Dr William Bay after his latest win in the courts.

IN 2023, William Bay, the Queensland doctor suspended by the AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency) during the Covid plandemic for publicly criticising government coercion to take mRNA injections, managed to get his case referred to the High Court of Australia.

Dr Bay had challenged not only the actions of AHPRA, but its actual legal standing. AHPRA was formed in 2010 under Queensland law after an intergovernmental (and unconstitutional) COAG agreement.

Dr Bay, self-represented, submitted to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Queensland that AHPRA was not a legal body under Australian law, only (possibly) under Queensland law, and the authority of AHPRA and the Medical Board of Australia to regulate doctors’ free political speech needed to be tested in the High Court.

Dylan Oakley, who has been closely following the case, wrote in Substack in 2023 that Australians have an implied right to freedom of political communication according to several High Court cases. We also have the freedom to choose our own leaders, and this is not possible without the ability to speak freely about political matters.

“Bay’s right to freedom of political communication is what is issue in this case. He says he has a a right to communicate about government Covid policy,” Oakley said.

AHPRA found itself in a corner and, with the support of the Queensland  government, tried to tell the Supreme Court that Dr Bay was wasting the the court’s time and money and sought for his two-day case to be thrown out. 

Instead the chief justice took the case herself and called an emergency court hearing. Dr Bay self-represented while both AHPRA and the Queensland government had four lawyers each.

Dr Bay went on to show the Chief Justice that there is no Health Practitioner Regulations National Law, only The Health Practitioner Regulations National Law Regulation 2018 – a subtle but legal difference.   The Chief Justice granted his request to move his case to the High Court. 

In Brisbane on Wednesday (Sept. 25th), Dr Bay was back in court for the pre-trial hearing, self-represented and facing AHPRA’s legal counsel team of seven. The legal team had earlier objected to Dr Bay’s witness documents as evidence but then withdrew all opposition to them. The three-day trial will take place on October 21st.

Dr Bay was originally suspended due to what media called his “bizzare rant” at doctors meeting for a medical conference in July 2022. Dr Anne Tonkin, the head of the panel that suspended Dr Bay, was also one of the alleged ‘victims’ of his ‘crime’, who ran away when Dr Bray shouted: “I’m here today to ask you to join with the people of Australia and stop forcing these vaccines on people who are getting killed by them.”

AHPRA’s suspension notice said Dr Bay’s conduct posed “a serious risk to persons” and required “immediate action” to protect public health. “The statements by you, as recently as June 2022, have the potential to undermine public health directives and positions in relation to the Covid-19 vaccine,” it stated.

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

19 thought on “Dr William Bay clocks up significant win in legal battle against AHPRA”
  1. I think it’s time that patriots everywhere launched a new prize.
    “The Noble Prize for Courage”

    I nominate Dr Bay as the first recipient.
    It doesn’t matter if he wins or not.
    A really courageous man.

    Just to be clear; the Nobel prize is funded by the manufacturers of explosives in some sort of conscience cleansing process. Many of the laureates are trying to block RFK from the White House. Conflict of interest?

  2. Bill Bay might get down to the wire with a good case but still lose. There Is no justice in the Courts, just the upholding iof the system, as people like Ian Henke found out.

  3. Ummm!! Seven bloodsuckers verse one doctor
    That pretty well explains everything
    One has a concious the others are there for the money
    That’s the way our political/ legal system rolls
    Perhaps we need to bring back the ancient but effective
    “Council of the Elders”
    Those that live in their communities and answer to them directly
    Won’t help the local Merc dealer but it would definitely give us honest justice

  4. A formidable campaigner, hopefully the groundswell of opinion nationally is enough by now to give him wings

  5. Isaac said – “… The doctor should not have to fight any battle…”

    … and TBH, we shouldn’t have to fight the moths in the pantry, and yet…

    FWIW, I’ve yet to find a can of “Hang the Bastards” on the shelf in the pest-control aisle down at the local supermarket. When someone FINALLY decides to patent and market it, there’ll be a HUGE customer base just ITCHING to snap it up.

    Or maybe Australians will eventually learn to improvise like the cheese-eating French. Surely there are still a few carpenters and metal workers left in Australia.

  6. A brave woman doing extraordinary things in NZ.
    The way forward !? Get the swamp creatures squirming and imploding because of their own devices. Hoist them on their own petard. Brilliant!

    Riveting testimony by Janine of the House of Arabella (New Zealand) as she recounts the steps that led her to gain mastery of the private administrative process for remedy, and using affidavits and commercial liens to hold public officials liable for their harmful actions.

    https://rumble.com/v5f7gl9-the-power-of-affidavits-testimony-of-janine-of-the-house-of-arabella.html?ysclid=m1d92lin2r112117247

  7. I’m seeing lots of congratulations here for Dr. Bay, but that’s a bit like congratulating a runner for being entered into a race before the starting gun has even fired.

    It ain’t over until the Fat Lady sings and every last individual involved in any way, shape or form with this AHPRA abomination is identified, dragged into the streets and sstrung up to lamp posts.

    Figuratively speaking, of course, because who would EVER possibly have ill will or bad intentions toward a pack of TREASONOUS sold-out self-annointed UNELECTED ARSEHOLES who PRESUME to have the “authority” to RULE OVER US just because THEY SAY SO?

    A pack of MASS-MURDERING pieces of SHIT responsible for the GREVIOUS INJURY AND DEATH of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of Australians, not unlike that OTHER rolling circus of paid-off SCUM the TGA and it’s latter-day horror movie escapee Skerritt who ran for the hills with HIS accumulated Genocide bonuses from 50 years of loyal wet-work and poison promotion for Big Pharma.

    Which is why when we DO hang EVERY LAST ONE of these disgusting vermin, it will be done all nice and legal-like, and ONLY in the best POSSIBLE taste.

  8. FANTASTIC DOC AND THANK YOU FOR NOT ONLY STANDING UP FOR AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS BUT THE RIPPLE EFFECT AROUND THE WESTERN WORLD WILL BE NOTICED. IT WOULD BE A GOOD THING IF SOME OF YOU AUSSIES STARTED A CAMPAIGN TO SUPPORT THE GOOD MAN.

  9. I posted this on Dylan Oakleys’ Fact check site just now, and he does not seem to like it. Maybe his moderators are looking it over:
    “You are wrong about the right to free speech, as the political rights and duties of Aussie people are enshrined in the Crimes Act 1914 Section 28, which says that anyone interfering with the political rights and duties of any other person, by threats, violence or intimidation, is guilty of “an offence” which is punishable b y three years jail. So does the Criminal Code Act 1995, Section 83.4. So get the facts right, Dylan.”
    I have sent that document to this publication, and it might be time they posted it, just to get the facts STRAIGHT!!!

  10. Kudos Dr Bay. When others joined in a conga line, you displayed courage at a significant cost to yourself. Unlike the judiciary, civil rights campaigners, human rights lawyers, politicians, the medical profession and the MSM, none chose to question or refute the lies we were told. The unjustified loss of liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of movement and freedom of assembly whilst knowing that there were legitimate medical concerns in relation to the mandated use of an experimental vaccine, its questionable efficacy and long-term effects must never be forgotten or excused.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading