by Alison Ryan
In this video you can hear Anthony Albanese take the Affirmation of Office which is not in accordance with the Schedule of Affirmation in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. The Affirmation states:
I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law.
(NOTE – The name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time.)
However, the Affirmation sworn by Mr Albanese before Governor General David Hurley on 23 May 2022 is:
“I, Anthony Norman Albanese do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia, her land, and her people in the Office of Prime Minister.”
Video: Election Fraud = Scam = WAKE UP (rumble.com)
Editor: The video claims Accenture supplied software to the AEC and was paid $44M to set it up. In response to an inquiry from Cairns News a week ago the AEC denied Accenture provided or installed any software and was paid $44M.
Australia’s Governor-General has suggested the country could become a republic after the Queen dies. Mr Albanese’s government has promised Australians will face another republican referendum if their government wins a second term in 2025.
Australians have already rejected the constitutional change in a referendum held in 1999.
Matt Thistlethwaite was appointed new assistant minister for the republic last month after Labor won government.
Mr Thistlethwaite has said it was time to start having discussions on the country’s future.
Source: Australian Governor-General flags republic ‘discussions’ after the Queen dies | Daily Mail Online
There are two things about the “new” honorable excellency PM of Australia that stand out very much after taking off for a busy world trip straight after the $election:
1. EVERY newly elected “leader” of the “Western money oriented coalition” travels first to the “holy land” for “kosher education”. Albo did not! Does that mean some “kosher Australian branch” is preparing Matzo ball soup with unclean ingredients?
2. The team of “handlers” who accompany the HONORABLE Australian son brought up by a single mum and government welfare – hardly anyone notices. By looking closer one will detect “Australian women of excellence” who work very hard” in the foreign interests of Australia’s prosperity and (some) “Australian” people. A prime example of why Australian politics has turned out exactly as it is while Aussies AGAIN look at old dusty law books from a century ago and dream about the GLORIOUS colonial past.
Australian women in politics will have a lot to answer for if there ever were a tribunal of justice.
LikeLiked by 2 people
OT, and also affirms that CO2 causes global warming – another falsehood.
Atmospheric gas ratios are self regulating. If Greens as they reckon have the ability to alter the atmospheres gas ratios then there will be no life left on Earth.
From “CO2 Spin on that” – a site no long available –
……..In his memoirs entitled “Contributions to Molecular Physics in the Domain of Radiant Heat”, detailing a series of experiments conducted at the Royal Institution, Tyndall fallaciously states with regard to Oxygen and Nitrogen that they are both quote:
“practically transparent to radiant heat.”
Thus laying the foundations of AGW fraud.
This statement by John Tyndall is the origin of such claims as “the science is settled” and the “greenhouse effect is 150 year old established physics.” In terms of radiant heat it is the only factor that would differentiate between the various atmospheric gases.
After all, Oxygen and Nitrogen constitute 99% of the atmosphere. If these two gases are shown to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, what would make so called “Greenhouse Gases” like CO2, such a threat to the environment at only 0.0385% of the atmosphere?
So the basis for the “Greenhouse Effect” is that incoming and out going IR is not absorbed by Oxygen and Nitrogen which instead passes straight through these gases. According to this unsubstantiated hypothesis, only those gases which are termed “Greenhouse Gases” posses the capability to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation.
The problem for the hypothesis of the “Greenhouse Effect” and of course AGW itself is that the basic premise on which the hypothesis is based is false.
Firstly, Oxygen and Nitrogen both have higher specific heat capacities than CO2……………
……………The evidence I have presented here conclusivly shows that Oxygen and Nitrogen which constitute 99% of the Earths atmosphere, as one would expect, do in-fact absorb infrared radiation.
The claim that these two gases are transparent to IR is completely fallacious. Which goes along way to explain why the “Greenhouse Effect” hypothesis is one of the longest standing unsubstantiated hypothesis in the history of science.
The so called “Greenhouse Effect” will always remain an hypothesis for the simple reason that it is based on pseudo science.
Click to access COW-water-Jan2011.pdf
……………
The climate change believers science is debunked
CO2 is only 0.0385% of the atmosphere and is the heaviest gas in the atmosphere which is why plants are able to utilise it in the respiration process.
Carbon Dioxide Not a Well Mixed Gas and Can’t Cause Global Warming
By: John O’Sullivan
“………CO2: The Heavy Gas that Heats then Cools Faster!
