Letter to the Editor
To the Editor Herald Sun
You recently reported my appearance in the Bairnsdale Magistrates Court. Since that appearance I have discovered a High Court conversation had on the 7th December 1995 between Sir Maurice Byers and a Justice Dawson regarding S 79 Constitution. I told Magistrate Walsh that he was not entitled to sit without a jury. He disagreed and found against me, but if I had known of that conversation in the High Court I could have convinced him that S 79 Constitution means each and every Magistrate in Australia who sits without a jury is a serious Commonwealth offender, offending against the “Kable Principle” and S 43 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). This attracts ten years imprisonment for any summary judgment with the transcript of proceedings admissible in evidence against the Magistrate under S 129 9(5) Evidence Act 1995 ( Cth). This is so important an issue it warrants an article on its own. This is a huge story.
Peter Gargan
Melbourne
2Ray Spinks, the “judge” has not abandoned the Court, it was the “recess”, next time listen what clerk says when a man in black robe leaves the bench. Regardless what was it, the recess or absence of the master of the ship, it certanly was not Win, it was lost and costs in the long term, and your case was not dismissed, adjourned or anything else, you just been left in the court with nothing. Nothing and no one – mean no outcome, no positive, no negative, left as is and was. You have not learn the lesson, yet.
When you see fully armed mercenaries, bailiffs or sheriffs at your door do not forget then to remind them how you “won” and “own” the court, it will benefit you greatly 🤦♂️
Ray Spinks – Correct, true, right on the mark, etc.
G.G. is corporate.
Courts are corporate.
Yes traitors.
Well done, good to hear that you had success, very hard to do under present corporate systems of government and courts.
It is in our Rightful Commonwealth Constitution 1901.
We are winning Court Cases all around Australia. In fact I helped a friend own the court, when the judge abandoned the court because we insisted on using this Constitution, and not their Corporate Constitution 1988 of which they gave us, without a Referendum.
So you could say it’s a joke, and is TRAITORIST.
Ask your G.G, if he is Corporate.?.?
Perhaps I am a bit simple, but it was my understanding that magistrates courts do not feature trial by jury because the consequences are relatively insignificant. Ergo, if a crime warrants more than two years in prison, this is considered a serious crime and the trial is referred to the Supreme Court.
So where do sections 43, 79, or 129 come into it?
Can somebody please explain?
The whole system is Satanically controlled and has zero validity at LAW
The system is derived from the occult wicked Cannanites and their God of the planet Saturn ( Satan ) Lord of the Rings
This is why it is written in the book of Revelation “Get out of her, Babylon the great is falling”
WE must have nothing to do with the falling system, and do not vote for any of them, in order to be free from her sins ( crimes )
Nothing is Lawful
Yeh, huge story, good luck to get a copy or any glimp of the transcript from any proceedings civil or criminal where the validity and jurisdiction of those men in black robe is challenged.
Our rightful Commonwealth Constitution 1900 , demands a trial has to have a jury
of your peers.
The Corporate Governments Constitution 1988, thinks that is too good, and gives their power to the judges, and Magistrates.
We are winning Court Cases all around the country.
All you have to DO IS DEMAND ONE.
It seems that we are no longer under our Constitution. The Corporation registered on the New York Stock exchange seems to be the modus operandi these days. And on top of that the referendum we had to see if we wanted to be a Republic and we voted no, we still want to be part of the British Commonwealth, has been totally disregarded. Now we also have been sold out to the UN and their preposterous social credit score Digital ID banking fraud and medical terrorism system .But do Australians care? Doesn’t seem like it.
All of the present courts are part of the private corporations that are owned and run from overseas entities.
The present courts do not have much, if anything to do with the constitution and common law as found in the constitution. The 1901 constitution has been hidden away from the Australian people, it is not taught (in any depth) in schools or even universities.
The original 1901 constitution, the one only changed by referendum, survives, but is on purpose, ignored by the governments, courts, police, etc.
Legislation has been created by private corporation governments to replace the constitution – all illegal / unlawful.
Do your research.
Will the people rise up to fix the mess? Going on recent history, no,.
We keep voting for the grubs who sold off and gave away our country, so do we deserve what we get for doing so?
So, the legal system may not need an overhaul, it simply needs to put the constitution back in use in the courts and apply common law, as found in the original 1901 constitution – job done.
The entire system is unlawful. There was never a referendum or Royal Assent given to any decimal currency Act. Indeed there is no decimal currency Act.
The Commonwealth Constitution requires that public officials are paid in the lawful currency of the Constitution the Pound. Even what proports to be a High Court acknowledged this (Leske V Commonwealth).
Therefore all pretend public officials being paid in the Dollar are of no standing at Law and are criminals.