Scientists, doctors won’t take the mRNA COVID vaccines: Why should you?
By EDITOR, Cairns News
SCOTT Morrison and the public health establishment’s beloved Pfizer vaccines are dangerous for anyone who is uninformed enough to willingly get one, and two former Pfizer scientists who went to court in Europe trying to stop the trials can attest to this, as do other highly qualified scientists.
Anyone worried about “catching the virus” should go to their doctor and get a prescription for the common medicine highly recommended by doctors and medical experts worldwide – Ivermectin. It works as both a prophylaxis (preventative) and treatment for infection. But you won’t hear much about this very effective anti-COVID medicine because governments and media are in the pockets of big pharma.
A US doctor has also posted on Facebook, warning the general public has no idea if it the new mRNA vaccine will be effective or safe because “absolutely no long-term safety studies will have been done to
ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines.” “If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity,” the doctor writes. There have already been six deaths associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trials – two who received the vaccine and four who did not (placebo). That’s the official information from Pfizer, a company with major convictions for dishonesty and fraud.
And with all the uncritical, corrupt spin from the global media about how vaccines will “save us from the virus” (SARS-Cov2), Pfizer has snuck it’s COVID vaccine into the government-subsidized marketplace under the guise of preventing death. But so-called COVID-19 deaths are mostly normal deaths in which COVID-19 may have played a role i.e. comorbidity. The “cases” are mostly the false positives that show up in the faulty PCR testing that can produce up to a 100% false positive rate in people with no symptoms.
Pfizer presents the deaths in its trial as a mere 0.01% of the 43,459 involved. Of the two who took the vaccine and died one had a heart attack 62 days after being vaccinated (and died three days later) and the other “died from arteriosclerosis three days after vaccination”. Pfizer’s ho-hum spin on the deaths was that they “represent events that occur in the general population of the age groups where they occurred, at a similar rate.” How very convenient.
But that information alone should serve as one big hint for people with any kind of heart condition – don’t take the COVID shots! Vaccines shock the immune system, which often results in neurological reactions and damage like autism in children or short-term side effects like convulsions or facial paralysis, which has been suffered by trial participants.
You might well survive with mild reactions, or you might not. Vaccines are a death and injury lottery but with much lower odds than your regular lottery ticket. The common claim is that such deaths and adverse reactions are “one in a million”. Statistically, they are much higher. The Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) in the US reveals 40-50,000 adverse events voluntarily reported annually. But VAERS says those reports are as low as 1% of the actual adverse events. The deaths of infants that occur post vaccination are also often reported as “SIDS”.
The ex-Pfizer scientists who have safety concerns about the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are the former head of respiratory research, Dr Michael Yeadon, and the former head of the public health department, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg. They recently filed a petition for a stay of action asking the European Medicine Agency to suspend phase III of the clinical trials and all other clinical trials.
These two whistleblowers cited “significant safety concerns” and requested all trials be halted until specific criteria outlined in their stay action is met to ensure efficiency and safety. Cairns News is unaware of the outcome of the case, but it looks unlikely to succeed, given that Pfizer already has the vaccine out in the hospitals and doctors’ surgeries. Dr Yeadon, in a video posted on the UK Express says there is already herd immunity in London and “over-assignment of deaths to COVID”.
Meanwhile, concerns over the nature of the Pfizer vaccine have been posted by Mike Smallwood in an open letter on Facebook attributed to a US doctor with 50 years of practice. Smallwood cites his own academic background as Columbus University.
“People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies,” the doctor writes. “The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. The mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.”
The doctor says traditional vaccines simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction but the new mRNA vaccine actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells.
“Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.”
He says the mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction, so in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles.
“This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and auto-immune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.”
The doctor says the new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. “The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.”
Further, he says since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
Other medical experts questioning mRNA technology include Dr Peter Jay Hotez at Baylor College of Medicine, who is worried about “innovation at the expense of practicality” because mRNA vaccines are “weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.”
Michal Linial, PhD, a Professor of Biochemistry says she won’t be taking an mRNA vaccine “probably not for at least the coming year” to see whether it really works. “We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know.”
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky of Flinders University Adelaide, is also on the record as saying he would not take it. Professor Petrovsky and a team at Flinders, have developed their own COVID-19 vaccine that has the highest safety rating worldwide, but has been ignored by the Morrison government. Go figure. Pfizer has all the dollars, right? They also have no legal liability for damages.
The US doctor’s final advice is that anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.
“Here’s my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one available.”