Daily Mail Australia caught manufacturing fake news

We will keep reminding you of government total control over Australian media bowing to their masters every command

It should go without saying that you shouldn’t believe everything you hear — especially if you hear it from the mainstream media.

Here’s a perfect example — it’s a video of Barclay Crawford, the editor for the Daily Mail in Australia, one of the world’s most visited English news sites instructing staff to lie and mislead the people with dedicated support to focus on government unaccountable agenda.

The leaked video was captured during a recent editorial meeting about the outlet’s pandemic reporting, and it perfectly illustrates why many have lost their trust in the people we expect to report the news accurately.

Pass this video to everyone you can. This grub should be jailed and will the British Daily Mail sack him?????

You would think this fiction dealing editor would remember to turn the camera off or was it divine intervention.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on July 22, 2021, in corruption, Covid vaccines, General, media, New World Order and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 21 Comments.

  1. A Letter to Thomas F. Bayard:

    by Lysander Spooner (1808-1887)


    SIR – I have read your letter to Rev. Lyman Abbott, in which you express the opinion that it is at least possible for a man to be a legislator (under the Constitution of the United States) and yet be an honest man.

    This proposition implies that you hold it to be at least possible that some four hundred men should, by some process or other, become invested with the right to make laws of their own – that is, laws wholly of their own device, and therefore necessarily distinct from the law of nature, of the principles of natural justice; and that these laws of their own making shall be really and truly obligatory upon the people of the United States; and that, therefore, the people may rightfully be compelled to obey them.

    All this implies that you are of the opinion that the Congress of the United States, of which you are a member, has by some process or other, become possessed of some right of arbitrary dominion over the people of the United States; which right of arbitrary dominion is not given by, and is, therefore, necessarily in conflict with, the law of nature, the principles of natural justice, and the natural rights of men, as individuals. All this is necessarily implied in the idea that the Congress now possesses any right whatever to make any laws whatever, of its own device – that is, any laws that shall be either more, less, or other than that natural law, which it can neither make, unmake, nor alter – and cause them to be enforced upon the people of the United States, or any of them, against their will.

    You assume that the right of arbitrary dominion – that is, the right of making laws of their own device, and compelling obedience to them – is a “trust” that has been delegated to those who now exercise that power. You call it “the trust of public power.”

    But, Sir, you are mistaken in supposing that any such power has ever been delegated, or ever can be delegated, by any body, to any body.

    Any such delegation of power is naturally impossible, for these reasons, viz: –

    1. No man can delegate, or give to another, any right of arbitrary dominion over himself; for that would be giving himself away as a slave. And this no one can do. Any contract to do so is necessarily an absurd one, and has no validity. To call such a contract a “Constitution,” or by any other high-sounding name, does not alter its character as an absurd and void contract.

    2. No man can delegate, or give to another, any right of arbitrary dominion over a third person; for that would imply a right in the first person, not only to make the third person his slave, but also a right to dispose of him as a slave to still other persons. Any contract to do this is necessarily a criminal one, and therefore invalid. To call such a contract a “Constitution” does not at all lessen its criminality, or add to its validity.

    These facts, that no man can delegate, or give away, his own natural right to liberty, nor any other man’s natural right to liberty, prove that he can delegate no right of arbitrary dominion whatever – or, what is the same thing, no legislative power whatever – over himself or anybody else, to any man, or body of men.

    This impossibility of any man’s delegating any legislative power whatever, necessarily results from the fact that the law of nature has drawn the line – and that, too, a line that can never be effaced nor removed – between each man’s own interest and inalienable rights of person and property, and each and every other man’s inherent and inalienable rights of person and property. It, therefore, necessarily fixes the unalterable limits, within which every man may rightfully seek his own happiness, in his own way, free from all responsibility to, or interference by, his fellow men, or any of them.

    All this pretended delegation of legislative power – that is, of a power, on the part of the legislators, so-called, to make any laws of their own device, distinct from the law of nature – is therefore an entire falsehood; a falsehood whose only purpose is to cover and hide a pure usurpation, by one body of men, of arbitrary dominion over other men.

    That this legislative power, or power of arbitrary dominion, is a pure usurpation, on the part of those who now exercise it, and not “a trust” delegated to them, is still further proved by the fact that the only delegation of power, that is even professed or pretended to be made, is made secretly – that is, by secret ballot – and not in any open and authentic manner; and therefore not by any men, or body of men, who make themselves personally responsible, as principals, for the acts of those to whom they profess to delegate the power.

    All this pretended delegation of power having been made secretly – that is, only by secret ballot – not a single one of all the legislators, so-called, who profess to be exercising only a delegated power, has himself any legal knowledge, or can offer any legal proof, as to who the particular individuals were who delegated it to him. And having no power to identify the individuals who professed to delegate the power to him, he cannot show any legal proof that anybody ever even attempted or pretended to delegate it to him.

    Plainly, a man who exercises any arbitrary dominion over other men and who claims to be exercising only a delegated power, but cannot show who his principals are, nor, consequently, prove that he has any principals, must be presumed, both in law and reason, to have no principals; and therefore to be exercising no power but his own. And having, of right, no such power of his own, he is, both in law and reason, a naked usurper.

    Sir, a secret ballot makes a secret government; and a secret government is a government by conspiracy; in which the people at large can have no rights. And that is the only government we now have. It is the government of which you are a voluntary member and supporter, and yet you claim to be an honest man. If you are an honest man, is not your honesty that of a thoughtless, ignorant man, who merely drifts with the current, instead of exercising any judgment of his own?

    For still another reason, all legislators, so-called, under the Constitution of the United States, are exercising simply an arbitrary and irresponsible dominion of their own; and not any authority that has been delegated, or pretended to have been delegated, to them. And that reason is that the Constitution itself (Article 1, Section 6) prescribes that: –
    “For any speech or debate [or vote] in either house, they [the Senators and Representatives] shall not be questioned [held to any legal responsibility] in any other place.”

    This provision makes the legislators constitutionally irresponsible to anybody; either to those on whom they exercise their power, or to those who may have, either openly or secretly, attempted or pretended to delegate power to them. And men who are legally responsible to nobody for their acts, cannot truly be said to be the agents of any body, or to be exercising any power but their own; for all real agents are necessarily responsible both to those on whom they act, and to those for whom they act.

    To say that the people of this country ever have bound, or ever could bind, themselves by any contract whatever – the Constitution, or any other – to thus give away all their natural rights of property, liberty, and life, into the hands of a few men – a mere conclave – and that they should make it a part of the contract itself that these few men should be held legally irresponsible for the disposal they should make of those rights, is an utter absurdity. It is to say that they have bound themselves, and that they could bind themselves, by an utterly idiotic and suicidal contract.

    If such a contract had ever been made by one private individual to another, and had been signed, sealed, witnessed, acknowledged, and delivered, with all possible legal formalities, no decent court on earth – certainly none in this country – would have regarded it, for a moment, as conveying any right, or delegating any power, or as having the slightest legal validity, or obligation.

    For all the reasons now given, and for still others that might be given, the legislative power now exercised by Congress is, in both law and reason, a purely personal, arbitrary, irresponsible, usurped dominion on the part of the legislators themselves, and not a power delegated to them by anybody.

    Read on –



  2. Media are merely outlets for official religious controlled propaganda. https://newtube.app/user/DarknessIsFalling Only the brave will listen to these vids. Forget everything you thought was true about the jewish. Don’t agree with this man but a lot of his research lines up with Bill Cooper – https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL11E33A6AEEB2674F

    Pretty out there stuff but worth having a listen to.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. In 1913, John D. Rockefeller Sr. took full control of Western Medicine and promoted what’s known as “germ theory” in hopes to control the world and peddle patented vaccines & pharmaceuticals on unsuspecting, fearful citizens…

    This short, informative video will explain the 2 theories and how they relate to health, the PCR tests, and the Covid “vaccine”.

    https://www.bit chute.com/video/9OoEO2oTS64v/

    Liked by 1 person

  4. crisscross767

    Minnesota Woman Loses both Legs and both Hands Following Second Pfizer COVID-19 Shot



  5. crisscross767

    “Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise – The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but Communism) !!!


    from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
    by Elizabeth Dilling

    ………..Luther’s Last Sermon

    Repeatedly, Luther warns the clergy against participation in the blasphemies of Judaism, by aiding or enduring these in any way. His last sermon included this:

    You, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ; they call our blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and Her Son a bastard … if they could kill us all, they would gladly do so; in fact many of them murder Christians, especially those professing to be surgeons and doctors. They know how to deal with medicaments in the manner of the Italians — the Borgias and Medicis — who gave people poison which brought about their death in one hour or a month … As a good patriot I wanted to give you this warning for the very last time to deter you from participating in alien sins. You must know I only desire the best for you all, rulers and subjects.


    Liked by 1 person

  6. pass this around Denyse the evidence is there for a polling day reflection but I will not hold my breath ..ED


  7. How about if a camera was left on in chasnnel7, channel9, SBS, ABC, studios we may see and hear a similar story ..ED


  8. Jogging people’s memory we of the downunder dictatorship have more public servants and government advisers/consultants working for ther establishment than the whole nation public sector workforce in our 25 million population… and guess who they vote for?

    Liked by 1 person

  9. If the people do not wake to this blatant abuse of fictional power of the press god help the rest of us .. ED

    Liked by 1 person

  10. truthtellertonni

    They don’t want ppl talking with one another in case they join the dots & wake up.
    No need for dots anyway, like you said Ed, it’s right there in front of everyone’s faces, just some ppl don’t want to see. They want to be idiots.


  11. They won’t sack him. He will be rewarded, promoted and win glorious awards for his courageous defence of “western civilisation.”


  12. Obviously Cherry Kant be human! She’s been lobotomised by the vaccine rant!


  13. Not surprised at all – the media in Australia with only a few exceptions has a direct feed from the globalist BS factory. Pumping it out 24/7. Like what was mentioned, its surprising this charlatan was lax enough to let this get out…their cover is totally blown, but so many sheep STILL not looking past their paddock to see and hear other opinions.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. It’s absolutely appalling, but doesn’t surprise me at all unfortunately!!


  15. crisscross767, wow what an evil b*tch, this so-called health official is.

    Now is exactly the time to unite, not the other way around.

    Mostly the weak & gullible will fall for such bs.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. “Jews are behind the pandemic,” chant crowd at Polish anti-vaccine protest

    At an anti-vaccine protest in Poland yesterday, participants chanted that “Jews are behind the pandemic” and “rule the world”. Protesters also engaged in confrontations with the police, leading to three arrests.

    Separately, the far-right Confederation (Konfederacja) party – which has also been involved in protests against coronavirus restrictions – shared a video of one of its supporters saying that she “does not want Jewry” in Poland.


    “Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise – The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but Communism) !!!


    Liked by 1 person

  17. This is now right out of hand ..the bulls*** is now a mountain all over the sheeple ..ED

    Liked by 1 person

  18. You can rely on them…ED


  19. As expected


  20. Australian Health Official Says “Not the Time” to “Engage in Conversation With Others” or “To Be Friendly,”

    Dr. Kerry Chant, the Chief Health Officer of New South Wales, says that because of 78 new cases of covid detected in their state, people must completely abandon their humanity and ignore neighbors and friends.

    Read the post



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: