from The Australian
A NSW Supreme Court judge has taken the extraordinary step of warning the public not to contact him as he gets set to hear a test case over NSW’s public health orders later this week.
Justice Robert Beech-Jones will oversee a three-day trial in which Health Minister Brad Hazzard will defend the state government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Two plaintiffs, Al-Munir Kassam and Natasha Henry, have filed civil suits challenging various aspects of the public health orders instituted in response to the latest outbreak fuelled by the Delta variant.
Starting this Thursday, Justice Beech-Jones will hear the challenge to the rules which state that essential workers must receive their first vaccination by September 19 if they are to leave an LGA of concern for work purposes.
The lawsuit is challenging rules which prevent unvaccinated workers from leaving their LGAs for their jobs. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Jeremy Piper.
And Justice Beech-Jones took the unorthodox step of warning those watching online not to contact him unless they were lawyers for the two parties.
He said that the deluge of emails and phone calls to his chambers had been so great, that those with legitimate business with the court were having trouble getting through.
He emphasised that he would not take any correspondence into consideration.
“Over the last few days, my office has been inundated with emails and telephone calls from people who are interested in the proceedings but are not lawyers or parties,” Justice Beech-Jones said.
“Please understand I will not read any of your emails or take any of your calls.
“People who do so risk interfering with the administration of justice. And anyone who encourages any of this to happen is equally encouraging the interference with the administration of justice.”
The matter will be subject to a three-day hearing starting Thursday, with Justice Beech-Jones on Tuesday morning ruling that evidence in one matter will be evidence in the other.
Ms Henry’s lawyers opposed the move, arguing that it would cause her legal costs to blow out.
The court heard that her matter was only expected to take up one day of the hearing and she would only be calling two expert witnesses, as opposed to Mr Kassan who is calling eight.
However Justice Beech-Jones said given the overlap in the two cases and their contentions, “the prospect of differential evidence in both cases leading to a differential outcome” was unsatisfactory.
Premier Gladys Berejiklian on Monday announced that on December 1, unvaccinated persons would have restrictions lifted as part of a staged repealing of lockdown measures.
Barrister Jeremy Kirk, acting for Mr Hazzard, said he did not know if this would include the easing of restrictions which are being challenged in the suit.
Editor: It now seems, in light of the overwhelming medical evidence we have seen that the so-called Delta variant is actually the result of mRNA vaccines.
Yes, No judge will open themselves to the truth revealed with this experimental socalled “vaccine” which, in itself, has caused a pandemic throughout the world!
A most vivid description of this well orchastrated vaccine side effects pandemic was published by a lady who visited John Hunter Hospital and experienced, first hand, the chaos and absolute epidemic caused by these dangerous vaccines;
Judges, these days, do not “judge” based on what is lawful; That the judge refuse to accept emails from all those out in the community who are experiencing,
On any intelligent understanding of Civil conscription in the Constitution with respect to medical services means the conscription of any individual to provide medical services to any person.
Those who are obliged or coerced into vaccination are being conscripted to provide themselves with medical treatment, specifically “vaccination”, no matter that they employ or not employ a doctor or a third party to perform the physical act of administering an injection.
The conscription refers to a person being compelled to provide THEMSELVES with medical services, notwithstanding whether a doctor is compelled or not.
Can’t see why a legally qualified person might have an issue with that.
Covert court is where judges play with their loaded dice .. ED2
Oh dear! Watching the Supreme Court case live on the Supreme Court Youtube Channel… the video was cut off at 4.42 pm and marked as Private! That means you need permission to sign in and follow the case. Who we are supposed to get permission from is a mystery!
Is it the Judge’s work or the Supreme Court’s or Youtube’s? I assume it was a slightly delayed “live” broadcast so perhaps something occurred that we aren’t meant to see? Then again, perhaps it’s just an inconvenient technical glitch due to too much public interest?
Get rid of the problem polling day John They cannot function without people support and that is well on the way to zero by all account of the comments passing through here.
I thought the Judges were supposed to be looking after the best interests of the Citizens of Australia. This is obviously not what is reality. They like the government need to be cattle prodded and told what the majority want. Currently they are only interested in their disgusting pay packed, just like our greedy political ‘masters’. This is disgusting and really needs to change.
Same email
The email barrage is not targeting the judge to follow, it informs him any shift from judicisl justice for friends is now being watched ,, keep sending .. ED
Why in hell would you appoint the foxes to render justice to the chickens?
Seriously, what outcome do you expect?
Thursday is the 30th of the 9th.
That’s a 39 signature 3×13. They always do things on the occult numbers 11, 22,33 and 13,26,39.
If It goes for 3 consecutive days it
Covers the 1st of 10th or an 11
Then the 2nd of the 10th =12 +21 for the year is a 33.
This Tells me the fix is in. Rigged.
Great to know that hundreds are sending Emails and contacting Justice Beech-Jones office shows how much people want the Vaccine mandate for Essential Workers be removed. As long as Justice Beech-Jones is not bought off and follows the constitutional law, will know how it will go in 3 days starting this Thursday.
ED I agree that Delta Variant came into existence soon as Experimental Gene Therapy inoculations started and pushed hard. I believe be another Variant either from Booster 1 or from Israel for Booster 2 it will be linked to Children as young as 5 because Pfizer pushing for EUA and only way is when 5 to 11 year olds catch this new Variant and has to be more deadly than Delta because a lot of children from 5 to 11 would end up with Severe Adverse Reactions and have died. Not sure how many parents will believe a new Variant is killing 5 to 11 year olds its fear porn going to be the ongoing Narrative from Big Media.
You forgot to include his email address. Is this the same bloke who never replied to our requests for info on the hearing? Aside: a diet may help him feel better about himself.