Voter fraud took out Le Pen in French election

by Kev Moore

Marine Le Pen

2017 – Marine Le Pen: The French Election Was Rigged

It’s not some grand conspiracy, but it’s grand theft all the same. Le Pen voters lost their ballots, their rights, by the millions on Sunday.
In France, if a ballot is damaged, it cannot be cast. So the political establishment, who are desperate to prevent Le Pen from taking office, arranged for the destruction of millions of Le Pen ballots.

Up to one third of all ballots sent out to voters, an estimated 60% of Le Pen ballots, were destroyed at the time of mailing. Only Le Pen ballots arrived destroyed, there is not one report of a single ballot for Macron arriving destroyed.
In the week leading up to the election reports began pouring in that an enormous number of ballots for Le Pen were destroyed at the time of mailing. They were torn badly, rendering them void, before they were mailed out.

The randomness of the tears proves they were torn by hand – with intent. This was a major, co-ordinated effort, orchestrated by the establishment.
The Le Pen campaign complained to the election watchdog, claiming ballots had been “systematically torn up” – but the watchdog merely gave a Gallic shrug, and banned the media from reporting on it.

But it gets even worse.

Voters in districts which heavily favored Macon also received multiple ballots, enabling them to vote twice. The French election commission even confirmed that multiple votes would count, and wouldn’t be investigated until after the election.
The French election was, in this method, stolen. Macron is not the legitimate president of France.

How did this happen?

The French media, forever in the pocket of the elite, refused to report on the issue, allowing the establishment to stifle the will of the people.
However, after the election, mainstream outlets did publish some interesting data. Agence France Press, for instance, admitted that a staggering number of French voters cast ballots which didn’t count.

Nearly one in three French citizens who voted on Sunday did not cast a valid ballot for Macron or Le Pen.
There is always a number of blank or spoiled protest votes in any election. But the number of spoiled ballots in this election was quadruple the usual number in France.

Suspicious much?

Agence France Press tried to cover up the fact that many people had their votes destroyed by claiming that these people “declined to choose” between Macron and Le Pen, and reported that many of them had spoiled their ballots.
Spoiled how? Rips and tears? How convenient.

According to Agence France Press:

A third of French voters declined to choose between centrist Emmanuel Macron and far-right leader Marine Le Pen in Sunday’s presidential election, either abstaining or spoiling their ballots — a record rate in nearly half a century.
According to official results with more than 80 percent of votes counted, the abstention rate stood at 24.52 percent — the highest since the presidential election in 1969.

“That would make a total of one French person out of three who decided not to choose between the two candidates. It’s really a lot for a presidential election,” Anne Jadot, political science professor at the University of Lorraine, told AFP.

The steal is in. The French establishment successfully silenced the voice of the people. Now the media is attempting to cover it up.

Macron is a usurper and not a legitimate president. He was selected by the elite, and placed into power via a rigged election that silenced millions of French patriots. What millions of French people suspected has now been visibly and obviously proven to them – will they now join Le Pen’s call for revolution against the establishment?

Clear evidence of election fraud in French presidential elections. In this first video mainstream news reporter Jean Baptist announces that data received directly from the government showed Marine Le Pen was slightly ahead of Macron with exactly 13,899,494 votes. Yet somehow by the time the night was over her vote count had DECREASED by over 1.13 million votes. This by itself is going to create serious legitimacy issues for Macron, but a second video which has also gone viral makes shows precisely how this was accomplished. As you can see the ballots for Le Pen were intentionally defaced in order to rule them invalid. The fact that all of the tears were in exactly the same place means that someone was doing this on a massive scale and quickly.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on April 27, 2022, in Election, General and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 13 Comments.

  1. Hehehe….

    Le Pen’s vote goes DOWN by 3 million in 1 hour and 20 minutes.

    Macron’s vote goes UP by 250,000 in the same time!

    And everybody thinks it’s kosher? How exactly do 3 million votes suddenly disappear? It’s lucky they stopped counting or Le Pen might have gone into negative figures!


  2. Pauline Hanson’s Please Explain, Episode 24 “Please Explain Voter Fraud”
    Voter fraud. What is it? How do they do it? How bad is it? How do we stop it?
    With an election just weeks away these are important questions that need answers.


  3. Statistical Proof Shows Marine Le Pen Actually Won the Runoff Election


  4. The modus operandi of “perpetual fraud”.
    A case in point, and worthy of repeating, is that of Lady Renouf, wife of the late Sir Frank Renouf, who was prosecuted under Germany’s notorious §130 Volksverhetzung law, but ended without her being found guilty of any offence. After 32 months the German courts backed down, and Lady Renouf was acquitted.
    Why? For the sake of fraud and perpetual fraud.

    The following excerpts are copied from “Role Model on Trial”:

    The Dresden prosecutors feared media examination of the Hermann Abs story. Abs was a friend and colleague of the late Sir Frank Renouf. They worked together to open up West German investment banking. Hermann Abs was the most powerful banker in postwar Europe. Defence evidence in the trial of Lady Michèle Renouf would have exposed the existence of a previously unknown British spy inside the Third Reich.

    [Lady Michele Renouf, being an Australian-born international model and television commercials actress, is an excellent reason for Australians to know her story and the process of her prosecution.]

    Hermann Abs was the most powerful German banker of the 20th century, his career having flourished under Adolf Hitler. Peter Rushton, who was a research consultant to the Renouf defence team, uncovered a secret that has lasted for almost eighty years – the identity of a German-Jewish spy inside the Third Reich, and his role in the postwar rehabilitation of Hermann Abs.

    Hermann Abs was described by the late David Rockefeller as “the most important banker of our time”. A biographical summary prepared for the chief of the CIA’s European Division in December 1974 quoted Rockefeller’s assessment, and added that while Abs “holds no governmental positions his influence is enormous and dates back to his successful leadership in 1952 of the German Delegation which regulated the post-war German reparation question and set the basis for the FRG [West Germany] to regain its sovereignty in 1955…”

    Hermann Abs was recruited by the British to help rebuild Germany’s postwar banking system and to do so, the British had to protect Abs from their vengeful allies.

    A US intelligence report prepared for the War Department in March 1945 had featured Abs prominently among those financial and business leaders who “in an outstanding way thrived under National Socialism, …aided the Nazis to obtain power, …[and] shared the spoils of expropriation and conquest.” Jewish-American attorney Col. Bernard Bernstein was a partisan supporter of the Morgenthau Plan devised by his co-racialist Henry Morgenthau, President Roosevelt’s Treasury Secretary, who aimed at the permanent destruction of Germany’s industrial and technical capacity, despite an assessment that this would mean the deaths of 40% of German civilians. Bernstein had himself been a US Treasury Department attorney before being transferred to the Army as financial adviser to Allied Commander Gen. Dwight Eisenhower. Col. Bernstein led the American effort to put Abs on trial, sending a fellow Jewish officer, Maj. Andrew Kamark to interrogate him in the British zone.

    This interrogation failed to obtain any evidence on which Abs could be charged, but by the start of 1946 continuing political pressure from the Americans, including threats to leak stories about Abs to the British press, meant that he had to be purged from his directorships and jailed. Even then, held in Altona prison in Hamburg, and later at the notorious Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre during the first half of 1946, Abs was locked up not so that he could be ill-treated in any way, but so that he could be kept away from the Americans.

    It would have been revealed in court that the British occupation authorities were lobbied to press ahead with Abs’s rehabilitation by Robi Mendelssohn, a partner in the long-established Jewish banking firm Mendelssohn & Co. to rebuild postwar Germany.

    Who was Robi Mendelssohn? Why was he in a position to give high-level advice to the postwar British authorities? And why has his role remained secret until now, more than 75 years after the war?

    Robert von Mendelssohn played an important role in what had been Germany’s largest private bank, especially in regard to international trade and government debt. He made a trip to Stockholm in 1943 where he met with M16 representative Harry Carr. Harry Carr was a veteran MI6 officer who first worked for British intelligence in Russia soon after the Bolshevik revolution. From 1928 to 1941 he had been in charge of the important MI6 station in Helsinki, mainly focused on anti-Soviet operations, then relocated to Sweden after Finland joined the German side in 1941. Mendelssohn made two further visits to Stockholm during the second half of 1943, and one in 1944, on each occasion meeting with MI6 and with an unnamed American diplomat… He appears to have been partly acting as an intermediary on behalf of German military intelligence officer Georg Hansen, right-hand man to Abwehr chief and arch-plotter Admiral Wilhelm Canaris.

    Up until this work undertaken by Lady Renouf’s defence team, nothing has been written about Robi Mendelssohn, who survived treason arrests and trials entirely unscathed.

    It seems that at Mendelssohn’s instigation. Hermann Abs (with British backing) successfully proposed that there should be a common German currency – the Deutsche Mark, introduced in the three western zones of Germany (British, American and French) on 20th June 1948.

