Senator Parry refuses to explain his incriminating words about Port Arthur

Letter to the editor

If you would like the details (includes references) of Stephen Parry’s inside knowledge of the official massacre at Port Arthur in April 1996, please email me for the 50-page summary document: “20 YEARS, CORRUPTION, DECEPTION, LIES” (no copyright, distribute freely) –

This evasive embalmer from Tasmania has refused to explain his incriminating words which he presented at a government seminar in 1997. (see details in above-mentioned summary)

What does it say about the affairs of State in Australia when Stephen Parry – a person who knew preparations for the massacre (allegedly 35 killed; 23 wounded) were made in Victoria “ready for the incident” – becomes President of the Senate? But don’t just condemn the Liberal Party. A copy of the Show Cause Notice which was directed to Parry was also sent to every senator at the time. None have replied or reacted.

It seems every senator in Australia is quite content to see the torture of the poor patsy Martin Bryant continue. He has been wrongly condemned and imprisoned since 1996. Over 20 YEARS!!!!!!!!!

There was NO hard evidence proving guilt, NO motive, NO fingerprints, NO credible identification, NO public inquiry, NO legal integrity, NO proper firearm ownership, NO DNA evidence, NO coronial inquest (with 35 killed!), NO free admission of guilt , NO witness ever testified in a court, NO forensic results, NO crime re-enactment, NO jury, NO complete list of evidence, NO explanation for the naked black-haired woman police wrote they saw at Seascape (it was not the owner who officials said was already dead), NO proper legal representation, and Martin had NO trial (hearings in courtrooms are NOT trials).

All there was were official allegations all unproved and blown up to psycho-shock and unsettle the very gullible public. Just right as a prelude to the gun-control legislation which quickly followed.

Of course officials could not have had a trial. The only witness who knew Martin Bryant and who was at Port Arthur said the gunman was not Martin Bryant. Terry Hill a gunsmith was pressured to say he sold a weapon to Martin, but Mr. Hill refused to lie. (All documented in the book MASS MURDER.) And the marksmanship and coolness of the gunman was way beyond mentally handicapped Martin. (And did you know two people – ASIO or MOSSAD? – voluntarily went and sat inside the vehicle WITH the gunman at the PAHS toll booth, and there had a discussion with him. It seems those two people knew the gunman and/or why he was there. They knew the gunman had already killed people, but they just went and had a chat with him. This is documented in the statements of witnesses who were at that tollbooth. You’re not supposed to know this. It’s all in the book MASS MURDER.)

Do not believe for one minute the bullshit about him making a confession. For six months Martin Bryant clearly stated he was innocent. But to circumvent proper legal and trial procedures, that criminal lawyer Johne Avery worked Martin over and got him to accept Avery’s plea. (Even Martin’s bewildered mother was herself pressured to put pressure on Martin to get him to say he did it. And she did.) Given his mental handicap (IQ of 66; retarded), Martin should have had a protecting guardian with him at all times. But that did not happen. Three official mongrels John Avery (corrupt lawyer), Damian Bugg (corrupt prosecutor), and William Cox (corrupt judge) worked on poor Martin then locked him away forever.

Martin Bryant is INNOCENT! It is Stephen Parry who is GUILTY!


Dr. Keith Allan Noble; author
Vienna, Austria
t. 43-1-9712401

free pdf of the book:
MASS MURDER: Official Kiling in Tasmania, Australia
(2nd edition; 2014)

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on November 1, 2017, in Northern Territory Police, Port Arthur and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. As a good friend of mine said a lot of years ago about this sort of stuff: –
    You are boxing in the devil’s ring, and whilst you may get in a few good punches, ultimately, because you are boxing with the devil, and the devil is the referee, you will not win.
    I would modify that statement slightly……”until there are enough people (not persons), who know the truth and are prepared to stand up and be counted (which I estimate to be 15-25% of the population), to remove the devil as the referee, nothing will change.
    I have already been told that this will not happen in my lifetime, but since I’m well over 70, maybe the rest don’t have to wait too long.
    Old Kodger.


  2. Cognitive dissonance, people have been so conditioned to believe what MSM tell them. Notice whenever a shooting happens he is always mentioned. Conversely when Police shoot any one not a word.


  3. people are stuck watching their favorite TV reality talk show or program the ancient Romans had a saying give the people fun and games and they’ll do anything for you.


  4. Thanks for posting this Cairnsnews. I have researched this for many years and the official story is a pathetic fairy tale. It amazes me how many dummies are still brainwashed with the propaganda about Martyn Bryant doing the shooting. So many are just stuck in their emotions and cannot think rationally when presented with the actual facts. I urge everyone to research the Port Arthur massacre and to share the undeniable facts with as many people as possible. It was a false flag attack to disarm the nation plain and simple.


  5. This event was our 911 moment the whole driving force behind this event was gun confiscation and people control, for an disarmed society is easier to control and they can’t fight back against your agenda. And yes i find that very strange why there has never been any mention of any of Martin’s overseas trips anywhere in the official story of this event.


  6. Has anyone ever tried to explain the reason behind Bryant’s multiple trips to Europe prior to the massacre? Given his mental disability, I don’t accept that he didn’t have an (unacknowledged?) escort.

    Could this have been to instil Tavistock-type conditioning? I don’t know enough to have a firm opinion, but have always thought his overseas trips a curious thing.

    What do others think about so many of the unexplained, and little mentioned by the media, aspects of this terrible part of our history?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: