Attorney General George Brandis QC next to go: says government insider
We have been made a Republic without a Referendum. The High Court of Australia is not even ashamed of itself for failing to read the Sections 16 and 34(2) Constitution, and the ABC in the form of Anthony Green tweets that those Sections of the Constitution, were exhausted in 1901 with the first Election. In this republic we never agreed to there must be some sort of magic that turns people into gender neutral robots, who fail to understand the plain words of the English language. It is time the whole Parliament, the 76 Senators and 150 members of the House of Representatives met in a joint sitting and asked some hard questions of the seven members of the High Court and the judiciary generally but especially the High Court, because we need these questions answered.
What do you not understand about Clause 5 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900? It says , This Act and all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under this Constitution, Shall be binding on the courts judges and people of every State notwithstanding anything in the laws of any State. If the High Court Judges are people, they are bound. If not or they do not understand that the Constitution binds them, and if Anthony Green of the ABC does not understand that he is one of the people referred to in that Section, the Commonwealth and ABC should let them go. If someone who earns $350,000 at least tax free cannot read and understand plain written English, then it is time that we got someone in there who can. That is what S 72 (ii) Constitution provides.
S 16 Constitution deals specifically with the Qualification of Senators, and S 34 (ii) Constitution deals with the qualification of Members of the House of Representatives. These sections say that if they have been in the country five years and owe allegiance to the Queen, they are eligible. Clear straight forward instructions, to the courts judges and people and once again the High Court is defying the Parliament of the Commonwealth and the Laws of the Commonwealth. So too are Judges and Magistrates all over Australia and a regime of institutional theft has been introduced by the States, for the benefit of the States because the High Court needs to go to Specsavers. So too it seems do all the lawyers who had their expenses paid by the Commonwealth and failed to make this argument to the Apex Club sitting at the top of the organised crime gang, presently operating in Australia and severely burdening the people with greater and greater expenses keeping children in poverty, and old people poor while our wealth is exported and the Banks pay huge dividends and make enormous profits.
If the High Court were not really ordinary people and did not have to eat as we do, drink as we do, and die eventually as we do, they would be entitled to consider themselves as Gods. They will all die eventually, they will all retire at seventy, but they should on their performance since 2004, be all sacked after their response to my first question. I asked Senator George Brandis the Commonwealth Attorney General, on the 12th September 2016 why for 12 years they had felt free to defy the Laws of the Commonwealth by leaving the Name of the Queen off all process issued out of the High Court. If they had bona fide set out to correct the High Court Rules 2004, after they admitted they were wrong, then this debacle of supposedly sacking six duly elected Members of Parliament would never have happened. I have incontrovertible evidence on the High Court letterhead that they were advised of this problem in 2006-7 and did nothing for nine more years.
They may look like a Golden Calf, and Act like a Golden Calf, but the same fate as befell those who worshipped that Golden Calf in Exodus, should all make their exodus, with their lives, but little else. The Sins of the High Court are many. They believe, if the Record is examined that they are the Government and the Parliament is an inconvenient nuisance to be ignored. I and every other member of the people of the Commonwealth, have been given authority to call them before the Queen they deny is the Sovereign, the Queen to whom I swore allegiance when I became a Senator. I have got Senator George Brandis as George Henry Brandis before that Queen on criminal charges, and when a person, any person reads S 5 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and then S 147.1 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) it is quite clear that it is a serious crime to put violence on a Commonwealth Public Official. The head -butter who assaulted Tony Abbott is prosecuted by the Australian Federal Police but they have not yet prosecuted the High Court for assaulting by Paper Order they expect to be obeyed, 6 out of the eight sitting Members illegally haled before them, and thrown out of Parliament by them. There is a special punishment prescribed for people who are Judges and Magistrates who assault Members of Parliament. Instead of ten years imprisonment the Parliament says they must get 13 years . It’s all there in black and white.
As for the lawyers of the Commonwealth. Not one of them publicly pointed out that Ss 16 and 34(ii) Constitution make the politically murdered perfectly qualified to be in Parliament. As for the lawyers of the Commonwealth. Not one of them publicly pointed out that Ss 16 and 34 (ii) Constitution mean they are perfectly qualified if they were here for five years and owe allegiance to the Queen. Not one of them.
Lets get to the Court of Disputed Returns. After I attempted to intervene to save the other five elected representatives in this proceedings, by pointing out that S 77 (i) Constitution prohibits the Parliament of the Commonwealth from legislating to define the jurisdiction of the High Court, which it has done in the Court of Disputed Returns, and pointed out that since 1986 the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is definitely part of the Laws of the Commonwealth, they ploughed on regardless. The Court of Disputed Returns is illegal and has been ever since it was created. It is being used not for its intended purpose but to intimidate Members of Parliament. It exercises a defined jurisdiction. So intimidated are the Members of both Houses the High Court and Federal Court of Australia have been allowed to get away with political murder.
For 498 years from 1372, to 1870 lawyers were banned from Parliament in the United Kingdom. Perhaps we need a referendum to ban them from this nations Parliament in the House of Representatives. If the best we have can get it so wrong, what are we employing them for? I am a rainmaker. The drought certainly broke for the lawyers I employed to defend me in the High Court and the Federal Court of Australia has arguably by sitting without a jury, which I requested, broken the law in S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) which bans the arbitrary infliction of imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty upon any of us, and a Sequestration Order in Bankruptcy, is a severe deprivation of physical liberty carrying Seventeen Years imprisonment , and this Order of the High Court is another. Where are the Australian Federal Police when we really need them? They should march up to the High Court as Moses did to the worshippers of the Golden Calf, and lay the charges that ought to be laid on them for political murder. A political murder that should not go unpunished in the Parliament of the Commonwealth. It is utter and complete contempt by them for your elected representatives, and must be fixed. The Parliament of the Commonwealth has the power. For our Nations sake it must use it. from Rodney Culleton’s law research team
Local Councils also are bound by section 44, they are another government department with new illegal powers why hasn’t anyone brought that to the media’s attention?
I do not think that they were not looking, I think it was more that he was doing what they wanted so they looked the other way. They never miss a trick if they want a seat. Rod is evidence of this, a key was sufficient to exile him. We should be really pissed off about this. Regarding s44(i), we should start with anyone holding an oath of allegiance to anyone other than our constitution.
They started the sedition in 1966 with the unlawful removal of our currency and moved on in 1973 [Whitlam] topped of by the [Australia Act 1986]. All done without any referral to the people.
Any change should start in the Judiciary because they are the ones preventing discovery and this would have been over in the 80s if it were not for their interference in the lawful process of our Courts. Preventing lawful change by the people.
There are many eminent people, the Late Sir Harry Gibbs, Sir Isaac Isaacs on land title and Fitzgibbon v HM Attorney General [invalid constitution] and now Senator Rodney Culleton and David Walter that have revealed the flaws in our system of government however at every turn a Judge or Magistrate side steps the matter. Or prosecutes vexatious actions on behalf of government Officials or fails to sign orders or does any manner of dubious things that only they can get away with.
Mullins and Bentley hold their own courts in contempt by returning summons. These scribes [BAR Attorney’s] have no place in our Courts unless they uphold the constitution as they lawfully must. Whereas the constitution holds supremacy over the States and the Judiciary as it states that it is binding.
Fortunately we now have a great team that is dissecting their fraud in what I believe is a very brave attempt at peaceful resolution for our benefit and we must support them at every turn.
UNIDROIT Article 3.2.5 gives us remedy from concealed contracts.
Good one Sue.Ed
Sorry Rod – your comments are correct if we assume only s16 & s34(ii) are relevant to this whole mess – but you have forgotten s44 – which is the crux of the argument the High Court dealt with.
s44. Any person who –
(i) is under ANY acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, OR is a subject or a citizen or entitles to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power:
shall be INCAPABLE OF BEING CHOSEN OR OF SITTING as a senator OR a member of the House of Representatives.
That is exceptionally clear and the High Court found that Barnaby Joyce and Co fitted the details of that section.
It is not the new election we should all be concerned with – it is why no-one in government checked these details BEFORE these people ran for office and were elected.
Barnaby was in for 11 years as an ineligible person, voted for 11 years as an ineligible person, took hundreds of thousands in wages as an ineligible person and helped run our country as an ineligible person.
Therein lies the real error and costs.
hanks John we will publish more about the Unidroit Treaty soon.Ed
Next election it’s on like donky kong all the traitors to this country and the Australian constitution need to start looking for a new job as we are kicking you out>
This is an absolute farce it’s time to start pitching these people from their positions and reclaim the country before it’s too late wake up people
Got it in one.
