Inaccurate Covid PCR tests used in Queensland just a part of the Covid fear scam

Letter to the Editor

This PCR test farce has been going on since Mar 2020.

Whilst extending the number of cycles beyond 40 may increase the sensitivity of the assay, it
may also increase the risk of false positivity due to non-specific amplification.

This looks like the Fed Govt uses 40 as the “OK” parameter, so all these new “cases” are 96% bullshit.

Even the Delta strain.😁

This next bit is important to understand. Queensland Health, or the rest of Australia for that matter, does not understand this concept. but it is up on the Fed Govt website.

“Analytical accuracy of the PCR is therefore very high but clinical accuracy of the PCR is a function of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the population being tested. A higher prevalence of SARS-COV-2 in the population, increases the pretest probability and the likelihood for detecting SARS-COV-2 RNA. This is reflected in a higher positive predictive value for the test. Conversely, even a very specific test will have a reduced positive predictive value if the population being tested has a very low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2.

For example, if a test with a specificity of 99% is used to test symptomatic passengers on a cruise ship where the likelihood of infection is 50%, the positive predictive value is 99% (i.e. for every 100 people with a positive test result, 99 people will have SARS-CoV-2 infection but 1 person without infection will have a false positive result).

However, using the same test, if a low risk asymptomatic population is tested where the likelihood of infection is 5 in 10,000 (i.e. 0.05%), the positive predictive value is 4.3% (i.e. for every 100 people with a positive test result, four to five will have SARS-CoV-2 infection but 95-96 people out of those 100, without infection, will have a false positive result).”

According to:

There have been 2,854,125 tests done in Queensland which resulted in 1,686 “cases”.

Even if all those were certain positives, that equates to 0.059%. We can take that as the “likelihood of infection”. So, according to the Fed Gov website citing 0.05%, it must mean 96% of those Queensland tests were “false positives”.

So only 68 people out of the 1,686 “cases” reported in Queensland so far are probable positive for SARS-CoV-2. If they are fit and healthy individuals an illness that results from a certain positive diagnosis has a 99.74% chance of full recovery, without any medical treatment.

What’s the fuss all about?

David Blake
Bribie Island

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on June 29, 2021, in coronavirus, Covid Cops, Covid passport, Covid vaccines, Covid-19, General and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. These RT-PCR tests were never designed for Clinical Diagnosis just for Research purposes. Right now Australia is having Casedemic and Cases will bring on Lockdowns,Facemasks,QR Check ins which some people break down and accept the Experimental Gene Therapy Injections. Australia had what ScoMo wants is 80% gotten the Gene Therapy Injections then cases will be so much less because the CT can be adjusted to suit the Covid 19 Narrative.
    Look whats happening in most of the Blue States numbers are low due to higher percentage of these injections so the CT is reduced. A blind Nelly can see what the end game is.


  2. Love your work David


  3. my brother is a top class expert in DNA, mRNA etc, having published over 100 Papers in his 35 years in Germany as a medical research scientist.

    He told me months ago that the PCR test should not be extended beyond 35 cycles otherwise it becomes very unreliable.  He said that even at 35 cycles it is not ideal, a little bit unreliable.

    If the news story below is correct, then the Queensland government is using the PCR test at 40 cycles.

    It is ironic that he fell foul of this PCR test recently.

    For a long while he has been wanting to come to Australia to see for the first time the house that he purchased over a year ago on the coast near my two brothers at Bega.

    Airflights were booked, but a few days before departure he failed a PCR test in Germany, and so was forced to cancel his airflights.

    Three days later he had another PCR test and he passed it  — thus of course providing a vivid _*demonstration of the unreliability of the PCR test!*_

    He then booked new airflights and spent late May/early June in two weeks’ quarantine in Sydney, after which I was able to meet him for the first time in some years.

    We had some good chats, during which he spoke of his concerns about the coronavirus vaccines being ineffective, and that insufficient scientific information has been published about them to enable him to assess the scientific aspects.

    regards, Lex Stewart


  4. The fuss is about a criminal global communist taker over.. Also, as is well know to readers here – the state of emergency had to be continued – 26-6-2021..

    We all should realize if the “emergency” can be discredited – and this would seem obvious to me, – then all their BS power dissolve away.. So as well documented here the pcr tests are fraud – the “vaccines are not “vaccines” and masks lock downs and distancing have no support in real science.. How do we take the pcr fraud up to them – In America there is much resistance and legal action – Huge protests around the world..

    Another way would be to get a medicine like Ivermectin up – they can’t get approval for the “vaccines” in that circumstance – and the evidence is overwhelming..

    “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”


  5. Depopulation vaccinations


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: