BBC going pink and it is mandatory

One in six of all on-screen BBC roles must go to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender or disabled people by 2020, the corporation’s new diversity targets state.

In a bid to deter criticism that it has been failing to reflect its audience, the BBC has pledged that LGBT and disabled people will each make up eight per cent of all on-air and on-screen roles.

The new targets follow a heated debate in the House of Commons led by David Lammy MP on the issue of the broadcaster’s diversity.

The BBC’s new diversity targets follow a debate in the House of Commons led by David Lammy MP (pictured) on the issue of the broadcaster’s diversity

Fifty per cent of all on-screen and broadcasting roles will go to women, who already make up 48.5 per cent of the BBC’s total workforce.

However, the BBC will still be able to commission shows where the main roles are more likely to be male-dominated.

Radio 2, which has a particularly male-dominated line-up of broadcasters, including DJs and presenters Chris Evans, Simon Mayo, Jeremy Vine and Bob Harris, faces an overhaul.

Last year, a review by the BBC Trust, the corporation’s watchdog, found that six stations – including Radio 2 – raised concerns that they were failing ethnic minority audiences.

Advertisements

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understand the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head this year.

Posted on April 26, 2016, in General. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Doreen Spillman

    O.M.G. . . .What next? Where will it end? As a starting point . . . .Who watches TV to see ‘copies’ of themselves anyway? Don’t we watch to be entertained – to escape from the reality – or even boredom – of our lives? Then there is the issue of stereotypes – Define how a ‘gay’ or ‘lesbian’ person would look compared to a heterosexual of the same gender! They are all just people . . .. in the case of TV . . .they are actors. ‘Straights’ can play the role of ‘gays’ and vice-versa . . ..The ‘job’ of an actor entails acting after all! How then would you define a ‘disabled’ person . . . What would the stereotype of a disabled person be?? A bit tricky given the wide scope this ‘label’ encompasses – with mental and physical disabilities of varying degrees. Just imagine if you will . . .. a drama about a time in history . . . Does history have to be altered in order to fit these diversity requirements? Is there a risk that shows with considerable quality and merit will not be aired simply because the station would then not be able to meet these diversity criteria, because of the shows that they were already committed to running?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.