https://rumble.com/vrkxko-the-vintage-apron-capalaba-central-29-december-2021.html
This gutsy cafe owner in Capalaba Centre and his patrons know their rights and stand on solid ground while ordering errant cops from the premises. Eventually the cops give in. Credit to them. No credit to the ALP/LNP duopoly for supporting Covid tyranny.
Capalaba Central shopping centre, in what is the largest regional shopping centre deal of the year was bought by a Taiwanese conglomerate Shayher GroupIN Capalaba Central. Shayher Group is owned by the Pau Jar Group which paid $148.5 million for the former Dexus Property owned shopping centre.
Readers can make up their own minds whether to boycott this shopping centre. But support the Village Apron.
Right on, crisscrios. From my lawful Notice to Daniel Andrews, which saw 16 large white envelopes delivered to the public housing units I am at, from the sate government-they were full of masks:
(Dear Daniel) “If your mandate on wearing face masks, Daniel Andrews, is an order, then you must be aware that your government is fully liable for the supply or reimbursement to the people of Victoria for the cost of purchase of those face masks should the STATE not supply those masks.”
What is MANDATE?
In practice. A Judicial command or precept proceeding from a court or judicial officer, directing the proper officer to enforce a judgment, sentence, or decree. Seaman v. Clarke, 60 App. Div. 416, 69 N. Y. Supp. 1002; Horton v. State, 63 Neb. 34, 88 N. W. 146. In the practice of the supreme court of the United States, the mandate is a precept or order issued upon the decision of an appeal or writ of error, directing the action to be taken, or disposition to be made of the case, by the inferior court In some of the state jurisdictions, the name “mandate” has been substituted for “mandamus” as the formal title of that writ In contracts. A bailment of property in regard to which the bailee engages to do some act without reward. Story, Bailm. jj 137. A mandate is a contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The mandatary is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is responsible for gross neglect. The fact that the mandator derives no benefit from the acts of the mandatary is not of itself evidence of gross negligence. Richardson v. Futrell, 42 Miss. 525; Williams v. Conger, 125 U. S. 397, 8 Sup. Ct. 933, 31 L Ed. 778. A mandate, procuration, or letter of attorney is an act by which one person gives power to another to transact for him and in his name one or several affairs. The mandate may take place in five different manners,
More On This Topic
What is GRATUITOUS?
https://thelawdictionary.org/gratuitous/
Without valuable or legal consideration. A term applied to deeds of conveyance and to bailments and other contracts.In old English law. Voluntary; without force, fear, or favor. Bract, fols. 11, 17.As to gratuitous “Bailment,” “Contract” and “Deposit,” see those titles.
https://thelawdictionary.org/article/what-is-common-law/
A contract is An agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted and each party benefits. Agreements can either be formal or informal, written, oral, or implied for example, by a long-term business relationship. Examples of contracts include leases, promissory notes, rental agreements, etc. There are four necessary components to make a contractual agreement; an offer, acceptance of the offer, the intention to enter into a legally binding agreement, and consideration………………………….
I hope this direct action snowballs to the point where the tyrants in Australia’s parliaments and the departments of health walk away with their tails between their legs. No need for aggression. All we need to do is stop obeying Bill Gates and then let all of his faithful servants leave Australia and go and live with him. I am sure he has enough funds to accommodate all of his petty bullies.
Mandates are not laws, they are requests to contract:
State to them:
You are a corporate employee.
Your offer to contract is hereby declined.
You are hereby trespassing and you need to leave now
State this a number of times, and then it is binding that they are trespassing.
See HC case Plenty vs Dillon (plus others, re: them being held accountable for trespass).
The man is absolutely correct, but he needs to Notice the cops o\in question as to their liability in trying to shut the business down, or force people to wear masks. If they are going to shut him down then he needs to be compensated for all losses, including those incurred by his staff. And the cops can be individually held liable because they are acting as corporate policy enforcement officers, not as lawful police constables.So there is both professional and personal liability in play, and I am sure none of those cops would like to be stumping up compensation out of their own pockets. The sooner these cops are made aware of this then the sooner they might start actin honourably.
Kudos to the business owner, his supporters and customers for standing up to this harrassment. If all of them showed this same courage, we would soon win this battle. You can sense from the interaction that the police know they’re in the wrong.
Thakyou always. Tony 🌈