Anna De Buisseret: All The Law Is On Our Side… There Will Be A Second Nuremburg Trial

Anna De Buisseret – a retired army officer and a senior lawyer – warns those in positions of responsibility that if they do not speak out, they will be held accountable in a second Nuremburg Trial. Anna assures people that “more lawyers than the public realise” are working behind the scenes; and stresses the importance of people knowing what their rights are in order than we should continue to uphold them. “No oppressive regime has ever lasted, because we the people stand up.”

Find the full and uncensored version of this interview on Odysee. Look for the ★ to find uncensored versions within the catalogue: https://odysee.com/@ResistanceGB:f/An… 8th September 2021, London. Veterans’ freedom rally. —- Thanks for watching the video. If you’d like to show your support – please like and share, and feel free to leave your comments.

Subscribe for more content, uploaded regularly – and hit the notification bell to be informed when new videos premiere so you can join in the chat. https://ResistanceGB.org https://linktr.ee/resistancegb

YOUTUBE CENSORS: This interview is on illegality of government actions such as lockdown measures; there is no attempt to platform or endorse any opinion on medical matters, and steps have been taken to avoid confusion.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on September 16, 2021, in Corporate Government, corruption, covid lockdown, Covid vaccines, political spin and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.

  1. Good grief! We’ll barely have any politicians left by the time the Nuremburg plandemic is finished with them.

    As well as regular PCR tests, all politicians must be required to pass regular lie detector tests to protect the Australian population from a pandemic of corrosive influence and manipulation… inoculate and regularly test the politicians, keep Australia safe!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Who wears the Crown? –

    When people say that the Vatican controls everything just remember that the Vaticans Pope is no longer coronated with a Crown. The void has been filled by Rothschid’s Crown City of London.

    It apparent to me that Romes papal authority over the world, symbolised by the Popes 3 tiered crown has moved from Vatican Hill to Capitoline Hill, Washington, D.C.

    “In 1968 after touring the United States, the crown was presented by Archbishop Luigi Raimondi, apostolic delegate to the United States, to Msgr. William McDonough, the (Vatican) shrine’s director.”

    https://www.nationalshrine.org/blog/a-moment-in-history-the-papal-tiara-at-the-basilica/

    Washington DC was established as a city-state in 1871 with the passage of the Act of 1871, which officially established the United States as a corporation under the rule of Washington, which itself is subservient to the Crown City of London.

    https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalelite177.htm

    Documents relating to registration with the SEC of the Australian Government as a privately owned American company
    Date
    30 June 2017

    Attached are documents released under a Freedom of Information request seeking access to all documents that confirm the following: registration with the SEC of the Australian Government (Commonwealth of Australia) as a privately owned American company, file number:333-163307 CIK:0000805157.

    https://treasury.gov.au/foi/documents-relating-to-registration-with-the-sec

    Liked by 1 person

  3. The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust

    Do the ‘war crimes’ trials prove extermination?

    by Mark Weber

    “………….Indicative of the largely political nature of the Nuremberg process was the important Jewish role in organizing these trials. Nahum Goldmann, one-time president of both the World Jewish Congress and the World Zionist Organization, reported in his memoir that the Nuremberg Tribunal was the brain-child of World Jewish Congress officials. Only after persistent effort were WJC officials able to persuade Allied leaders to accept the idea, he added. /8

    The World Jewish Congress also played an important but less obvious role in the day to day proceedings. Above all, the powerful but secretive organization made sure that Germany’s persecution of the Jews was a primary focus of the trials, and that the defendants were punished for their involvement in that process. /9

    Two Jewish officers in the US Army — Lieutenant Colonel Murray Bernays and Colonel David “Mickey” Marcus — played key roles in the Nuremberg enterprise. In the words of historian Robert Conot, Bernays was “the guiding spirit leading the way to Nuremberg.” Bernays, a successful New York attorney, persuaded US War Secretary Henry Stimson and others to accept the idea of putting the defeated German leaders on trial. /10

    Marcus, a fervent Zionist, became the “number three man in making American policy” in occupied Germany. As chief of the US government’s War Crimes Branch in 1946 and 1947, he selected almost all of the judges, prosecutors and lawyers for the Nuremberg NMT Trials. (He later became a commander of Zionist “Haganah” military forces in Palestine.) /11

    Some of the Americans who participated in the Nuremberg trials became disillusioned with the entire business. One of the few to make public his feelings was Charles F. Wennerstrum, an Iowa Supreme Court justice who served as presiding judge in the Nuremberg trial of German generals. “If I had known seven months ago what I know today, I would never have come here,” he declared immediately after sentences were pronounced. “The high ideals announced as the motives for creating these tribunals have not been evident,” he added. /12

    Wennerstrum cautiously referred to the extensive Jewish involvement in the Nuremberg process. “The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome … Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and researchers were employed who became Americans only in recent years, whose backgrounds were imbedded in Europe’s hatreds and prejudices.” He criticized the one-sided handling of evidence. “Most of the evidence in the trials was documentary, selected from the large tonnage of captured records. The selection was made by the prosecution. The defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case.” He concluded that “the trials were to have convinced the Germans of the guilt of their leaders. They convinced the Germans merely that their leaders lost the war to tough conquerors.” Wennerstrum left Nuremberg “with a feeling that justice has been denied.”………………”

    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Webera.html.

    Like

  4. rogergreen988gmailcom

    👍👍And so they should.

    Like

  5. What concerns me, is they have now injected enough people that they could probably change the constitution via referendum. Mob rule?

    Obviously almost every person that has been injected thinks it’s right to do so, the vast majority think ALL should be vaccinated. I recall a poll not too long ago, where it was something like 62% thought these injections should be compulsory for all.

    What do we do if they hold a referendum to alter the constitution?

    Also, while I’m here, where is Epstein’s mate, Bully Gates? You couldn’t silence the criminal pre-injection rollout, now he’s nowhere to be seen.

    Like

  6. I’ll also add that it took more than just ‘standing up’ to end previous oppressive regimes, a lot more.

    I believe we’ve all been ‘standing up’ for 18 months now. All that’s done is given us a better view of our oppression. I’m becoming more than little fed up with meaningless soundbites.

    ” I’m still standing (Yeah, yeah, yeah)”

    Like

  7. This is why many astute observers claim Australia is the 52nd US state. Ed

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Australia needs a fast and safe cure for the “pandemic”.

    1. All politicians, bureaucrats and media MUST be injected with regular and mandatory sodium pentothal “truth serum” injections to save our country from total and imminent collapse !

    2. Further, all politicians, bureaucrats and media MUST submit to mandatory LDTs (lie detector tests) as soon as they open their mouths.

    3. Politicians with memory lapses, e.g. Dan Andrews and Co., MUST be forced to undertake regression therapy for the purpose of exacting justice for victims of incompetence and stupidity. We the people of Australia believe the victims.

    4. All sullied politicians, bureaucrats and media MUST be separated from the unsullied patriotic ones in order to prevent the spread of parasitic infection.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. truthtellertonni

    Yeah it’s called the ‘second coming’.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Nuremberg – it went on for years, we do not have years left before we are dead, dying or wounded. Forget Nuremberg, it was a show for the Sheeple of that era. There were not that many hung or jailed out of the many thousands who should have been.

    The Australian courts can and often do take months and years to come up with a final result or finding. Possible that the corporation owned and run courts may not give timely and honest findings, etc. There have been cases in the courts for months already, no results yet.

    So, is there anything more short term that we can do that would be effective?
    Just asking.

    Like

  11. Hello

    Can anybody please explain is the following will impact on my rights not to disclose my medical and other private information:

    COVID-19 and the Privacy Act To assist entities during this period, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has published a guide, Coronavirus (COVID-19): Understanding your privacy obligations to your staff- external site.

    https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/privacy

    Thank you in advance for your help in clarifying what this means and how it will affect us all.

    Please keep fighting because we are.

    Kind regards,

    John and Liz Alexander

    Sent from Mail for Windows

    ________________________________

    Like

  12. Re: Above comment from Liz. – Privacy.
    I am not having a go at you Liz, just using your question as a reason to make a comment.

    Where can your private information end up, who can access it? You may never know who is looking at and keeping your private information,

    Security officers in (Unnamed State) Hospitals collect stickers given by clinicians and admin staff that have your name, address, phone numbers, medical chart number and whatever else is on the sticker at the time. The stickers are stuck into their notebooks or placed on security officers incident reports and files that can then be read by other officers and admin officers for reference. You do not have to have done anything wrong (crime, breach of regulation, etc) for an officer to be provided with the information by a clinician or admin officer, no reason has to be given by the officer to get the information. A security officer may collect many stickers during just one shift. I am not saying the practice is wrong (how dare I) it’s just an example.

    The privacy Acts are (mainly) there for the systems benefit not the individual. Privacy acts – there is what is written in the acts and what you are told by the system, then there is reality.

    Yes, I can prove above info, NO I will not supply any information to prove it. I am prevented from doing so by the protection that the corporation run Health System give themselves. One of those protections is their privacy act(s).

    Most of you likely have little to no idea of how rotten the systems have become, they have long ago gone past fixable.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Patrick Donnelly

    Indeed!

    We need accountability, but the courts are never fully independent, are they? What judges are members of Freemason Lodges Knights of Malta etc?

    Like

  1. Pingback: …but the reptilian #joo.w.o. ‘demon-strate’ that #it doesn’t abide by ‘the law’! | (On)sensitiewe Woord

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.