PUBLIC HEALTH AMENDMENT (VACCINATION COMPENSATION) BILL 2021
Second Reading Speech
Reverend the Hon. FRED NILE (15:31):
As I was saying earlier today, a report in the British Medical Journal in 1999 titled “Public should be told that vaccines may have long-term adverse effects” was authored by John Barthelow Classen and David C. Classen and concluded that the risks of vaccines were not trivial and these should be communicated to the public more effectively so that people can make better informed choices about how to manage their health. I believe what was said then holds true today.
On 1 January 2021 Sonia Acevedo, a 41-year-old Portuguese nurse and mother of two, died two days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine. Her father told The Daily Mail that she never drank alcohol and was in perfect health. On 3 January 2021 Dr Gregory Michael, a Miami obstetrician, died of a haemorrhagic stroke after receiving the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine. Dr Michael developed a well-known vaccine side effect known as acute idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or ITP, immediately after receiving it. On 14 January 2021 the Norwegian Medicines Agency reported a total of 29 people had suffered side effects—13 of them were fatal. These are just three of the most recent examples of horrendous side effects experienced by people who have taken the COVID vaccine.
According to the latest information published by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System, 934 people have died after taking the COVID vaccine. While this is statistically a small percentage, it is still a huge amount in human cost. In light of this, I think it is perfectly understandable why some members of the community are concerned about the vaccine’s application. Whether a business requires an employee to be vaccinated is a private legal matter but it is one that can be regulated by legislation, which is one of the things that the bill seeks to do. The bill addresses all vaccines, not just the ones that are being promoted by the Federal Government and the mainstream media at present.
Over the past several months there has been some commentary about whether any future vaccination regime should be compulsory. I think a reasonable person may conclude that if ordinary activities associated with life, such as entering a public building or getting on transport, are rendered near impossible for a person who cannot prove that he is vaccinated, then it could be said that the regime is effectively compulsory. The right of bodily integrity is a fundamental right under our law. However, there are exceptions to this rule and some laws exist in other jurisdictions that allow authorities to compel members of the public to undergo medical treatments if there is a strong public interest to do so.
Naturally, we should all be very concerned about the potential for overreach in some of these provisions, and I certainly hope that New South Wales does not follow suit in passing the draconian legislation that is now on the books in other States. In any case, for the purposes of the bill, the controversy can be boiled down to the following question: Should an employer acting on their own motion have the right to effectively coerce an individual to undergo an invasive medical procedure against that person’s will or consent? I would say most normal people would say no. The slogan “my body, my choice” comes to mind, but somehow those who are most enthusiastically shouting it in relation to other matters seem to be strangely silent on this subject.
In the event that any employer makes vaccination a condition for continued or new employment and doing so is deemed lawful, it is only reasonable that the employer take on the liability for any adverse effects suffered by the vaccinated person. After all, why should somebody who effectively forces an individual to do something that they would not have ordinarily done themselves, and who suffers damage as a result, not be held liable? The bill simply legislates a responsibility on the party that is requiring somebody to do something that may be hazardous and holds them to account for their own policies and requirements in the event of damage or loss. I commend the bill to the House.
Australia: (Basically employers are now responsible for compensation for vaccine adverse reactions)
Public Health Amendment (Vaccination
Compensation) Bill 2021
b2021-001.d08
Explanatory note
This explanatory note relates to this Bill as introduced into Parliament.
Overview of Bill
The object of this Bill is to amend the Public Health Act 2010 to provide for the payment of
compensation to workers who suffer injury, loss or damage as a result of a requirement to be
vaccinated. https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/bill/files/3835/First%20Print.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3IsCZsBAXNkXCyRM6sfT6FhOhU1noRYUqA5-8w-BaRKf82thIVzm_par8
I rang 3AW Neil Mitchel morning show in the early days to talk some facts about covid from the CDC,s own website.His producer hung up on me.So much for free speech.Controlled opposition.
