Foreign body corporate owns Reserve Bank, lends money to the Commonwealth at interest

by Kev Moore

The RBA and the ATO are owned by the owners of the corporation called “The Commonwealth of Australia”, registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 “The Reserve Bank is a foreign ADI. A “foreign ADI” means a body corporate that:

(a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and

(b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and

(c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia”.

Therefore under section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act no person on being elected is eligible to sit in parliament as they are subject to a foreign power

Statute Law is Maritime or the Pirates of Finance law

Rabbi Reichhorn’s Protocols

“6. By the ceaseless praise of DEMOCRATIC RULE we shall divide the Christians into political parties, we shall destroy the unity of their nations, we shall sow discord everywhere. Reduced to impotence, they will bow before the LAW of OUR BANK, always united, and always devoted to our Cause.”

Section 44: Disqualification

Any person who:

    is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or

    is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer; or

    is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or

    holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth: or

    has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;

shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.

“It is illegal for an Australian company to hire a foreign official as its paid agent.” — The Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian constitution

The Reserve Bank is a foreign ADI. A “foreign ADI” means a body corporate that:

(a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and

(b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and

(c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia.

Prior to 1959 the Commonwealth issued and printed its own money and had control of the printing of money. However after the 1959 Reserve Bank Act, the Reserve Bank was established as a stand alone independent foreign ADI, which took over the printing of money and lent the money it printed to the Commonwealth at interest. So instead of the Commonwealth printing its own money, we have a foreign body corporate printing our money and lending it to the Commonwealth which the Commonwealth needs to pay back!

“RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 77

Guarantee by Commonwealth

The Commonwealth is responsible for the payment of all moneys due by the Bank” (The commonwealth of Australia is paying money it borrows back to the stand alone bank)

(Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/ … 0/s77.html)

“RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 27

Bank to be banker for Commonwealth

The Bank shall, in so far as the Commonwealth requires it to do so, act as banker and financial agent of the Commonwealth” (The reserve bank is the Commonwealths banker and lender and the Commonwealth must pay the money back to the Bank!)

(Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/ … 0/s27.html)

EVIDENCE THE BANK IS A FOREIGN ADI WITH FOREIGN LINKS AND BRANCHES:

The below act shows how foreign corporations have power of attorney over the Reserve Bank of Australia:

RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 76

Attorney of Bank

The Bank may, by instrument under its seal, appoint a person (whether in Australia or in a place beyond Australia) to be its attorney and a person so appointed may, subject to the instrument, do any act or execute any power or function which he or she is authorized by the instrument to do or execute. (Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/ … 0/s76.html)

Foreign Agents in control of the Reserve Bank of Australia:

RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 75

Agents etc.

In the exercise of its powers and the performance of its functions, the Bank may:

(a) establish branches and agencies at such places, whether within or beyond Australia, as the Bank thinks fit;

(b) arrange with a person to act as agent of the Bank in any place, whether within or beyond Australia; and

(c) act as the agent of an ADI carrying on business within or beyond Australia.

Letter to ADIs: Operation of foreign banks in Australia

Under the Banking Act 1959, foreign banks are required to be licensed by APRA as authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) in order to conduct banking business in Australia. APRA also authorises representative offices for foreign banks that otherwise wish to maintain a permanent establishment in Australia. Representative offices are generally granted an exemption under Section 66 of the Banking Act in order to use the restricted term ‘bank’ in connection with their activity in Australia. However, they must limit their activities to those prescribed by APRA for representative offices.1

Over time, reflecting the global nature of banking business and the centralisation of many functions, foreign banks operating in Australia as branches have conducted some aspects of their local operations from offshore or outside the branch. In general, APRA does not have a fundamental concern with these types of operational structures but notes that they have the potential to lessen APRA’s ability to provide effective prudential supervision of the local operations.

Recently, APRA has received a number of proposals from foreign banks wishing to conduct activities with Australian customers from their offshore offices. As a result, APRA is issuing this letter to clarify its policy expectations with respect to business conducted in Australia, or with Australian customers, by foreign banks.

