Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths in Australian men.1 Worldwide, approximately 1.4 million men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2020 alone. 2
Now there’s evidence linking this common and life-threatening disease with the radiofrequency radiation from mobile and cordless phones.3
The new study was conducted by oncologist Professor Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg, using data they’d collected from previous studies.
‘The main finding of this study was an increased risk for prostate cancer associated with use of mobile phones,’ the authors said.
Their results make compelling reading. They found:
- men who had used mobile phones for more than ten years had nearly three times (2.8 times) the normal risk of developing prostate cancer;
- men who used mobile phones for more than 2,000 hours had 2.4 times the normal risk of developing prostate cancer;
- men who used mobile phones for between 1,000 and 2,000 hours and men who used cordless phones for the same amount of time had 2.3 times the normal risk of developing prostate cancer;
- men who used mobile and cordless phones had more than double the risk of developing the most malignant type of prostate cancer.
Hardell and Carlberg point out that there’s been evidence linking RF radiation with cancer for a very long time.
- Based on a review of studies, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RF radiation as a Class 2B (‘possible’) carcinogen in 2011.
- The 2018 Ramazzini Institute study found further evidence of tumours in exposed animals.
- The 2018 study by the National Toxicology Program confirmed this finding and showed evidence of lesions in the prostate glands of exposed animals.
- The 2024 UK (Biobank) study found increased risks of prostate cancer associated with mobile phone use.
References
- https://www.pcfa.org.au/news-media/news/prostate-cancer-in-australia-what-do-the-numbers-tell-us/
- https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer/chapter/epidemiology-and-aetiology
- Lennart Hardell, Michael Carlberg. Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones and the Association with Prostate Cancer. Fortune Journal of Health Sciences. 8 (2025): 267-273; https://cdn.fortuneonline.org/articles/use-of-mobile-and-cordless-phones-and-the-association-with-prostate-cancer.pdf
From Gil May
RE: “why aren’t all the fastidiously celibate Religious Orders overflowing the cancer wards at the murder centers?”
Last I heard, allegedly, most of them surreptitiously receive sufficient and direct prostatic stimulation from each other and from their illustrated Jack and Bill children’s books. But it might be simply a scurrilous rumour.
Caveat emptor.
Hey folks,
If anyone who fails to Spank that Monkey (Naughty Monkey!) at least twice a week is doomed to Prostate Cancer, then why aren’t all the fastidiously celibate Religious Orders overflowing the cancer wards at the murder centers?
One can only assume they bathe their gonads daily in steaming hot Kelp Soup (for, you know, penance or something).
My pure-as-driven-snow unblemished unsullied intellect can’t think of ANY other possible resolution to this puzzle. Not a one…
Dandy
And how long have these ‘studies’ been going on?, a couple of decades?, a half century?
Each to their own I suppose.
The cultivation of the unique life-giving essence within the sexual fluids has been central to certain groups since the dawn of writing.
The ancient texts make it abundantly clear, that the ancient Aryans understood the properties of Telomerase, where as previously stated, – doesn’t exist in normal cells or tissue, but only within the mature male and developing female reproductive cells, – and malignant tumours, which lends to cancerous cells.
Simply letting the semen sit there, serves little purpose, as you’ll just end up neurotic and smelling like an old buck-goat. The fluid needs to be sublimated, raised and diffused.
The diffused sublimate emits a pleasing subtle fragrance, which the opposite sex senses and naturally gravitate towards.
If one is smart enough to instigate the cultivation of the semen from a young age, they’ll have no problems as the years roll by, as the ongoing cultivation causes the cells to age much slower and healthier.
Even when loving a young lady, if the practitioner accidentally loses his prescribed inner mental focus and control of the operation, which results with the undesired consequence of instigating the ejaculation process, – one should simply expel the airs with force and redirect the semen back into the bladder by pressing the perineum.
The redirected semen within the bladder can then be reabsorbed into the body via another auxiliary technique.
‘Little bleeders’ decay quickly like post-menopausal women: when its gone, they’re gone.
To Michael M
The small studies that I am aware of directly linked the PSA level with “emptying the sack” as you put it.
That would be open to interpretation then wouldn’t it.
How important is the PSA? and how accurate is it
over the life of the prostate.
Screening too much?
Too quick to jump to ‘cancer’ conclusions based on a PSA?
Prostate hypertrophy (BPH) from inactivity? is that a better clue of health?
The studies also suggested more frequency when younger (no one complaining about that) while over the age of 70 years, it was “as able” for prostate health but preferably once a week.
Excuse me for quoting my favourite source, but this article lays the blame on childhood vaccinations, which, with the available evidence from the researchers mentioned in the article, may only be part of the problem:
https://annavonreitz.com/justbetweenus.pdf
I have recently written to the local paper here in Geelong, bashing a local MD and his crew, about their fearmongering over the flu, and urging peope to get a flu shot.
Worst idea in the world, given the examples quoted-and the word was, over ten years ago, that anyone who had had the flu shot had been secretly microchipped:
“Having known a number of peopel who have had seriously drastic adverse effects from flu shots they have taken, I would challenge Dr. Bernard Shui to accept to pay financial compensation to anyone he vaccinates with the flu shot who suffer serious adverse effects.
One Melbourne friend’s grandmother, post flu vax, went into a coma for several months.
Another, a local man in his eighties, who made the cover of this paper when Council compulsorily acquired his ropery, had his yearly flu shot and was so badly affected by that shot that he could not do the work he normally did on his semi-rural property in Marshalltown.
This friend’s previous shot had caused no problems, so why, people might ask, did this one?”
Not published, yet, but told the Letters Editor I would send it to Dr Shui if they didn’t publish.
Better still, I might LN the doctor to tell him that he must accept full commercial liability for all adverse effects from any vaxes he gives peopel.
My theory is that both Selwood brothers were vaxxed.
So the professionals say, that if you don’t empty your sack every week your prostate cancer risks rise?
Each to their own I suppose?
In nature most mammals have naturally limited periods of sexual activity, – mating season. For most of the year they retain their rich nutritional essence within.
Professional fighters and sportsmen do they same.
Not only is semen an extremely valuable source of iron, hormones and other chemcals, but more importantly, it is the body’s only source of the anti-ageing enzyme, Telomerase [the so called, ‘enzyme of immortality’], which only exists within mature male and developing female reproductive cells (ovaries and Skene’s gland secretions), – and malignant tumours. Telomerase is non-existent in normal cells.
The ancients understood all this, hence their large harems, – their ‘telomerase farms:’ – and the farms so called Rose of Sharon and Scarlet Women, etc.
If you want to open up the passage passing between the prostate gland, or conduct a bladder enema: learn how to perform the Vajroli-Mudra [preferably when your young].
No shit ? 🙄
Re: “My Oncologist said lack of use was the biggest cause of the disease”
With the new definition and state of today’s “womanhood” lack of use will become exacerbated and will develop into a new pandemic. Unless of course the Average Joe decides to jump ship and recycle one.
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
The Risks Associated with Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation. Dr. Gary G. Kohls
Global Research, May 31, 2024
Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter 28 June 2007
The following compilation of scientific studies and analysis by Dr. Gary G. Kohls M.D. was first published in the Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter, No. 304, 28 June 2007.
Microwave Radiation Causes Eye Damage
Microwave Radiation Damages DNA – The damaged DNA was passed on to subsequent generations of cells, a condition for the formation of cancer.
Cell Phone Usage Causes Tumors
Cell Phone Usage Disrupts Children’s Brains
Cell Phone Usage Causes Sterility in Women and might be the reason for birth defects and damaging the growth of embryos.
Cell Phone Usage Cuts Male Fertility
Microwave Radiation Causes Brain Damage
The Head Absorbs Radiation
Mobile Phone Signals Affect Brain Activity
Radiation From Cell Phones Makes Cancer Grow Faster
Cell Phone Radiation Can Cause Brain Tumors
Cell Phones Increase Blood Pressure
Just as the tobacco industry was able to hold back the truth regarding the health effects of smoking, the cell phone industry has suppressed the truth about cell phone hazards.
Continue >
https://www.globalresearch.ca/cell-phone-use-deadly/5858593
BILL GATES (*MAJOR FUNDER OF THE WHO) AND FRIEND/ASSOCIATE OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN
—-
‘You know we’re in trouble’ when industry-friendly WHO says there’s a problem
‘High Certainty’ Cellphone Radiation Linked to Cancer in Animals, WHO Study Finds.
Experts say it’s time for the World Health Organization to classify wireless radiation as a “known human carcinogen,” after a review commissioned by the organization concluded there is “high certainty” evidence that cellphone radiation exposure causes two types of cancer in animals.
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
April 28, 2025
“When even the WHO panel designed to whitewash the issue says there is a problem, you know we’re in trouble,” she said.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/high-certainty-cellphone-radiation-cancer-animals-who-study/
BILL GATES (*MAJOR FUNDER OF THE WHO) AND FRIEND/ASSOCIATE OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Biased? WHO-Backed Study Finds No Link Between Cellphones and Cancer
“The WHO selected scientists to conduct systematic literature reviews on the biologic and health risks of wireless radiation who had demonstrated their bias through prior publications by either not finding evidence of harm or dismissing any evidence they found”.
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D. – September 4, 2024
A scientific review commissioned by the WHO in Environmental International claims there is no link between cellphone use and brain cancer, but an expert on wireless technology and public health accused the reviewers of being biased.
Continued >
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/brain-cancer-cellphones-who-study/
From 2021 – Rare, Factual Account of Telecom Industry’s Corruption and Deception
Investigative reporter Barbara Koeppel exposes how the telecom industry, with help from regulatory agencies, has deceived the public about the health hazards of wireless technology.
by CHD 5G and Wireless Harms Project Team
January 15, 2021
“If you believe your cellphone is safe, why do you believe that? Is it a fact or based on carefully crafted messages that you’ve heard or read?”
With these simple, straightforward questions, investigative reporter Barbara Koeppel unpacks the telecom industry’s decades of deceptive public relations, capture of regulatory bodies, suppression of real science and intimidation of critics — tactics deployed by the industry in its quest to convince the public that cell phones are safe.
Those tactics have worked, Koeppel said, in her article published in The Washington Spectator:
“The industry is spectacularly successful in ensuring that its message echoes far and wide: its profoundly deep pockets purchase seats at all the right tables in the global and national watchdog agencies, media organizations, and scientific associations—which manage the misinformation.
Thus, industry’s billions decide which scientists and studies get funded or defunded, which get quoted or discredited, which agency commissioners bounce back and forth from telecom companies and corporate law firms, and how dissenters—such as U.S. states and cities—are sued and usually silenced.”
So successful, Koeppel reports, that only 5% of American adults worry about their cell phones.
Koeppel reviews the numerous international studies, conducted by independent scientists who refused to be silenced by industry linking, linking cell phone use to a host of human health issues. She writes:
Continued >
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rare-factual-account-telecom-industrys-corruption-deception/
If you want to depopulate your bloodline here is an interesting way you can do it while shopping at the supermarket
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/isteK4uQhQA
Any whistleblowers / anyone who opposes any of the ‘agendas/narratives’ are allegedly brought to their knees by any means they can think of.
You only have to do internet searches ‘do cell phones/ mobile phones cause cancer’ – and you are smashed with there is no evidence that cell phones / mobile phones cause cancer.
Many alleged this is why Dr. Charlie Teo was ‘brought down’ and his reputation smeared / destroyed in Australia – I remember quite some time ago when I first heard him talk about it – I thought you are a champion – you have integrity and you are blowing the whistle on this massive industry that is allegedly causing harm >
Renowned Neurosurgeon Dr. Charlie Teo Calls For the Right To Know About Cell Phone Radiation
h ttps://www.radiationresearch.org/articles/renowned-neurosurgeon-dr-charlie-teo-calls-for-the-right-to-know-about-cell-phone-radiation-youtube/
Mobile Phone and Brain Cancer – Dr Charlie Teo Warning Pt 1 of 2 – Watch Video
h ttps://cellsafe.com.au/blog/2015/03/17/mobile-phone-and-brain-cancer-dr-charlie-teo/
Stop Smart Meters Australia
https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/about-us/
A mobile phone = 2.4GHz
A microwave oven = 2.4GHZ
To Donald,
There are studies out there to confirm that it does need to be emptied regularly and that makes sense for all organs that need to go through a cleaning cycle.
The PSA was shown to be higher in those who didn’t do that and also shown to reduce back down when they did.
The question therefore is, why remove the prostate if that was the only reason?
Just emptying something regularly does not make it healthy alone, but it obviously helps.
Testicular cancer is more the risk with microwave anyway as that is closest to a mobile phone.
It’s a no brainer.
What a crock of shit, I didn’t own or use a mobile or cordless phone when I was diagnosed and had my prostate removed (8.5 on the Gleeson scale). My Oncologist said lack of use was the biggest cause of the disease, it should be emptied at least twice a week, manually if necessary.
Re: “What I wanna know is what are all those men doing with cordless phones in their CROTCH?”
Taking selfies.
I would add to that the serious lack of iodine in a man’s diet which the prostate LOVES.
It needs IODINE.
Iodine used to be the solution that cleaned the cow teats and we had it in our milk. No more.
Iodine is not in table salt, the iodized version not enough, especially if men are being told to avoid salt.
Iodine is in eggs (what eggs?)
Put some iodine on your crown jewels in the morning but don’t blame me if it wakes sleeping dogs.
I’m just the messenger.
Or read what Weston A. Price has to say about how critical it is to one’s health.
Reference: “the great iodine debate”
westonaprice. org
And keep the microwave out of your pocket anyway. There’s nothing that needs cooking down there.
The authior said – “… men who used mobile and cordless phones had more than double the risk of developing the most malignant type of prostate cancer…”
What I wanna know is what are all those men doing with cordless phones in their CROTCH?
“Prostate cancer linked to wireless radiation”
Really?https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/prostate.html#Prostate_Gland_CA
[…] Source link […]