By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
THE national class action against the COVID-19 tyranny has been relaunched, Melbourne lawyer and human rights advocate Serene Teffaha has announced. Two related court cases are already underway.
“We are now relaunching the National Class Action such that we target the negligent misrepresentations of our governments both national and state in relation to the lack of safety and efficacy in relation to influenza vaccines, COVID-19 vaccinations, masks, asymptomatic testing, hotel detention and lockdowns,” Ms Teffaha announced on her Telegram channel on Tuesday, August 10th.
“Thank you everyone for your patience. We realise that our governments are colluding with employers and businesses to force the uptake of these bioweapons masquerading as vaccines by forcing lockdowns and making vaccination a condition of return to work.
“Governments are unlawfully pushing these agendas through employers and businesses without legitimate directions and in the absence of employers and businesses having the power to mandate medical interventions on groups of people. They are also agitating their position against children in schools. This is a spiritual war for your consciousness. And it is now the time for us to stand in solidarity.”
Ms Teffaha and her supporters at AdvocateMe have spent a month strategising and while they believe laws are on their side, many bureaucrats, scientists, doctors, judges and teachers are “devoid of any humanity and have succumbed to the elites’ agendas”.
“The first thing we all need to do is SAY NO irrespective of the loss of jobs and livelihoods. We have to make tough decisions and take our children out of schools and our elderly members out of aged care homes.
“I understand that for many of you, you are in shock as it is the first time you are confronted by this irrational brutal adversity. But the zombie apocalypse is visible now and there are many within our own families who have become zombies. With all that said, this is the time to stand in our truth, in our faith, in our logic, in our rationalism and in transparent science.”
Ms Teffaha says irrespective of the corruption in the judiciary AdvocateMe will use legal processes as merely one tool in a toolbox. “But we are now thinking outside of the box and we are looking at establishing and connecting as communities through cooperatives to pool our resources, skills and abilities together to create better systems. Please stay tuned for that.” She noted that her group’s strategy was “different to other lawyers who we don’t agree with”.
“We are asking for pledges meaning that you will not transfer any money to us until we incur costs appropriately and proper invoicing has occurred. We don’t agree with ad hoc raising of money and ad hoc legal strategies destined to fail.
“Other parties asking you to pay in go fund me accounts and trust accounts that can be pilfered by governments is not a strategy we recommend or share. We are proud of our honesty and transparency and I will not apologise to anyone for speaking my mind and calling out bullshit when I see it.
“I am happy to unite on terms of transparency and purpose. So please join our Class Action and be weary of those that ask you for money without delivering any service.”
Her group has also established People for Safe Vaccines as a research, campaign and educational platform. “We realise that we need to spearhead actions against employers and businesses who are taking the law in their own hands and as unqualified individuals are now mandating medical interventions on their staff.
“We will be spearheading and supporting Fair Work actions that we intend to escalate to the Federal Court on the lawfulness and reasonableness of their directions. We have now two cases we are leading.”
AdvocateMe is targeting individuals impacted by the COVID-19 vaccination mandates and/or directives, including mandates in Queensland for hospital related employees, workers and contractors, mandates in NSW on transport workers in airports, and imminent impacts on aged care workers and nurses as a result of the announcement of the mandating of vaccines in aged care setting by the Commonwealth.
Also targeted are:
(i) Individuals impacted by mandatory influenza vaccination mandates and/or directions that disallow employees from accessing their jobs and/or visitors from accessing their loved ones;
(ii) Individuals impacted by mandatory hotel detention;
(iii) Individuals impacted by mandatory masking and/or PPE directives;
(iv) Individuals impacted by compulsory RT-PCR testing;
(v) Individuals impacted by forcible and complete business, services and/or place of worship lockdowns;
(vi) Individuals impacted by forcible separation from loved ones in residential aged care facilities and/or any other facilities.
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
CAN the wrecker of Victorian small business and lives, Premier “Dictator Dan” Andrews, be made accountable for his misdeeds in an international court?
Long-serving Victorian government economist Sanjeev Sabhlok aims to find out and has lodged a complaint in the International Criminal Court against Andrews for “crimes against humanity” under his insane and lawless state lockdowns.
Sabhlock says there is not a single peer reviewed paper or document – official or unofficial – to support lockdowns. He says the established Australian pandemic management policy was the same as the so-called “Swedish model” that we were led to believe was the exception.
The existing policy was suddenly switched to become the lockdown tyranny imposed by Andrews and other premiers. Sabhlock says lockdowns cannot be justified by science even under a Spanish flu pandemic. He says they are in fact dangerous and that is a major reason he filed the ICC complaint.
Sabhlok resigned in protest from the Department of Treasury and Finance in September 2020 after being asked to remove social media posts critical of the Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton and the government’s continued restrictions on people’s liberties.
Sabhlok, who served in Victoria’s public service for 20 years, 15 in the Treasury as a senior economist, and was a high-level public servant in India previously, accused Sutton of “massively exaggerating and misleading the entire public and politicians”. Cairns News believes it is an accusation that could be brought against all chief health officers across Australia who have become virtual dictators, apparently on behalf of global pharma and the Gates-Rockefeller mass vaccination, population control scam.
The Rockefeller Foundation floated the idea of a dictatorial government model in its May 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, in cahoots with the Global Business Network (GBN) of futurologist Peter Schwartz. GBN is part of the global health combine pushing vaccines.
The report’s first scenario, “Lock Step”, describes a world of total government control and authoritarian leadership in a future where a pandemic allows national leaders to impose rules and restrictions that would remain after the pandemic faded. Could string pulling by these powerful interests have facilitated the authoritarian pandemic response seen globally?
Sabhlok, in an interview with the Australian YouTube program In The Interests Of The People, said that between March 20 and 27th last year “something really big happened to Australia”. “The national cabinet completely abandoned all its plans and declined to do any of the risk-based approaches that were actually embedded in our own plans, which is what I explained in my complaint to the International Criminal Court,” he said.
In October Sabhlok wrote an open letter to the Victorian Treasury secretary David Martine asking him to provide all the relevant documents he provided the government relating to risk-based approaches, proportionality and cost benefit options in the pandemic management. He said if the Treasury didn’t do that, they didn’t perform their basic, fundamental role.
“We’ve had significant public service failure, we’ve had groupthink – so essentially what I’m saying is we should have a Royal Commission … that will look at the original Cabinet documents, we’ll look at the supporting documents … the various claims made by people.”
He said the only documents he had so far were those published in the Parliament and included the Chief Health Officers memos “which were really very shoddy – I cannot imagine a more pathetic set of documents that would determine public policy in Victoria.”
Sabhlok said he had studied a number of plans across the world including Sweden “who followed exactly what is in our plan, which is basically called flattening the curve, making sure the health system remains within capacity, we have voluntary social distancing, we monitor the people who are sick, we ask them to stay at home, we create management plans for businesses so that businesses can operate in a safe manner.
“That would have ensured we would have had a bit of a downfall in the economy – a bit of a minor recession I suppose – but we would have recovered very quickly without any of this massive unemployment and other issues we have faced. And of course, I’m not just talking unemployment I’m talking the mental harms, the tortures, the lockdowns and so on…. But there’s been a complete shift between the 20th and the 27th of March. We abandoned Australia’s well-established regulatory practices.”
Sabhlok says the three major “threads” in his study of the pandemic response are China, who were heavily involved in Italy through Belt and Road initiatives, the UK scientist Neil Fergusson who released bad modelling of the pandemic and the WHO chief Tedros Adhanom “who calls himself a doctor, which is very unfortunate because he’s not and he’s essentially a communist politician”.
Sabhlok said the role of politicians was also part of his complaint to the ICC because once the panic was created by the media, the politicians had strong incentives to follow the herd and reap only the political gains, “which is what Dan Andrews has been enjoying”.
Letter to the Editor
The World Health Organization is now coming out against lockdowns. Dr David Nabarro, the WHO’s special envoy on COVID-19, said recently:
We really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method…
We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus.
The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.
YOUR Governments have destroyed our Economy for no good reason! destroyed jobs, families for no good reason.
state that the death rate of those under 70-years old is only 0.33% and the average age of coronavirus deaths is 80 years old (and there are big concerns as to the reliabililty of the data – dying WITH coronavirus does not mean dying BECAUSE OF coronavirus)
As for Premier Dan “dunno” Andrews, words fail me.
But ScoMo is not much better, having destroyed Qantas and many jobs for no good reason.
Alex Stewart, NSW
Will dozy Australians take the cue? Protests have taken place across the world. Citizens from United States, India, Brazil, France, Russia are revolting
Americans are awake to the role the mainstream fake media is playing in this ‘pandemic’ Will Australians wake up?