Consistent with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s principles on home-host country supervision, APRA has generally taken the position that foreign banks soliciting and operating an active business in Australia should be subject to Australian prudential regulation and supervision, regardless of where the business is booked. However, APRA would not object to a foreign bank conducting business with Australian counterparties from its offshore offices provided:

•the foreign bank does not maintain an office or permanent staff in Australia, including staff employed by another entity within the banking group that conducts business on its behalf;

•the foreign bank is not soliciting business from retail customers in Australia;

•all business contracts and arrangements are clearly transacted and booked offshore, and are subject to an offshore legal and regulatory jurisdiction; and

•the foreign bank does not breach Section 66 of the Banking Act. APRA will not provide exemptions from Section 66 for foreign banks operating in Australia other than in conjunction with the limited activities of a representative office.

http://www.apra.gov.au/adi/Publications/Pages/Letter-to-ADIs-Operation-of-foreign-bank

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on July 29, 2022, in Banks, General, New World Order, NWO, Putin. Bookmark the permalink. 21 Comments.

  1. The only accurate part of that article is the reference to Section 44. The Reserve Bank is owned by the BIS, which is the Bank for International Settlements of Basle, Switzerland, owned entirely by the Rothschilds. Treasury, also, is owned and operated by the Rothschilds.

    How to get it back? Renationalisation. This ain’t new.

    Like

  2. Have a look at this.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/X3U0LzhxZmxG/
    Direct Emergy Weapon Set Up in Canberra

    The Owners and Betters of their United [Communist] Nations state are looking to protect their Australian Politburo (National Cabinet) and our Health System in charge of the Vaxx genocide (a Semashko if ever there was one). The Cheka is on the scene once the filming starts.

    Like

  3. Yes the next generation (what is left of them) will exist, they will have nothing and be happy..
    Or, they will have nothing and be slaves to the system.

    Can we prevent it from happening, yes, will we?
    Going by recent history, no, we will let it happen.

    We will (likely) keep commenting about what should be done to the grubs who have been taking away or rights, freedoms, health, country, etc. But we will (likely) not get together as Communities across all of Australia to take back / apply our original constitution and apply common law to reverse what the grubs have done to us.

    Like

  4. BarbieJean G.

    It has been known to me for decades that Morgan’s ran the Reserve Bank and Commonwealth, Westpac and NAb etc etc. I did their research and had to also do work on their HSBC and ING banks. So…where does that leave us now that we pensioners rely on those banks for our pay?

    Barbara J Gibbs, Dip.Diet& Nut:BA/BSc:Grad.Cert.OSH;TEFL Cert Ganoderma Distributor http://www.online-ganoderma.com/gibbsbj http://online-ganoderma.com/gibbsbj e’mail: positive7yes@gmail.com

    Like

  5. The Head needs to be chopped OFFFFF…

    Like

  6. Your Quote: “We are leaving a real mess for the next generations – we let it happen.”
    WHAT NEXT GENERATION? NO SIGN YET THEIR WILL BE A NEXT GENERATION !

    Like

  7. Yes Indeed for a long time…

    Like

  8. No referendums to give these mongrels carte blanch to sell off anything that belongs to the COMMON WEALTH of the Australian people.: Theft and treason. the people don’t owe the debts the con lying political parties do

    Like

  9. We are all corp-orations – lost at sea and presumed dead.

    Cestui Que Vie Act 1666
    1666 CHAPTER 11
    An Act for Redresse of Inconveniencies by want of Proofe of the Deceases of Persons beyond the Seas or absenting themselves, upon whose Lives Estates doe depend.
    Annotations:
    Editorial Information
    X1 Abbreviations or contractions in the original form of this Act have been expanded into modern lettering
    in the text set out above and below.
    Modifications etc. (not altering text)
    C1 Short title “The Cestui que Vie Act 1666” given by Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 2
    C2 Preamble omitted in part under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), Sch. 1
    C3 Certain words of enactment repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1888 (c. 3) and remainder omitted under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c. 62), s. 3
    I.] Cestui que vie remaining beyond Sea for Seven Years together and no Proof of their Lives, Judge in Action to direct a Verdict as though Cestui que vie were dead.
    If such person or persons for whose life or lives such Estates have beene or shall be granted as aforesaid shall remaine beyond the Seas or elsewhere absent themselves in this Realme by the space of seaven yeares together and noe sufficient and evident proofe be made of the lives of such person or persons respectively in any Action commenced for recovery of such Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners in every such case the person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate depended shall be accounted as naturally dead, And in every Action brought for the recovery of the said Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners their Heires or Assignes, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person soe remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting himselfe were dead.

    Word: maritime

    Definition:

    From 13th Century Latin maritimeo/maritimus = “The mariner fleet of the Sea (Holy See) to be feared”. From earlier Latin maris “sea” and timeo “to fear, be afraid, dread”. From 16th Century English/French “Of the (Holy) Sea”.

    Word: majuscule

    Definition:

    From 18th Century English as legal term meaning “a capital letter”. More commonly known as UPPER CASE. From Latin magnus = “large, great, important” and vulgar Latin culus = “anus, arse”. The meaning of the word literally translates as “great arse” indicating a general contempt by the authors of early LAW DICTIONARIES to those who do not recognise UPPER CASE legal fictions as having superiority over lower case names under ROMAN LAW.

    Definition for: de jure sanguinis coronae

    Century: 16th

    Source Language: Latin

    Definition:    Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns”. In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against then to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition. This means any failure of DUE PROCESS or failure to account for RELIEF by the COURT obligates to compensate the individual accused.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Do It Yourself Credit Card, Secured & Unsecured Debt Elimination, Redemption Program & More.

    http://discharge-debt.com/do_it_yourself_credit_card__secured___unsecured_debt_elimination__redemption_.htm

    Like

  11. SHOW ME THE LOAN
    PROMISSORY NOTE ACCOUNTING

    Click to access show_me_the_loan2.pdf

    Like

  12. Han Barkmeyer

    Complete List Of Rothschild Owned And Controlled Banks
    https://themillenniumreport.com/2017/02/complete-list-of-rothschild-owned-and-controlled-banks/

    Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia

    Like

  13. It did not happened yesterday it had happened in 1974 – 48 years ago!
    Ozzie ozzie ozzie Oi oi oi lets chuck a few shrimp on the barbie and flush them down with XXXX beer…

    Like

  14. So is Centrelink Head Office Kansas…

    Like

  15. Yes it`s all been sold off to the highest overseas bidders, electricity generation, poles and wires, rural water, roads, tollways, hospitals, thousands acres farmland, etc. It`s to late Aussies were to complacent and now their children and future generations future is gone . We are but mice on the treadmill for overseas corporations.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. We the people no longer own any government buildings / departments / banks / etc/etc/etc.
    The grubs have stolen, sold off and given away most if not all of it.

    No good saying wake up Australia – they have already done the damage.

    We are leaving a real mess for the next generations – we let it happen.

    We should be ashamed that we let it happen, and that we are still letting it happen, and even going along with and supporting the grubs who now have a free hand to do more damage.

    How do we try and fix it? Community assemblies and similar community groups.
    Not much time left.

    I just hope that the next generation coming behind us will not throw rocks at us.

    Proud Australians. proud of what?.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Yes, isn’t it ridiculous, these crims with hundreds of PhD’s on $150k+ twiddling thumbs doing economic forecasts..

    Liked by 1 person

  18. old news, owned by Rothchild as most reserve banks around the world are.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. 😳 we don’t even own the reserve bank

    Like

  20. Thought tad rose Ass wipe was arrested Please explain

    Like

  21. International law states that if the buyer cannot produce the original contract with verifiable signatures, stamps and proof of payment then said contract is null and void.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: