By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
ROBERT Malone, the doctor who invented mRNA vaccine technology, has warned the vaccines are “very dangerous” because of an unforeseen cytotoxic (toxic to cells) effect of the spike proteins encoded by the vaccines. The same doctor has also spoken out against the widespread suppression of common drugs like Ivermectin, that is a repurposed and proven treatment for COVID-19.
The vaccines are now linked to at least 5000 deaths (higher estimates are 10 times that) in the US including deaths of teenagers, who do not need the vaccine because children to teens are almost entirely non-susceptible to the infection. But vaccinated teens are reporting heart inflammation (myocarditis) from the vaccines and young pregnant mothers, abortions. Many post-vaccination deaths are reported as unrelated to the vaccines.
Dr Malone went public on a widely followed YouTube channel Dark Horse, hosted by husband and wife biologists and free speech advocates Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying of Portland, Oregon. Also appearing with Dr Malone was engineer and entrepreneur Steve Kirsch who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines and sponsored a group to promote COVID treatment with repurposed drugs such as Ivermectin.
Both Dr Malone and Kirsch, who has published articles in TrialSite News exposing the COVID vaccine dangers, warn that the spike protein cleaves off the cell and travels throughout the body including to the heart, brain, lungs and ova in females. Kirsch says medical authorities are not acknowledging the 50-times increase in myocarditis and pericarditis in teenagers.
“We are being told it is a ‘safe’ vaccine so adverse effects are attributed to another cause so it looks to everyone like nothing is wrong. There is deliberate suppression of early treatments,” he said on a BitChute page running the discussion.
Dr Malone said in a normal vaccine development situation there is rigorous animal testing that would have picked up the spike protein problem. “We absolutely should have known and understood that,” he said. “I received a (Pfizer vaccine) data package and reviewed it on behalf of TrialSiteNews and I was very alarmed by what I saw.
But Dr Malone’s alerts to the FDA were dismissed on the basis of insufficient evidence and media have been ignored as the vaccines are pushed relentlessly as “our only hope” through governments by the global pharmaceutical complex and its crooked front man Dr Tony Fauci, who is now the subject of a Bill sponsored by Republican members of Congress to sack him. Kirsch calls Fauci the worst mass-murderer in history.
Dr Malone is not anti-vaccine and in fact took the Moderna mRNA vaccine, as did Steve Kirsch, apparently before becoming aware of the dangers involved. Weinstein is taking Ivermectin as a COVID-19 prophylactic. Kirsch attempted to get National Institutes of Health support for a steroidal drug called Fluvoxamine, confirmed in a large phase 3 trial (standard of evidence) to be very effective against COVID. Kirsch said the NIH did not even respond and neither did the Gates Foundation or the WHO, when informed.
Kirsch also referred to Ivermectin and a report by Dr Tess Lawrie of South Africa, done three months ago and referred to the WHO, but again, ignored. “Tess Lawrie created this report and these guys did nothing. They sat back and said ‘Well Tess, it’s not peer-reviewed, nobody’s going to peer review it so we don’t have to do anything.” Kirsch said the study was subsequently peer reviewed, submitted to a medical journal for publication.
His frustration was compounded when he presented evidence supporting Ivermectin to the top Indian health authorities. “They said we believe in evidence-based medicine. I said here’s all the evidence. Here’s the systematic review and meta-analysis that you need. That’s the highest level of evidence, look at the evidence, and the response is ‘Well the WHO and NIH don’t say so, so sorry I’m not interested’.”
Dr Malone said the Ivermectin was “the sticker” for him. “I just got another report of a physician in Africa who had championed Ivermectin and there was a regime change and now she’s being threatened with being put in jail.”
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
THE battle against the suppression of ivermectin, probably the most effective treatment for “SARS-Cov-2” (or any variant of corona virus), has stepped up in New York state with at least three families winning court actions to force hospitals to administer the drug to loved ones suffering infections. The recoveries have been remarkable.
The court actions fly in the face of the Biden administration’s Federal Drug Administration, which has issued a blatantly dishonest statement that ivermectin “can be very dangerous”. Oh sure, if you take a livestock-level dose of ivermectin, squirt it on your back like a bull, and you could die. But the drug has been given to humans for 33 years in billions of doses and was awarded a Nobel Prize for annihilating parasitic illness.
Big tech companies Facebook and YouTube and mainstream media are also actively and criminally suppressing videos and other information on a treatment shown to be literally a life-saving medical intervention.
Freelance journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer, writing for the medical website Trialsitenews.com, says the FDA statement is the lynchpin of COVID policies worldwide and “purports to protect the public from taking over-the-counter ivermectin meant for animals”.
Pfeiffer has also reported on the Yale University professor and renowned cancer researcher Dr Alessandro Santin, who has studied the COVID-19 literature and treated several dozen patients. The practicing oncologist and scientist who runs a large laboratory at Yale believes firmly that ivermectin could vastly cut suffering from COVID-19. How about that for a story BBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN etc?
But not all media is willingly blind to life-saving truth. In New York state Dan Herbeck at the Buffalo News reported on the case of John W. Swanson, an 81-year-old farmer from Stafford, east of Buffalo, who was infected and placed on a ventilator, a dangerous and frequently fatal treatment. According to his affidavit he was ‘on death’s doorstep’ at United Memorial Medical Center. When Swanson was given one dose of ivermectin, he started breathing properly again.
But the doctors, probably acting on orders from above, then refused to give follow-up doses. Swanson’s family moved swiftly for justice and his wife Sandra hired the same lawyers who convinced other New York State judges to compel other hospitals to administer ivermectin to dying patients.
TrialSite staff have reported at least three cases where families of elderly or seriously ill COVID-19 infected patients were denied ivermectin treatments. While dozens of studies (see meta-analysis below) from around the world show overwhelmingly positive results, regulatory authorities and apex research bodies are hesitant to accept any of the positive data yet and have pounced on any data that shows neutral results.
They also carried ongoing reporting on the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and other reports of the accumulating positive data associated with ivermectin research around the world. This data has apparently been reviewed by family members involved in the New York cases. The families have turned to attorneys including Ralph C. Lorigo and Jon F. Minear of the West Seneca-based Law Office of Ralph C. Lorigo.
In another case, Lorigo’s firm secured a Supreme Court Judge Henry J. Nowak’s declaration that the Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital must treat 80-year-old New York State patient Judith Smentkiewicz with ivermectin. The additional treatments helped as she rapidly improved, recovered and went home, TrialSiteNews reported.
TrialSite further reported a New York Supreme Court judge Frank Caruso making a similar order for the plaintiff, Robert Dickinson, a doctor and husband of the plaintiff, in his legal request to use ivermectin off label. Rochester General Hospital was compelled to follow the physician and allow the ivermectin treatment.
Ivermectin, a medicine for parasites, has been around for four decades. While not FDA-authorized for use against COVID-19, the drug is legally available in the US and Australia for “off-label” use, i.e. available as a prescription-only treatment for conditions other than those listed on the label.
Eminent Australian professor, Thomas Borody of Sydney, released a triple therapy protocol with ivermectin, zinc and doxycyline in August 2020, but was ignored by medical authorities. However, at the time inquiries for the treatment were received from 57 Australian GPs, 30 doctors from overseas, 184 members of the public.
TrialSite said the US National Institutes of Health “conveniently hedges its position” on ivermectin but does acknowledge the off-label use scenario. “For that, they are to be commended,” TrialSite staff stated.
But they also noted high-level efforts to suppress mention of the drug on media including social media, when their documentary about ivermectin use in Peru was taken down by YouTube. They further discovered that Google was hand-selecting videos involving ivermectin for de-emphasis and hence less or no advertising remuneration, while Facebook had identified any news coverage of ivermectin as “misinformation”.
“For example, when TrialSite reported on Slovakia’s health authority approving off label use of the ivermectin for COVID-19 as a fact, which it is, Facebook punished those that posted that news link. Now, they claim that the news item was misleading, but it isn’t at all—it was and is fact,” TrialSite reported.
“This means that there is a significant misinformation agenda now underway, led by social media companies but reinforced by the interests of at least some pharmaceutical companies and kindred spirit in the regulatory bodies.”