The same principle is applied to heat transfer, the Specific Heat (SH) of air is 1.0 and the SH of CO2 is 0.8 (heats and cools faster). Combining these properties allows for thermal mixing. Heavy CO2 warms faster and rises, as in a hot air balloon. It then rapidly cools and falls………………”
https://co2insanity.com/2011/09/04/top-scientists-in-heated-debate-over-%E2%80%98-slaying-of-greenhouse-gas-theory/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah well they’re just MSM wearing lippy.
LikeLike
And we thought Sky news was on our side? Ed
LikeLike
Here is an explicit and finely tuned summary…
https://xyz.net.au/2022/06/the-australian-government-is-colluding-with-a-foreign-power-to-oppress-its-own-people-guess-who/
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watched the G G Hurley been sworn In the first time, by Scomo.
It seemed great, until the last paragraph, when SKY TV, smothered it with an add.
I think they did the same with Scomo.?
LikeLike
In addition to the problem of a false oath, there is also the matter of the constitution having no such office as “Prime Minister” and no mention of political parties either, so how can you have a party form Government?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jeffrey Sill… Precisely. As Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs pointed out, all Acts “assented to” since 1973 are illegal.
At the moment, everything government does is illegal so now is the time to topple the illegal government.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sure, it is time for discussions about the country’s future, not by politicians, but by the people, in an environment of free speech and equal access to information.
As long as the Murdoch Empire controls our news and information flow, there should be no change in power status.
LikeLike
Governor General indeed, all GG since 1973 need to be charged with treason, reason, masquerading as an Officer of the Crown, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second was removed using an unlawful Act called the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 it was unlawfully used to remove Queen Elizabeth and install an unlawful entity called “the queen of australia” this entity can not be used to give Royal asent
LikeLiked by 2 people
HUllo,It is not right for a serving PM and Governor General to dictate events to the people of the land. They should have a re-run! ________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
see aboce ________________________________
LikeLike
Hullo,It is disrespectful for both the PM and Governor General to overstep their job description.They are there to serve the people of Australia not to dictate events they wish to happen! ________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
Albanese is a walking time bomb – of getting it ‘wrong’. Please don’t let him play with anything at all that has a trigger, or a war head.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Who or What is The Crown? –
Political Parties sit under their own private Party Constitutions so know exactly what they are doing. Some of the TREASON is in their hansard. Founding and Primary Law Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.
The Political Parties Australia created in 1973 doesn’t Consolidate the Preamble and the first 6 Clauses. Therefore they don’t recognize OUR GOD “humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God,”
Every State changed the name of the Church of England and created a Church of England in Australia (Political Parties Australia) then removed the Church of England in Australia. By doing this they removed the “Defender of the Faith”. By doing this they removed the DEED OF GRANT TO OUR LAND, the contract we have with the Crown. NOW the Political Parties own all LAND in the Political Parties Australia.
.
Also removing the “Defender of the Faith” removed all rights = EVERYTHING.
This was done in Conjunction with Anglican Church Leaders.
Here is OUR “Defender of the Faith” (allegedly)
Elizabeth the Second by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Our other Realms & Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, the current holder of the Crown. NOT the Political Parties Queen of Australia Created in 1973
LikeLiked by 2 people
Who for the time being is our sovereign at present? – “let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who makes its laws” – Rothschild
The Commonwealth of Australia is a corporation registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission
Acts Interpretation Act 1901
.
16 References to the Sovereign
.
In any Act references to the Sovereign reigning at the time of the passing of such Act, or to the Crown, shall be construed as references to the Sovereign for the time being.
.
.
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (The Lawful one)
Constitutional and Official Definitions
17. In any Act. unless the contrary intention appears
(a) “The commonwealth” shall mean the commonwealth of Australia:
(b) “Australia” includes the whole of the Commonwealth
.
Acts Interpretation Act of 1973 (The Corrupt one)
Constitutional and Official Definitions
4: (1) Section 17 of the Principal Act is amended—
(a) by omitting paragraphs (a) and (b) and substituting the following paragraph:-
“(a) ‘Australia’ or ‘the Commonwealth’ means the Commonwealth
of Australia and, when used in a geographical sense, does not include an external Territory
LikeLiked by 1 person