By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
A FORMER Pfizer employee has confirmed the scandal revealed on Stew Peters’ online TV show that mRNA vaccines are contaminated with nanoparticles of the poisonous-to-humans metal graphene oxide, as stated by Dr Jane Ruby on the show early in July.
Karen Kingston, a former biotechnology analyst and marketing specialist with Pfizer blew away the lying and obfuscating big media “fact checkers” when she appeared on the show a few days ago. Kingston said she was “as confident as there is gravity” that there is graphene oxide (GO) in the vaccines. And that’s just one of the problems with the vaccine, which has just been given FDA approval.
Kingston quoted from a July 2020 patent for mRNA vaccines referring to the use of hydrogel in the vaccine to encapsulate the lipid nanoparticles that carry the mRNA that initiates the production of spike proteins. Hydrogel is made from graphene oxide.
Kingston also revealed how the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer jab would be the “checkmate move” to end the shots that are linked to deaths and injuries, worldwide. She said the approval process would require Pfizer to reveal its ingredient list within the coming few weeks.
The so-called International Fact Checking Network, funded by mainstream media and globalist foundations, went into overdrive after Dr Ruby’s claims on Peters’ show back in July. Kingston then came on to back up what Dr Ruby claimed, but as a Pfizer insider and whistleblower she was able to more intimately detail the processes involved in the development of the vaccine.
For instance she said Pfizer had not undertaken any obvious marketing of the vaccines, for instance setting up a website, as would normally happen with a product approval. This was because it would expose the company to another level of lawsuits, apart from those likely to arise from harm already done.
Nevertheless, the fact-check network continued its lying and obfuscation against Kingston, trying to discredit her at every turn and running the Pfizer PR spin without question and stepping around or avoiding altogether the difficult questions around the vaccine’s known and admitted shedding characteristics and inability to protect against further infections.
Kingston went on to quote a vaccine trial that required vaccinated participants to distance themselves from pregnant mothers because of the shedding factor. The fact checkers stepped around that matter as well.
To the lady who requested info on how to reverse the “vax”.
I am reasonably informed from other medical sites that Acetl-L-carnitine, and N-acetyl -Cysteine, helps to reverse the “graphene oxide” question, but to what degree I,m not sure, but it can’t do any harm to try
Eon no time just do a search back through the pages
Please help me! I believe I was vaccinated without my consent! Please help me!
Will chelation, approved by fda for removal of toxic metals remove graphing oxide
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dsznwvQgW94G/
microscopy picture of actual ‘entities’
in vaccines – Dr Carrie Madej – researcher and revealer.
old kodger: yes, in common law applied in Australia, Donahue v Stevenson is very much a valid, current and authoritative Tort precedent relating to duty of care and negligence.
old kodger… “It was as it is”, to quote a phrase. 🙂
Daviddd2, That only strengthens the assertion that the Vatican houses the antichrist, and does nothing to reverse the Papal Bull, usually when you buy a business you buy ALL of it, lock stock and barrel.
Chieftua, insofar as this is Scottish ( ie English ) law, does it cross the water successfully to be an effective president here in Australia?
@old kodger Some people claim the Papacy has not been what it was ever since the Borgias (Spanish Borjas) bought it and installed the Loyola-ist mercenaries for the protection of their “faith”. 🙂
Hi, having been in the job as I have, this maybe a achilles heel for the so called immunity of these callous companies Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562, [1932] UKHL 100, 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31, 1932 S.L.T. 317, [1932] W.N. 139.The doctrine of negligence The worm in the bottle case. The government giving immunity is only a civil agreement but this is old case law Cheers and keep up the good work. Resistance is Duty Peter Kemp
The answer to that question is in the Papal Bull, of around 1600 (I’m not sure of the exact date) when the reigning king signed off on a statement from the Vatican that the pope owned ALL the souls on the planet.
Look seriously at the Vatican (and the pope) as the antichrist.
So much for giving informed consent! Being coerced by an employer and being injected with an undisclosed quantity because it’s a “trade secret” … How does that square up with “informed and voluntary” consent?
And our governments think that’s perfectly OK? First they took away our rights and freedoms so the terrorists would not be able to change our way of life. Now they insist on stripping us of our right to think and the right to decide what we do with our bodies.
Would somebody please be kind enough to let me know when I was actually sold out as livestock and who my new owner is?
Liars are at the bottom of the living organism hierarchy
‘Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive’
Control everything! means Lying…
When you start to lie you must keep doing it, or suffer the consequences.