Climate change judgement in Federal Court says Minister must protect young people

By HARRY PALMER

Federal Court judge Mordecai Bromberg delivered a landmark judgement 27 May 2021 that federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley has a duty of care to avoid harm to young people as a result of climate change.

The litigants, eight Australian high school students Anjali Sharma, Isolde Shanti Raj-Seppings, Ambrose Malachy Hayes, Tomas Webster Arbizu, Bella Paige Burgemeister, Laura Fleck Kirwan, Ava Princi and Luca Gwyther Saunders and a catholic nun, Sister Marie Brigid Arthur acted as their representative.

Respondents were federal Minister for the Environment and Vickery Coal Pty Ltd.

After reading the judgement I query who paid the students’ surmountable legal costs. A three day hearing represented by senior counsel, Mr Noel Hutley, junior counsel Mr E Nekvapil, Ms K Brazenor, Ms S Brenker and solicitor David Barnden of Equity Generation Lawyers. Unless this legal team appeared pro bono their fee would keep the North Shore for a year.

Spokeswoman for the high school students, Ava Princi, (pictured) a pivotal member of ‘School Strike 4 Climate’, a high school group of mislead environmentalists and climate change activists said “I’m thrilled because this is a global first,”

“We understand it is the first time a Court anywhere in the world has ordered a government to specifically protect young people from the catastrophic harms of climate change.”

This judgement could have flow-on consequences for projects seeking to increase Australia’s production of coal.

Fortunately most serious scientists across the world say climate change or global warming is nonsense.

Labor politicians will seize on this dodgy judgement and it could affect the neglected majority which is often denied constitutional protection. However governments could challenge the Federal Court finding in the High Court.

One example of failed constitutional duty of care by government is out-of-control young Aboriginal thugs and ethnic youth gangs which rampage with immunity around the nation when non-Aboriginal Australians are subject to the full weight of law.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on June 9, 2021, in ABC, Agenda 2030, agenda21, Climate Change, General and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 10 Comments.

  1. Sarah Packman

    But it’s okay to inject young people with an unnecessary toxic ‘vaccine’, govern their social interactions and force them to limit their oxygen with pointless masking?
    How daft are young people these days? NB I suspect this was funded via via cloak dagger … yup… Big Pharma and their investors who want our young people focused on pronouns and C02 rather than medical fascism and the removal of freedom and democracy. Nothing to see here, move along….

    Like

  2. What catastrophic harm ?

    Like

  3. armandamartini2gmailcom

    What about a duty of care to protect children from the constant brainwashing and mind control constructs daily at work in the classroom to indoctrinate them into false science and unfounded fear causing trauma??? A crime against humanity and of malfeasance!!!!!!

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Like

  4. Yeah Amanda that would be a much better outcome

    Like

  5. selwyn noffke

    where did this judge emerge from , Does this ONLY work against WHITE Australians

    Like

  6. Bromberg of course was the “judge” who infamously ruled against free speech in the Andrew Bolt case a few year’s ago. Just another discredited Victorian beak who owes his position to political affiliations.

    Like

  7. The problem here is many faceted. It’s a known fact that children are easily influenced, and high schoolers ARE CHILDREN. They believe what is told to them from a purported “official” source, in this instant school. They form their opinions not on research but on information supplied. If their information is tainted so is their opinion. unfortunately, opinions formed in childhood tend to remain lifelong, albeit (maybe) moderated to some degree.
    The frightening thing about all this is that they are destined to become the next tier of politicians.

    Like

  8. (((Bromberg))).

    Nothing more needs be said.

    Like

  9. selwyn noffke

    MY thoughts excactly when i read that report , IMO there everywhere

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.