Prof Zimmerman warns government Covid measures are unlawful

Prime Minister Scott Morrison is well aware he is unable to lawfully mandate vaccination or conscription of any medical procedure. Therefore as Professor Zimmerman explains the entire Covid response has been and is unlawful.

Cairnsnews fervently hopes the people will rise up in any manner or form but especially to start legal proceedings against nearly every politician in Australia. None of them have any protection at Common Law and their statutes are simply corporate policies which have no meaning or effect upon the natural citizens of Australia.

Lock downs, vaccination passports, masks, contact tracing, home incarceration, road blocks, arrests and coercion by financial penalty are all covered under the ambit of section 51 (xxiiiA) particularly when the entire plandemic has been thoroughly investigated by innumerable, reputable virologists across the world and found to be a scam.

Workplace-related vaccine mandates also fall under Section 51. Tell any so-called authority to go jump if you are pressured by Covid cops to submit. -Editor

Constitutionally Inoculated to Resist Coercion

24 July 2021   Dr Augusto Zimmermann is Professor and Head of Law at Sheridan Institute of Higher Education, and Professor of Law (Adjunct) at the University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney campus.  Dr Zimmermann was chairman and professor of constitutional law at Murdoch University from 2007 to 2017. He is also a former Law Reform Commissioner in WA (2012-2017) and President of the Western Australian Legal Theory Association (WALTA).

Professor Augusto Zimmerman, former Chairman of Constitutional Law at Murdoch University and Professor of Law at Notre Dame Sydney warns governments that compulsory vaccination and related medical procedures are unlawful, This includes vaccine passports

One of the most remarkable characteristics of the Australian Constitution is its express limitation on governmental powers.  In drafting the Constitution, the framers sought to design an instrument of government intended to distribute and limit the powers of the State.  This distribution and limitation upon governmental powers was deliberately chosen because of the proper understanding that unrestrained power is always inimical to the achievement of human freedom and happiness.  As such, the Constitution allocates the areas of legislative power to the Commonwealth primarily in sections 51 and 52, with these powers being variously exclusive or concurrent with the Australian States.

The Constitution was slightly amended in 1946 by a referendum in order to include section 51 (xxiiiA). This provision determines that the Parliament, inter alia, can make laws with respect to:

The provision of … pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorise any form of civil conscription) benefits to students and family allowances…

As can be seen, this provision allows for the granting of various services by the federal government but not to the extent of authorising any form of civil conscription. The prohibition of such conscription is directed particularly to the provision of medical services.[1]

The idea that constitutional provisions protect individual rights plays a fundamental role in our understanding of these express limitations and, indeed, our understanding of the implied constitutional limitations derived from them. In this context, the “no conscription” requirement to be found in that provision amounts to an explicit constitutional limitation. It is an implied constitutional right of the individual so that such prohibition is not directed only to the federal government but it must also be extended to the exercise of legislative power by the Australian states.   

In other words, no Australian government, either federal or state, or those acting on its behalf, is constitutionally authorised to force any individual to take medicament against his or her own will, or force them or their children to be, among other things, compulsorily vaccinated.  

The concept of ‘civil conscription’ was first considered by the High Court in British Medical Association v Commonwealth (1949) 79 CLR 201; [1949] HCA 44 (7 October 1949).  That case involved federal legislation which required medical practitioners to comply with a particular federal medical determination as part of a scheme to provide pharmaceutical benefits.

In other words, that case was about the validity of legislation which compelled medical practitioners to render a particularly medical-pharmaceutical service.   In his written judgement Justice Williams stated (emphasis added):

Accordingly, in my opinion, the expression invalidates all legislation which compels medical practitioners or dentists to provide any form of medical service” (emphasis ours). [2]

Similarly, in his written decision Justice Webb commented:

If Parliament cannot lawfully do this directly by legal means it cannot lawfully do it indirectly by creating a situation, as distinct from merely taking advantage of one, in which the individual is left no real choice but compliance” (emphasis ours).[3]

Of course, a doctor who freely performs his or her medical service does not create conscription. However, as Justice Webb explicitly mentioned:

When Parliament comes between patient and doctor and makes the lawful continuance of their relationship as such depend upon a condition, enforceable by fine, that the doctor shall render the patient a special service, unless that service is waived by the patient, it creates a situation that amounts to a form of civil conscription.[4]

That important decision confirmed the fundamental right of Australian citizens to determine by their own will whether they should take any medical or pharmaceutical benefit provided. Accordingly, any legislation that requires medical practitioners to prescribe government-mandated medical services constitutes a form of civil conscription that is constitutionally invalid.

