Letter to the Editor
Just read your mandate article published on the TAP website.
I’ve written a few letters to the Commonwealth and State Health Ministers as well as the TGA.
If you read the State Heath Directions (Qld) you will see there is actually a mandate. It’s not enforceable though except by the usual method of threatening third parties like restaurants and employers.
The mandate is for a TGA approved vaccine. That is in the definitions in the State Heath Directions.
The TGA have written and confirmed there are none. The current ‘vaccines’ are unregistered.
The State threatened parties with fines for not enforcing the mandate which is actually unenforceable.
That would be a crime.
Please share this special report with everyone you know, especially people who are planning on traveling.
Victor Hugo, an American Refugee currently stuck in the republic of Georgia, shares first hand accounts of friends of his who were trying to get back home since the pandemic, and who were scanned at the airports for luciferase, and then were forcibly injected.
Former Navy Tech and Engineer Tivon Rivers describes the technology that they are using on the public. This report is backed up with the facts, the studies, and the patents.
Special Report: Human Bodies Scanned At Airports For Luciferase Proof of Vaccination
And I left out the other important part
“Not enough participants”.
Against every rule of any clinical trial, etc etc etc.
I also read the budget part where it is anticipating 77 million going to vaccine injured. WTF? (someone else’s back pocket). There has barely been a payout made to date as requires doctor to sign off, in addition to being hospitalised and other conditions from memory.
Further to the registration of the provisional vaccines, according to the TGA yes they are provisionally registered and provisional registration seems to equate to provisional approval (one and the same) but they are not FULLY approved. If FULLY approved, pharmaceutical companies lose their indemnity and then can be held responsible and sued. However, once on the Childhood Immunisation Register which is what they will soon be pushing for they are again not liable. Now whilst on the TGA I found that booster shots from Moderna and Pfizer have now been approved for both 5-11 year olds and 12-17 year olds (slipped under my radar).
“On 19 October 2022, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provisionally approved Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine, SPIKEVAX (elasomeran), for use as a booster dose in individuals aged 12 years and older.
This mRNA vaccine is already provisionally approved for immunisation to prevent COVID 19 in individuals aged 6 months and older and as a booster dose for adults aged 18 years and older.”
“On 20 September 2022, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provisionally approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, COMIRNATY (tozinameran) for use as a booster dose in individuals 5 years to 11 years.
As with all COVID-19 vaccines, the Government’s decision on the use of this vaccine as a booster in this age group will be informed by advice from the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI)”
See TGA website for all of above.
Now move to the Department of Health website
“COVID-19 vaccines are safe for children
Results of a recent clinical trial demonstrate that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are highly effective and that most side effects are mild and short-term.
The TGA carefully evaluated available data for both vaccines to support their safety and efficacy among children.
COVID-19 vaccine safety data from AusVaxSafety shows that 5 to 11 year olds are reporting fewer short-term vaccine side effects than those reported by older Australians. ”
What is wrong with this picture?
“Children need to complete their primary course
It is important children complete their primary course, as having all the doses recommended for their age and health needs will extend their protection against COVID-19.
For most children, this will be two vaccine doses given 8 weeks apart.
For children with immunocompromise, or children who are aged 6 months to 4 years, this will be 3 doses.”
Now from the fact sheet parent information fact sheet regarding 6 month – 5 year old approval. The wording should ring alarm bells to any parent, not to mention having to sign a consent form. (Never asked for with any other vaccines).
” A clinical trial showed that the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine provided some protection against infection with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Children in the trial who received the vaccine were 35% to 52% less likely to get COVID-19 than children who did not have the vaccine.
Protection against COVID-19 starts from about 2 to 3 weeks after the first dose. While one dose may give some protection, it may only last for the short term. Two doses will improve protection.
It is possible that your child could still get sick from COVID-19 after vaccination. But evidence shows that people who are vaccinated are much less likely to get seriously ill from COVID-19 or need to go to hospital.”
“Some COVID-19 vaccines, including Moderna, have a very rare risk of heart inflammation (called myocarditis or pericarditis). These conditions are most commonly seen in adolescents and young adults, and are very rare in children under 12 years of age. The clinical trial in children aged 6 months to 5 years did not have enough participants to assess rates of heart inflammation after vaccination with the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. The benefits of vaccination are considered to outweigh this potential risk for infants and children in this age group who are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19.”
I wish I could highlight and bold but this is disgraceful. “A trial” (one singular)
“some protection” some???? “evidence shows” (please provide the reference which they don’t).
Share this with anyone you know who has a child under 5 they could potentially have 3 shots by 18 months at this rate.
Click to access covid-19-vaccination-moderna-information-and-consent-form-for-parents-and-guardians-of-children-aged-6-months-to-5-years.pdf
Note a New York judge has just ordered city to re-instate staff stood down for not taking jab- and will be reimbursed in full for lost salaries–hope this is a precedent for Australia
Legal eagles – what is happening in the EU Parliament? Mislav Kolakusic, MEP and lawyer on the crime of the millenia: ‘the EU has been sold a FAKE VACCINE .. requests a refund of the 2.5B Euro paid so far .. calls for immediate termination of Pfizer contract .. calls to prosecute Pfizer and others involved in the “greatest scandal in history”.
Can’t say I disagree with any of his recommendations.
The TGA needs to be dismantled after a Royal Commission. Most career politicians and hellth bureaucrats can get exported to China if that is where their loyalty sits.
Del Bigtree ‘The Highwire’ #290 The Speed of Science has some video of the EU Covid panel MEPs, starts about 1hr 20mins in.
Perpetrators of the UN /WEF ‘sars nouvelle cov-2’ pandemic hoax 2020 – the National Cabinet [Politburo] and Operation CoVID Shield [Cheka] of the Australian CoVID Regime must be identified, investigated and (if warranted) charged over the Hoax, the lockdowns, police state assaults, ruin of livlihood and health for so many Australians, wrongful deprivation of human and civil rights and then mandated injection with a bioweapon and the resulting morbidities and mortalities.
The budget just handed down Oct 25 puts this price tag on these crimes at a paltry 77 billion. There is no monetary price tag on what these CoVID Pandemic bolsheviks and genociders have done. Restitution can only be in terms of the restoration of Australian law and rightful government in this nation. And the Australian CoVID Regime – its policy makers and implementers must face criminal charges.
Seeing I’ve already typed the comment, I’ll post it as an add on to Blisskitt’s comment.
I was wondering the same Rosemary Tempany.
Provisional Approval means a medicine is not proven safe, as the Sponsors (Australian Manufacturers, importers, exporters) applied for a Provisional Determination, not a Priority Determination that requires a complete dossier proving their medicine is safe.
The Covid-19 mRNA and GMO products are listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.
By unregistered, does Mark mean not listed on The Schedules of medicines and poisons in the Poisons Standard?
According to what I have found out as well as many others, provisional means just that provisional ie. not full. ( compare to a drivers license). The TGA could only provide provisional approval under a state of emergency or pandemic. Additionally, provisional approval could only be given if there were no alternative treatments available (Ivermectin, HCQ). Of course they were banned, discredited to make way for the provisional approval. No COVID vaccines are fully approved in this country. If they provide full approval, pharmaceutical companies are then liable. However if they get it on the childhood immunisation register (like in The US , going through now) they are again no longer liable. I only became aware of this about 18 or so months ago. As a parent who had children immunised I was not aware of this fact and therefore nowhere near informed. Of course I was never really informed anyway, stupid me should have asked more questions than I did.
You can check this information out by going to the TGA website which links you to the Immunisation schedule and additionally to what is in vaccines etc.
Yes there are numerous cases before the courts now. Ed
On a side note but relevant I have not watched in entirety, (couple hours) apparently very good mostly. Some criticism. https://odysee.com/@thebigreset:1/ENGLISH:bb
How does or is there a difference between ” registered ” and ” provisional approval”?
Because these injections had provisional approval . In 2021 the then Federal Health Minister publicly acknowledged we were in the middle of a ” global human experiment “
My mother was locked down in a nursing home in May of this year. She had 2 falls, 2 days in a row. I went to visit and staff insisted I provide a RAT test. I refused, and asked staff to contact the Care Home Manager for clarification. Staff then let me in later saying “whilst it’s a mandate of the government, we can’t force you to have one, it’s not a LEGAL requirement”. My mother passed away soon after. It was just so sad .. I think because of staff shortages, she wasn’t cared for properly.
Actually, Obvious Bob, although that is true by recent convention. in a democracy, the only legal mandate is The People, and in Australia, by national referendum.
As to calls for lawsuits, forget it. Government does not care about mandates.
A clear and massive example: the 1945 Referendum mandated the 1946 Social Services Act, which created a worker-owned Welfare Fund to pay specified pensions and benefits. Government was specifically forbidden to interfere in any way.
Yet in 1954, Robert Menzies helped himself to the Welfare Fund to pay for the Snowy River Scheme, and Paul Keating illegally imposed a means test on age pensioners, denying them access to their own money. Then Social Services Minister Jenny Brock, actually lied to us all, claiming all Australian pensions have always been means-tested.
Currently, any age pensioner who gets a tiny or occasional job has his age pension cancelled unless he “reports” every second Friday. If he has no access to a computer, cannot comprehend the hopelessly scrambled and ambiguous content of MyGov.com.au website, or is unable to travel to the nearest Centrelink office, he starves.
I am entirely unambivalent about this behaviour. The authors of these atrocities must be tried, condemned and executed following a national referendum on the restoration of the death penalty. I know through full demographic surveys that more than 80% favour capital punishment. I will volunteer to put the rope around Keating’s neck, although I will probably be crushed underfoot in the rush to action this pleasurable item of justice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Governments are the mandated party, not the mandator.
A mandate is a contract for services given by a group (the people, at election time, who contract those who would form government in order to have them deliver required services, only.
That is why election promises are not enforceable-because the candidates are not CONTRACTED prior to taking their oath of Office.
WOW.That is good news!!!!!.thank you.
Can we sue the government for illegal mandates and loss of employment?
Can we sue the government for illegal mandates and loss of employment