Harry explains the podcast site sudden shut down. He chats with Rod Culleton who updates his case with the Australian Parliament illegally dismissing him as a senator, his submission to the British privy council to address our out of control political system which is circumnavigating our constitution…. and more.
To listen to this APR Podcast [CLICK HERE]
I must agree, Robert.
But not only the Privy Council, also the Constitution and the Monarchy are but vassals of the supranational plutocracy that interprets and/or implements them according to the dictates of a treasonous secretocracy.
Time is short though, and I suspect that the only way to put a brake in the runaway wheels and buy some time is to sell a slogan that ordinary people can identify with and simply implement.
Something like: “we know the government is corrupt. Vote in ink and put major parties last”.
As much as you don’t like to hear the truth Ed the Privy Council is Dead Buried and Cremated!
I still think that you, Mike and Harry, are barking up the wrong tree. Imagining that the ordinary people are going to, en masse, up stakes and support another wannabe demagogue whom they don’t know is most unlikely… being mostly concerned with making their own “ends meet” they’ll mostly just stick with “the devil they know” even if they’re thoroughly disenchanted with both devils.
Perhaps a simple slogan like: “The major Parties support foreign interests (like banks). Vote independent with an indelible pen” might seem less like a leap into the dark embrace of an unknown demagogue for most ordinary people who don’t follow the maze of political intrigue.
Yair, I know that most “movers and shakers” in politics are wannabe demagogues who are just seeking an entourage of “supporters”; but you’re not going to get that unless you have the backing of an ideologically corrupt media.
A better idea (not likely to happen in the short term) is a “Patriot’s cooperative” where the candidates are proposed by the ordinary people and are supported by, and are answerable to them… unlike the present system where the candidates are selected and presented by a secretocracy to be endorsed by the electorate to represent the interests of the secretocracy.