In this sense, Chief Justice Latham argued in the British Medical Association case that civil conscription would include not only legal compulsion to engage in particular conduct but also the imposition by government of a medical duty to perform a service in any particular way.[5]  Constitutional limits on legislation which does not acknowledge this important guarantee were more recently acknowledged in Wong v Commonwealth; Selim v Professional Services Review Committee .  In this ruling the High Court restricted the capacity of both federal and state governments to implement mandatory vaccination, even recommendations from the National Health directives for either federal or state governments.

Of course, in the PSR case the Court was simply following precedent as per the previous 1949 decision which had already clarified the issue.  Accordingly, Chief Justice French and Justice Gummow held that civil conscription is a ‘compulsion or coercion in the legal and practical sense, to carry out work or provide [medical] services’.[6]

Importantly, the High Court also indicated that the prohibition of civil conscription must be construed widely, to invalidate any law requiring medical practitioners (expressly or by practical compulsion) to work for the Commonwealth government or any Australian State.  Simply put, no law in this country can compel any medical service on behalf of the Australian government.

As can be seen, section 51 (xxiiiA) maintains the prohibition of vaccination through any form of government-run health service, indicating that vaccination should only be through voluntary means in accordance with the free communications between medical doctor and patient, which is essential to achieve a high-quality healthcare. 

To conclude: the Australian Constitution explicitly prohibits any form of legal compulsion upon the medical profession to carry out any form of medication, including vaccination.

In fact, no government, either federal or state, can impose compulsory vaccination in this country, or prevent medical practitioners from remaining entirely free to choose whether or not to provide certain medical services, including vaccination.

[1] See: Alexandra Private Geriatric Hospital Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1987) 162 CLR 271 at 279; 69 ALR 631; Halliday v Commonwealth (2000) 45 ATR 458; [2000] FCA 950 AT [11].

[2] (1949) 79 CLR 201, at 287 (Williams J).

[3] (1949) 79 CLR 201, at 293 (Webb J).

[4] (1949) 79 CLR 201, at 295 (Webb J).

[5] (1949) 79 CLR 201, at 295 (Latham CJ).

[6] Wong v Commonwealth; Selim v Professional Services Review Committee (2009) 236 CLR 573, at [62]

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on August 11, 2021, in ABC, Common Law, Commonwealth Constitution of Australia, coronavirus, Corporate Government, Corporate policy, Covid Cops, Covid passport, Covid vaccines, Covid-19 and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 40 Comments.

  1. armandamartini2gmailcom

    Note to editor: the term “citizen” take you out of common law inalienable rights and puts you back into your strawman and the fictional corporate realm.

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Like

  2. Maybe the enforcers of all this madness feel they have no issue with legal proceedings as they have the backing of the wealthiest most powerful elite on earth?
    This is good to read about this professor and I hope this all develops rapidly. It just seems like the other side races forwards non stop, with no hope for us in spite of slowly advancing cases coming into play by Serene or others.

    Like

  3. Richard Noakes

    In America. AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna are still “Experimental Test Vaccines” for Emergency Use only and have not been approved for use in humans, in fact the Pfizer one is not supposed to be ready for human use until 2023, when it might pass all of the pretest conditions and then be approved.

    Yet the Australian Government rubber stamped these 3 for immediate use – while they are still test vaccines in America, which makes no sense.

    Like

  4. Thank God for this clause inserted into our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and praise God for Professor Augusto Zimmerman. This was good news to read this morning Editor. Thank you.
    See how Psalm 94 speaks to our situation world wide now:

    94 O Lord God, to whom vengeance belongeth; O God, to whom vengeance belongeth, shew thyself.

    2 Lift up thyself, thou judge of the earth: render a reward to the proud.

    3 Lord, how long shall the wicked, how long shall the wicked triumph?

    4 How long shall they utter and speak hard things? and all the workers of iniquity boast themselves?

    5 They break in pieces thy people, O Lord, and afflict thine heritage.

    6 They slay the widow and the stranger, and murder the fatherless.

    7 Yet they say, The Lord shall not see, neither shall the God of Jacob regard it.

    8 Understand, ye brutish among the people: and ye fools, when will ye be wise?

    9 He that planted the ear, shall he not hear? he that formed the eye, shall he not see?

    10 He that chastiseth the heathen, shall not he correct? he that teacheth man knowledge, shall not he know?

    11 The Lord knoweth the thoughts of man, that they are vanity.

    12 Blessed is the man whom thou chastenest, O Lord, and teachest him out of thy law;

    13 That thou mayest give him rest from the days of adversity, until the pit be digged for the wicked.

    14 For the Lord will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance.

    15 But judgment shall return unto righteousness: and all the upright in heart shall follow it.

    16 Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?

    17 Unless the Lord had been my help, my soul had almost dwelt in silence.

    18 When I said, My foot slippeth; thy mercy, O Lord, held me up.

    19 In the multitude of my thoughts within me thy comforts delight my soul.

    20 Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?

    21 They gather themselves together against the soul of the righteous, and condemn the innocent blood.

    22 But the Lord is my defence; and my God is the rock of my refuge.

    23 And he shall bring upon them their own iniquity, and shall cut them off in their own wickedness; yea, the Lord our God shall cut them off.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. It’s been suggested that what we need is a National prize for anyone who can provide a scientific paper describing the successful isolation / purification of the “virus”, which the politicians claim is the basis for their very restrictive “covid laws”, Risky injections, and
    health endangering facemasks.

    I will contribute towards such a Prize.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. “Amended in 1946 by a referendum” when the horrors of the NAZI medical experiments were fresh in the popular mind.

    It didnt stop the federal government withholding supporting parent benefits to compel parents to have their kids injected with stuff. A government in the service of drug companies can always weasel ways to do the drug company’s bidding.

    There is a full-on attempt by the drug companies to lock-in governments to future vax roll-outs , a desperate attempt before widespread knowledge of Terrain Theory tosses the unscientific ‘Germ Theory” into Historys’ dustbin.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Marines Rebuke Def. Sec.: “No Mandatory Vaccinations for My Marines.”

    “Under no circumstances will Marines be compelled to take a potentially hazardous vaccination that the FDA won’t even fully endorse,” Gen. Berger told Austin. “You are a coward and a traitor, manipulated by people pushing bad policy on the men and women who provide security to our nation. Neither you nor your puppet president has authority to enforce such a policy.”

    https://realrawnews.com/2021/08/marines-rebuke-def-sec-no-mandatory-vaccinations-for-my-marines/

    Liked by 1 person

  8. we already know this the real deal is removing all the fear porn and restrictions and tracing and quarantine camps

    who is fighting for our old abnormal?

    Like

  9. Richard Noakes

    So – your State Premier says you must have a vaccine and he or she enforces it – saying Section 51 and 52 of Government Law is not going to cut it, so how do we take this action to the next step – what Lawyer is going to go up against the State Government, especially if they have been vaccinated – and how much is that going to cost, per person, for us to do?

    I suppose no Lawyer will work on a no win, no pay, payout incentive, if they win, from the State Premier concerned and they don’t get paid if they lose, will they?

    Mandates are in place now – no jab, no job and who knows what the next reduction will be on our rights, I was told by the police once, that “we” don’t have any rights – so I said “I’d love to help you, but I have nothing to say at this time” which went down like a lead brick – but it is how it is and I said nothing (which everyone should do when questioned by police, because even the most innocent comment can be used against you in a Court Of Law) – but that won’t work when someone is trying to give you a jab you don’t want, will it?

    Richard

    Like

  10. Richard Noakes

    De Buisseret also discussed the Nuremberg Trials in the context of Covid-19.

    You can listen to Anna de Buisseret’s full 30-minute interview https://www.bitchute.com/video/AYvCetnuH5aG/

    Like

  11. I have seen only the first part of the transcript of Patrick King’s case in Alberta. It seems evident that he did not set out to “take on” the covid scam, more that he was trying to defend himself from the perpetrators of that scam. In the transcript, it is evident that he intended to subpoena the individuals of the Alberta government responsible for the regulations that were in place. I’m guessing that he required them to “show cause” ie. produce evidence of the existence of the “covid 19” virus.
    The point that I’m trying to get to here is that he managed to mandate their appearance in court IN PERSON to be cross examined, at what appears to be very little cost to himself.
    Perhaps it’s time we took a leaf out of his book and subpoena’d Scummo to appear and be cross examined (to say nothing of Janette (Mengle)) and Desperate Dan, to name two others.
    Statements from them UNDER OATH would be very interesting indeed.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. All good and well….but answer me this

    How come they are doing the exact opposite?
    How is it that they are getting away with this?
    How can the average Joe fight against a corrupt government when they are brutalised by corrupt police?

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Richard Noakes

    Re my post: So – your State Premier says you must have a vaccine and he or she enforces it, above:

    Seems to me that SloMo is the cause of these contracts being signed for Pfizer and Moderna and AstraZeneca and he should be called to account along with the contracts he signed on behalf of all Australians and see if he is corrupt, to Pfizer, for starters, for signing the Pfizer contract and why would he do that and rubber stamp all of them as passed for general use, while none of them have been approved in America and are all still for Emergency Use only and under “Experimental Test Vaccines?”

    I can’t tell for sure, but I think it is possible for someone to go to the High Court and lodge a personal charge, calling someone to account for their actions and I think you lodge your complaint with the Clerk Of Courts and then it goes on from there.

    I’m too old and past it, to contemplate doing it myself, but someone in Canberra with youth and lots of spunk, would be ideal for the motion, and I think it only costs a few dollars to lodge the “thing” and then it takes off with a life of its own – maybe the female solicitor I have been reading about here: “I’m back!!”

    Richard

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Georges Salman

    Dear Augusto Zimmerman

    I’m and my Heart is with you !
    With in respect you will have my support
    towards humanity and for the TRUTH .

    Yours faithfully
    Georges Salman

    Like

  15. Richard Noakes

    Hey Mr Leader. You want to save lives from Covid with your Experimental Test Vaccines which in America, have been supplied under Emergency Use and have not been approved for General Use (untested) yet and I want to save lives with my free salt water cure against Coronavirus, before it ever gets to be Covid, so why don’t you advertise both methods, for those who don’t want your vaccines and then it is a win/win for your Government, with lives won, instead of lives lost from the Coronavirus, virus, after it becomes Covid Delta, or the new Delta/Lambda Variant in Peru at the moment, the only difference being that I have been doing my salt water cure for 26 years longer than the 7 months your AstraZeneca, Moderna and Pfizer vaccines have been around and I place my total trust in my salt water cure to keep me safe and anyone else who decides to try it – we are, after all, trying to achieve the same thing and save lives, aren’t we?

    “Even so, a key issue is that the current vaccines block severe disease “but do not prevent infection”, said Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine scientist at the Mayo Clinic. That is because the virus is still capable of replicating in the nose, even among vaccinated people, who can then transmit the disease through tiny, aerosolized droplets” Reuters

    Me: My free salt water cure “kills the infection dead”.

    The Achilles Heel of Coronavirus, is while it is still in the developing stage as Coronavirus/Covid in the warm, wet areas inside the nasal passages of your head (nose) and before it gets to become Covid in your head and lungs, 10 to 14 days later. If Coronavirus is not treated with my free salt clean water cure to flush out your nasal passages, as soon as possible, or during self isolation, it becomes Covid, which is where the money is. You cannot catch Covid! Always breathe through your nose and keep your mouth shut, because you really don’t want the Coronavirus to seed itself in your lungs!! My free salt water cure has “absolutely nothing” to do with mRNA test vaccines. Treating Coronavirus with my free salt clean water cure, flushes out the nasal cavity and kills Coronavirus, before it gets to be Covid, irrespective of if you have had mRNA vaccines or not. Mix one heaped teaspoon of salt in a mug of warm or cold clean water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives. If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity. While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfuls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Bronchitis there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done. Pour some of the solution on a flat surface and allow to dry and see what you have then. This is what coats the nasal passages in your head and kills Coronavirus/Covid off. You can see why it is so effective. This is what I have done for the past 26.5 years and I am NEVER ill, nor do you need to be either.

    Reminds me of the English pilot who was flying his plane with passengers onboard, recently, who was able to stop himself from blacking out from a blood clot, but he can’t fly any more – about the same time that those 4 English pilots died from blood clots after getting their Covid vaccines- which weren’t the vaccines, of course..

    Read somewhere that vaccinated passengers should check with their insurer before flying, because the pressurized cabin can cause blood clots and nobody wants to be billed by some overseas hospital and then find their insurance is canceled, because it does not cover in flight blood clots – right?

    Richard

    Like

  16. How do we get help to overturn any demands by schools employers ect that we provide vaccination certificates before we are allowed to participate in or enter any premises or function to go about or normal lives.

    Like

  17. Serve the school with a NOTICE that they are breaking the law with any Covid demands

    Like

  18. The Covid pandemic is a hoax – it was pre-planned by Big Tech and Big Pharma before it was released on the world and is a convenient way to get technology into us, without needing to consider aspects of the Geneva Convention, under the Emergency Use legislation.

    Here is a chunk out of the main blurb which sets the record straight – they want us all to have the shots irrespective of if we live or die:

    One of the principal DARPA-incubated vaccine technologies to gain prominence in the Covid-19 era are the nucleic acid (mRNA and DNA) vaccines that turn the human body into its own “bioreactor” (Ghose, 2015; Usdin, 2020). Vaccines using mRNA (such as Moderna’s and Pfizer’s) — which developers compare to “software” (Garde, 2017) and praise for their “programmability” (Al-Wassiti, 2019) — target the cell’s cytoplasm and rely on delivery technologies such as lipid nanoparticles to “ensure stabilization of mRNA under physiological conditions” (Wadhwa et al., 2020). DNA vaccines (such as Inovio’s) are intended to penetrate all the way into a cell’s nucleus and come with the risk of “integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases” (Zhang, Maruggi, Shan, & Li, 2019). Describing the scientific community’s early doubts about nucleic acid vaccines — arising from the potential for “many things” to go wrong — a DARPA program manager recently noted, “It was something that was much too risky for groups like the NIH to fund” (Usdin, 2020).

    Risks aside, DARPA and vaccine manufacturers are attracted to one chief benefit of nucleic acid vaccines: They can be developed much more quickly and cheaply. Other military-initiated technologies are also coming into view with Covid-19 vaccines. These include electroporation, which applies a high-voltage electrical pulse to make cell membranes permeable to a vaccine’s foreign DNA (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, 2020); syringe-injected biosensors that enable continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs and body chemistry (Peer, n.d.; Profusa, n.d.; Diego, 2020b; Tucker, 2020); and the quantum-dot-based infrared detectors that are under discussion as a tool for tracking vaccination status (Johnson, 2011; Trafton, 2019). DARPA has also played a leading role in developing and funding technologies that “blur the lines between computers and biology”, including brain-machine interfaces and neuromonitoring and mind-reading devices (CB Insights, 2019; Gent, 2019; Tullis, 2019).

    Some of Moderna’s earliest funding came from DARPA, which awarded the company $25 million in 2013 to develop the mRNA platform that has become a key feature of its coronavirus vaccine (Usdin, 2020). Other DARPA beneficiaries now involved in efforts to develop Covid-19 vaccines or therapeutics include AbCellera Biologics, CureVac, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Vir Biotechnology; some of AbCellera’s partners include major players like Pfizer and Gilead (Usdin, 2020).

    The Pentagon’s involvement in coronavirus-related efforts goes well beyond DARPA-funded research. Four-star General Gustave Perna is serving as chief operating officer of Operation Warp Speed alongside chief advisor Moncef Slaoui. General Perna, in charge of U.S. Army Materiel Command, oversees the global supply chain for over 190,000 U.S. Army employees (HHS, 2020b). For the first time ever, the distribution of the eventual coronavirus vaccines is being planned as a “joint venture” between the CDC and the Pentagon, with the latter overseeing “all the logistics of getting the vaccines to the right place, at the right time, in the right condition” (Owermohle, 2020a). In a CBS “60 Minutes” appearance in early November, General Perna indicated that Operation Warp Speed already had doses of (currently unapproved) vaccine and syringes stockpiled and protected by armed guards, and intends to get them out the door “within 24 hours” of vaccine approval and delivered “to every zip code in this country” (Martin, 2020).

    The Pentagon has indicated that private-sector involvement could be a key feature of the distribution strategy, and the private sector is positioning itself to participate. Merck, for example, is testing drone delivery of vaccines in partnership with Volansi, Inc., a company that provides “on-demand” drone services for the military (Landi, 2020; Simmie, 2020). In July, Merck’s CEO set the stage for its logistics involvement by describing vaccine distribution as “even a harder problem” than the “scientific conundrum of coming forward with a vaccine that works” (Murray & Griffin, 2020).

    Outside the pharmaceutical arena, technological transformations that are speeding the world toward more centralized control also reveal the influence of the military-intelligence sector. For example, Amazon Web Services has held cloud-computing contracts with the CIA since 2013, with the original $600 million contract extending to all 17 intelligence agencies (Konkel, 2014). In October of 2019, the Department of Defense awarded the $10 billion JEDI cloud computing contract to Microsoft, a decision that Amazon has unsuccessfully disputed in court (Sandler, 2020). In early 2020, the U.S. Navy awarded a cloud computing contract to Leidos (Leidos, 2020).

    5G, too, relies in part on the high-range millimeter-wave spectrum previously used almost entirely by the military for “non-lethal” crowd dispersal weapons (Joint Intermediate Force Capabilities Office, n.d.). In October, the Department of Defense announced it would spend $600 million to test “dual-use” applications of 5G to enhance the U.S. military’s “leap-ahead capabilities”, including applications such as 5G-enabled augmented/virtual reality, 5G-enabled “smart” warehouses, and 5G technologies “to aid in Air, Space, and Cyberspace lethality” (U.S. Department of Defense, 2020).

    Both 5G and cloud computing are critical components of the Big Data and IoT build-out that is enabling the conversion of individual data into the “new oil” (Fitts, 2020a), and both have exploded in 2020 (Howell, 2020; Klebnikov, 2020). The technologies are essential to the “centrally controlled digital financial transaction systems” envisioned by central bankers, who plan to rely on seamless data flows to and from “every smartphone, community, and home without exception” (Fitts, 2020a

    The Defender

    Liked by 1 person

  19. If it is unlawful for the feds as in unconstitutional then that is the law of land uncrossable by anyone or any entity, state or private. End of story. Black and white law. I M O
    anyway. Dave Coleman.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Ola Williamson

    All we want is peace & freedom.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Hanna Haverbeck

    @Richard Noakes & Karen Elliot, it is disingenuous to attempt to falsely accuse National Socialist of The German Third Reich of cruel medical experiments while presenting otherwise useful scamdemic info. There is no evidence for this alleged crimes other than jewish-controlled hollywood propaganda.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. To: Hanna Haverbeck

    The Geneva Convention missed you or your parents in 1947?

    Pfizer is German – can’t help but wonder about what their background is?

    Like

  23. Florie Mitchell

    Thank you! We just need to be rid of this Government that I voted for before they kill us all!!! Help us turn this country around and save our children and their future!
    This Government and all who participated should be brought to Justice!
    We need a new PARTY FOR THE PEOPLE and save our country Australia!!!!

    Like

  24. To Florie – I agree with you, but this government is no better than the Labour Government, if they were to take power after Morrison, they all march to the same tune, just under different flags and “we” are powerless to stop them, because they control the armed forces, the police, the benefits and every other cog of our society and I never thought I would see what amounts to legal murder, on such a vast scale and because of these vaccines and yet nothing is done to stop this from carrying on.

    Someone who posts the Australian Letter to The New York Times, thinks 85% of all Australians will be vaccinated by Christmas “because vaccines save lives” – shudder.

    Like

  25. Thankyou but why are they still pushing the vaccinations?

    Like

  26. To keep NWO agenda momentum going at any cost.

    Like

  27. Richard Noakes

    And because the governments secret contract with Pfizer and Pfizer’s vaccines, make us all owned by Pfizer, once “we” accept their vaccines. Dark day in Hell, before that happens to me.

    Like

  28. Richard Noakes

    You will be interested in this: Pfizer from Poland directed to young super spreaders
    August 15, 2021 6.51pm AEST
    Author
    Michelle Grattan
    Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
    Disclosure statement
    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
    People aged 20-39, who were identified by the Doherty Institute modelling as super spreaders of COVID, will be targeted for the one million Pfizer doses the Morrison government has purchased from Poland.
    Of these, 530,000 doses will be sent urgently to a dozen Sydney local government areas, where the outbreak remains out of control. They will start being administered in state clinics this week, Scott Morrison said.
    He said the allocation to NSW “will give everyone aged 20 to 39 years in the 12 LGAs the opportunity to be vaccinated”.
    The Doherty modelling said: “As supply allows, extending vaccinations for adults under 40 years offers the greatest potential to reduce transmission now that a high proportion of vulnerable Australians are vaccinated”.
    Get your politics analysis from academic experts, not vested interests.
    When the modelling was recently released Professor Jodie McVernon, Director of Epidemiology at the Doherty Institute, said the 20 to 39 year olds were “the peak spreaders” of the virus.
    “They will bring COVID home to their children, they will take it home to their own parents, and this is the group now where we’re proposing the reorientation of the strategy,” she said.
    In the heartland of the Sydney outbreak many of this age group are necessarily mobile because they are in essential jobs and unable to work from home.
    Sunday saw 415 new locally acquired NSW cases announced and four deaths. Late Saturday the state government locked down the whole of regional NSW. Victoria recorded 25 new cases and the ACT two, in Sunday’s announcements.
    NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian said:“The experience of Delta is that no other jurisdiction has been able to eliminate it. It’s not possible to eliminate it completely. We have to learn to live with it. But the best chance we have to live with it freely and safely is to get the case numbers down as low as possible.”
    A particular concern is the spread of the disease into regional areas of NSW where there are vulnerable Indigenous populations.
    The Pfizer doses from Poland were set to begin landing in Australia on Sunday night.
    The rest of the vaccines will be distributed on a per capita basis to other parts of the country, to accelerate the vaccination of the under 40s and high risk groups.
    “Within days of landing in Australia, these extra Pfizer doses will be available to go into the arms of young Australians in our hardest hit COVID hot-spots,” Morrison said.
    “These young Australians are often the backbone of our essential workforce and these doses will not only protect them, but their loved ones, their state and our nation.”
    He thanked Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki and the Polish government “for their generous support of Australia’s COVID-19 response, during this challenging time”.
    The vaccines were produced at Pfizer’s Belgium facility.
    The federal government has been pulling out all stops internationally to try to get more Pfizer.
    The Conversation

    Like

  29. What is most striking, is that Michele Gratten is simply a conduit for government handouts.
    I sense NO individual, critical intelligence in her reports. It is simply propaganda. None dare call it Journalism…
    But there are no surprises really. The main Sydney morning paper (SMH) ceased being a ‘newspaper’ years ago. Most of it’s “news” these days is based on government and corporate Media PR Handouts, keeping in trend with research published some time ago that 60-70% of reporting is rewrites of handouts. (ie. most content is propaganda).
    It is easy to see why the Big Tech companies are developing algorithms to replace newsroom hacks (and it’s not because the cost of bananas to employ monkeys for the function is a consideration.)

    Like

  30. Karen you are so right ..ED

    Like

  31. What surprised me most was that Morrison has 40 million doses of Pfizer on order – I did not think there were that many Australian’s – am I confused or something?

    Like

  32. Richard~ Around 25million we have, but for true corruption with backhanded brown paper bags to work for services rendered, 100% is added to the order..ED

    Like

  33. Richard Noakes

    Probably first shot, second shot and still more wanted for third shot, bearing in mind that in Israel, Pfizer is now 35% efficient, meaning that out of 100 souls, 35 will probably recover and 65 probably won’t, but at days end, it won’t matter, because they will all have the mRNA particles throughout their bodies (it takes 4 hours from injection) and once in, mRNA particles don’t come out, so after the third shot they will be swimming in particles inside their bodies (an alternative blood supply ?) – not bad for an mRNA medication, which has never been used in humans before and whose final outcome remains unknown (officially) – all within 7 months since their release, to those who volunteered for them, but not in Australia, only in America, here they were rubber stamped for general use, without anyone knowing if they are effective or not and where their efficiency might be, if not for Covid?

    Like

  34. Richard Noakes

    Hey Ed,

    I have put together a really interesting piece which suggests that Delta has now become no more virulent than the common cold for the unvaccinated, but for those who are vaccinated, it presents a much more dangerous illness and from my point of view, it seems apparent to me that the vaccines are part of an extermination program, which according to the medical fraternity, who I have covered inside, suggest those vaccinated will all die within 2 to 3 years – that is 5.5 billion out of 7.2 billion with possibly 1.7 billion, so far not vaccinated.

    Biden and all governments are pushing for more to get vaccinated, even though the reported figures suggest the pandemic is more of less over for Delta and it is interesting to see, contrary to the news in Aussie, of the rise of the pandemic in Melbourne,

    Melbourne Australia:
    “To say the draconian restrictions are unjustified would be a huge understatement considering the current data on Covid-19 in Victoria, Australia.
    As of August 15th the entire state registered just 22 new alleged confirmed cases of Covid-19. For context 6.7 million people currently reside in Victoria, Australia.
    As of the 15th August 2021 just 2.4% of the 205 alleged cases, and 0.00007% of the entire population of Victoria have been admitted to hospital with a positive test result for Covid-19, whilst just a single person is currently in intensive care” today, being the August 16th?

    What would be interesting, is to see if anyone can verify the numbers that the Morrison Government is putting out and if they are valid, or not?

    I can’t post my article here, because you don’t allow enough space for it, but if you go to:

    https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/16/dr-tess-lawrie-responds-to-mhra-be-transparent-about-vaccine-deaths-and-suspend-the-covid-19-vaccination-programme

    “One” of your other subsidiaries, you can read the whole thing there

    Cynical me, Morrison has one million Pfizer shots to get rid of, with another 40 million on the way, for what – a Delta common cold?

    Ray

    Like

  35. Thanks Richard see what we can do. Ed

    Like

  36. It is hard to know whom to believe about what is happening now, if we can’t trust the government for accurate numbers, it would be great for those nurses and doctors at the pit face, to tell us what is happening in hospitals and if the numbers quoted are true or not, for vaccinated or unvaccinated Covid deaths?

    If the government is more interested in saving us from Covid, than it is saving lives by not giving injections, then I really don’t understand their motivation – do you?

    Like

  37. Under threat of dismissal, medical staff maintain sealed lips

    Like

  38. Richard Noakes

    Agreed, but if their names are not mentioned or where they work, then a general picture would tell a lot more, than nothing at all.

    Getting Coronavirus is not the same as getting Covid, which is something else again – what you get about 20 days after your initial infection, but totally avoidable after my free salt water cure.

    Like

  39. Question: Does this apply to Tony Abbott’s no-jab-no play diktat and the no-jab-no-welfare bullying?

    If so, and if there was written confirmation of denial of child-care service and also denial of welfare would this warrant legal action? Maybe a class action?

    If the government was found to be behaving unlawfully (according to the constitution) and if parents were compelled to comply with the vaccine diktats which resulted in vaccine damage to their children, would there not be grounds for a civil action to claim damages?

    Just a thought.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.