has no way of removing any or many of them. Perhaps the case should be made for us to go back more to the use of rainwater as our major source of water for general consumption, cooking and bathing, leaving the recycled stuff for washing vehicles and flushing toilets ONLY.
    Crops are often sprayed with effluent which is either not treated or only minimally treated, bur even if recycled water is used it would mean that what we eat and what we drink could well be doused in COVID WATER.
    I am not vaxxed for anything let alone the clot shot but when I had my and my wife’s bloods analysed yesterday, just a few graphene particles and long strands of something else were present which were not there 12 months ago and my naturopath who did the test said he is seeing these things in everyone he has tested in the last few months. The only source I can consider is from foods doused in chemicals including recycled water and being around vaccinated people in the community – comments!

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Have yet to watch your video davidd2, but considering the SARS-CoV-2 is a bio-weapon, already proven consistently by many experts, and the related jabs are a complimentary weapon delivered into the body containing payloads hostile to the human genome, then yes, the mutation rate so much greater in the case of the omicron variant.

    Sadly, the plotters and planners and worker bees of the pLandemic do not realise yet that earthly glory is fleeting. When their time has finished on this earth there is no turning back; they have made their choice.
    There will always be some problem on this sin-sick earth so the love of God offers the everlasting gospel to every person, and a sober reminder, that it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment. So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

    Your choice. My choice. Eternal consequences for each. Christ in me the hope of glory.

    Like

  14. In response to Alison posting the article written in a UK broad topic Journal, I am guessing that she may be revisiting all potential options due to the Omicron fear gripping some people.

    But there is no point in hoping for hydroxychloroquine.
    The boss said no.

    Having gone through 2 years of crap and conflicting information I feel like a dog about to regurgitate it’s dinner.
    Fortunately we can safely say there is much more information out there now.

    This is a very old article, written in Jan 2020 before Australia had even shut down it’s borders due to the threat of a bioweapon.
    It is the storyline the world was given.

    Just to clarify, do we know who Thomas authored this Journal article with, and that there were no conflicts of interest, including ties to any Pharmaceutical Companies past or present at the time?
    One should always check this first, before reading any article.

    So in his article he says they took a sample from someone’s lung who had pneumonia in Wuhan China, and identified it as a respiratory virus. That makes sense because it was taken from the lung.
    It was a new virus though.
    I hope we are not going to go through this every time they find a new virus.
    There are thousands out there.
    “mutating at an alarming rate”

    That is if we believe that viruses are not exosomes.
    Disclaimer: Some Scientists and Doctors believe that’s all they are (the body cell detoxing)

    So from there they chose the name Sars Cov2, because it looked similar to SarsCov1 which the world hardly noticed a few years earlier.
    SarsCov1 was the ‘pandemic’ fizzer we were supposed to have.
    The MERS from the Middle East afflicted 2500 people in 2012.

    We now know that the PCR test is not able to actually diagnose any infectious disease.
    Even WHO has been forced to acknowledge that slight misnomer.
    So the people had cases of…..

    Nevertheless, those who had a positive PCR test i.e., they had a virus or a bacteria or a fungi still up their nose from a past exposure to something (or were just body cell detoxing), were given Vitamin C, Zinc and Vitamin D as well as Chloroquine and Azithromycin.

    So which of the actual medications above was the magic ingredient?
    They can’t actually say.
    Given it was a coronavirus of the ‘cold family’, my guess it was probably a 5 day period of rest and some Vitamin C.
    Unless Hydroxychloroquine was given in isolation, they can’t definitively say it was that.
    Zinc is an effective antiviral so maybe it was that.
    Or maybe the Vitamin D which is good for the immune system.
    Or maybe a combination of some or all.

    We have all worked out by now that respiratory viruses are RNA and that is why there has never been a successful vaccine for a cold in the past.
    Something to do with messaging and instructions and conversion.

    The explanation of the above coding noted that this now decoded new virus had an affinity to the ACE-2 receptor.
    Quite providential given a spike protein injection with an affinity for the ACE-2 receptors was already in the works.

    So why is the latest ‘Omicron’ mutating faster?
    It depends what you think it is.

    If it’s just another cold virus we know how quickly they spread.
    But generally within a week or two, people get over it.
    If it’s an influenza, (flu) that knocks one about for longer.

    If it’s people shedding exosomes as they detox their bodies having been injected with a spike protein toxin, then we will see 90% of the population do that…. about now.

    It just depends what theory you choose to believe.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Sorry out of my domain but a reader will know. Ed

    Like

  16. This is a question, not a comment as such: Why is the mutation rate so much greater in the case of the omicron variant? In fact what governs mutation rate and thus why should it vary from variant to variant at all?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: