By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
SO who ran the computer algorithm that swung the US presidential against President Donald Trump? That’s the big question that should be raised in a US court where extensive, sophisticated mathematical evidence has been filed to show voting results in Michigan and other key states were swung against President Trump by external algorithmic interference.
Key witness is physicist Douglas D. Frank, who has a PhD in surface electrochemistry, has written 60 peer-reviewed publications and has been testing models on election data since December. Dr Frank has managed to track the algorithmic “footprint” in election data from nine Michigan counties and other states and it shows up consistently.
He says one reason for the pushback against election fraud investigations is that the same algorithm has been used in places other than the US. Cairns News suspects one of those places is Australia.
Dr Frank’s analysis has confirmed an algorithm at work in every state he has so far analyzed, and in particular, the nine counties in the state of Michigan that will be scrutinized in the Michigan court. “There is clear evidence of algorithmic allocation of voters to ballots which in turn clearly indicates fraud,” Dr Frank reports.
The court case in question was filed by US constitutional attorney Matthew DePerno on November 23rd last year on behalf of Antrim County resident Bill Bailey. Michigan state authorities immediately went into damage control on December 9, when Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson intervened on behalf of Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy.
But Benson’s intervention opened the door to the discovery process regarding her role in the Antrim election. In March subpoenas were issued to the clerks of eight other counties. Dr Frank’s filed evidence now demands a verdict and the case is listed for non-jury trial on June 8-90.
Dr Frank’s analysis has already shown there were 66,000 recorded ballots from the nine counties that were not associated with a registered voter in the October database. In total there were 25.5% more registered voters in Antrim County than eligible residents, indicating a large number of potential “ghost ballots”. It also shows “clear evidence of algorithmic allocation of voters to ballots which in turn clearly indicates fraud”. Antrim is the only county where registrations have dropped since the 2020 election was held
Also supplying evidence in the Michigan case is Russell Ramsland, CEO of Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) of Dallas, Texas. ASOG’s damning report targets Dominion Voting Systems, which has launched lawfare in the form of multiple defamation suits against New York mayor Rudi Giuliani, Attorney Sidney Powell, businessman and documentary maker Mike Lindell and others.
The ASOG report states: “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
If ASOG’s 23-page summary of evidence is not enough, prominent whistleblowers will appear disguised in Mike Lindell’s latest documentary Absolute Interference, a follow-up to Absolute Proof, downloaded some 1.3 million times. A preview can be seen at Lindell TV. Lindell is protecting the whistleblowers’ identities for now in order to establish a “they know that we know” situation.
Dr Frank was asked by radio host Pete Santilli if there was any evidence for “widespread” election interference – which was very publicly denied by former Attorney General Bill Barr. “I have piles and piles of evidence for the whole country. Now I can say with certainty that murder happened – there’s bloody footprints on the floor walking away from the body.” Dr Frank went on to describe the investigation and exposure of the fraud as “a poker game”. “You don’t always tip your hand. What Mike Lindell is doing is brilliant.
“Just imagine that the president of Microsoft flew into the studio and put on masks and goggles and tells this is how we set up etc. The average person says ‘oh how do we know that’s who you say it is.” The point is all the people who were involved now know we have the goods and whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork like crazy because they know we’ve got them.
Santilli: “Do you agree with me … this isn’t just about saving the USA this information the entire world will benefit from this , because the electionic means to rig elections like this is impacting the entire world, correct?” Dr Frank: “Yes, and it’s not new. Part of reason there’s reluctance to expose all of this is because other countries are going to say ‘hey what about this?’ There’s a sort of a getting caught with our pants down situation. The bottom line is you can’t have electronics anywhere (in the voting system) if you want to have a fair election.”
Dr Frank’s involvement in the election investigation began when US Senate candidate Kathy Barnett appeared to clearly win her state congressional election race on November 3, but the next morning found her lead had been switched to a 40-60% loss to Democrat incumbent Madeleine Dean. “She gave me data and we found amazing amounts of problems,” Dr Frank told Santilli.
“I don’t care if you’re Republican or Democrat. If you want to ever have an election again in this country, you have to fix this. It’s serious. Everybody who has looked at my data and looked at my analyses – I have yet to meet an authority who hasn’t been very concerned.”
Arizona update: Four companies, Wake Technology Services, CyFIR, Digital Discovery and Cyber Ninjas, have started their forensic audit of the December 3rd Arizona election. The audit will include, but is not limited to, scanning all the ballots, a full manual recount, auditing the registration and votes cast, the vote counts, and the electronic voting system.