NSW Premier’s crime family

by Shane Dowling – www.kangaroocourtofaustralia.com

NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet’s brothers Charles and Jean-Claude

NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet’s brothers Charles and Jean-Claude, who operate behind the scenes in the Liberal Party trying to turn a dollar, were accused of further crimes such as branch stacking and taking bribes on last Monday’s Four Corners (4/7/22) show but the old media have gone into cover-up mode.

A quick internet search shows this is not the first time they have been accused of crimes with Charles being accused in 2014 at the NSW ICAC of money laundering donations for the Liberal Party and Jean-Claude being acquitted of rape by a jury in the NSW District Court in 2017. 

I edited the Four Corners program titled “The War Within” which is about Liberal Party infighting and used the part about Charles and Jean-Claude Perrottet and added my commentary in the video below:

Read Shane’s the full story [HERE]

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on July 10, 2022, in corruption, General, Politicians and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. CATACLYSMIC DUCK

    Resilience Centres and emergency management of Australians by unelected corporations and ultra rich sponsors of the WHO & UN in times of crisis is a reality of Australia’s political Toads, Alison.

    I will do some research on the three ugly sisters above,see if and how they connect to the word resilience.

    Like

  2. (Reposting due to problem with links)
    This seems to be a warning and a highlight to greater government woes in NSW and further afield. eg: Regarding the Federal Government last year, itnews reported the Prime Minister’s department was named amongst the agencies to fail the Australian National Audit Office’s (ANAO) cyber security audit. The national auditor revealed that some of the federal government’s most powerful departments were amongst those still failing to fully implement mandatory cyber security controls, leaving them “vulnerable” to attack. These agencies were the Attorney-General’s Department (AGD); Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C); Department of Health; Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE); Future Fund Management Agency; IP Australia; and Austrade.

    And this year’s Audit revealed that “cyber basics was still beyond the fed gov”. On Jun 10 2022, itnews reported that like the past ANAO audits, the 2022 review also found no significant improvement over time of entity compliance with the protective security policy framework (PSPF) cyber security requirements.

    The ANAO noted that low compliance by entities with PSPF cyber security requirements risked compromise to information.
    Source: itnews.com.au/news/cyber-basics-still-beyond-fed-gov-as-essential-eight-mandate-looms-581172

    All the while, the NSW and Australian Governments are working closely together to explore the adoption of a national Digital Identity ecosystem. NSW Government chief information and digital officer Greg Wells voiced platitudes that “privacy and security were of the utmost importance to the NSW Government”, and that “ACIC has reported that oversharing of personal information and identity crime cost customers and the private sector more than $3.1 billion across Australia in 2018/19”.  
    Source: itnews.com.au/digitalnation/news/nsw-government-showcases-its-digital-identity-program-578383

    Yet for those in NSW who are affected by the floods, the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) website cannot be accessed for information and warnings. A search for BOM appears fruitless. Information under BOM links state:
    “The Bureau of Meteorology website does not currently support connections via HTTPS. You will shortly be redirected to http://www.bom.gov.au”, and, “The Australian Bureau of Meteorology recognises the need for supporting international web standards. The content on the page you came from is accessible to all”, yet BOM does not redirect, and its links do not open.

    Instead, weather news is delivered by the Australian Government Services Australia which is then directing readers to the online myGov and login PRODA (Provider Digital Access); or directing readers to the NSW State Emergency Service, or the SES facebook site, or even Elders weather.

    BOM is stated to be an Executive agency of the Australian government, along with Australian Financial Security Authority, Digital Transformation Agency, Infrastructure and Project Financing Agency,

    Under the previous Morrison Liberal/National government, The Commonwealth committed to establishing a new virtual climate and disaster risk information and services centre called ‘Resilience Services’ by 1 July 2021.
    The ‘Resilience Services’ centre would collect and leverage the Commonwealth’s extensive data, information and capabilities from agencies such as Bureau of Meteorology, the CSIRO, Geoscience Australia and the Australian Bureau of Statistics, to aid the information needs of Emergency Management Australia and the new National Resilience, Relief and Recovery Agency [See Foreword by Scott Morrison MP in “A national approach to national disasters”, Commonwealth of Australia 2020, pdf]

    Providing weather information to Australians will never be the same again. In the place of the BOM Morrison has changed weather information and warning advice to the buzz words of long-term risk reduction and adaptation to natural disasters. There is something seriously troublesome here.

