Letter to the Editor
90% Efficacy?
COVID vaccine revelation sinks like a stone; disappears
Nov11
by Jon Rappoport
“………..A few weeks ago, I ran a one-off. The analysis and commentary were mine, but the story was an opinion piece in the New York Times. The Times called it an opinion piece to soften its blow. I suspected it would disappear, and it did.
Its meaning and implication were too strong. It would be a vast embarrassment for the White House, the Warp Speed COVID vaccine program, the vaccine manufacturers, the coronavirus task force, and vaccine researchers.
And embarrassment would be just the beginning of their problem.
So…here it is again. The vanished one-off, back in business:
COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw; NY Times opinion piece exposes all three major clinical trials.
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.
September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:
“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”
“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”
“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”
“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
There. That’s the NY Times one-off. My piece analyzing it went on much longer, but you get the main thrust: ………….
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/11/11/covid-vaccine-revelation-sinks-like-a-stone-disappears/
Kev Crisscross
Brisbane
Just watched an interesting Documentary and was not on Bitchute appears that was just 170 cases to have Pfizer on EUA and TGA Provisionally Approved and they got positive cases using RT-PCR tests so we all know how they can produce false Positives and Negatives.
Seems that these Vaccines been exposed through the media stating can prevent hospitalisations and even death well that’s FAKE NEWS.
https://www.mp-22.com/vaccine-trials-film
Seems to be more evidence that these mRNA Vaccines and RT-PCR tests linking us to 5G those who take it going to eventually end up being controlled by AI.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/12/vacccine-turns-us-into-mind-controlled-slaves.html
Are we actually living the real Hunger Games 🤔🤔🤔
Why are doctors so uninformed/misinformed?
Recently a doctor offered me a flu injection and my response was to ask him if he wanted to kill me. It rocked him back on his heels and after a bit of mumbling i was quickly shown the door.
“……….Pediatricians who ultimately dismiss some vaccine-refusing families, after efforts at persuasion have failed, may have done their part to promote vaccination. At least they tried,” Dr. Navin said. “But pediatricians who do not even accept vaccine-refusing families into their practices have likely not done enough.”
With several potential COVID-19 vaccines up for approval within the next year, these conversations with vaccine-hesitant patients and parents may become increasingly important, said Dr. Joshua Williams of the Denver Health Medical Center in Colorado.
Dr. Williams, who wasn’t involved with the new paper, has written about alternatives to dismissal for vaccine-hesitant families.
“It will be more important than ever for providers to work together to dispel myths and address concerns,” he told Reuters Health by email. “Now is not the time to close our doors to vaccine-hesitant patients or parents – it’s precisely the moment to open them.”
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/3k0ZY81 Pediatrics, online November 6, 2020.
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/940546?nlid=138192_5404&src=wnl_dne_201111_mscpedit&uac=373954PG&impID=2669637&faf=1
Commenter says –
“Following up your observation, Martin, I wonder whether the concept of a “placebo” can even be applied to vaccine trials.
Traditionally, medicines are tested on patients who are actually sick. A medicine that seems to help most patients get better is considered to have done well. Placebo can be used in such cases, as it should make the patient neither better nor worse.
With vaccines, two important things are different.
1. The subjects (not really patients) are not sick at all. The object of a vaccine is to prevent healthy people from becoming ill at some indefinite time in the future. Therefore the success of a vaccine is hard to evaluate.
2. A traditional placebo, as Martin points out, cannot serve its purpose in a vaccine trial as its lack of immediate side-effects is fairly obvious.
Using a different potentially harmful vaccine formula instead of a placebo serves no useful purpose and instead exposes subjects to additional risk of harm”.
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/11/10/ninety-per-cent/
SCIENCE FRAUD: Covid-19 vaccines were manufactured and stockpiled by the military long before they were tested and “approved”
The largest looting operation of the year had to be the federal government’s $20+ billion “Operation Warp Speed” vaccination program, a taxpayer-funded gambit that promised a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine before the 2020 election. Because the emergency vaccine program did not seek consent from American taxpayers, the final distribution plan will similarly coerce compliance and ignore any vestige of individual rights that the American people are still clinging onto.
A 60 minutes interview with the Army General in charge of the vaccine’s distribution finds that the vaccine was already manufactured and stockpiled, long before it was even remotely tested and “approved” by the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA’s three phase “gold standard” testing protocol wasn’t even observed. The vaccines were manufactured and stockpiled in advance, in anticipation of approval, because vaccine makers get what they want, and they are held to no real scientific standard whatsoever. The vaccine makers also enjoy full legal exemption from liability when their products injure people. The new vaccines are untested instruments of force just waiting to be unleashed by the U.S. military…………
https://www.newstarget.com/2020-11-10-covid-19-vaccines-manufactured-stockpiled-before-tested.html