Thank goodness not all those threatened keep quiet. If we were to publish all the whistleblowers from the medical/nursing fraternities our site would overflow … ED2
I work in health in another state and have looked after patinets post vaccination with adverse effects, major adverse effects. Yet we too, have been told its mandatory. The information sheets on these trial medications state clearly there is insuffiencent data for use in pregnacy, lactation and no information on long term effects. Yet the Gov. is happy to advertise its safe use in pregnacy/breastfeeding. Thar data is still being collected. Why should AUstalia be a gunia pig. Israel is not doing so well with its high level of population vaccinated, If the vaccines are what they are cracked up to be why the worry over the unvacinnated – you should have no worries! I am so suprised that the rates of influenza and deaths from influenza seem to be nonexistent 2020/2021. I also note that the Aust. Bureau of Staistics dictate the recording of covid-19 on the death certiciate as …ALL decedents where the disease caused, or is assumed to have caused, or contributed to death. IS ASSUMED – how to skew the stats! https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1205.0.55.001 Wake up Australia.
if people realised that Nurses and Doctors face discipline and even losing their licence for raising the alarm and questioning what they see, then surely that would be a red flag that something doesn’t add up. If the trusted can’t speak…then why are they being trusted?
See, your mistake was letting them grow up in intact families where Mom and Dad took them to church and read the Bible. Otherwise they would be perfect putty in the hands of this dark emerging world. Psalm 91. Proverbs 17:15.
3AW media bitch shut that down quickly didn’t she.
When the damn finally cracks we are going to need to ask the doctors and the media people where they were when we most needed them. They failure of courage among doctors is mind-boggling.
I am not surprised people are scared.They have been brainwashed with lies for about 18 months.. People I know, including family members have believed the jab works a miracle. In may family there are bad effects, Nothing to do with the needle though.Just co-incidence. I will not have this trial injection.. I do not want to go to a gulag, but who knows.Sounds like imagination, I wish ir was. There are some things to be done to relieve the side effects.But if peole do not want to listen ????
comeinspinner.
www.cairnsnews.org 
PUBLIC HEALTH AMENDMENT (VACCINATION COMPENSATION) BILL 2021
Second Reading Speech
Reverend the Hon. FRED NILE (15:31):
As I was saying earlier today, a report in the British Medical Journal in 1999 titled “Public should be told that vaccines may have long-term adverse effects” was authored by John Barthelow Classen and David C. Classen and concluded that the risks of vaccines were not trivial and these should be communicated to the public more effectively so that people can make better informed choices about how to manage their health. I believe what was said then holds true today.
On 1 January 2021 Sonia Acevedo, a 41-year-old Portuguese nurse and mother of two, died two days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine. Her father told The Daily Mail that she never drank alcohol and was in perfect health. On 3 January 2021 Dr Gregory Michael, a Miami obstetrician, died of a haemorrhagic stroke after receiving the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine. Dr Michael developed a well-known vaccine side effect known as acute idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, or ITP, immediately after receiving it. On 14 January 2021 the Norwegian Medicines Agency reported a total of 29 people had suffered side effects—13 of them were fatal. These are just three of the most recent examples of horrendous side effects experienced by people who have taken the COVID vaccine.
According to the latest information published by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System, 934 people have died after taking the COVID vaccine. While this is statistically a small percentage, it is still a huge amount in human cost. In light of this, I think it is perfectly understandable why some members of the community are concerned about the vaccine’s application. Whether a business requires an employee to be vaccinated is a private legal matter but it is one that can be regulated by legislation, which is one of the things that the bill seeks to do. The bill addresses all vaccines, not just the ones that are being promoted by the Federal Government and the mainstream media at present.
Over the past several months there has been some commentary about whether any future vaccination regime should be compulsory. I think a reasonable person may conclude that if ordinary activities associated with life, such as entering a public building or getting on transport, are rendered near impossible for a person who cannot prove that he is vaccinated, then it could be said that the regime is effectively compulsory. The right of bodily integrity is a fundamental right under our law. However, there are exceptions to this rule and some laws exist in other jurisdictions that allow authorities to compel members of the public to undergo medical treatments if there is a strong public interest to do so.
Naturally, we should all be very concerned about the potential for overreach in some of these provisions, and I certainly hope that New South Wales does not follow suit in passing the draconian legislation that is now on the books in other States. In any case, for the purposes of the bill, the controversy can be boiled down to the following question: Should an employer acting on their own motion have the right to effectively coerce an individual to undergo an invasive medical procedure against that person’s will or consent? I would say most normal people would say no. The slogan “my body, my choice” comes to mind, but somehow those who are most enthusiastically shouting it in relation to other matters seem to be strangely silent on this subject.
In the event that any employer makes vaccination a condition for continued or new employment and doing so is deemed lawful, it is only reasonable that the employer take on the liability for any adverse effects suffered by the vaccinated person. After all, why should somebody who effectively forces an individual to do something that they would not have ordinarily done themselves, and who suffers damage as a result, not be held liable? The bill simply legislates a responsibility on the party that is requiring somebody to do something that may be hazardous and holds them to account for their own policies and requirements in the event of damage or loss. I commend the bill to the House.
Debate adjourned.
https://constitutionwatch.com.au/public-health-amendment-vaccination-compensation-bill-2021/
LikeLike
Australia: (Basically employers are now responsible for compensation for vaccine adverse reactions)
Public Health Amendment (Vaccination
Compensation) Bill 2021
b2021-001.d08
Explanatory note
This explanatory note relates to this Bill as introduced into Parliament.
Overview of Bill
The object of this Bill is to amend the Public Health Act 2010 to provide for the payment of
compensation to workers who suffer injury, loss or damage as a result of a requirement to be
vaccinated.
https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/bill/files/3835/First%20Print.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3IsCZsBAXNkXCyRM6sfT6FhOhU1noRYUqA5-8w-BaRKf82thIVzm_par8
LikeLike
I rang 3AW Neil Mitchel morning show in the early days to talk some facts about covid from the CDC,s own website.His producer hung up on me.So much for free speech.Controlled opposition.
LikeLike
MSM (3AW) cannot have their performing platform disturbed by some person telling the truth. 2GB demigod Hadley is a prime example ..ED2
LikeLike
Thank goodness not all those threatened keep quiet. If we were to publish all the whistleblowers from the medical/nursing fraternities our site would overflow … ED2
LikeLike
Maybe you are lost in space? – – – Any nurses out there would you let this person in on the facts next you maybe called liars .. ED2
LikeLike
Thank you for this Jenny I have published this on a page ..ED2
LikeLike
I work in health in another state and have looked after patinets post vaccination with adverse effects, major adverse effects. Yet we too, have been told its mandatory. The information sheets on these trial medications state clearly there is insuffiencent data for use in pregnacy, lactation and no information on long term effects. Yet the Gov. is happy to advertise its safe use in pregnacy/breastfeeding. Thar data is still being collected. Why should AUstalia be a gunia pig. Israel is not doing so well with its high level of population vaccinated, If the vaccines are what they are cracked up to be why the worry over the unvacinnated – you should have no worries! I am so suprised that the rates of influenza and deaths from influenza seem to be nonexistent 2020/2021. I also note that the Aust. Bureau of Staistics dictate the recording of covid-19 on the death certiciate as …ALL decedents where the disease caused, or is assumed to have caused, or contributed to death. IS ASSUMED – how to skew the stats! https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1205.0.55.001 Wake up Australia.
LikeLike
Why do i sense that both videos are fake?
LikeLike
if people realised that Nurses and Doctors face discipline and even losing their licence for raising the alarm and questioning what they see, then surely that would be a red flag that something doesn’t add up. If the trusted can’t speak…then why are they being trusted?
LikeLike
See, your mistake was letting them grow up in intact families where Mom and Dad took them to church and read the Bible. Otherwise they would be perfect putty in the hands of this dark emerging world. Psalm 91. Proverbs 17:15.
LikeLike
3AW media bitch shut that down quickly didn’t she.
When the damn finally cracks we are going to need to ask the doctors and the media people where they were when we most needed them. They failure of courage among doctors is mind-boggling.
LikeLike
I am not surprised people are scared.They have been brainwashed with lies for about 18 months.. People I know, including family members have believed the jab works a miracle. In may family there are bad effects, Nothing to do with the needle though.Just co-incidence. I will not have this trial injection.. I do not want to go to a gulag, but who knows.Sounds like imagination, I wish ir was. There are some things to be done to relieve the side effects.But if peole do not want to listen ????
comeinspinner.
LikeLike