How economically sustainable is Australian rare earth mining? An examination of Thorium extraction
The Labor Party government and the Greens are staunchly opposed to nuclear reactors being built in Australia to provide affordable electricity.
While uranium is being mined and exported to trading partners, Labor is dismantling coal-fired electricity and uranium is not allowed to fuel any future reactors for electricity generation.
Labor has wasted billions on subsidising Chinese-supplied wind generators and solar panels for an intermittent and expensive electricity supply, but serious, non-government investment has been disappearing as fast as PM Albanese from a synagogue dinner.
The renewables fantasy is all but over.
In 2025 PM Albanese struck a deal with US President Donald Trump to access Australia’s critical minerals. However existing laws and regulations prevent mining of elements such as Thorium.
How the US or local miners will legally and economically extract our rare earth is yet to be determined but protocols for developing a new mine are so excessive that the US surely will realise no new miner can comply with the most restrictive mining regulations in the world.
Unattainable, unsustainable and ridiculous environmental regulations, punitive taxation and royalties, toughest industrial relations laws in the world, health and safety regulations making it too safe to operate, unreliable and highest electricity costs in the world and excessive fuel costs would turn away any new venture.
If Queensland’s NW Mining Province were to be opened for mining of rare earths any miner would have to seriously examine the third-world road and rail network, no available, affordable electricity supply, insufficient surface water supplies and no housing or accommodation.
Economically, other than iron ore, new Australian mining ventures remain a pipe dream of the political class.

A focus on Thorium for energy, supply chain and advanced nuclear capability
By Adam Orlando, Mining.com.au
Thorium is not a near-term production commodity, but is increasingly relevant to Australia’s long-range defence and energy security planning. Abundant domestically and commonly hosted within rare earth mineral systems, thorium represents a strategic resource whose value lies in optionality rather than immediacy.
As digital oversight, nuclear innovation, and geopolitical uncertainty converge, thorium’s role shifts from geological curiosity to latent national asset.
Mining.com.au previously reported thorium is similar to uranium and can be used as a source of nuclear power with consensus there’s probably more energy available from thorium than from both uranium and fossil fuels.
In a strategic context, thorium is emerging in defence planning through three intersecting lenses – energy security, supply chain sovereignty, and advanced nuclear capability.
In this report, Mining.com.au outlines why thorium warrants attention within defence-adjacent mining policy, how digital technologies reshape its viability, and what strategic signals to monitor between now and 2030.
No longer flying under the radar
Military and defence spending is rising across the world, which is leading to more demand for metals and minerals crucial to the sector from antimony to rare earths to thorium and uranium.
World Population Review reports America leads the world in military and defence spending at about $970 billion, ahead of China ($320 billion), Russia ($150 billion), and Germany ($86 billion). Australia ($33 billion) and Canada ($29 billion) are way down the list.
Unlike uranium, thorium is not currently embedded in Australia’s nuclear fuel cycle. However, its abundance (three times more abundant than uranium and about the same as lead), distribution and byproduct nature within rare earths systems offer Australia a potential future advantage should alternative nuclear technologies mature and longstanding policies change.
Analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) shows that critical minerals cooperation, including nuclear fuel inputs, offers a way for the allied partners of Western nations to find common ground and bolster defence supply chains.
Although thorium itself is not singled out, the report stresses the defence sector’s growing reliance on strategic mineral security as part of broader geopolitical competition.
From a defence perspective, thorium offers strategic optionality. Advanced reactor concepts, particularly those designed for long-duration, low-maintenance power, are often discussed in the context of remote installations, hardened infrastructure and future naval or industrial systems.
While these technologies are not yet commercial-ready, thorium’s presence especially within Australia’s resource base positions the country to not be structurally excluded from future pathways.
In October 2025, the Government of Canada announced the launch of the Critical Minerals Production Alliance with allied partners – a C$6.4 billion initiative to accelerate critical minerals supply chains crucial for defence, clean energy, and advanced manufacturing.
Minister Tim Hodgson says the measures will “accelerate and unlock” projects vital to strengthening national and allied security interests. While not solely about thorium, this reflects how critical minerals policy – including uranium and potentially byproduct thorium – is being integrated into defence industrial strategies.
Organisations from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) to the World Nuclear Association point out in terms of defence, there’s no readiness to mine thorium tomorrow, but there should be readiness to respond if demand emerges and technology advances.
Thorium in Australia does not typically occur as a primary target. It is most often found in monazite-bearing rare earth deposits, alongside zircon and titanium minerals.
As global tensions rise and a potentially irreversible fracturing of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) emerges, this aspect could become important for defence strategy as it reduces standalone project risk, enables thorium to be extracted within existing or future critical-minerals supply chains, and avoids the need for a dedicated thorium mining industry.
A November 2022 report by law firm Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer notes that Australia has leveraged existing trade relationships with America, India, and Japan (formalised under the recently signed Critical Minerals Partnership), establishing commitments towards building secure critical minerals supply chains between Australia and each relevant economy.
The firm reports that using these partnerships, Australia can garner investment in collaborative ventures in the critical minerals industry, from research and development and pilot studies through to commercial projects.
“These international agreements help Australia to solidify trade pathways for critical minerals demand and its reputation as a reliable supplier of resources to the world,” the firm says.
“The growing global demand for critical minerals, coupled with Australia’s significant demonstrated reserves and commitment from the Australian Government places Australian mining companies in a position to benefit from investing in critical mineral exploration.”
There are commercial opportunities available to repurpose existing exploration and mining operations to take advantage of existing infrastructure and supply chains, including co-production of critical minerals occurring at existing sites; establishing new processing and extraction facilities on existing sites; post-production extraction of metals, such as deriving metals from mine waste (tailings extraction); and mine closure and rehabilitation planning, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer continues.
To ensure that any benefits earned from critical minerals exploration and processing activities are not offset by the material geological, political, trade, and investment risks associated with critical minerals, sharing of risk allocation can be achieved by utilising collaborative contracting structures.
From a strategic resilience standpoint, co-production would allow thorium to “ride along” with commodities already recognised as defence-critical, particularly rare earths used in electronics, guidance systems and advanced manufacturing.
From Geoscience Australia
Significant uranium mining has not occurred in Queensland since 1982 due to a ban by the Queensland Government. However, exploration for uranium is still allowed.
There is no production of thorium in Australia but it is present in monazite being mined with other minerals in heavy mineral beach sand deposits. The heavy sands recovered are processed to separate these heavy minerals, and the light fraction is returned to the deposit. In current heavy mineral sand operations, the monazite fraction is returned to mine site and dispersed to reduce radiation as stipulated in mining conditions. Stream sediments, alluvial terraces, beach sediments, beach terraces, and shallow water sediments have all been mined for heavy minerals.
Thorium-bearing monazite extracted from mineral sands is usually mixed with a variety of other minerals, including silica, magnetite, ilmenite, zircon, and garnet. The first stage of concentrating the monazite is to wash out lighter minerals by placing the sand on shaking tables and passing the resulting monazite fraction through a series of electromagnetic separators.
To separate thorium from the other elements in monazite, the mineral is ground into a powder and mixed with hot concentrated sulphuric acid or sodium hydroxide solutions. The residue that is left contains 99% of the thorium and 5% of the other elements (mostly rare earths). An alternative processing method involves converting the thorium in monazite, thorite, or other minerals to thorium dioxide (ThO2). This is then heated with calcium, sodium or magnesium. The compound produced is mixed with dilute nitric acid and then washed with water, alcohol, and ether. This produces a metal powder which can be compacted to form 99.7% pure thorium metal. Further processing can produce thorium metal that is 99.97% pure.

Left,right,center of Politics are GOYIM SUICIDE KITS, supplied by the Small Hats, Ba,al Hats. White anting Countries from within. One day the Goyim will rise up, after a long sleep and we will no longer be bonded slaves. What was before LRC of Politics, do you have an IQ to work it out? or just carry on with the LRC Noise….
Rare Earths are not rare in terms of being unavailable. They are rare because they have to be concentrated to such levels that this process also concentrates radionuclides in the soil, making the whole lot radioactive. Fortunately one Australian company has devised a technical method to circumvent and disperse the radionuclides before radioactivity even becomes a problem.
All is never what it seems.
The latest proposed $10 billion Gippsland Data Centre wouldn’t happen to be where the Victorian fires have been burning in Gippsland would they?
Either way, Data Centres need the critical mineral copper.
Right now critical minerals are all about AI and technology.
Raping the earth and future generations as we go.
These ever increasing Data Centres also need a spotlight shone on them.
Why? Because they take water.
For cooling.
Lots of water.
In some Countries like Mexico, the water is draining agricultural land and taking away from the people.
This is yet something else to shine a light on.
Remember the new Da-vos appointee head honcho said something about “water” – didn’t make sense at the time.
Reference: “Could thirsty AI worsen the water crisis? | People & Power
Al Jazeera English (Ytube)
Quacking auto bot *conscience
The potential for nuclear weapons getting into the hands of religious movements and people with beliefs of eschatological views with apocalyptic finalities is very real.
What would be better for Life on Earth, for Mother Earth?
Thorium-232 with a half-life of ~ 14 billion years, or uranium-238 with a half-life of ~ 4.5 billion years?
Kickbacks and stories have consequences.
Kalgoorlie going dark causing scarcity, is probably the reason Stoker Chook is keeping the coal fires burning in Western Australia for at least another five years; convenience over conscious, needs over ideology.
I see a massive A.I. driven Data Centre is being built in JoeB’s country; said to need 200 million watts of power at any one time to keep it alive.
The greatest destruction and pollutant to the biosphere, to life, is caused by unchecked war, biological, atmospheric, nuclear, conventional.
What does it matter if lead is used in armaments and solder in A.I. Data Centres.
The green circular economy is controlled by China, was bankrolled by Western debt, mostly U.S.
Why should China allow their products to be sent back by aggressive militaries of collapsing empires to kill their own people?
Will they allow metals refineries be built around the world, Australia, the U.S., that result in the same outcome?
Hey folks,
Strange that the strategic needs of the collapsing Empire always seem to “Trump” Australia’s.
Everything was going swimmingly there for a while with the bourgening harmonious economically complementary and very lucrative relationship with China. Until the fake corporate Australian “government” got its instructions to kick CHina in the balls, over and over and over and over again. Even a Dragon gets tired and just a little bit annoyed with a mouse kicking it repeatedly in the balls.
That was way back in the days when Australians still had electricity and some semblance of basic local industry and infrastructure and food FFS, and people lived in houses instead of under bridges and in cemeteries. Bend over and kiss all of that goodbye.
Meanwhile, why in the world should we now be puckering over the prospect of tooling up at great expense to flog even more of our continental resources at give-away prices to the walking dead, when we already know with great confidence that the so-called United States of America won’t even exist within a decade or so?
Seems we just can’t extricate ourselves from that subordinate colonial carriage and off that train, folks, that runaway LOCKSTEP train barreling down that hole in the ground leading straight down to Hell.
Commenter Shulze supplied this exhaustive list a few days ago
https://www.sott.net/article/504302-Geopolitics-and-the-Weaponizing-of-the-periodic-table
There is a lot of concern about military stockpiles but I think the USA has got beyond a lot of that by now.
Nucular war was never really on the table and always a deterrent. I told people in the Reagan years.
I think magnesium can be stored, what they are talking about may be granules of ore or something like that
All rare earths require labour and capital intensive production programs as per the last paragraph above. In Australia we seem to just rip up the rock and offload it to cheap labour and energy regions for processing to its final stage. Ideally the US would just like to purchase the end product as they have been doing with China, so the real question here is which resource company is willing to commit the massive capital required to have a production facility catering to the US. Is it viable here?
People of basic common sense are now rallying around Pauline Hanson and I will have no hesitation in going with the crowd. The UnaParty is obsessed with their kickbacks and post political career moves. Nothing good will ever come from any of them, only notable exception is Alex Antic. I don’t hold out much hope for Hastie since he needs to show he is different from UnaParty he has failed, as did Susan Ley. Both failures.
Australia will never succeed at anything with this UnaParty dragging us under. They will just borrow and borrow for their useless idiot schemes and in 20 years all their windmills will be scrap. Canberra is a serious, very gravely serious, problem for this country and the new APH should be shut down and the old one restored to original minimalist function, with no lobbyists allowed in. This country is like a diseased dog with worms inside and leeches all over it and half blind so it can barely walk. Only the dog food keeps it alive, a big bowl every day from the North West. The reason for the fast-tracked degradation is wholly and entirely because of our governments and politicians.
re: Australia is owned by the USA, Trump told them he wants Port of Darwin back under Australian ownership so they have to do it. If the CCP wants Andrew ROBb’s head on a plate as far as I’m concerned they are welcome to it. I am available for the presentation.
The united states owns Australia, no need to ask permission to mine here, GOT-IT-YET, USA owns Australia
Thorium should be left on the shelf, period.
B,B,B,But isn’t Australia owned by a Corporation based in the USA owned by some banking Mob ?
Would it not be up to them what is mined seeing they own the turf we walk upon , we seem to exist here to pay for their Administration fees to run Australia for them .
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]