    Like

  3. This seems to be a warning and a highlight to greater government woes in NSW and further afield. eg: Regarding the Federal Government last year, itnews reported the Prime Minister’s department was named amongst the agencies to fail the Australian National Audit Office’s (ANAO) cyber security audit. The national auditor revealed that some of the federal government’s most powerful departments were amongst those still failing to fully implement mandatory cyber security controls, leaving them “vulnerable” to attack. These agencies were the Attorney-General’s Department (AGD); Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C); Department of Health; Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE); Future Fund Management Agency; IP Australia; and Austrade.

    And this year’s Audit revealed that “cyber basics was still beyond the fed gov”. On Jun 10 2022, itnews reported that like the past ANAO audits, the 2022 review also found no significant improvement over time of entity compliance with the protective security policy framework (PSPF) cyber security requirements.

    The ANAO noted that low compliance by entities with PSPF cyber security requirements risked compromise to information.
    https://www.itnews.com.au/news/cyber-basics-still-beyond-fed-gov-as-essential-eight-mandate-looms-581172

    All the while, the NSW and Australian Governments are working closely together to explore the adoption of a national Digital Identity ecosystem. NSW Government chief information and digital officer Greg Wells voiced platitudes that “privacy and security were of the utmost importance to the NSW Government”, and that “ACIC has reported that oversharing of personal information and identity crime cost customers and the private sector more than $3.1 billion across Australia in 2018/19”.  
    https://www.itnews.com.au/digitalnation/news/nsw-government-showcases-its-digital-identity-program-578383

    Yet for those in NSW who are affected by the floods, the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) website cannot be accessed for information and warnings at http://www.bom.gov.au/akamai/https-redirect.html A search for BOM appears fruitless. Information under BOM links state:
    “The Bureau of Meteorology website does not currently support connections via HTTPS. You will shortly be redirected to http://www.bom.gov.au”, and, “The Australian Bureau of Meteorology recognises the need for supporting international web standards. The content on the page you came from is accessible to all”, yet BOM does not redirect, and its links do not open.

    Instead, weather news is delivered by the Australian Government Services Australia which is then directing readers to the online myGov and login PRODA (Provider Digital Access); or directing readers to the NSW State Emergency Service, or the SES facebook site, or even Elders weather.

    BOM is stated to be an Executive agency of the Australian government, along with Australian Financial Security Authority, Digital Transformation Agency, Infrastructure and Project Financing Agency,

    Under the previous Morrison Liberal/National government, The Commonwealth committed to establishing a new virtual climate and disaster risk information and services centre called ‘Resilience Services’ by 1 July 2021.
    The ‘Resilience Services’ centre would collect and leverage the Commonwealth’s extensive data, information and capabilities from agencies such as Bureau of Meteorology, the CSIRO, Geoscience Australia and the Australian Bureau of Statistics, to aid the information needs of Emergency Management Australia and the new National Resilience, Relief and Recovery Agency [See Foreword by Scott Morrison MP in “A national approach to national disasters”, Commonwealth of Australia 2020, pdf]

    Providing weather information to Australians will never be the same again. In the place of the BOM Morrison has changed weather information and warning advice to the buzz words of long-term risk reduction and adaptation to natural disasters. There is something seriously troublesome here.

    Like

  4. If known by the Premier, he and they have to resign from the Liberal Party. If unknown by the Premier (which logic would dictate that is unlikely) he needs to take a step back and have a long hard look at his Liberal Party apparatus, and his brothers still need expulsion. Either way, it is not a good look and will reflect poorly on the Party as a whole.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: