By SANDY BARRETT – ADVOCATEME.COM.AU

Our political leaders have adopted the mantra that mass vaccination is the only way to reopen the country. From this mantra our leaders and their agents have successfully compelled large groups of the population to get vaccinated. As of today, official data claims that 59.1% have had their first dose and 35.5% both doses.

Australia has largely embraced vaccinations over the years, and most consider them safe and effective. So, it was surprising that many were hesitant to roll up their sleeves for covid-19 vaccines when it became available. A widely circulated survey from 2020, completed by hundreds of thousands of Australians, indicated the reason for hesitancy was the fact that they were new and largely untested.

Those who took a closer look at these “vaccines” found even more reason to be apprehensive, because they didn’t seem to fall under the traditional definition of what a vaccine is. Historically, vaccines contain a small amount of the virus in question, so the immune system can mount its own defence to the disease. But this new group of vaccines does not work in this way.

The technology being used is as novel as covid-19 itself and is previously untested on humans. Prior to this, tests on animals resulted in complications that ended in death when those vaccinated animals were exposed to the live virus.

For those reasons alone, most can understand the hesitancy, however another reason a growing number of Australians remain hesitant is the secrecy – despite their claims of transparency – surrounding National Cabinet meetings, and the contracts between the Commonwealth government and the vaccine manufacturers.

If the decisions being made were in the best interests of the public, decisions which strip us of our freedom and cause untold social and economic damage to society, why are we not privy to them? This lack of transparency around what are life and death decisions for the health and wellbeing of the population should be a major concern to us all.

For those who don’t already know, Pfizer has a dubious history and in 2009 the company was fined $2.3 billion in a legal settlement over misleading marketing practices. Since the year 2000, according to Violation Tracker, Pfizer has accumulated $4,660,896,333 in fines for:-

  • Off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
  • False Claims Act and related infringements / offenses / charges
  • Drug or medical equipment safety violation
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Acts violations
  • Environmental violation

Johnson & Johnson are not far behind Pfizer, being fined $4,248,447,763 for offences such as:-

  • Off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
  • False Claims Act and related offenses
  • Drug or medical equipment safety violation
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations
  • Price-fixing or anti-competitive practices

AstraZeneca are not much better either, being fined only $1,148,775,284, guilty of offences relating to:-

  • Off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
  • False Claims Act and related offenses
  • Kickbacks and bribery
  • Consumer protection violation
  • Employment discrimination

Read the full story – https://www.advocateme.com.au/post/golden-ticket-or-poisoned-chalice