The Big Pharma -sponsored Therapeutic Goods Administration and its Chairman Professor John Skerritt are prosecuting anyone who imports Ivermectin for any purpose. Big Pharma has tied up the TGA and politicians so well that any alternative treatment for ‘Covid’ will be prevented no matter what.
A reader imported Ivermectin tablets from India for animal treatment but TGA’s Sam, no surname, informed him he cannot bring the Covid cure in without a permit.
Endemic corruption festers in the ranks of all bureaucracy and politics and it begs the question, how did PM Scott Morrison accumulate $52million in assets on a $450,000 per annum salary?
Cairns News is doing an investigation of Skerritt’s wealth over the past two years and will publish the results.
Yeah David we published a copy of a Pfizer contract some time ago now and it was bloody awful, a document no sane person would sign. Ed
The health Ranger is an interesting guy.. My take? Sadly, with the new technology, they don’t need us any more..
Yes the contracts would show us lots – but because our (govt) is a company it will have clauses disallowing inspection. It will have penalties and bonuses – which will explain a lot of the aggressive actions taken..criminals all..
Yes, but it seems to me that none of the bad guys are mindful of the law, harm, or anything else except for what their agenda is.
I have often said that Australia is so lawless and corrupt that it makes a South American banana republic look like Nirvana.
As Big Pharma is all about keeping people sick in order to make a profit (the health Ranger said, once, that some 250k Americans die form their meds every year) do you not think that they will keep doing what they are doing (making quids) on an even grander scale?
And no-one, not even the health Ranger, has divulged the real reason they want to get rid of people.
If you ask me-and I wish the Health Ranger would-I will tell you, but in a roundabout way, for a start (I am all about imparting information you know?).
COORECTION TO PREVIOUS POST
OMITTED THE WORD “LOWER”
Should read….
“It is disgusting that with its astoundingly low success rate and destructive potential as evidenced by reports Remdezivir is PREFERRED to alternatives which have shown much greater success and much *LOWER* risk of harm.
The remdesivir IS the BIG DEAL because if it is lethal, that should be a game cganger everywhere.
Ardis is the main man in this one, as no Aussie is doing what he does.
When he has the proof, you will have it, as will everyone globally.
And you’ll have to take it from there.
I wasn’t talking Ardis, I was talking Australian Government deal with Pfizer and if it includes prohibiting alternative medication and treatments apart from the bio-engineering injections.
But yes, Remdezivir is certainly worth checking out and I hope Dr Ardis or somebody else manages to do it. It is disgusting that with its astoundingly low success rate and destructive potential as evidenced by reports Remdezivir is PREFERRED to alternatives which have shown much greater success and risk of harm.
Smells BIG to me. Why are none of the treacherous political big wigs smelling it and asking questions?
Dr Ardis is looking for a vial of Remdesivir so he can analyse the stuff. Depending on what’s in it there may be hell to pay if the stuff is lethal, as in the touted venoms Ardis disclosed recently that are allegedly in the vaccines.
So hold your horses and maybe exercise a bit of patience, because if Ardis does find lethal amounts of toxins in the Rem, then all hell must break loose.
I may have dreamt it but didn’t the published contracts between Pfizer and some of the two bit States contain a provision that the countries would not permit any alternative therapies or treatments, except Fauci’s (?) Remdezivir? Perhaps someone could look into the Australian contract, excluding of course the redacted commercial-in-confidence bits?
Where are all our intrepid investigative journalist heroes when we need them?
looks like our Gov is not only corrupt….but could not care less if the Oz people know……cos what will we do about it………….?
In response to Janicew37, if I had of known in advance that shares in CSL and vaccine manufacturing were about to exponentially rise, would I have purchased them?
Isn’t there a pecuniary interest register for Politicians that would shed some light?
Reference: Pecuniary interest – Parliament of Australia (www.aph.gov .au)
Members are required to notify any alterations to interests.
“The registrable interests include:
shareholdings in public and private companies;
family and business trusts and nominee companies, subject to certain conditions;
real estate, indicating the location and the purpose for which it is owned;
registered directorships of companies;
partnerships, including the nature of the interests and the activities of the partnerships;
liabilities, indicating the nature of the liability and the creditor concerned;
the nature of any bonds, debentures and like investments;
savings or investment accounts, indicating their nature and the name of the bank or other institutions concerned;
the nature of any other assets, excluding household and personal effects, each valued at over $7500;
the nature of any other substantial sources of income;
gifts valued at more than $750 from official sources or more than $300 from other sources, provided that a gift from family members or personal friends in a purely personal capacity need not be registered unless the Member judges that an appearance of conflict of interest may be seen to exist;
any sponsored travel or hospitality received where the value of the sponsored travel or hospitality exceeds $300;
membership of any organisation where a conflict of interest with a Member’s public duty could foreseeably arise or be seen to arise; and
any other interests where a conflict of interest with a Member’s public duties could foreseeably arise or be seen to arise”
Section 44(v) of the Constitution states that any person who has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than 25 persons shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Senator or a Member of the House of Representatives
Section 45(iii) provides that if a Senator or Member of the House of Representatives directly or indirectly takes or agrees to take any fee or honorarium for services rendered to the Commonwealth, or for services rendered in the Parliament to any person or State, the place of the Senator or Member shall thereupon become vacant.
Not sure what that all means but the tax man at least needs to target all the Politicians this financial year.
It’s their turn.
Heard of the molestation rumors. Wow! There is a woman who goes by the name of FIONA BARNETT who wrote a book called EYES WIDE OPEN. She has a whole chapter dedicated to Hillsong. The woman herself was molested as a small child by a prominent now dead Prime Minister and mentions other big named politicians involved in pedophilia and media Barons too. I don’t think she ever mentioned Morrison though. Think there are YouTube videos showing Barnett. Her nickname was Candy Girl.
I think the problem here, Alison, is that you are dealing with corporate entities, and these are outside the Constitution.
Your local council, incorrectly classed as “…an essential tier of government…” is anything but.
Your council is a corporation, and outside the Constitution-no lawful government entity can claim “commercial -in-confidence” for anything, simply because lawful government must be unincorporated, by its very nature.
And my guess is that corporate government has no hold on us unless they can show a wet ink contract with us individually.
And we are not obliged to pay tax to a corporate government because we are not shareholders and once again have no wet ink contract with the CORPORATION.
And if they are using unlawfully gleaned “taxpayer” funds for their private corporate enterprises, well the where is my annual dividend?
And you can also ask your local council the same question: “Where is my annual dividend???”
Betty, have a look at this link, and then go and type Morrison’s name into the search box at the top of the page, and see what manner of corruption associated with Morrison you will find:
https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2020/10/10/scott-morrison-was-sacked-as-managing-director-of-tourism-australia-for-financial-fraud-why-should-we-trust-him-with-our-money-now/
Then you might go here and take note that this all happened under Morrison’s watch-was this a “Captain’s Pick?”:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z4GbWqyeAhBP/
Mag Igan may mention the large number of dams built in Australia, with public money, but the dams are privately owned-maybe by foreign almond growers in South Australia?
“the fact that they, the TGA, dictate outcomes”, becomes a problem to us when we are hindered by the TGA from exercising our free will choices on how we want to take best health care of our bodies or for others.
The TGA is a WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Quality Assurance.
Let’s get this fact into our heads. The decisions they make are subservient towards fulfilling a WHO Universal Heathcare Plan. As such then the TGA et al have made themselves traitors to our own Australian Commonwealth Constitution. We as autonomous Australians are facing a coup d’état of our health independence if our country signs the proposed WHO Treaty for Pandemics, Preparedness and Response.
When I watched Mr Skerritt answer Senator Malcolm Robert’s questions in the Senate there was a noticeable lack of regard on his part for the sufferings and deaths of Australians due to the covid-jab. It’s apparent the TGA has other interests to serve, not the everyday Australians’ interests.
The Australian Constitution s. 51s. 51(xxiiiA)) forbids Commonwealth provision of medical services to require anybody to accept those services.
That includes “pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits”. This section 51(xxiiiA) means that the TGA cannot authorize any form of citizen conscription of “pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits”. Would this include the importation and supply of a medical treatment, in this case, Ivermectin?
See:
Subsection 51
(i) trade and commerce with other countries, and among the States
(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment,
pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize
any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances
See:
“Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.”
New restrictions on prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19 | Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
“the fact that they, the TGA, dictate outcomes”, becomes a problem to us when we are hindered by the TGA from exercising our free will choices on how we want to take best health care of our bodies or for others.
The TGA is a WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Quality Assurance.
Let’s get this fact into our heads. The decisions they make are subservient towards fulfilling a WHO Universal Heathcare Plan. As such then the TGA et al have made themselves traitors to our own Australian Commonwealth Constitution. We as autonomous Australians are facing a coup d’état of our health independence if our country signs the proposed WHO Treaty for Pandemics, Preparedness and Response.
When I watched Mr Skerritt answer Senator Malcolm Robert’s questions in the Senate there was a noticeable lack of regard on his part for the sufferings and deaths of Australians due to the covid-jab. It’s apparent the TGA has other interests to serve, not the everyday Australians’ interests.
The Australian Constitution s. 51s. 51(xxiiiA)) forbids Commonwealth provision of medical services to require anybody to accept those services.
That includes “pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits”. This section 51(xxiiiA) means that the TGA cannot authorize any form of citizen conscription of “pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits”. Would this include the importation and supply of a medical treatment, in this case, Ivermectin?
See:
Subsection 51
(i) trade and commerce with other countries, and among the States
(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment,
pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize
any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances
See:
“Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.”
https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-restrictions-prescribing-ivermectin-covid-19
Yes they have all profited in the damage and deaths – People like Skerritt should be dealt with..
In response to chockylover, I understand the frustration for people who want a fix to their symptoms, but the horse paste has a minuscule dose of the actual drug Ivermectin. It contains other ingredients. People should not be playing around with Veterinarian drugs.
The human Pharmaceutical Ivermectin is a version developed for humans.
Even the human version is not safe for pregnant women or Nursing mothers.
I’m sure there is something in nature that is antiparasitic.
Whatever did we do before Pharmaceutical Companies?
The issue is the purposeful withholding of a medicine that appears to have helped some people (as noted particularly in India before it was banned by the WHO).
Ivermectin, is an agricultural pesticide and broad spectrum antiparasitic synthetically derived from the fermentation of streptomyces avermitilis, a gram positive soil bacteria.
It has been used for roundworms (strongyloides) or onchocerciasis (a filarial worm called onchocerca volvulus that causes river blindness). They also use it for toxoplasmosis (a very common parasite in the world including in Australia).
Doxycycline also treats river blindness. Will they ban that too?
Suramin kills the adult worms of onchocerciasis.
Suramin is found in nature….
Onchocerciasis is a simulium genus of blood sucking flies or protozoan diseases of birds…
The overarching issue is that those who can, still refuse to disclose all the components of the injectable clinical trial due to their ‘Commercial in confidence’ agreements.
People need to demand this ‘commercial in confidence’ as null and void so they know what they are dealing with.
What were they injected with?
They had every right to know what they were signing up for when they were pressured, coerced, and bullied into participating in a injectable Clinical trial which has at least 9 pages of adverse effects, including death.
The adverse effects of which the Pharmaceutical Company tried to hide for 75 years…but failed.
When one investigates Morrison’s history, which is very vague, you can piece it together and when you do, you get a picture of a man who is not as pure and Christian as he would have us think.
Fraud and molestation are two that come to light.
So they won’t allow Ivermectin (which seemed to be working particularly in India before it was banned), but they have just announced a 2nd Global Covid Summit on the 12th May with the aim to “bring solutions to vaccinate the world for everyone, everywhere”.
This was never about a solution.
Obviously.
I have an idea how to get Ivermectin. On the website http://www.NaturalNews.com which I recommend everyone use several people say that the Ivermectin horse paste and human tablets have the same ingredients. You just have to calculate your weight in kilos. I’d also like to find out how the sleaze ball Prime Minister came to get those millions. We must all vote him out soon. There are several good candidates.
I remember-and hope my memory is not failing me?-that Bob Hawke died with a $200 million estate, thought I stand to be corrected, if necessary:
https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/wealth/key-moment-at-bob-hawkes-memorial-revealed-looming-bitter-stoush/news-story/93f20fa5ccf4d0243c75e7471a2acbbc
Remember Morrison was not always on 450000 he had lower pay.
It would have to be “bib” Pharma, they dribble so much.
But if you look you will find that the TGA is likely incorporated, and it is: ABN is: 40 939 406 804 and they have been registered for GST since November 1 1999, so they are a for-profit trading entity, and, this being so, quite entitled to accept sponsorship, except for the fact that they dictate outcomes that no corporate entity should be able to.
The TGA’s ABN Lookup entry: https://www.abn.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=40939406804
In regard to GST, only business operations with an annual turnover over $70k are required to registered-or so it was last time I looked.
Thank you so very much for all the information you share and for all you do. I don’t always agree with everything but there is always enough provided that I can look further into articles that interest me and learn more.
I would love to know the answer to the question of Morrison’s millions… we can hazard a guess but actual proof would be great