WEF’s witch is back censoring ‘politically sensitive’ content on X

AUSTRALIA’S WEF/EU-aligned eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant issued a 20-page removal notice to X on September 26, demanding the platform censor 23 specific posts of raw CCTV clips showing the last moments of Ukrainian woman Iryna Zarutska’s life on a US train.

X has been threatened with staggering fines of AU$825,000 per day – yet the footage has been described as not gratuitous.

Targeted posts included commentaries about the murder of Zarutska on her way to work by a convicted criminal. Many of the posts by journalists and online commentators criticised the double standards of the West when white women are murdered by criminals.

Inman-Grant, who slithered into the Australian Senior Executive Service under the Morrison government, is now notorious internationally for trying to censor the internet and control access to information on behalf of her handlers at the WEF.

She had a previous stoush with X, where she was once employed under the Twitter banner, before it was taken over by Elon Musk. Twitter at that time had become notorious for banning dissident voices, including even the President of the US, Donald Trump and many thousands of others.

Inman Grant pretends her job is all about ensuring “online safety” but in fact she’s treacherously and duplicitously driving the WEF information control agenda, using Australia as a “test case”.

Albanese and his Labor Party are of course willing participants in this, and are concurrently pushing digital ID along with the UK socialist Starmer and Von der Leyen’s EU technocracy.

Inman Grant is also something of an embarrassment for the Federal Government, after losing a number of court battles over her vendetta against free speech, costing Australian taxpayers hundreds of thousands in legal fees.

Inman Grant is now using Australia’s Online Safety Act to police the posts of non-Australian individuals who post on X and other platforms. Among those individuals were Texan broadcaster Alex Jones, commentator Nick Sortor and the prominent Dutch activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek, an outspoken opponent of EU open-door immigration.

It’s no accident that Australia’s e-Karen is attempting to censor online material posted by prominent anti-globalists.

Ian Miles Cheong, a Malaysian journalist and frequent X poster, and Dries van Langenhove, a nationalist activist from Flanders in Belgium, were forwarded a 20-page letter sent by Inman Grant to X, in which she demanded X remove or geoblock the 23 accounts.

Van Langenhove has been jailed by the Belgian government for posting memes in a private chat group, deemed to be in breach of “holocaust denial” and “anti-racism” laws.

“Who does @tweetinjules think she is?” asked van Langenhove. “In one of her last posts before she left X, she is seen with Ylva Johansson, the communist (yes, she was a long time member of the Swedish Communist Party) and EU Commissioner for Migration who said “Europe needs a lot more migrants, a million more each year”.

Johansson was Inman-Grant’s “special guest” in Australia. It’s clear who’s pulling the strings in this country in regard to stamping out “distasteful” online content, in the name of “combating violent extremism and terrorism, including online radicalisation” and “strengthening the ongoing EU-Australia collaboration on security matters”.

Van Langenhove said Johansson was the driving force behind the EU Migration Pact which wants to criminalise criticism of mass migration. “We must push these communists out of power before it is too late,” he said.

Ian Miles Cheong said he received the same letter. “They can go fuck themselves,” he responded.

“The Australian government is forcing 𝕏 to remove my video footage of Iryna Zarutska’s murder. They’d love to take it down worldwide but neither 𝕏 nor I are subject to their global censorship policies so it’ll only be withheld from being displayed in Australia. Insane.”

Ken O’Connor, an Australian free speech advocate, called on Musk to get involved again because the American 1st amendment needs to be protected in every western democratic country in the world as it is in the USA.

“Because if countries like Australia, NZ, UK and other European countries violate it and it is not protected, then by association, American free speech won’t be protected either, as it may very well be censored by these censorship czars in the other countries under the guise of eSafety and protecting you from the harms of free speech,” he said.