Scomo to be summonsed over criminal cartel running law enforcement

NOTICE AT COMMON LAW

On the………………………… day of……………….2021…………….am/pm

Peter Alexander Gargan

  Of, 1365 Corringle Road

Corringle

Victoria 3886

In the Electorate of Gippsland

The Affiant,

Addressee:

The Prime Minister

Scott John Morrison

Parliament House,

Parliament Drive

Canberra ACT 2600.

REF: Being Grossly negligent in allowing the States of Australia to ignore the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Constitution, Laws of the Commonwealth  and the Federal Court of Australia to ignore its obligations at law.

This document is Time Sensitive.

TAKE NOTE,

  1.  I, Peter Alexander Gargan (as commonly called), being the Undersigned Affiant, do solemnly swear, declare, and depose:
  2. That, I am competent to state the matters set forth herein. and
  3. That, I have first-hand knowledge of the facts stated herein. and                            
  4. That, I the Affiant am a Natural Human Man. and
  5. That, I the Affiant am within the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. and
  6. That, I the Affiant am a subject of Elizabeth the Second By the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her Other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
  • For Consideration
  • I write in the utmost of good faith, as a law enforcement partner of the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, to lay a complaint and information before you as Prime Minister, and a number of key members of your government with the aim that if you do not act upon it, it will be on the public record that you have offended S 44 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) which carries three years imprisonment and will forever be disqualified from sitting in the Parliament of the Commonwealth under S 44, of the Constitution.
  • I claim the status of law enforcement partner because in S 13 and 15F Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second as heir and successor to the King in 1913 is bound to recognise this Act as legitimate, the High Court has confirmed it as legitimate in 1915 ( R V Kidman ( 1915) 20 CLR 425) In 1487, in the Statute 4 Hen VII Ch 20  ( Imp) the then King granted a franchise to every subject of the Queen of the Constitution to partner with the Crown to obtain a profit for the Crown as well as themselves, by involving themselves in law enforcement. This complies with S 5 Partnership Act 1891 (Q).
  • The partnership is further confirmed in S 42 and 43 Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Q). The High Court has confirmed partnerships exist whenever two or more entities enter an agreement to work together to obtain a profit. (United Dominions Corporation LTD  V Brian Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1.)
  • The partnership cannot be conducted uberrimae fidei by the Crown unless the Crown Courts abide the Free Access to Courts Act 1400, 2 Hen 4 Ch 1   S 4 and 5. In force in the Australian Capital Territory and cease protecting alleged criminals.
  • There is at present a criminal cartel running law enforcement in the Commonwealth, every bit as horrific as the Deep State that is being dismantled as we speak in the United States of America. That cartel is the legal profession, with large numbers of its members in the Parliament of the Commonwealth and in your government.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on May 31, 2021, in Common Law, Commonwealth Constitution of Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, Scott Morrison and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. Appears Peter is confused. Why would he write the content in all capital letters? That indicates a foreign language and a foreign jurisdiction.
    Also an ‘affiant’ is a ‘person’ making an affidavit. A ‘person’ is a corporation, a ‘res’. Wrong jurisdiction. He also admits to being a ‘subject’, under the authority of, a slave. Why?
    This is a small excerpt from information freely available. It may help the knowledge base as to how we are all deceived, or it may be too advanced to comprehend. It does indicate a very organized way of controlling the people which has taken a long time to formulate, so it is intentional. Please consider.

    The UCC Deals with the Following Consecutively Numbered Subjects
    1. General Provisions; 2. Sales of goods; 2A. Leases, leases of good; 3. Negotiable Instruments; 4. Bank Deposits; Banks, and Banking, Check collection process; 4A. Fund Transfers, Transfers of perceived money, Fiat FRN DOLLARS, between banks; 5. Letters of Credit, transactions involving letters of credit; 6. Bulk transfers and bulk Sales Actions, and liquidations of assets; 7. Warehouse Receipts, Bills of Lading and other Documents of Title; 8. Investment Securities, Security Instruments, CAP Security Instruments, and financial assets; 9. Secured Transaction, Transactions secured by security interests — and most importantly, Debt Liens.
    Under the UCC you are considered to be a “vessel” over which Maritime Admiralty Laws apply.
    Under the UCC you can be liened — in total conflict with Declaration of Independence “unalienable rights”.
    Under the UCC by contracting — such as applying for a license — your inherent (original) rights are turned into privileges that can be liened. You’re under the contract of Martial Law Rule. You’ve already been liened.
    • Your unalienable right to travel is now a privilege to drive.
    • Your unalienable right to own property is now a privilege to use the property.
    • Your unalienable right to pay off debt is now a privilege to discharge the debt as a debt slave.
    • Your unalienable rights and freedom are now a privilege to use government benefits and be controlled.
    • Your unalienable right to liberty is now a privilege to be a good little debt slave.
    • Your unalienable right to free speech is now a privilege to protest.
    • Your unalienable right to hold property is now an asset owned by the government inequity that can be seized at any time.
    • Your unalienable right to hunt and fish is now a privilege to hunt and fish, which can be fined.
    • Your unalienable right to elect government officials to represent you is now a privilege to vote for corporate foreign agents to rule you.
    These are just a few examples of the usurping statutes of the UCC code of the District of Columbia CORPORATION Franchise. Because the Governments own it all, the Governments own your title; the Governments own your cars; the Governments own everything you registered to the state; and more. The Governments see you as a war-time criminal. Under the UCC all of us are considered to be an asset of the STATE OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPALITY Corporation— a civilly dead Person and Citizen Debt slave used as human capital collateral for the Governments’ National debts. All of you are equity for debts to the District of Columbia UNITED STATES CORPORATION MUNICIPALITY. Think about it

    Like

  2. Edit: sorry, didnt see p2 on phone! Can delete both my comments, keep up the great work!

    Like

  3. I sincerely hope this case goes to Court and proceeds to a just outcome.
    Morrison has a lot to answer for.It is very obvious that he is working for the Great Reset in their attempt to rule the world.
    If Morrison is re-elected , he will take the flip flop gloves off and start to tighten the screws on the people of Australia.
    But who can take his place?
    Definitely not Labor or greens.They would be far worse.Dutton as PM would be my choice.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Freddo, I cannot see any connection between your comment on American law and the fact our PM is being taken to Court in Australia.We have totally different laws.

    Like

  5. That’s the point. You are not meant to. Keep looking. There are actually 3 jurisdictions. The first letter of each is in the word ‘law’. Land , air, and water.. Law.. Now which one are u in if you were born on the land? What about if you are a ‘resident’? Do u understand what a ‘res’ is?
    We have all been ‘pressganged’ into a foreign jurisdiction without full disclosure. it is a very deep rabbit hole. The UCC is the rules of commerce. It applies to all corporations involved in interstate commerce. What is a ‘person’ again.? U don’t mean American law either,. It is the law of the U.S.A. and the U.S. Completely separate entities. Two are corporations, one is not.

    Like

  6. Vote One: One Nation!

    Like

  7. selwyn noffke

    I agree with most on this site in regards of the duopoly I E LNP & Labor and labors arsewipes the greens , One comment suggested Peter Dutton as P M forget it as we,ll later find out DUTTON has become one of them under control of the NWO.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.