Use Christian name only [if you have to] and sign on the bottom of the ledger right hand side [creditor]. Notice the absolute confusion on the faces of those of those asking for your surname when you tell them that you cannot claim/hold/own/utter or claim that Crown copyright name that the Government bonded [servitude] at birth/berth. Lawyers are even worse. Recently I had one right saying that the meaning of the name was unclear, when he was confronted with this format “Joe Buggs: [Bunny]”. My comment was “I hold no liability for meanings that you are unclear on”.
There is also the issue of paying all their ill gotten gains back, going right back to Edward Whitlam, as they expected Rod Culleton to do. Brandis has issue also via his Oath to the BAR , a foreign power. For clarification i believe a QC stands for Queens Counsel. Which Queen you may well ask? Good question not sure if it is the Paper Queen [fiction] or the enumerated Head of Power! Jailing them would be to good. Stripping them of their assets sounds better. Then make the traitors work for the dole. Time to bring back the stocks of old public humiliation may curb their ways.
Anyway they will slip a referendum in on the “Sheeple” to vote in a Republic, reminded that the UN granted control of the assets back in 1999, however all the Sheep were on alert at the time. Now I see them positioning themselves with the Public unrest and dissatisfaction with Government and I fear they will fall for the trap of voting “yes” in a referendum for a Republic thinking that those very same bureaucrats lurking in the back ground will actually let them regain control of the Government.
It begs a clean sweep and Grand Juries under common law the Law of the land not the law of Merchant.
Most people are unaware of the UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome, SIGNED in 1973 by Prime Minister Whitlam. I guess one could say that Australia was put under Administration by the US Federal Reserve and the Vatican world banking system but it was kept secret from the people of Australia for good reason. Australians own enough mineral and energy wealth to cover its debts for the next thousand years but if we were legally separated from the real Australia and converted into citizens of a foreign $2 corporation, that had a name that could deceive people into assuming such a foreign corporation was the real Australia, than the US Federal Reserve could legally take such mineral and energy wealth while real australians were still confurse about who they really were… “Australians” or “AUSTRALIANS”… This very clever trick is really just a criminal banking act aided and abetted by the Vatican owned world banking system and their administrative parliaments that we assume are our real governing bodies…. They create a trust in an official office form such as the office of creditor, debtor and administrator but only two of thoes offices can be held or filled by a man at any one time… If we stand as the surname debtor, the creditor is no longer in the office because we can only be creditor or debtor at one time, leaving the administrator Vatican world banking system at its own will to plunder the mineral and energy wealth of our country, Australia, by a foreign entity… once Australias get their head around how this false quasi trust law sustem works, they will understand why they have lost their constitutional rights because they unwittingly left the real Australia in order to serve as a third party debtor in a foreig banking corporation called AUSTRALIA…
WOW! I do AGREE and I have mentioned in the past that ALL POLLIES SHOULD RE-EDUCATE THEMSELVES TO UNDERSTAND THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION!! THIS IS THE PROTECTION FOR THE AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE AND WE MUST ALL BE AWARE OF OUR RIGHTS! GEORGE BRANDIS I HOPE IS SENT OVER SEAS AS I DO NOT TRUST HIM AT ALL.(too many contacts?)
Yes the next call is for ALL THOSE WHO WORK IN THE OFFICES OF THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GRAB A COPY AND ENROL IN SCHOOL!!..THE AUDACITY OF THE PM TURNBULL TO ATTEMPT TO ..SWAY THE DECISIONS OF THE HIGH COURT REGARDING DUAL CITIZENSHIP SAGA….IS TOTALLY SCANDALOUS AND LEAVES ROOM TO INVESTIGATE ANY OTHER “SLIPPERY SLOPES” WHICH HE HAS ENFORCED.
THE ARROGANCE THAT HE DISPLAYS AND THE DELIBERATE IGNORANCE AND WARNINGS THAT HE HAS SHOWN OVER THE “ADANI COAL MINE AFFAIR” AND THE “CLADDING AFAIR” SHOULD EARN HIM A VOTE OF ..NO CONFIDENCE ” ANYLONGER IN THE HUNG PARLIAMENT!
HE HAS A SHORT MEMORY” MY GOVERNMENT” IS THE PEOPLE’S GOVERNMENT ..NOT HIS!!’