    The introduction of the Deutsche Mark was one of the ways in which Hermann Abs shaped the postwar world, along the lines suggested by Robi Mendelssohn to British intelligence: what could be termed an anti-Morgenthau Plan.

    With the end of the Cold War and the slow passing of the wartime generations, Germany’s enemies (in fact Europe’s enemies) chose to restart the witch-hunts and a worldwide obsession with the ultimate crime – the ‘Holocaust’.

    British documents unreported until today show that Robi Mendelssohn – the very man who had been a partner in the largest Jewish family bank supposedly seized by Hermann Abs on behalf of Deutsche Bank – was the man who persuaded the British to rescue this ‘nazi banker’ and secured his position postwar.

    Time and again, historians have picked over the bones of the Abs story; but each time they have ignored Robi Mendelssohn. Moreover the same historians who are usually so keen to discover stories of wartime spies and Jewish heroism have completely ignored the fact that a half-Jewish banker – part of Germany’s most famous Jewish banking family – was an Allied spy inside the Third Reich.

    In October 2020, the Mendelssohn story formed part of a dossier about Hermann Abs, including other contradictory statements and actions from influential Jews – a dossier that would have formed part of the defence case for Lady Michèle Renouf, former wife of Abs’s old friend Sir Frank Renouf, had Dresden prosecutors gone ahead with their long-planned case against her for ‘Holocaust denial’.

    Now the Mendelssohn story is part of a forthcoming book by Peter Rushton, research consultant to the Renouf defence team.
    Role Model on Trial (

    During the Cold War there might have been good reasons why the Western Allies never revealed the story of their German-Jewish spy Robi Mendelssohn – especially as this related to sensitive histories of German peace proposals and the role of Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg, who like Robi Mendelssohn had mysterious ties to British and American intelligence, before disappearing in January 1945 – a case that has never been solved.

    In Melbourne, a small memorial in honour of Raoul Wallenberg stands at the Jewish Holocaust Museum and Research Centre. A monument dedicated to him is at Kew Junction on the corner of Princess Street and High Street, Kew, and a tree and memorial seat are in Carlisle St. at St Kilda Town Hall, Balaclava. Trees were planted also with explanatory plaques at the front of the Federal Parliament in Canberra. The trees were “a project of the Raoul Wallenberg Unit of B’nai B’rith Melbourne”.

    British and German authorities are now under an obligation to be fully candid about their archives on Robi Mendelssohn and German Jewry: official half-truths and evasions are unacceptable while historical sceptics are locked up for asking awkward questions.
    Role Model on Trial (


  5. So the question is, will our election fall foul?. Also if countries stop supplying arms and munitions to the Ukraine, this war would be over, we’re fueling the fire and for what?


  6. I was really surprised to hear Macron won as the people hate him and all want change there. I thought immediately that some skull duggery had happened there and it has. The whole of France should rise up this time and get rid of this fake puppet president. Someone needs to step forward and expose this fake election of Macron.

    I am fearful about what may happen in our elections in Australia… we all want change too, but will we be allowed to have it? Most are not voting for any major parties in… and let us not be complacent if the unthinkable happens..


  7. Step O’Rafferty: Shades of the 1930s and the cancelling of Germany in Europe and Japan in the Asia-Pacific. This time round it’s Russia in Europe and China in the Asia-Pacific.

    Problem > Reaction = Solution

    Simon says a Global Reset will need a preceding Global Disaster.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. So Le Pen’s vote went backwards? I can understand that. lol

    And the Frenchies are going to cop it sweet, just like the Americans and soon the Aussies. Without a whimper.


  9. Step O'Rafferty

    Now the real reasons for provoking Russia into the Ukraine are revealing themselves: The destabilisation of Europe and possibly another massive cull of the population. If France rises up against the ruling class it will be messy and I have a feeling that the aftermath of such a conflict will not be good for anyone.


  10. I will have to find the article again. I personally find it more likely they cheated because that seems to be the way things are these days. I will hunt it out and post it.


  11. Where did you read she threw the election.? I find that unlikely.Not saying it is not true.But evidence ? She has spent years trying to achieve a goal.
    I felt that Macron would get in by fair or foul means. What a bloody shame.


  12. I just read another article that said she took a $30mil bribe to throw the election……??


  1. Pingback: Voter fraud took out Le Pen in French election – debtstop

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: